<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent sightings.</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent sightings.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 10:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>188608d3-3cd3-4202-bed4-4db50d706604</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/188608d3-3cd3-4202-bed4-4db50d706604/export</link>
      <description>{"uuid": "188608d3-3cd3-4202-bed4-4db50d706604", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-88617", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stackflag.bsky.social/post/3mvnmgpv4lc2r", "content": "CVE-2026-88617\nThe configuration query function in SmartAdmin version 3.30.0 does not check who is using it, so a remote hacker could upgrade their access level. This could let the attacker control settings they should not.\u2026\n\nToo many irrelevant or confusing CVEs? Use stackflag.com\n\n#CVE #infosec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-16T17:00:07.517534Z"}</description>
      <content:encoded>{"uuid": "188608d3-3cd3-4202-bed4-4db50d706604", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-88617", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stackflag.bsky.social/post/3mvnmgpv4lc2r", "content": "CVE-2026-88617\nThe configuration query function in SmartAdmin version 3.30.0 does not check who is using it, so a remote hacker could upgrade their access level. This could let the attacker control settings they should not.\u2026\n\nToo many irrelevant or confusing CVEs? Use stackflag.com\n\n#CVE #infosec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-16T17:00:07.517534Z"}</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/188608d3-3cd3-4202-bed4-4db50d706604/export</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
