<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 01:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-98067 — erofs: disable LZ4 rolling decompression for now</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-98067</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;erofs: disable LZ4 rolling decompression for now&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LZ4 rolling decompression [1] was introduced to reduce the memory
footprint of temporary pages:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For many cases, it is needed for users to read small data within
 a compressed extent (pcluster), either due to random small read, or
 since uptodate folios (typically order-0) cannot be reused for
 decompression again since decompression algorithm refills
 already-uptodate folios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rolling decompression works because LZ4 is LZ77-based and only refers
to the most recent 64 KiB of decompressed data, so in theory only a
bounded rolling window of temporary pages is needed when decompressing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It can save a lot of temporary memory, e.g.
 601,960-byte data can be compressed into a 256k LZ4 compressed extent,
 which means it needs 146 extra pages per request in the worst case if
 rolling decompression is disabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the upstream LZ4 implementation is not under EROFS&amp;#39; control:
For example, the literal copy memmove() may still **copy long literals
backward** on x86 based on the address comparison even when the source
and destination ranges do not overlap (IOWs, inline decompression
doesn&amp;#39;t need to be considered here). That breaks the rolling assumption
and makes the optimization broken.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Disable it for now to make sure the data correctness first since EROFS
is used everywhere now: The rolling window approach can be revived once
we either ensure that the official…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;erofs: disable LZ4 rolling decompression for now&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LZ4 rolling decompression [1] was introduced to reduce the memory
footprint of temporary pages:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For many cases, it is needed for users to read small data within
 a compressed extent (pcluster), either due to random small read, or
 since uptodate folios (typically order-0) cannot be reused for
 decompression again since decompression algorithm refills
 already-uptodate folios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rolling decompression works because LZ4 is LZ77-based and only refers
to the most recent 64 KiB of decompressed data, so in theory only a
bounded rolling window of temporary pages is needed when decompressing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It can save a lot of temporary memory, e.g.
 601,960-byte data can be compressed into a 256k LZ4 compressed extent,
 which means it needs 146 extra pages per request in the worst case if
 rolling decompression is disabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the upstream LZ4 implementation is not under EROFS&amp;#39; control:
For example, the literal copy memmove() may still **copy long literals
backward** on x86 based on the address comparison even when the source
and destination ranges do not overlap (IOWs, inline decompression
doesn&amp;#39;t need to be considered here). That breaks the rolling assumption
and makes the optimization broken.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Disable it for now to make sure the data correctness first since EROFS
is used everywhere now: The rolling window approach can be revived once
we either ensure that the official…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-98067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
