<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 15:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-93203 — batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93203</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;batadv_bla_add_claim() is used to add claims and modify the backbone of
claims for CLAIM frames from remote backbones and local packets. When it
handles a claim, it needs to either&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* add the new claim&amp;#39;s CRC to the backbone CRC
* remove the already existing claim&amp;#39;s CRC from the old backbone and add it
  to the new backbone&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But when the &amp;#34;new&amp;#34; claim code was running in parallel to the &amp;#34;change
backbone&amp;#34; code, it can happen that the CRC was invalid because the
backbone_gw of the claim was changed twice in the &amp;#34;new&amp;#34; claim code path:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* CPU0 creates the claim for gateway A and publishes it in the claim
  hash. The crc16 of the address has not yet been added to A&amp;#39;s crc at
  this point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* CPU1 processes a claim frame of gateway B for the same client, finds
  the just published claim, and performs the ownership change: it
  switches the pointer to B, removes the crc16 from A&amp;#39;s crc - which
  never contained it - and adds it to B&amp;#39;s crc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* CPU0 continues behind the creation branch, unconditionally switches
  the pointer back to A without compensating B&amp;#39;s crc (its remove_crc
  is false for the creation path), and finally adds the crc16 to A&amp;#39;s
  crc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CRC is then wrong for both:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* claim belongs to A: but CRC is not part of backbone A&amp;#39;s CRC
* claim doesn&amp;#39;t belong to B: CRC is still part of backbone B&amp;#39;s CRC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This wrong CRC is never recomputated from th…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;batadv_bla_add_claim() is used to add claims and modify the backbone of
claims for CLAIM frames from remote backbones and local packets. When it
handles a claim, it needs to either&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* add the new claim&amp;#39;s CRC to the backbone CRC
* remove the already existing claim&amp;#39;s CRC from the old backbone and add it
  to the new backbone&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But when the &amp;#34;new&amp;#34; claim code was running in parallel to the &amp;#34;change
backbone&amp;#34; code, it can happen that the CRC was invalid because the
backbone_gw of the claim was changed twice in the &amp;#34;new&amp;#34; claim code path:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* CPU0 creates the claim for gateway A and publishes it in the claim
  hash. The crc16 of the address has not yet been added to A&amp;#39;s crc at
  this point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* CPU1 processes a claim frame of gateway B for the same client, finds
  the just published claim, and performs the ownership change: it
  switches the pointer to B, removes the crc16 from A&amp;#39;s crc - which
  never contained it - and adds it to B&amp;#39;s crc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* CPU0 continues behind the creation branch, unconditionally switches
  the pointer back to A without compensating B&amp;#39;s crc (its remove_crc
  is false for the creation path), and finally adds the crc16 to A&amp;#39;s
  crc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CRC is then wrong for both:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* claim belongs to A: but CRC is not part of backbone A&amp;#39;s CRC
* claim doesn&amp;#39;t belong to B: CRC is still part of backbone B&amp;#39;s CRC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This wrong CRC is never recomputated from th…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-93203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
