<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 19:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-80807 — nilfs2: reject invalid block index in GC ioctl</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-80807</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nilfs2: reject invalid block index in GC ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reported list corruption caused by a double list_add_tail() call on
bh-&amp;gt;b_assoc_buffers within nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysis revealed that the root cause was the insertion of a page/folio
with a page index of ULONG_MAX into the page cache via the GC ioctl.
filemap_get_folios_tag(), called by nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers(),
repeatedly detects a dirty folio with a page index of ULONG_MAX due to
index wrap-around, leading to duplicate processing of dirty buffers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a preparatory step, the GC ioctl loads the page/folio of the block to
be moved during GC and inserts it into the page cache based on information
in the nilfs_vdesc structure passed as an argument.  Normally, this does
not cause issues because the user-space GC library configures the
nilfs_vdesc structure properly.  However, since there is no range check on
the parameters determining the page index, a request with artificially
crafted parameters -- such as those generated by Syzbot -- can result in a
page/folio being inserted with a page index of ULONG_MAX, triggering the
above problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This resolves the issue by checking the ranges of &amp;#39;vd_offset&amp;#39; and
&amp;#39;vd_vblocknr&amp;#39; in the nilfs_vdesc structure that determine the page index,
thereby preventing the invalid page/folio insertions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nilfs2: reject invalid block index in GC ioctl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reported list corruption caused by a double list_add_tail() call on
bh-&amp;gt;b_assoc_buffers within nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysis revealed that the root cause was the insertion of a page/folio
with a page index of ULONG_MAX into the page cache via the GC ioctl.
filemap_get_folios_tag(), called by nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers(),
repeatedly detects a dirty folio with a page index of ULONG_MAX due to
index wrap-around, leading to duplicate processing of dirty buffers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a preparatory step, the GC ioctl loads the page/folio of the block to
be moved during GC and inserts it into the page cache based on information
in the nilfs_vdesc structure passed as an argument.  Normally, this does
not cause issues because the user-space GC library configures the
nilfs_vdesc structure properly.  However, since there is no range check on
the parameters determining the page index, a request with artificially
crafted parameters -- such as those generated by Syzbot -- can result in a
page/folio being inserted with a page index of ULONG_MAX, triggering the
above problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This resolves the issue by checking the ranges of &amp;#39;vd_offset&amp;#39; and
&amp;#39;vd_vblocknr&amp;#39; in the nilfs_vdesc structure that determine the page index,
thereby preventing the invalid page/folio insertions.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-80807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
