{"uuid": "0f217035-a4b7-492d-8233-0d96c028780b", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2025-58034", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/Intel_Encyclopedia/3018", "content": "\u2728 Vulnerabilities & Exploits \u2728\n\nFortinet criticized for \u2018silent\u2019 patching after disclosing second zero-day vulnerability in same equipment\n\n\u2014\n\nSummary:\n\n  \n       \n      \n\n\n\n\nOnly days after Fortinet was criticized by researchers for \u2018silently\u2019 patching a zero-day vulnerability without informing its customers, it has emerged that it did the same for a second zero-day that is being used as part of the same attack chain.\n\n\n\nThis is a story of two zero-day vulnerabilities in the FortiWeb web application firewall made public four days apart: CVE-2025-64446 (FG-IR-25-910), made public on November 14, and a second, \u00a0CVE-2025-58034 (FG-IR-25-513),...\n\n\u2014\n\nSource: CrowdStrike fired insider for sharing internal info with hacking group | CSO Online\nPublished: 2025-11-20 19:29\n\n#vulnerabilities__exploits #criticized #fortinet\n\nhttps://www.csoonline.com/article/4093949/fortinet-criticized-for-silent-patching-after-disclosing-second-zero-day-vulnerability-in-same-equipment.html", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-10T00:00:46.811809Z"}