<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 03:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-53830 — OpenClaw &lt; 2026.4.22 - Webhook Secret Revocation Bypass via secrets.reload</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53830</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenClaw&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenClaw before 2026.4.22 contains a webhook secret revocation bypass vulnerability allowing callers with old Slack and Zalo webhook secrets to remain active after secrets.reload. Attackers can exploit the stale-secret window to deliver webhook events after operator-expected secret revocation, potentially accepting previous credentials.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenClaw&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenClaw before 2026.4.22 contains a webhook secret revocation bypass vulnerability allowing callers with old Slack and Zalo webhook secrets to remain active after secrets.reload. Attackers can exploit the stale-secret window to deliver webhook events after operator-expected secret revocation, potentially accepting previous credentials.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53830</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-275c-xpvc-jgfw — OpenClaw: Slack and Zalo webhook secrets could remain active after secrets.reload</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-275c-xpvc-jgfw</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: openclaw&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Slack and Zalo webhook secrets could remain active after secrets.reload. In affected versions, a caller with an old webhook secret during the stale-secret window could keep accepting the previous secret after `secrets.reload`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw&amp;#39;s trusted-operator model: authenticated Gateway operators, installed plugins, and intentional local execution surfaces remain trusted unless a separate policy, approval, allowlist, sandbox, or auth boundary is crossed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, this could deliver webhook events briefly after the operator expected revocation. Practical impact depends on the operator&amp;#39;s configuration and whether lower-trust input can reach that path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patched Versions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first stable patched version is `2026.4.22`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Mitigations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;restart the affected channel runtime after rotating webhook secrets until patched. As general hardening, keep channel and tool allowlists narrow, avoid sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disable the affected feature when it is not needed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: openclaw&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Slack and Zalo webhook secrets could remain active after secrets.reload. In affected versions, a caller with an old webhook secret during the stale-secret window could keep accepting the previous secret after `secrets.reload`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw&amp;#39;s trusted-operator model: authenticated Gateway operators, installed plugins, and intentional local execution surfaces remain trusted unless a separate policy, approval, allowlist, sandbox, or auth boundary is crossed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, this could deliver webhook events briefly after the operator expected revocation. Practical impact depends on the operator&amp;#39;s configuration and whether lower-trust input can reach that path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patched Versions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first stable patched version is `2026.4.22`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Mitigations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;restart the affected channel runtime after rotating webhook secrets until patched. As general hardening, keep channel and tool allowlists narrow, avoid sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disable the affected feature when it is not needed.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-275c-xpvc-jgfw</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
