<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-34826 — Rack: Unbounded Range Count in get_byte_ranges Enables DoS</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-34826</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; rack&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6, Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges parses the HTTP Range header without limiting the number of individual byte ranges. Although the existing fix for CVE-2024-26141 rejects ranges whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, it does not restrict the count of ranges. An attacker can supply many small overlapping ranges such as 0-0,0-0,0-0,... to trigger disproportionate CPU, memory, I/O, and bandwidth consumption per request. This results in a denial of service condition in Rack file-serving paths that process multipart byte range responses. This issue has been patched in versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; rack&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6, Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges parses the HTTP Range header without limiting the number of individual byte ranges. Although the existing fix for CVE-2024-26141 rejects ranges whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, it does not restrict the count of ranges. An attacker can supply many small overlapping ranges such as 0-0,0-0,0-0,... to trigger disproportionate CPU, memory, I/O, and bandwidth consumption per request. This results in a denial of service condition in Rack file-serving paths that process multipart byte range responses. This issue has been patched in versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-34826</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-x8cg-fq8g-mxfx — Rack's multipart byte range processing allows denial of service via excessive overlapping ranges</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-x8cg-fq8g-mxfx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; RubyGems: rack&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges` parses the HTTP `Range` header without limiting the number of individual byte ranges. Although the existing fix for CVE-2024-26141 rejects ranges whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, it does not restrict the count of ranges. An attacker can supply many small overlapping ranges such as `0-0,0-0,0-0,...` to trigger disproportionate CPU, memory, I/O, and bandwidth consumption per request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This results in a denial of service condition in Rack file-serving paths that process multipart byte range responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges` accepts a comma-separated list of byte ranges and validates them based on their aggregate size, but does not impose a limit on how many individual ranges may be supplied.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, a request such as:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```http
Range: bytes=0-0,0-0,0-0,0-0,...
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can contain thousands of overlapping one-byte ranges while still satisfying the total-size check added for CVE-2024-26141.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When such a header is processed by Rack’s file-serving code, each range causes additional work, including multipart response generation, per-range iteration, file seek and read operations, and temporary string allocation for response size calculation and output. This allows a relatively small request header to trigger disproportionately expensive processing and a much larger multipart response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is distinct from CVE-2024-26141. That fix prevents range sets whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size,…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; RubyGems: rack&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges` parses the HTTP `Range` header without limiting the number of individual byte ranges. Although the existing fix for CVE-2024-26141 rejects ranges whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, it does not restrict the count of ranges. An attacker can supply many small overlapping ranges such as `0-0,0-0,0-0,...` to trigger disproportionate CPU, memory, I/O, and bandwidth consumption per request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This results in a denial of service condition in Rack file-serving paths that process multipart byte range responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges` accepts a comma-separated list of byte ranges and validates them based on their aggregate size, but does not impose a limit on how many individual ranges may be supplied.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, a request such as:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```http
Range: bytes=0-0,0-0,0-0,0-0,...
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;can contain thousands of overlapping one-byte ranges while still satisfying the total-size check added for CVE-2024-26141.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When such a header is processed by Rack’s file-serving code, each range causes additional work, including multipart response generation, per-range iteration, file seek and read operations, and temporary string allocation for response size calculation and output. This allows a relatively small request header to trigger disproportionately expensive processing and a much larger multipart response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue is distinct from CVE-2024-26141. That fix prevents range sets whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size,…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-x8cg-fq8g-mxfx</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
