<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:18:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-m5ff-3wj3-8ph4 — HTTP Request Smuggling: Invalid whitespace characters in headers in Waitress</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-m5ff-3wj3-8ph4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: waitress&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a proxy server is used in front of waitress, an invalid request may be sent by an attacker that bypasses the front-end and is parsed differently by waitress leading to a potential for HTTP request smuggling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
Content-Length: 10
Transfer-Encoding: [\x0b]chunked
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For clarity:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
0x0b == vertical tab
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would get parsed by Waitress as being a `chunked` request, but a front-end server would use the `Content-Length` instead as the `Transfer-Encoding` header is considered invalid due to containing invalid characters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a front-end server does HTTP pipelining to a backend Waitress server this could lead to HTTP request splitting which may lead to potential cache poisoning or unexpected information disclosure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please upgrade to Waitress 1.4.1 which fixes this issue with stricter HTTP field validation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress 1.4.1 due to this change has become much more strict in what is allowed in header values, while the maintainers don&amp;#39;t believe that these changes will cause any issues, it may cause failures with non-conformist reverse proxies or clients, and it is highly recommend that users validate the changes in their environment and make sure it won&amp;#39;t cause any unacceptable failures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may enable additional protections on front-end servers, those that follow RFC7230 correctly would drop the request with a 400 Bad Request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress will now correctly responds to the request with a 400 Bad Request, and will drop the connection…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: waitress&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a proxy server is used in front of waitress, an invalid request may be sent by an attacker that bypasses the front-end and is parsed differently by waitress leading to a potential for HTTP request smuggling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
Content-Length: 10
Transfer-Encoding: [\x0b]chunked
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For clarity:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```
0x0b == vertical tab
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would get parsed by Waitress as being a `chunked` request, but a front-end server would use the `Content-Length` instead as the `Transfer-Encoding` header is considered invalid due to containing invalid characters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a front-end server does HTTP pipelining to a backend Waitress server this could lead to HTTP request splitting which may lead to potential cache poisoning or unexpected information disclosure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please upgrade to Waitress 1.4.1 which fixes this issue with stricter HTTP field validation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress 1.4.1 due to this change has become much more strict in what is allowed in header values, while the maintainers don&amp;#39;t believe that these changes will cause any issues, it may cause failures with non-conformist reverse proxies or clients, and it is highly recommend that users validate the changes in their environment and make sure it won&amp;#39;t cause any unacceptable failures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may enable additional protections on front-end servers, those that follow RFC7230 correctly would drop the request with a 400 Bad Request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Waitress will now correctly responds to the request with a 400 Bad Request, and will drop the connection…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-m5ff-3wj3-8ph4</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
