<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:38:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-54906 — concurrent-ruby: ReadWriteLock allows wrong-thread write release and stray read-release counter corruption</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-54906</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; ruby-concurrency concurrent-ruby&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;concurrent-ruby is a modern concurrency tools for Ruby. Prior to 1.3.7, Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_write_lock does not verify that the calling thread acquired the write lock. Any thread with access to the lock object can release an active write lock held by another thread. A second writer can then enter its critical section while the first writer is still running. Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_read_lock also decrements the shared counter even when no read lock is held. Calling it on a fresh lock changes the counter from 0 to -1, after which normal read acquisition raises Concurrent::ResourceLimitError. This is a synchronization correctness issue in the public Concurrent::ReadWriteLock API. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.3.7.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; ruby-concurrency concurrent-ruby&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;concurrent-ruby is a modern concurrency tools for Ruby. Prior to 1.3.7, Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_write_lock does not verify that the calling thread acquired the write lock. Any thread with access to the lock object can release an active write lock held by another thread. A second writer can then enter its critical section while the first writer is still running. Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_read_lock also decrements the shared counter even when no read lock is held. Calling it on a fresh lock changes the counter from 0 to -1, after which normal read acquisition raises Concurrent::ResourceLimitError. This is a synchronization correctness issue in the public Concurrent::ReadWriteLock API. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.3.7.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-54906</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6wx8-w4f5-wwcr — Concurrent Ruby: ReadWriteLock allows wrong-thread write release and stray read-release counter corruption</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6wx8-w4f5-wwcr</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; RubyGems: concurrent-ruby&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
`Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_write_lock` does not verify that the calling thread acquired the write lock. Any thread with access to the lock object can release an active write lock held by another thread. A second writer can then enter its critical section while the first writer is still running.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_read_lock` also decrements the shared counter even when no read lock is held. Calling it on a fresh lock changes the counter from `0` to `-1`, after which normal read acquisition raises `Concurrent::ResourceLimitError`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a synchronization correctness issue in the public `Concurrent::ReadWriteLock` API. It should not be framed as an authorization bypass; the lock is an in-process concurrency primitive, not an access-control boundary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;###  Version
Software: concurrent-ruby
Version: 1.3.6
Commit: 7a1b78941c081106c20a9ca0144ac73a48d254ab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`release_write_lock` checks only whether the global counter indicates that a writer is running. It does not track or verify ownership:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```ruby
def release_write_lock
  return true unless running_writer?
  c = @Counter.update { |counter| counter - RUNNING_WRITER }
  @ReadLock.broadcast
  @WriteLock.signal if waiting_writers(c) &amp;gt; 0
  true
end
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because ownership is not checked, a different thread can clear the `RUNNING_WRITER` bit while the original writer is still inside its critical section. Another writer can then acquire the write lock and run concurrently with the first…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; RubyGems: concurrent-ruby&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
`Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_write_lock` does not verify that the calling thread acquired the write lock. Any thread with access to the lock object can release an active write lock held by another thread. A second writer can then enter its critical section while the first writer is still running.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_read_lock` also decrements the shared counter even when no read lock is held. Calling it on a fresh lock changes the counter from `0` to `-1`, after which normal read acquisition raises `Concurrent::ResourceLimitError`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a synchronization correctness issue in the public `Concurrent::ReadWriteLock` API. It should not be framed as an authorization bypass; the lock is an in-process concurrency primitive, not an access-control boundary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;###  Version
Software: concurrent-ruby
Version: 1.3.6
Commit: 7a1b78941c081106c20a9ca0144ac73a48d254ab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`release_write_lock` checks only whether the global counter indicates that a writer is running. It does not track or verify ownership:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```ruby
def release_write_lock
  return true unless running_writer?
  c = @Counter.update { |counter| counter - RUNNING_WRITER }
  @ReadLock.broadcast
  @WriteLock.signal if waiting_writers(c) &amp;gt; 0
  true
end
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because ownership is not checked, a different thread can clear the `RUNNING_WRITER` bit while the original writer is still inside its critical section. Another writer can then acquire the write lock and run concurrently with the first…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-6wx8-w4f5-wwcr</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
