<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 01:58:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-46002 — ext2: reject inodes with zero i_nlink and valid mode in ext2_iget()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-46002</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext2: reject inodes with zero i_nlink and valid mode in ext2_iget()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext2_iget() already rejects inodes with i_nlink == 0 when i_mode is
zero or i_dtime is set, treating them as deleted. However, the case of
i_nlink == 0 with a non-zero mode and zero dtime slips through. Since
ext2 has no orphan list, such a combination can only result from
filesystem corruption - a legitimate inode deletion always sets either
i_dtime or clears i_mode before freeing the inode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A crafted image can exploit this gap to present such an inode to the
VFS, which then triggers WARN_ON inside drop_nlink() (fs/inode.c) via
ext2_unlink(), ext2_rename() and ext2_rmdir():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 609 at fs/inode.c:336 drop_nlink+0xad/0xd0 fs/inode.c:336
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 609 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.12.77+ #1
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 inode_dec_link_count include/linux/fs.h:2518 [inline]
 ext2_unlink+0x26c/0x300 fs/ext2/namei.c:295
 vfs_unlink+0x2fc/0x9b0 fs/namei.c:4477
 do_unlinkat+0x53e/0x730 fs/namei.c:4541
 __x64_sys_unlink+0xc6/0x110 fs/namei.c:4587
 do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x220 arch/x86/entry/common.c:78
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
 &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 646 at fs/inode.c:336 drop_nlink+0xad/0xd0 fs/inode.c:336
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 646 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted 6.12.77+ #1
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 inode_dec_link_count include/linux/fs.h:2518 [inline]
 ext2_rename+0x35e/0x850 fs/ext2/namei.c:374
 vfs_rename+0xf2f/0x…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext2: reject inodes with zero i_nlink and valid mode in ext2_iget()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext2_iget() already rejects inodes with i_nlink == 0 when i_mode is
zero or i_dtime is set, treating them as deleted. However, the case of
i_nlink == 0 with a non-zero mode and zero dtime slips through. Since
ext2 has no orphan list, such a combination can only result from
filesystem corruption - a legitimate inode deletion always sets either
i_dtime or clears i_mode before freeing the inode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A crafted image can exploit this gap to present such an inode to the
VFS, which then triggers WARN_ON inside drop_nlink() (fs/inode.c) via
ext2_unlink(), ext2_rename() and ext2_rmdir():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 609 at fs/inode.c:336 drop_nlink+0xad/0xd0 fs/inode.c:336
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 609 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.12.77+ #1
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 inode_dec_link_count include/linux/fs.h:2518 [inline]
 ext2_unlink+0x26c/0x300 fs/ext2/namei.c:295
 vfs_unlink+0x2fc/0x9b0 fs/namei.c:4477
 do_unlinkat+0x53e/0x730 fs/namei.c:4541
 __x64_sys_unlink+0xc6/0x110 fs/namei.c:4587
 do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x220 arch/x86/entry/common.c:78
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
 &amp;lt;/TASK&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 646 at fs/inode.c:336 drop_nlink+0xad/0xd0 fs/inode.c:336
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 646 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted 6.12.77+ #1
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 inode_dec_link_count include/linux/fs.h:2518 [inline]
 ext2_rename+0x35e/0x850 fs/ext2/namei.c:374
 vfs_rename+0xf2f/0x…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-46002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
