<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-37807</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-37807</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 210 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix kmemleak warning for percpu hashmap Vlad Poenaru reported the following kmemleak issue:   unreferenced object 0x606fd7c44ac8 (size 32):     backtrace (crc 0):       pcpu_alloc_noprof+0x730/0xeb0       bpf_map_alloc_percpu+0x69/0xc0       prealloc_init+0x9d/0x1b0       htab_map_alloc+0x363/0x510       map_create+0x215/0x3a0       __sys_bpf+0x16b/0x3e0       __x64_sys_bpf+0x18/0x20       do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x150       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Further investigation shows the reason is due to not 8-byte aligned store of percpu pointer in htab_elem_set_ptr():   *(void __percpu **)(l-&amp;gt;key + key_size) = pptr; Note that the whole htab_elem alignment is 8 (for x86_64). If the key_size is 4, that means pptr is stored in a location which is 4 byte aligned but not 8 byte aligned. In mm/kmemleak.c, scan_block() scans the memory based on 8 byte stride, so it won&amp;#39;t detect above pptr, hence reporting the memory leak. In htab_map_alloc(), we already have         htab-&amp;gt;elem_size = sizeof(struct htab_elem) +                           round_up(htab-&amp;gt;map.key_size, 8);         if (percpu)                 htab-&amp;gt;elem_size += sizeof(void *);         else                 htab-&amp;gt;elem_size += round_up(htab-&amp;gt;map.value_size, 8); So storing pptr with 8-byte alignment won&amp;#39;t cause any problem and can fix kmemleak too. The issue can be reproduced with bpf selftest as well:   1. Enable CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK config   2.…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 210 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix kmemleak warning for percpu hashmap Vlad Poenaru reported the following kmemleak issue:   unreferenced object 0x606fd7c44ac8 (size 32):     backtrace (crc 0):       pcpu_alloc_noprof+0x730/0xeb0       bpf_map_alloc_percpu+0x69/0xc0       prealloc_init+0x9d/0x1b0       htab_map_alloc+0x363/0x510       map_create+0x215/0x3a0       __sys_bpf+0x16b/0x3e0       __x64_sys_bpf+0x18/0x20       do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x150       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Further investigation shows the reason is due to not 8-byte aligned store of percpu pointer in htab_elem_set_ptr():   *(void __percpu **)(l-&amp;gt;key + key_size) = pptr; Note that the whole htab_elem alignment is 8 (for x86_64). If the key_size is 4, that means pptr is stored in a location which is 4 byte aligned but not 8 byte aligned. In mm/kmemleak.c, scan_block() scans the memory based on 8 byte stride, so it won&amp;#39;t detect above pptr, hence reporting the memory leak. In htab_map_alloc(), we already have         htab-&amp;gt;elem_size = sizeof(struct htab_elem) +                           round_up(htab-&amp;gt;map.key_size, 8);         if (percpu)                 htab-&amp;gt;elem_size += sizeof(void *);         else                 htab-&amp;gt;elem_size += round_up(htab-&amp;gt;map.value_size, 8); So storing pptr with 8-byte alignment won&amp;#39;t cause any problem and can fix kmemleak too. The issue can be reproduced with bpf selftest as well:   1. Enable CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK config   2.…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-37807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
