{"vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "sightings": [{"uuid": "74857ead-4c27-4aa3-87b8-45292074d607", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "86ecb4e1-bb32-44d5-9f39-8a4673af8385", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://www.kyberturvallisuuskeskus.fi/fi/dnspooq-haavoittuvuusjoukko-laajalti-kaytossa-olevassa-dnsmasq-ohjelmistossa", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2021-01-20T11:02:54.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "d3f06afa-f7f1-4415-a280-d205a0e80ee1", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/true_secator/1346", "content": "\u0418\u0441\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u043b\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0438 JOSF \u0415\u0432\u0440\u0435\u0439\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0443\u043d\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u0432 \u0418\u0435\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0430\u043b\u0438\u043c\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0442\u0447\u0435\u0442 \u043e \u0432\u044b\u044f\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u043c \u043d\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0445 \u043e\u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u044c DNS-\u0441\u043f\u0443\u0444\u0438\u043d\u0433 (\u043c\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044f \u043a\u044d\u0448\u0430 DNS \u0441 \u0446\u0435\u043b\u044c\u044e \u0432\u043e\u0437\u0432\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044e \u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e IP-\u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441\u0430) \u0438 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 (RCE), \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u043e\u043d\u0438 \u043d\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0438 DNSpooq. \n\nDNSpooq \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0438\u0442 \u0438\u0437 7 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0432 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0440\u044b\u0442\u043e\u043c DNS-\u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0435 dnsmasq, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u0448\u0438\u0440\u043e\u043a\u043e \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f \u0432 IoT, \u0434\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0448\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u0438 \u043a\u043e\u0440\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0445, \u0434\u0430\u0436\u0435 \u0432 Android-\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0444\u043e\u043d\u0430\u0445. \u0412\u0441\u0435 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u044b \u043d\u0430 \u0434\u0432\u0430 \u0442\u0438\u043f\u0430 - \u0442\u0440\u0438 (CVE-2020-25684, 25685, 25686) \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0442 \u043e\u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0442\u044c DNS-\u0441\u043f\u0443\u0444\u0438\u043d\u0433, \u0430 \u0447\u0435\u0442\u044b\u0440\u0435 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 (CVE-2020-25681, 25682, 25683, 25687) \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0434\u044f\u0442 \u043a RCE \u0437\u0430 \u0441\u0447\u0435\u0442 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u0443\u0447\u0438. \u0421 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0449\u044c\u044e \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0431\u0438\u043d\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u043e\u0439\u0442\u043e\u0432 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0438\u0441\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u043c\u043e\u0433\u043b\u0438 \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e \u0441\u043d\u0438\u0437\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0438.\n\n\u0421\u0430\u043c\u043e\u0435 \u0441\u043c\u0435\u0448\u043d\u043e\u0435, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0432\u0441\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u044f\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u043a\u043e\u0440\u044f\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u0440\u0435\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0435\u0439 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u044b \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0442\u043e\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430 DNSSEC, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0440\u0430\u0437 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0430\u0437\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 DNS. \u0422\u0430\u043a\u0438\u043c \u043e\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043e\u043c, \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0441 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0435\u0439 dnsmasq \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044c DNSSEC, \u0447\u0442\u043e\u0431\u044b \u0438\u0437\u0431\u0435\u0436\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a \u0441 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043a DNSpooq, \u043d\u043e \u0442\u043e\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0435\u0442 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0434 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0440\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 DNS-\u0441\u043f\u0443\u0444\u0438\u043d\u0433\u0430.\n\n\u0412\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0442\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f DNSSEC \u0438\u0441\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0443\u044e\u0442 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0442\u044c dnsmaq \u0434\u043e \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0438, \u043d\u043e, \u043a\u0430\u043a \u043c\u044b \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u043c, \u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043a\u043e \u043d\u0435 \u0432\u0441\u0435 IoT-\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u043e\u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0430\u044e\u0442 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0438\u0432\u043a\u0438.\n\n\u0421\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0438 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u044b\u0445 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432 - \u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u0448\u0440\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b ASUS, Cisco, D-Link, \u0441\u043c\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0444\u043e\u043d\u044b Honor \u0438 Motorola, \u0438 \u0434\u0430\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0431\u0443\u0442\u0438\u0432 Red Hat. \u041a\u0440\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0436\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f.\n\n\u041f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u043f\u0438\u0441\u043e\u043a \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u044b\u0445 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0435\u043d \u043f\u043e \u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0435.", "creation_timestamp": "2021-01-20T14:02:00.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "72ffc507-cd93-4de0-8d51-a64dda0f946e", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/22430", "content": "\u203c CVE-2020-25686 \u203c\n\nA flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When receiving a query, dnsmasq does not check for an existing pending request for the same name and forwards a new request. By default, a maximum of 150 pending queries can be sent to upstream servers, so there can be at most 150 queries for the same name. This flaw allows an off-path attacker on the network to substantially reduce the number of attempts that it would have to perform to forge a reply and have it accepted by dnsmasq. This issue is mentioned in the \"Birthday Attacks\" section of RFC5452. If chained with CVE-2020-25684, the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2021-01-20T20:27:21.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "3134c236-4261-438a-b1c7-001dc3862dc4", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/22350", "content": "\u203c CVE-2020-25685 \u203c\n\nA flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1 when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2021-01-20T18:27:29.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "64226d37-3c3c-41f1-b5dc-10e48390e763", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/VulnerabilityNews/19765", "content": "A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1 when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.\nPublished at: January 20, 2021 at 05:15PM\nView on website", "creation_timestamp": "2021-01-20T18:46:27.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "deda579b-3e17-4740-bc28-e4c545f34f53", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/CyberSecurityTechnologies/2534", "content": "#Whitepaper\n#Threat_Research\n\"DNSpooq: Cache Poisoning and RCE in Popular DNS Forwarder dnsmasq\", 2021.\n// CVE-2020-25684, CVE-2020-25685, \nCVE-2020-25686 - DNS-spoofing; CVE-2020-25681, CVE-2020-25682, CVE-2020-25683, CVE-2020-25687 - RCE.", "creation_timestamp": "2021-01-21T02:28:28.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "82d72d9f-6fc0-41e6-ae73-4c66d406065d", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/CyberSecurityTechnologies/2605", "content": "#Analytics\nTop 10 Most Used Vulnerabilities of the Month (january 1-31)\nCVE-2021-3156:\nhttps://t.me/cybersecuritytechnologies/2577\nCVE-2020-16875:\nhttps://t.me/cybersecuritytechnologies/1751\nCVE-2020-29583:\nhttps://t.me/cybersecuritytechnologies/2386\nCVE-2021-2109:\nhttps://t.me/cybersecuritytechnologies/2540\nCVE-2020-17519:\nhttps://t.me/cybersecuritytechnologies/2473\nCVE-2020-25684/25685/25686:\nhttps://t.me/cybersecuritytechnologies/2534\nCVE-2021-3011:\nhttps://t.me/cybersecuritytechnologies/2447", "creation_timestamp": "2025-01-04T20:01:45.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "1c6b708b-9ae8-42bb-ba83-350ac0a8e817", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/reverseame/851", "content": "DNSpooq - dnsmasq cache poisoning (CVE-2020-25686, CVE-2020-25684, CVE-2020-25685) https://github.com/knqyf263/dnspooq", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-03T13:21:45.478764Z"}, {"uuid": "a57fc96b-edf1-4e0e-9f9c-0db39e7f6c97", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/reverseame/851", "content": "DNSpooq - dnsmasq cache poisoning (CVE-2020-25686, CVE-2020-25684, CVE-2020-25685) https://github.com/knqyf263/dnspooq", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-04T00:00:39.423134Z"}, {"uuid": "f68895de-4330-46cf-a84e-daea7dc8d496", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/reverseame/851", "content": "DNSpooq - dnsmasq cache poisoning (CVE-2020-25686, CVE-2020-25684, CVE-2020-25685) https://github.com/knqyf263/dnspooq", "creation_timestamp": "2026-07-29T12:03:00.367900Z"}, {"uuid": "85be3d4f-da8e-487f-bc73-65d86c050335", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/reverseame/851", "content": "DNSpooq - dnsmasq cache poisoning (CVE-2020-25686, CVE-2020-25684, CVE-2020-25685) https://github.com/knqyf263/dnspooq", "creation_timestamp": "2026-07-30T00:02:49.854561Z"}, {"uuid": "e1dca881-b353-4a51-a9df-a03391a4da4f", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/cissp/2224", "content": "#Whitepaper\n#Threat_Research\n\"DNSpooq: Cache Poisoning and RCE in Popular DNS Forwarder dnsmasq\", 2021.\n// CVE-2020-25684, CVE-2020-25685, \nCVE-2020-25686 - DNS-spoofing; CVE-2020-25681, CVE-2020-25682, CVE-2020-25683, CVE-2020-25687 - RCE.", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:01:03.978149Z"}, {"uuid": "36967d39-3e4a-4acd-8e39-92a7bc680ef3", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/6537", "content": "Cisco Security Advisory\nMultiple Vulnerabilities in dnsmasq DNS Forwarder Affecting Cisco Products: January 2021\n\nA set of previously unknown vulnerabilities in the DNS forwarder implementation of dnsmasq were disclosed on January 19, 2021. The vulnerabilities are collectively known as DNSpooq.\n\nExploitation of these vulnerabilities could result in remote code execution or denial of service (DoS), or may allow an attacker to more easily forge DNS answers that can poison DNS caches, depending on the specific vulnerability.\n\nMultiple Cisco\u00a0products are affected by these vulnerabilities.\n\nCisco\u00a0will release software updates that address these vulnerabilities. Any workarounds for a specific Cisco\u00a0product or service will be documented in the relevant Cisco\u00a0bugs, which are identified in the Vulnerable Products section of this advisory.\n\nNote: At the time of publication, no Cisco\u00a0products were found to be affected by the remote code execution and DoS vulnerabilities, which are identified by the following Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) IDs:\n* CVE-2020-25681 \n* CVE-2020-25682\n* CVE-2020-25683\n* CVE-2020-25687\n\nThis advisory is available at the following link:\nhttps://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-dnsmasq-dns-2021-c5mrdf3g\n\nSecurity Impact Rating:  Medium \nCVE: CVE-2020-25681,CVE-2020-25682,CVE-2020-25683,CVE-2020-25684,CVE-2020-25685,CVE-2020-25686,CVE-2020-25687\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:02:45.388963Z"}, {"uuid": "2e8aed0d-4aa3-4b29-90a4-0618f229523d", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/6537", "content": "Cisco Security Advisory\nMultiple Vulnerabilities in dnsmasq DNS Forwarder Affecting Cisco Products: January 2021\n\nA set of previously unknown vulnerabilities in the DNS forwarder implementation of dnsmasq were disclosed on January 19, 2021. The vulnerabilities are collectively known as DNSpooq.\n\nExploitation of these vulnerabilities could result in remote code execution or denial of service (DoS), or may allow an attacker to more easily forge DNS answers that can poison DNS caches, depending on the specific vulnerability.\n\nMultiple Cisco\u00a0products are affected by these vulnerabilities.\n\nCisco\u00a0will release software updates that address these vulnerabilities. Any workarounds for a specific Cisco\u00a0product or service will be documented in the relevant Cisco\u00a0bugs, which are identified in the Vulnerable Products section of this advisory.\n\nNote: At the time of publication, no Cisco\u00a0products were found to be affected by the remote code execution and DoS vulnerabilities, which are identified by the following Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) IDs:\n* CVE-2020-25681 \n* CVE-2020-25682\n* CVE-2020-25683\n* CVE-2020-25687\n\nThis advisory is available at the following link:\nhttps://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-dnsmasq-dns-2021-c5mrdf3g\n\nSecurity Impact Rating:  Medium \nCVE: CVE-2020-25681,CVE-2020-25682,CVE-2020-25683,CVE-2020-25684,CVE-2020-25685,CVE-2020-25686,CVE-2020-25687\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:03:20.662433Z"}, {"uuid": "3ab45384-6312-457e-b9bb-a7d75301d907", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2020-25684", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/cissp/2224", "content": "#Whitepaper\n#Threat_Research\n\"DNSpooq: Cache Poisoning and RCE in Popular DNS Forwarder dnsmasq\", 2021.\n// CVE-2020-25684, CVE-2020-25685, \nCVE-2020-25686 - DNS-spoofing; CVE-2020-25681, CVE-2020-25682, CVE-2020-25683, CVE-2020-25687 - RCE.", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:04:53.943981Z"}]}