<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-72069 — locking/rt: Fix the incorrect RCU protection in rt_spin_unlock()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72069</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;locking/rt: Fix the incorrect RCU protection in rt_spin_unlock()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rt_spin_unlock() releases the RCU protection before unlocking the
lock. That opens the door for the following UAF scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;T1					T2
 spin_lock(&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock);		rcu_read_lock();
 invalidate(p);			p = rcu_dereference(ptr);
 rcu_assign_pointer(ptr, NULL);	if (!p) return;
 spin_unlock(&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock);		spin_lock(&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock)
 				   lock(&amp;amp;lock-&amp;gt;lock);
				   rcu_read_lock();
 kfree_rcu(p);			rcu_read_unlock();
				....
				spin_unlock(&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock)
				  rcu_read_unlock(); // Ends grace period
 rcu_do_batch()
   kfree(p);
			    UAF -&amp;gt;	  rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(&amp;amp;lock-&amp;gt;lock...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regular spinlocks keep preemption disabled accross the unlock operation,
which provides full RCU protection, but the RT substitution fails to
resemble that. Same applies for the rwlock substitution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the rcu_read_unlock() invocation past the unlock operations to match
the non-RT semantics. This makes it asymmetric vs. rt_xxx_lock(), but
that&amp;#39;s harmless as the caller needs to hold RCU read lock across the lock
operation. The migrate_enable() call stays before the unlock operation
because there is no per CPU operation in the unlock path which would
require migration to be kept disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;locking/rt: Fix the incorrect RCU protection in rt_spin_unlock()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rt_spin_unlock() releases the RCU protection before unlocking the
lock. That opens the door for the following UAF scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;T1					T2
 spin_lock(&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock);		rcu_read_lock();
 invalidate(p);			p = rcu_dereference(ptr);
 rcu_assign_pointer(ptr, NULL);	if (!p) return;
 spin_unlock(&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock);		spin_lock(&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock)
 				   lock(&amp;amp;lock-&amp;gt;lock);
				   rcu_read_lock();
 kfree_rcu(p);			rcu_read_unlock();
				....
				spin_unlock(&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock)
				  rcu_read_unlock(); // Ends grace period
 rcu_do_batch()
   kfree(p);
			    UAF -&amp;gt;	  rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(&amp;amp;lock-&amp;gt;lock...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regular spinlocks keep preemption disabled accross the unlock operation,
which provides full RCU protection, but the RT substitution fails to
resemble that. Same applies for the rwlock substitution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the rcu_read_unlock() invocation past the unlock operations to match
the non-RT semantics. This makes it asymmetric vs. rt_xxx_lock(), but
that&amp;#39;s harmless as the caller needs to hold RCU read lock across the lock
operation. The migrate_enable() call stays before the unlock operation
because there is no per CPU operation in the unlock path which would
require migration to be kept disabled.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-72069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
