<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:46:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-67218</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-67218</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.0.22, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, accept_content/2 at line 56 calls rabbit_stream_manager:create_super_stream/... directly after is_authorized (which only checks the management tag + vhost access via is_authorized_vhost). The stream-protocol equivalent (rabbit_stream_reader.erl create_super_stream handler) calls rabbit_stream_utils:check_super_stream_management_permitted/4 which enforces configure on the exchange and each partition queue. The HTTP handler omits this call entirely. A user with management tag and vhost access , but no configure permission on any resource , can create super-streams (an exchange + N partition stream queues + bindings) via the HTTP API. The native stream-protocol path enforces configure on each resource; the HTTP path does not, creating a privilege escalation from &amp;#39;can view&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;can create persistent cluster-wide resources.&amp;#39; Preconditions include rabbitmq_stream_management plugin enabled management tag + vhost access (no resource permissions needed). This issue is fixed in versions 4.0.22, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.0.22, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, accept_content/2 at line 56 calls rabbit_stream_manager:create_super_stream/... directly after is_authorized (which only checks the management tag + vhost access via is_authorized_vhost). The stream-protocol equivalent (rabbit_stream_reader.erl create_super_stream handler) calls rabbit_stream_utils:check_super_stream_management_permitted/4 which enforces configure on the exchange and each partition queue. The HTTP handler omits this call entirely. A user with management tag and vhost access , but no configure permission on any resource , can create super-streams (an exchange + N partition stream queues + bindings) via the HTTP API. The native stream-protocol path enforces configure on each resource; the HTTP path does not, creating a privilege escalation from &amp;#39;can view&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;can create persistent cluster-wide resources.&amp;#39; Preconditions include rabbitmq_stream_management plugin enabled management tag + vhost access (no resource permissions needed). This issue is fixed in versions 4.0.22, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-67218</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:67552 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/rhsa-2026:67552</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Unsanitized vhost names allow for XSS in management UI rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Authenticated user can bypass connection limits via stream protocol rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Information disclosure of decrypted Shovel URIs in debug logs rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Monitoring user can reset authentication attempt counters rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) misconfiguration allows unauthorized actions rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via atom table exhaustion in stream chunk_selector rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via management API regular expression filter rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Monitoring user can disrupt message flow via authorization flaw rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Information disclosure via cross-vhost authorization bypass RabbitMQ: RabbitMQ: Account takeover via stored Cross-Site Scripting in TLS peer-certificate DN rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via AMQP 1.0 array32 parsing rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via unbounded super-stream partition allocation rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Privilege escalation via super-stream HTTP creation rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via unbounded consistent-hash exchange weight rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via JMS topic exchange atom exhaustion rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Information disclosure of AMQP 1.0 shovel URI passwords rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Administrator path traversal allows arbitrary file write rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service vi…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Unsanitized vhost names allow for XSS in management UI rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Authenticated user can bypass connection limits via stream protocol rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Information disclosure of decrypted Shovel URIs in debug logs rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Monitoring user can reset authentication attempt counters rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) misconfiguration allows unauthorized actions rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via atom table exhaustion in stream chunk_selector rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via management API regular expression filter rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Monitoring user can disrupt message flow via authorization flaw rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Information disclosure via cross-vhost authorization bypass RabbitMQ: RabbitMQ: Account takeover via stored Cross-Site Scripting in TLS peer-certificate DN rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via AMQP 1.0 array32 parsing rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via unbounded super-stream partition allocation rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Privilege escalation via super-stream HTTP creation rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via unbounded consistent-hash exchange weight rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service via JMS topic exchange atom exhaustion rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Information disclosure of AMQP 1.0 shovel URI passwords rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Administrator path traversal allows arbitrary file write rabbitmq: RabbitMQ: Denial of Service vi…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/rhsa-2026:67552</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-67218</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-67218</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.0.22, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, accept_content/2 at line 56 calls rabbit_stream_manager:create_super_stream/... directly after is_authorized (which only checks the management tag + vhost access via is_authorized_vhost). The stream-protocol equivalent (rabbit_stream_reader.erl create_super_stream handler) calls rabbit_stream_utils:check_super_stream_management_permitted/4 which enforces configure on the exchange and each partition queue. The HTTP handler omits this call entirely. A user with management tag and vhost access , but no configure permission on any resource , can create super-streams (an exchange + N partition stream queues + bindings) via the HTTP API. The native stream-protocol path enforces configure on each resource; the HTTP path does not, creating a privilege escalation from &amp;#39;can view&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;can create persistent cluster-wide resources.&amp;#39; Preconditions include rabbitmq_stream_management plugin enabled management tag + vhost access (no resource permissions needed). This issue is fixed in versions 4.0.22, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: rabbitmq-server&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 4.0.22, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, accept_content/2 at line 56 calls rabbit_stream_manager:create_super_stream/... directly after is_authorized (which only checks the management tag + vhost access via is_authorized_vhost). The stream-protocol equivalent (rabbit_stream_reader.erl create_super_stream handler) calls rabbit_stream_utils:check_super_stream_management_permitted/4 which enforces configure on the exchange and each partition queue. The HTTP handler omits this call entirely. A user with management tag and vhost access , but no configure permission on any resource , can create super-streams (an exchange + N partition stream queues + bindings) via the HTTP API. The native stream-protocol path enforces configure on each resource; the HTTP path does not, creating a privilege escalation from &amp;#39;can view&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;can create persistent cluster-wide resources.&amp;#39; Preconditions include rabbitmq_stream_management plugin enabled management tag + vhost access (no resource permissions needed). This issue is fixed in versions 4.0.22, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-67218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
