https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:59:37 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-47241 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> ruby net-imap</p> <p>Net::IMAP implements Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) client functionality in Ruby. Prior to 0.6.5 and 0.5.15, several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument which is only validated to prevent CRLF injection and then sent verbatim. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, an attacker can force the next command to be absorbed as a continuation of the first command. This will cause the first command to eventually fail, but also prevents it from returning until another command is sent (from another thread). That other command will not return until the connection is closed. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.6.5 and 0.5.15.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> ruby net-imap</p> <p>Net::IMAP implements Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) client functionality in Ruby. Prior to 0.6.5 and 0.5.15, several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument which is only validated to prevent CRLF injection and then sent verbatim. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, an attacker can force the next command to be absorbed as a continuation of the first command. This will cause the first command to eventually fail, but also prevents it from returning until another command is sent (from another thread). That other command will not return until the connection is closed. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.6.5 and 0.5.15.</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-47241 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-c4fp-cxrr-mj66 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> RubyGems: net-imap</p> <p>### Summary</p> <p>Several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument which is only validated to prevent CRLF injection and then sent verbatim. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, an attacker can force the next command to be absorbed as a continuation of the first command. This will cause the first command to eventually fail, but also prevents it from returning until another command is sent (from another thread). That other command will not return until the connection is closed.</p> <p>### Details</p> <p>`Net::IMAP::RawData` was hardened in v0.6.4, v0.5.14, and v0.4.24 to reject string arguments that would smuggle an invalid literal-continuation marker onto the wire (CVE-2026-42257, GHSA-hm49-wcqc-g2xg). But the trailing-marker check uses an incorrect regex which does not match `{0}` or `{0+}`, so an attacker-controlled seach `criteria` or fetch `attr` string ending in `{0}` or `{0+}` passes validation and is sent verbatim. Since these arguments are sent as the last argument in the command, they will be followed by CRLF. Although the CRLF was intended to end the command, the server will interpret it as part of a literal prefix. This consumes the next command the client puts on the socket as additional arguments to the current command.</p> <p>This affects the following command&#39;s arguments: * `criteria` for `#search` and `#uid_search` * `search_keys` for `#sort`, `#thread`, `#uid_sort`, and `#uid_thread` * `attr` for `#fetch` and `#uid_fetch`</p> <p>The command which contained…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> RubyGems: net-imap</p> <p>### Summary</p> <p>Several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument which is only validated to prevent CRLF injection and then sent verbatim. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, an attacker can force the next command to be absorbed as a continuation of the first command. This will cause the first command to eventually fail, but also prevents it from returning until another command is sent (from another thread). That other command will not return until the connection is closed.</p> <p>### Details</p> <p>`Net::IMAP::RawData` was hardened in v0.6.4, v0.5.14, and v0.4.24 to reject string arguments that would smuggle an invalid literal-continuation marker onto the wire (CVE-2026-42257, GHSA-hm49-wcqc-g2xg). But the trailing-marker check uses an incorrect regex which does not match `{0}` or `{0+}`, so an attacker-controlled seach `criteria` or fetch `attr` string ending in `{0}` or `{0+}` passes validation and is sent verbatim. Since these arguments are sent as the last argument in the command, they will be followed by CRLF. Although the CRLF was intended to end the command, the server will interpret it as part of a literal prefix. This consumes the next command the client puts on the socket as additional arguments to the current command.</p> <p>This affects the following command&#39;s arguments: * `criteria` for `#search` and `#uid_search` * `search_keys` for `#sort`, `#thread`, `#uid_sort`, and `#uid_thread` * `attr` for `#fetch` and `#uid_fetch`</p> <p>The command which contained…</p> https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-c4fp-cxrr-mj66