<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 19:46:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-102823</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-102823</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Prior to 0.63.1, client_read_authenticated in russh/src/client/encrypted.rs forwards CHANNEL_DATA, CHANNEL_EXTENDED_DATA, CHANNEL_EOF, CHANNEL_CLOSE, CHANNEL_OPEN_FAILURE, CHANNEL_SUCCESS, CHANNEL_FAILURE, and CHANNEL_REQUEST subtypes exit-status, exit-signal, and xon-xoff to public client::Handler callbacks without confirming that the ChannelId belongs to a channel the client opened and established. A malicious SSH server can send lifecycle events for predicted, unopened, unconfirmed, or released channel identifiers, causing application panics or corrupting command completion and exit-code tracking. This issue is fixed in version 0.63.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Prior to 0.63.1, client_read_authenticated in russh/src/client/encrypted.rs forwards CHANNEL_DATA, CHANNEL_EXTENDED_DATA, CHANNEL_EOF, CHANNEL_CLOSE, CHANNEL_OPEN_FAILURE, CHANNEL_SUCCESS, CHANNEL_FAILURE, and CHANNEL_REQUEST subtypes exit-status, exit-signal, and xon-xoff to public client::Handler callbacks without confirming that the ChannelId belongs to a channel the client opened and established. A malicious SSH server can send lifecycle events for predicted, unopened, unconfirmed, or released channel identifiers, causing application panics or corrupting command completion and exit-code tracking. This issue is fixed in version 0.63.1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-102823</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-47hw-gvq5-r2gm — russh: Client-side channel-scoped Handler callbacks fire for channel IDs the client never opened</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-47hw-gvq5-r2gm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: russh&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
CVE-2026-68930 was fixed by adding `Session::is_established_channel()` in `russh/src/server/encrypted.rs`, which gates every channel-scoped SERVER-side message (CHANNEL_REQUEST, CHANNEL_DATA, CHANNEL_EOF, CHANNEL_CLOSE, CHANNEL_WINDOW_ADJUST, CHANNEL_EXTENDED_DATA) on `enc.channels.get(&amp;amp;channel).is_some_and(|c| c.confirmed)` before invoking any `Handler` callback. The identical validation was never added to the CLIENT side (`russh/src/client/encrypted.rs`), which processes channel-scoped messages sent by the SSH SERVER once the client has authenticated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
In `client_read_authenticated` (`russh/src/client/encrypted.rs`, ~lines 431-757), for CHANNEL_DATA, CHANNEL_EXTENDED_DATA, CHANNEL_EOF, CHANNEL_CLOSE, CHANNEL_OPEN_FAILURE, CHANNEL_SUCCESS, CHANNEL_FAILURE, and the CHANNEL_REQUEST sub-types exit-status/exit-signal/xon-xoff, the code only optionally forwards the event to the internal per-channel mpsc sender via `if let Some(chan) = self.channels.get(&amp;amp;channel_num) { ... }` (a no-op if the channel is unknown), but then **unconditionally** calls the corresponding public `Handler` trait method (`client.data(...)`, `client.exit_status(...)`, `client.channel_close(...)`, `client.channel_success(...)`, etc.) regardless of whether `channel_num` corresponds to any channel the client ever opened or that was ever confirmed. Only CHANNEL_OPEN_CONFIRMATION (closes the connection with `Error::Inconsistent` if unknown) and CHANNEL_WINDOW_ADJUST (returns early with `O…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: russh&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
CVE-2026-68930 was fixed by adding `Session::is_established_channel()` in `russh/src/server/encrypted.rs`, which gates every channel-scoped SERVER-side message (CHANNEL_REQUEST, CHANNEL_DATA, CHANNEL_EOF, CHANNEL_CLOSE, CHANNEL_WINDOW_ADJUST, CHANNEL_EXTENDED_DATA) on `enc.channels.get(&amp;amp;channel).is_some_and(|c| c.confirmed)` before invoking any `Handler` callback. The identical validation was never added to the CLIENT side (`russh/src/client/encrypted.rs`), which processes channel-scoped messages sent by the SSH SERVER once the client has authenticated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
In `client_read_authenticated` (`russh/src/client/encrypted.rs`, ~lines 431-757), for CHANNEL_DATA, CHANNEL_EXTENDED_DATA, CHANNEL_EOF, CHANNEL_CLOSE, CHANNEL_OPEN_FAILURE, CHANNEL_SUCCESS, CHANNEL_FAILURE, and the CHANNEL_REQUEST sub-types exit-status/exit-signal/xon-xoff, the code only optionally forwards the event to the internal per-channel mpsc sender via `if let Some(chan) = self.channels.get(&amp;amp;channel_num) { ... }` (a no-op if the channel is unknown), but then **unconditionally** calls the corresponding public `Handler` trait method (`client.data(...)`, `client.exit_status(...)`, `client.channel_close(...)`, `client.channel_success(...)`, etc.) regardless of whether `channel_num` corresponds to any channel the client ever opened or that was ever confirmed. Only CHANNEL_OPEN_CONFIRMATION (closes the connection with `Error::Inconsistent` if unknown) and CHANNEL_WINDOW_ADJUST (returns early with `O…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-47hw-gvq5-r2gm</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
