<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent sightings.</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent sightings.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 20:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>f3927f9f-a6e7-4b2a-a812-71b6e1fec3f8</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/f3927f9f-a6e7-4b2a-a812-71b6e1fec3f8/export</link>
      <description>{"uuid": "f3927f9f-a6e7-4b2a-a812-71b6e1fec3f8", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-72201", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stackflag.bsky.social/post/3mtbciy57j22j", "content": "CVE-2026-72201 - linux\nThe Linux kernel's NTFS file system does not immediately check index entries for validity when reading from disk. This can lead to potential security risks if not addressed. To fix this issue,\u2026\n\nToo many irrelevant or confusing CVEs? Use stackflag.com\n\n#linux #CVE #infosec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-17T08:40:05.546585Z"}</description>
      <content:encoded>{"uuid": "f3927f9f-a6e7-4b2a-a812-71b6e1fec3f8", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-72201", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stackflag.bsky.social/post/3mtbciy57j22j", "content": "CVE-2026-72201 - linux\nThe Linux kernel's NTFS file system does not immediately check index entries for validity when reading from disk. This can lead to potential security risks if not addressed. To fix this issue,\u2026\n\nToo many irrelevant or confusing CVEs? Use stackflag.com\n\n#linux #CVE #infosec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-17T08:40:05.546585Z"}</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/f3927f9f-a6e7-4b2a-a812-71b6e1fec3f8/export</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
