<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 03:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-46173 — exit: prevent preemption of oopsing TASK_DEAD task</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-46173</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;exit: prevent preemption of oopsing TASK_DEAD task&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When an already-exiting task oopses, make_task_dead() currently calls
do_task_dead() with preemption enabled.  That is forbidden:
do_task_dead() calls __schedule(), which has a comment saying &amp;#34;WARNING:
must be called with preemption disabled!&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an oopsing task is preempted in do_task_dead(), between becoming
TASK_DEAD and entering the scheduler explicitly, bad things happen:
finish_task_switch() assumes that once the scheduler has switched away
from a TASK_DEAD task, the task can never run again and its stack is no
longer needed; but that assumption apparently doesn&amp;#39;t hold if the dead
task was preempted (the SM_PREEMPT case).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means that the scheduler ends up repeatedly dropping references on
the dead task&amp;#39;s stack, which can lead to use-after-free or double-free
of the entire task stack; in other words, two tasks can end up running
on the same stack, resulting in various kinds of memory corruption.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(This does not just affect &amp;#34;recursively oopsing&amp;#34; tasks; it is enough to
oops once during task exit, for example in a file_operations::release
handler)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;exit: prevent preemption of oopsing TASK_DEAD task&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When an already-exiting task oopses, make_task_dead() currently calls
do_task_dead() with preemption enabled.  That is forbidden:
do_task_dead() calls __schedule(), which has a comment saying &amp;#34;WARNING:
must be called with preemption disabled!&amp;#34;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an oopsing task is preempted in do_task_dead(), between becoming
TASK_DEAD and entering the scheduler explicitly, bad things happen:
finish_task_switch() assumes that once the scheduler has switched away
from a TASK_DEAD task, the task can never run again and its stack is no
longer needed; but that assumption apparently doesn&amp;#39;t hold if the dead
task was preempted (the SM_PREEMPT case).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means that the scheduler ends up repeatedly dropping references on
the dead task&amp;#39;s stack, which can lead to use-after-free or double-free
of the entire task stack; in other words, two tasks can end up running
on the same stack, resulting in various kinds of memory corruption.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(This does not just affect &amp;#34;recursively oopsing&amp;#34; tasks; it is enough to
oops once during task exit, for example in a file_operations::release
handler)&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-46173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
