https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent sightings. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Sun, 14 Jun 2026 15:29:21 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/d6beba81-8a01-4d9a-a1a6-46ac91d94e00/export {"uuid": "d6beba81-8a01-4d9a-a1a6-46ac91d94e00", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2024-41021", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cvedetector/1850", "content": "{\n \"Source\": \"CVE FEED\",\n \"Title\": \"CVE-2024-41021 - IBM s390 Linux Kernel HWPOISON Memory Vulnerability\", \n \"Content\": \"CVE ID : CVE-2024-41021 \nPublished : July 29, 2024, 2:15 p.m. | 36\u00a0minutes ago \nDescription : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: \n \ns390/mm: Fix VM_FAULT_HWPOISON handling in do_exception() \n \nThere is no support for HWPOISON, MEMORY_FAILURE, or ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC on \ns390. Therefore we do not expect to see VM_FAULT_HWPOISON in \ndo_exception(). \n \nHowever, since commit af19487f00f3 (\"mm: make PTE_MARKER_SWAPIN_ERROR more \ngeneral\"), it is possible to see VM_FAULT_HWPOISON in combination with \nPTE_MARKER_POISONED, even on architectures that do not support HWPOISON \notherwise. In this case, we will end up on the BUG() in do_exception(). \n \nFix this by treating VM_FAULT_HWPOISON the same as VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, similar \nto x86 when MEMORY_FAILURE is not configured. Also print unexpected fault \nflags, for easier debugging. \n \nNote that VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE is not expected, because s390 cannot \nsupport swap entries on other levels than PTE level. \nSeverity: 0.0 | NA \nVisit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...\",\n \"Detection Date\": \"29 Jul 2024\",\n \"Type\": \"Vulnerability\"\n}\n\ud83d\udd39 t.me/cvedetector \ud83d\udd39", "creation_timestamp": "2024-07-29T17:07:46.000000Z"} {"uuid": "d6beba81-8a01-4d9a-a1a6-46ac91d94e00", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2024-41021", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cvedetector/1850", "content": "{\n \"Source\": \"CVE FEED\",\n \"Title\": \"CVE-2024-41021 - IBM s390 Linux Kernel HWPOISON Memory Vulnerability\", \n \"Content\": \"CVE ID : CVE-2024-41021 \nPublished : July 29, 2024, 2:15 p.m. | 36\u00a0minutes ago \nDescription : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: \n \ns390/mm: Fix VM_FAULT_HWPOISON handling in do_exception() \n \nThere is no support for HWPOISON, MEMORY_FAILURE, or ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC on \ns390. Therefore we do not expect to see VM_FAULT_HWPOISON in \ndo_exception(). \n \nHowever, since commit af19487f00f3 (\"mm: make PTE_MARKER_SWAPIN_ERROR more \ngeneral\"), it is possible to see VM_FAULT_HWPOISON in combination with \nPTE_MARKER_POISONED, even on architectures that do not support HWPOISON \notherwise. In this case, we will end up on the BUG() in do_exception(). \n \nFix this by treating VM_FAULT_HWPOISON the same as VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, similar \nto x86 when MEMORY_FAILURE is not configured. Also print unexpected fault \nflags, for easier debugging. \n \nNote that VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE is not expected, because s390 cannot \nsupport swap entries on other levels than PTE level. \nSeverity: 0.0 | NA \nVisit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more...\",\n \"Detection Date\": \"29 Jul 2024\",\n \"Type\": \"Vulnerability\"\n}\n\ud83d\udd39 t.me/cvedetector \ud83d\udd39", "creation_timestamp": "2024-07-29T17:07:46.000000Z"} https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/d6beba81-8a01-4d9a-a1a6-46ac91d94e00/export Mon, 29 Jul 2024 17:07:46 +0000