<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:49:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-97557 — smb: client: avoid leaking refcount in cifs_queue_oplock_break()</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-97557</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;smb: client: avoid leaking refcount in cifs_queue_oplock_break()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cifs_queue_oplock_break() unconditionally takes a reference on the
target file before queueing cifs_oplock_break(). Only that work item
decreases the reference counter again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If another oplock break arrives while that work is still queued,
queue_work() will return false and not queue this second work item. As a
result, we will never reach the point to drop the file reference again
and are leaking this reference. This can be triggered when interacting
with a slow-responding server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, later unmount operations for this file system will fail with&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: Dentry ... still in use (1) [unmount of cifs cifs]
  VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of cifs (cifs)
  kernel BUG at fs/super.c:777!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only incrementing the reference count if the work has been
queued successfully. Taking it after queue_work() is safe because all
three callers hold tcon-&amp;gt;open_file_lock across the call and
_cifsFileInfo_put() decrements under that same lock, so a worker that
starts the handler in the window cannot drop the reference before it has
been taken.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;smb: client: avoid leaking refcount in cifs_queue_oplock_break()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cifs_queue_oplock_break() unconditionally takes a reference on the
target file before queueing cifs_oplock_break(). Only that work item
decreases the reference counter again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If another oplock break arrives while that work is still queued,
queue_work() will return false and not queue this second work item. As a
result, we will never reach the point to drop the file reference again
and are leaking this reference. This can be triggered when interacting
with a slow-responding server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, later unmount operations for this file system will fail with&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: Dentry ... still in use (1) [unmount of cifs cifs]
  VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of cifs (cifs)
  kernel BUG at fs/super.c:777!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by only incrementing the reference count if the work has been
queued successfully. Taking it after queue_work() is safe because all
three callers hold tcon-&amp;gt;open_file_lock across the call and
_cifsFileInfo_put() decrements under that same lock, so a worker that
starts the handler in the window cannot drop the reference before it has
been taken.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-97557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
