<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent sightings.</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent sightings.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 12:36:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>5c2c4603-ff9b-4e64-885b-6d2cf8a25098</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/5c2c4603-ff9b-4e64-885b-6d2cf8a25098/export</link>
      <description>{"uuid": "5c2c4603-ff9b-4e64-885b-6d2cf8a25098", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-72429", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stackflag.bsky.social/post/3mtbpw5ozxt25", "content": "CVE-2026-72429 - linux\nThe Linux kernel had a problem with how it handled IPv6 routes with a specific type of packet. This could have led to a potential error when accessing certain data. The issue has been fixed in\u2026\n\nToo many irrelevant or confusing CVEs? Use stackflag.com\n\n#linux #CVE #infosec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-17T12:40:05.996907Z"}</description>
      <content:encoded>{"uuid": "5c2c4603-ff9b-4e64-885b-6d2cf8a25098", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-72429", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stackflag.bsky.social/post/3mtbpw5ozxt25", "content": "CVE-2026-72429 - linux\nThe Linux kernel had a problem with how it handled IPv6 routes with a specific type of packet. This could have led to a potential error when accessing certain data. The issue has been fixed in\u2026\n\nToo many irrelevant or confusing CVEs? Use stackflag.com\n\n#linux #CVE #infosec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-17T12:40:05.996907Z"}</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/5c2c4603-ff9b-4e64-885b-6d2cf8a25098/export</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
