<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 07:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-97435 — net: dsa: sja1105: flower: reject cross-chip redirect</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-97435</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: dsa: sja1105: flower: reject cross-chip redirect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dsa_port_from_netdev() may return a valid port from a different switch
chip. Programming another chip&amp;#39;s port index into the local hardware
causes redirection to the wrong port, or an out-of-bounds access if the
index exceeds the local chip&amp;#39;s port count.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apply a minimal fix that adds a check to catch this case and adjusts the
extack message. When cls-&amp;gt;common.skip_sw is not set, the operation could
instead redirect to the upstream port and let the software or upstream
switch(es) handle the forward, but that is not addressed here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: dsa: sja1105: flower: reject cross-chip redirect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dsa_port_from_netdev() may return a valid port from a different switch
chip. Programming another chip&amp;#39;s port index into the local hardware
causes redirection to the wrong port, or an out-of-bounds access if the
index exceeds the local chip&amp;#39;s port count.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apply a minimal fix that adds a check to catch this case and adjusts the
extack message. When cls-&amp;gt;common.skip_sw is not set, the operation could
instead redirect to the upstream port and let the software or upstream
switch(es) handle the forward, but that is not addressed here.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-97435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
