https://vulnerability.circl.lu Contains only the most 10 recent sightings. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Fri, 08 May 2026 16:49:36 +0000 https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/6404c531-9565-4694-90c3-d94b905f1873/export {"uuid": "6404c531-9565-4694-90c3-d94b905f1873", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2025-49179", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/DarkWebInformer_CVEAlerts/19182", "content": "\ud83d\udd17 DarkWebInformer.com - Cyber Threat Intelligence\n\ud83d\udccc CVE ID: CVE-2025-49179\n\ud83d\udd25 CVSS Score: 6.6 (cvssV3_1, Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H)\n\ud83d\udd39 Description: A flaw was found in the X Record extension. The RecordSanityCheckRegisterClients function does not check for an integer overflow when computing request length, which allows a client to bypass length checks.\n\ud83d\udccf Published: 2025-06-17T14:54:49.288Z\n\ud83d\udccf Modified: 2025-06-23T06:34:29.129Z\n\ud83d\udd17 References:\n1. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9303\n2. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9304\n3. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9305\n4. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9306\n5. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-49179\n6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369978", "creation_timestamp": "2025-06-23T06:45:51.000000Z"} {"uuid": "6404c531-9565-4694-90c3-d94b905f1873", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2025-49179", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/DarkWebInformer_CVEAlerts/19182", "content": "\ud83d\udd17 DarkWebInformer.com - Cyber Threat Intelligence\n\ud83d\udccc CVE ID: CVE-2025-49179\n\ud83d\udd25 CVSS Score: 6.6 (cvssV3_1, Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H)\n\ud83d\udd39 Description: A flaw was found in the X Record extension. The RecordSanityCheckRegisterClients function does not check for an integer overflow when computing request length, which allows a client to bypass length checks.\n\ud83d\udccf Published: 2025-06-17T14:54:49.288Z\n\ud83d\udccf Modified: 2025-06-23T06:34:29.129Z\n\ud83d\udd17 References:\n1. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9303\n2. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9304\n3. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9305\n4. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9306\n5. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-49179\n6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369978", "creation_timestamp": "2025-06-23T06:45:51.000000Z"} https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/6404c531-9565-4694-90c3-d94b905f1873/export Mon, 23 Jun 2025 06:45:51 +0000