https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent sightings. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Tue, 05 May 2026 14:27:35 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/8e8abd16-524a-4e53-96f4-308e8414cbd6/export {"uuid": "8e8abd16-524a-4e53-96f4-308e8414cbd6", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2024-39475", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cvedetector/89", "content": "{\n \"Source\": \"CVE FEED\",\n \"Title\": \"CVE-2024-39475 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability h\", \n \"Content\": \"CVE ID : CVE-2024-39475 \nPublished : July 5, 2024, 7:15 a.m. | 17\u00a0minutes ago \nDescription : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: \n \nfbdev: savage: Handle err return when savagefb_check_var failed \n \nThe commit 04e5eac8f3ab(\"fbdev: savage: Error out if pixclock equals zero\") \nchecks the value of pixclock to avoid divide-by-zero error. However \nthe function savagefb_probe doesn't handle the error return of \nsavagefb_check_var. When pixclock is 0, it will cause divide-by-zero error. \nSeverity: 0.0 | NA \nVisit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...\",\n \"Detection Date\": \"05 Jul 2024\",\n \"Type\": \"Vulnerability\"\n}\n\ud83d\udd39 t.me/cvedetector \ud83d\udd39", "creation_timestamp": "2024-07-05T09:34:17.000000Z"} {"uuid": "8e8abd16-524a-4e53-96f4-308e8414cbd6", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2024-39475", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cvedetector/89", "content": "{\n \"Source\": \"CVE FEED\",\n \"Title\": \"CVE-2024-39475 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability h\", \n \"Content\": \"CVE ID : CVE-2024-39475 \nPublished : July 5, 2024, 7:15 a.m. | 17\u00a0minutes ago \nDescription : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: \n \nfbdev: savage: Handle err return when savagefb_check_var failed \n \nThe commit 04e5eac8f3ab(\"fbdev: savage: Error out if pixclock equals zero\") \nchecks the value of pixclock to avoid divide-by-zero error. However \nthe function savagefb_probe doesn't handle the error return of \nsavagefb_check_var. When pixclock is 0, it will cause divide-by-zero error. \nSeverity: 0.0 | NA \nVisit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...\",\n \"Detection Date\": \"05 Jul 2024\",\n \"Type\": \"Vulnerability\"\n}\n\ud83d\udd39 t.me/cvedetector \ud83d\udd39", "creation_timestamp": "2024-07-05T09:34:17.000000Z"} https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/8e8abd16-524a-4e53-96f4-308e8414cbd6/export Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:34:17 +0000