<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:13:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-93229 — nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpc_status_get dumpit seqcount retry</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93229</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpc_status_get dumpit seqcount retry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hand-rolled seqcount-like protocol in nfsd_nl_rpc_status_get_dumpit()
is missing a read memory barrier (smp_rmb) before its second counter
check.  The standard kernel read_seqcount_retry() includes smp_rmb()
to ensure that all data reads complete before the counter is re-checked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Without this barrier, on weakly-ordered architectures (ARM, POWER),
the CPU may reorder field reads past the second counter check, making
the retry logic ineffective: it could observe a consistent counter pair
while reading fields that have been concurrently modified by the writer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add smp_rmb() before the second counter check to order the field reads
ahead of it, matching the barrier semantics of the standard seqcount
read-side.  The begin-side smp_load_acquire() already pairs with the
smp_store_release() in nfsd_dispatch(); with the smp_rmb() now ordering
the field reads, the retry check no longer needs acquire semantics and
reads the counter with a plain READ_ONCE(), as read_seqcount_retry()
does.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ cel: Use READ_ONCE instead of smp_load_acquire() ]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpc_status_get dumpit seqcount retry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hand-rolled seqcount-like protocol in nfsd_nl_rpc_status_get_dumpit()
is missing a read memory barrier (smp_rmb) before its second counter
check.  The standard kernel read_seqcount_retry() includes smp_rmb()
to ensure that all data reads complete before the counter is re-checked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Without this barrier, on weakly-ordered architectures (ARM, POWER),
the CPU may reorder field reads past the second counter check, making
the retry logic ineffective: it could observe a consistent counter pair
while reading fields that have been concurrently modified by the writer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add smp_rmb() before the second counter check to order the field reads
ahead of it, matching the barrier semantics of the standard seqcount
read-side.  The begin-side smp_load_acquire() already pairs with the
smp_store_release() in nfsd_dispatch(); with the smp_rmb() now ordering
the field reads, the retry check no longer needs acquire semantics and
reads the counter with a plain READ_ONCE(), as read_seqcount_retry()
does.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ cel: Use READ_ONCE instead of smp_load_acquire() ]&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
