<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent sightings.</title>
    <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent sightings.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 05:38:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>a5f163a7-3beb-41ca-8354-cc1c7519feea</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/a5f163a7-3beb-41ca-8354-cc1c7519feea/export</link>
      <description>{"uuid": "a5f163a7-3beb-41ca-8354-cc1c7519feea", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-84075", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stackflag.bsky.social/post/3mvtd5xayof2r", "content": "CVE-2026-84075 - guardium data protection\nThe 12.2 version of IBM Guardium Data Protection has a web component called ChangeTrackerServlet that does not check who is making the request. This could let someone on the\u2026\n\nToo many irrelevant or confusing CVEs? Use stackflag.com\n\n#ibm #CVE #infosec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-18T23:30:07.691276Z"}</description>
      <content:encoded>{"uuid": "a5f163a7-3beb-41ca-8354-cc1c7519feea", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-84075", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stackflag.bsky.social/post/3mvtd5xayof2r", "content": "CVE-2026-84075 - guardium data protection\nThe 12.2 version of IBM Guardium Data Protection has a web component called ChangeTrackerServlet that does not check who is making the request. This could let someone on the\u2026\n\nToo many irrelevant or confusing CVEs? Use stackflag.com\n\n#ibm #CVE #infosec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-18T23:30:07.691276Z"}</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/a5f163a7-3beb-41ca-8354-cc1c7519feea/export</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 23:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1b3b0a33-7217-4629-bc27-ca24cc700da0</title>
      <link>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/1b3b0a33-7217-4629-bc27-ca24cc700da0/export</link>
      <description>{"uuid": "1b3b0a33-7217-4629-bc27-ca24cc700da0", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-84075", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stemshop.bsky.social/post/3mvt6orbdrn2j", "content": "\ud83d\udea8 CVE-2026-84075 \u2014 CVSS 9.9 CRITICAL\n\nIBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to miss...\n\n\ud83d\udd0e https://stemshop.top/cve/CVE-2026-84075\n\n#CVE #CyberSecurity #InfoSec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-18T22:10:03.963857Z"}</description>
      <content:encoded>{"uuid": "1b3b0a33-7217-4629-bc27-ca24cc700da0", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2026-84075", "type": "seen", "source": "https://bsky.app/profile/stemshop.bsky.social/post/3mvt6orbdrn2j", "content": "\ud83d\udea8 CVE-2026-84075 \u2014 CVSS 9.9 CRITICAL\n\nIBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to miss...\n\n\ud83d\udd0e https://stemshop.top/cve/CVE-2026-84075\n\n#CVE #CyberSecurity #InfoSec", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-18T22:10:03.963857Z"}</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://vulnerability.circl.lu/sighting/1b3b0a33-7217-4629-bc27-ca24cc700da0/export</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 22:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
