<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:39:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-64313 — crypto: ecc - Fix carry overflow in vli multiplication</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-64313</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;crypto: ecc - Fix carry overflow in vli multiplication&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The carry flag calculation fails when r01.m_high is saturated
(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) and addition of lower bits overflows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The condition (r01.m_high &amp;lt; product.m_high) doesn&amp;#39;t handle the case
where r01.m_high == product.m_high and an additional carry exists
from lower-bit overflow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When commit 3c4b23901a0c (&amp;#34;crypto: ecdh - Add ECDH software support&amp;#34;)
introduced crypto/ecc.c, it split the muladd() function in the
micro-ecc library into separate mul_64_64() and add_128_128() helpers.
It seems the check got lost in translation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add proper handling for this boundary by accounting for the carry
from the lower addition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;crypto: ecc - Fix carry overflow in vli multiplication&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The carry flag calculation fails when r01.m_high is saturated
(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) and addition of lower bits overflows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The condition (r01.m_high &amp;lt; product.m_high) doesn&amp;#39;t handle the case
where r01.m_high == product.m_high and an additional carry exists
from lower-bit overflow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When commit 3c4b23901a0c (&amp;#34;crypto: ecdh - Add ECDH software support&amp;#34;)
introduced crypto/ecc.c, it split the muladd() function in the
micro-ecc library into separate mul_64_64() and add_128_128() helpers.
It seems the check got lost in translation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add proper handling for this boundary by accounting for the carry
from the lower addition.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-64313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
