{"vulnerability": "CVE-2021-3863", "sightings": [{"uuid": "e3d97ffb-3d2c-4a60-bd89-1d9ac9842c13", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38639", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/alexmakus/4291", "content": "\u0422\u0430\u043a, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043b\u0438, \u0442\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u043e Apple \u0430\u043f\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0442\u044b \u0441 \u0444\u0438\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043a\u0430\u0442\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c? \u0412\u0447\u0435\u0440\u0430 patch Tuesday \u0443 Microsoft, \u043a\u0443\u0447\u0430 \u0444\u0438\u043a\u0441\u043e\u0432, \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0435, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0435 \u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0443\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0440\u0443\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f:\n\nhttps://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-40444\n\nhttps://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36965\n\nhttps://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-38639\n\nhttps://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36975\n\n\u0412\u044b \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0435\u0442\u0435, \u0432\u043e\u0442 \u044d\u0442\u043e \u0432\u0441\u0451.", "creation_timestamp": "2021-09-15T03:57:10.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "5fad89ee-7ebc-4ae7-ad13-9e82269f9151", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38631", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cKure/7972", "content": "\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0 Microsoft Fixes Exchange Server Zero-Day. November security update contains patches for 55 bugs \u2014 including six zero-days across various products including CVE-2021-42298, Exchange Server (CVE-2021-42321), Microsoft Excel (CVE-2021-42292), CVE-2021-38631\u00a0and\u00a0CVE-2021-41371\u00a0\u2014 involve Microsoft's RDP while flaws \u2014\u00a0CVE-2021-43208\u00a0and\u00a0CVE-2021-43209\u00a0are RCEs in Microsoft's 3D Viewer Remote technology.", "creation_timestamp": "2021-11-10T12:44:04.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "4a7006bc-5b6d-4db3-824c-8f1870793d56", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38633", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/arpsyndicate/1598", "content": "#ExploitObserverAlert\n\nCVE-2021-36955\n\nDESCRIPTION: Exploit Observer has 5 entries related to CVE-2021-36955. Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-36963, CVE-2021-38633.\n\nFIRST-EPSS: 0.005580000\nNVD-IS: 5.9\nNVD-ES: 1.8", "creation_timestamp": "2023-12-10T02:09:23.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "e9576d06-f6c2-486c-b55b-73ebdf3b27df", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38631", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/true_secator/2302", "content": "\u200b\u200bMicrosoft \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0442\u0440\u0430\u0434\u0438\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 PatchTuesday, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0432 6 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 0-day \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0438 \u0435\u0449\u0435 49 \u0432\u0430\u0436\u043d\u044b\u0445, \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0449\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043e 55: \u0432 \u0442\u043e\u043c \u0447\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0435 20 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439, \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0441 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0439, 2 - \u0441 \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043c \u0444\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0446\u0438\u0439 \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438, 15 - \u0441 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430, 10 - \u0441 \u0440\u0430\u0441\u043a\u0440\u044b\u0442\u0438\u0435\u043c \u0438\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438, 3 - \u0441 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437\u043e\u043c \u0432 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438, 4 - \u0441\u043e \u0441\u043f\u0443\u0444\u0438\u043d\u0433\u043e\u043c.\n \n\u0422\u0435\u043a\u0443\u0449\u0438\u0439 Patch \u0437\u0430\u043a\u0440\u044b\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442 2 \u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e \u044d\u043a\u0441\u043f\u043b\u0443\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0440\u0443\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435\u0441\u044f \u0432 \u0434\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0435 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438: CVE-2021-42292 (\u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441 \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u043e\u043c \u0444\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0446\u0438\u0439 \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 Microsoft Excel) \u0438 CVE-2021-42321 (\u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0432 Microsoft Exchange Server).\n \n\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0447\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0443 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0441 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0440\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043b\u0438\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0432 Microsoft Exchange \u043e\u0431\u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u0443\u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0445\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0440\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u043d\u043a\u0443\u0440\u0441\u0430 Tianfu Cup, \u043e \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c \u043c\u044b \u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043b\u0438 \u0432 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u043b\u043e\u043c \u043c\u0435\u0441\u044f\u0446\u0435.\n \n\u0420\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0447\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u0441\u043a\u0440\u044b\u0432\u0430\u044e\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0438\u043c \u0438\u043d\u0446\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u043e\u0432, \u043e\u0434\u043d\u0430\u043a\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044f\u044e\u0442, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438\u043b\u0438 \u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0445\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0435\u0440 \u0438 \u0441\u0432\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u044b \u0441 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0432 Exchange 2016 \u0438 2019, \u0437\u0430\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0433\u0438\u0432\u0430\u044f \u043b\u043e\u043a\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0439 Microsoft Exchange Server, \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0438 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0435\u0440\u044b, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0435 \u043a\u043b\u0438\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0432 \u0433\u0438\u0431\u0440\u0438\u0434\u043d\u043e\u043c \u0440\u0435\u0436\u0438\u043c\u0435 Exchange. \u041d\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0435\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043d\u0438\u043c \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0437\u0438\u0438 \u0421\u0428\u0410 \u0438 \u0438\u0445 \u0441\u043e\u044e\u0437\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432, \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u044f \u0415\u0421, \u0412\u0435\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0431\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044e \u0438 \u041d\u0410\u0422\u041e, \u0432 \u0430\u0434\u0440\u0435\u0441 \u043a\u0438\u0442\u0430\u0439\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u043e\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e \u0448\u0438\u0440\u043e\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0441\u0448\u0442\u0430\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0445\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0440\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043a\u0430\u043c\u043f\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0438 \u043d\u0430 Microsoft Exchange.\n \n\u0412\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0439 0-day \u0431\u044b\u043b \u0437\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d \u0432 \u043f\u043e\u043f\u0443\u043b\u044f\u0440\u043d\u043e\u043c \u0438\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 Microsoft Excel \u0438 \u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d \u043a\u0430\u043a \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0444\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0446\u0438\u0439, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u044f \u043f\u043e\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044f\u0442\u044c \u043a\u043e\u0434 \u0441 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0449\u044c\u044e \u0441\u043f\u0435\u0446\u0438\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e \u0441\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0442\u0430\u0431\u043b\u0438\u0446. \u0414\u044b\u0440\u0430 \u0431\u044b\u043b\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u0441\u043e\u0431\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u043c \u0426\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043c \u0430\u043d\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0443\u0433\u0440\u043e\u0437 \u0438 \u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b\u0430\u0441\u044c \u0432 \u0437\u043b\u043e\u043d\u0430\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0430\u0445, \u043d\u043e \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0434\u043e\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0441\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439.\n \n\u041d\u043e\u044f\u0431\u0440\u044c\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u0442\u0447 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0441\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0438\u0442 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0434\u043b\u044f CVE-2021-3711, \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0431\u0443\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0430 \u0432 \u0444\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0434\u0435\u0448\u0438\u0444\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f SM2 OpenSSL, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0436\u0438\u043b\u0441\u044f \u0432 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0446\u0435 \u0430\u0432\u0433\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430 2021 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0438 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0431\u044b\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0443\u043c\u044b\u0448\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0443\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u0438 \u043e\u0442\u043a\u0430\u0437\u0430 \u0432 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u0435. \u0441\u043e\u0441\u0442\u043e\u044f\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f (DoS).\n \n\u0414\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0435 \u0432\u0430\u0436\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u044e\u0442 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043a \u0432 Chakra Scripting Engine (CVE-2021-42279), Microsoft Defender (CVE-2021-42298), Microsoft Virtual Machine Bus (CVE-2021-26443), RDP (CVE-2021-38631 \u0438 CVE-2021-41371), \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0445 3D-\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0430 (CVE-2021-43208 \u0438 CVE-2021-43209).\n \n\u041e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f Microsoft Patch Tuesday \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u044e\u0442 \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043a\u043e\u0432, \u0437\u0430\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0433\u0438\u0432\u0430\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0445 Azure, Microsoft Edge, Visual Studio \u0438 \u0434\u0440\u0443\u0433\u0438\u0445 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u043e\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0442\u043e\u0432 Windows.\n \n\u041a\u0440\u043e\u043c\u0435 \u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e, \u0432 Patch Tuesday \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0436\u0435 \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043e\u0442 Adobe, \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043b\u044f\u044e\u0449\u0438\u0435 \u043a\u0430\u043a \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0443\u043c 4 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043a\u0430 \u0432 \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043a\u0442\u0430, \u0432 \u0442\u043e\u043c \u0447\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0435 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d \u0441\u0430\u043c\u044b\u0439 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u044c\u0435\u0437\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043d\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u043a CVE-2021-39858 \u0432 RoboHelp Server (RHS2020.0.1 \u0438 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u043d\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0434 Windows) \u0438 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u0443\u0447\u0438\u043b \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u0443 \u00ab\u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0439\u00bb, \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0430\u0435\u0442 \u043a\u043e\u0440\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u0443\u044e \u0441\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0443 \u0430\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0430\u043c \u0441 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0430.\n \n\u041f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044c \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439 \u0438 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0449\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0440\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0446\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u043e \u043e\u0442\u0434\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u043c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c\u0430\u043c \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u043d\u043e\u044f\u0431\u0440\u044c 2021 \u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d \u0437\u0434\u0435\u0441\u044c.\n \n\u041e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0434\u043b\u044f Mac \u043f\u043e\u043a\u0430 \u0435\u0449\u0435 \u043d\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0449\u0435\u043d\u044b, \u0434\u0430\u0436\u0435 \u043d\u0435\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0442\u043e, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c Excel \u0437\u0430\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0433\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0435\u0442 Microsoft Office \u0434\u043b\u044f macOS.\n \n\u0420\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0443\u0435\u043c \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0435\u043b\u044c\u0446\u0430\u043c Windows \u0431\u0435\u0437 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u043c\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0442\u044c \u0432\u0441\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0443\u043f\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u0430 \u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044f\u043c macOS \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043d\u0430 \u0443\u0434\u0430\u0447\u0443 \u0438 \u0442\u0435\u0440\u043f\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435.", "creation_timestamp": "2021-11-10T13:12:56.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "de597a8d-3941-454d-9235-144c0d2c6619", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38638", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/28878", "content": "\u203c CVE-2021-38638 \u203c\n\nWindows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2021-38628.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2021-09-15T16:22:17.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "63792d4a-5250-425d-9e09-051b7329eecd", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-3863", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/30767", "content": "\u203c CVE-2021-3863 \u203c\n\nsnipe-it is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2021-10-19T16:33:33.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "eb89e007-8f19-457a-b5d1-246ee7e490af", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38639", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/23976", "content": "atpost that a trio of local privilege-escalation vulnerabilities in the Windows Common Log File System Driver (CVE-2021-36955, CVE-2021-36963, CVE-2021-38633) are also noteworthy, all of them being listed as \u201cexploitation more likely.\u201d\n\n\u201cLocal priv-esc vulnerabilities are a key component of almost every successful cyberattack, especially for the likes of ransomware operators who abuse this kind of exploit to gain the highest level of access,\u201d Breen said via email. \u201cThis allows them to disable antivirus, delete backups and ensure their encryptors can reach even the most sensitive of files.\u201d\n\nOne glaring example of that emerged in May, when hundreds of millions of Dell users were found to be at risk\u00a0from kernel-privilege bugs. The bugs lurked undisclosed for 12 years, and could have allowed attackers to bypass security products, execute code and pivot to other parts of the network for lateral movement.\n\nThe three exploits Microsoft patched on Tuesday aren\u2019t remote, meaning that attackers need to have achieved code execution by other means. One such way would be via CVE-2021-40444.\n\nTwo other vulnerabilities \u2013 CVE-2021-38639\u00a0and CVE-2021-36975, both Win32k escalation of privilege flaws \u2013 have also been listed as \u201cexploitation more likely\u201d and, together, cover the full range of supported Windows versions.\n\nBreen said that he\u2019s starting to feel like a broken record when it comes to privilege escalation vulnerabilities. They\u2019re not rated as high a severity risk as RCE bugs, but \u201cthese local exploits can be the linchpin in the post-exploitation phases of an experienced attacker,\u201d he asserted. \u201cIf you can block them here you have the potential to significantly limit their damage.\u201d\n\nhe added, \u201cIf we assume a determined attacker will be able to infect a victim\u2019s device through social engineering or other techniques, I would argue that patching priv-esc vulnerabilities is even more important than patching some other remote code-execution vulns,\u201d Breen said. See Also: Hacking Stories: Andrian Lamo \u2013 The \u2018homeless\u2019 HackerStill, This RCE Is Pretty ImportantDanny Kim, a principal architect at Virsec who spent time at Microsoft during his graduate work on the OS security development team, wants security teams to pay attention to CVE-2021-36965\u00a0\u2013 an important-rated Windows WLAN AutoConfig Service RCE vulnerability \u2013 given its combination of severity (with a CVSS:3.0 base score of 8.8); no requirement for privilege escalation/user interaction to exploit; and breadth of affected Windows versions.\n\nThe WLAN AutoConfig Service is part of the mechanism that Windows 10 uses to choose the wireless network a computer will connect to, and to the Windows Scripting Engine, respectively.\n\nThe patch fixes a flaw that could allow network-adjacent attackers to run their code on affected systems at system level.\n\nAs the Zero Day Initiative explained, that means an attacker could \u201ccompletely take over the target \u2013 provided they are on an adjacent network.\u201d That would come in quite handy in a coffee-shop attack, where multiple people use an unsecured Wi-Fi network.\n\nThis one \u201cis especially alarming,\u201d Kim said: Think SolarWinds\u00a0and PrintNightmare.\n\n\u201cAs recent trends have shown, remote code execution-based attacks are the most critical vulnerabilities that can lead to the largest negative impact on an enterprise, as we have seen in the Solarwinds and PrintNightmare attacks,\u201d he said in an email.\n\nKim said that in spite of the exploit code maturity being currently unproven, the vulnerability has been confirmed to exist, leaving an opening for attackers.\n\n\u201cIt specifically relies on the attacker being located in the same network, so it would not be surprising to see this vulnerability used in combination with another CVE/attack to achieve an attacker\u2019s end goal,\u201d he predicted. \u201cRemote code execution attacks can lead to unverified processes running on the server workload, only highlighting the need for constant, deter[...]", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:02:22.804229Z"}, {"uuid": "668cfed3-1364-47e0-9b80-319ab29d69f1", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38631", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/Unidentified_TM/1299", "content": "< \u0646\u0648\u0627\u0645\u0628\u0631 2021 \u067e\u0686 \u0633\u0647 \u0634\u0646\u0628\u0647 >\n\n \u0645\u0627\u06cc\u06a9\u0631\u0648\u0633\u0627\u0641\u062a \u067e\u0686 \u0647\u0627\u06cc \u0627\u0645\u0646\u06cc\u062a\u06cc \u0631\u0627 \u0628\u0631\u0627\u06cc 55 \u0622\u0633\u06cc\u0628\u200c\u067e\u0630\u06cc\u0631\u06cc \u062c\u062f\u06cc\u062f \u0645\u0646\u062a\u0634\u0631 \u0645\u06cc\u200c\u06a9\u0646\u062f\u060c \u0627\u0632 \u062c\u0645\u0644\u0647 \u062f\u0648 \u0646\u0642\u0635 \u0632\u06cc\u0631\u0648-\u062f\u06cc \u062f\u0631 \u0627\u06a9\u0633\u0644 (CVE-2021-42292) \u0648 Exchange Server (CVE-2021-42321).\n\nCVE-2021-43208 (CVSS score: 7.8) - 3D Viewer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\nCVE-2021-43209 (CVSS score: 7.8) - 3D Viewer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\nCVE-2021-38631 (CVSS score: 4.4) - Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\nCVE-2021-41371 (CVSS score: 4.4) - Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n\n\n@Unidentified_TM", "creation_timestamp": "2026-07-26T07:01:49.079657Z"}, {"uuid": "07669486-f4ea-44b0-8b63-d8cde7790d7a", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38631", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/Unidentified_TM/1299", "content": "< \u0646\u0648\u0627\u0645\u0628\u0631 2021 \u067e\u0686 \u0633\u0647 \u0634\u0646\u0628\u0647 >\n\n \u0645\u0627\u06cc\u06a9\u0631\u0648\u0633\u0627\u0641\u062a \u067e\u0686 \u0647\u0627\u06cc \u0627\u0645\u0646\u06cc\u062a\u06cc \u0631\u0627 \u0628\u0631\u0627\u06cc 55 \u0622\u0633\u06cc\u0628\u200c\u067e\u0630\u06cc\u0631\u06cc \u062c\u062f\u06cc\u062f \u0645\u0646\u062a\u0634\u0631 \u0645\u06cc\u200c\u06a9\u0646\u062f\u060c \u0627\u0632 \u062c\u0645\u0644\u0647 \u062f\u0648 \u0646\u0642\u0635 \u0632\u06cc\u0631\u0648-\u062f\u06cc \u062f\u0631 \u0627\u06a9\u0633\u0644 (CVE-2021-42292) \u0648 Exchange Server (CVE-2021-42321).\n\nCVE-2021-43208 (CVSS score: 7.8) - 3D Viewer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\nCVE-2021-43209 (CVSS score: 7.8) - 3D Viewer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\nCVE-2021-38631 (CVSS score: 4.4) - Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\nCVE-2021-41371 (CVSS score: 4.4) - Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n\n\n@Unidentified_TM", "creation_timestamp": "2026-07-27T00:01:33.410356Z"}, {"uuid": "0c75d662-fae7-44f1-bf5f-6f9e0b0e60de", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38631", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/Unidentified_TM/1299", "content": "< \u0646\u0648\u0627\u0645\u0628\u0631 2021 \u067e\u0686 \u0633\u0647 \u0634\u0646\u0628\u0647 >\n\n \u0645\u0627\u06cc\u06a9\u0631\u0648\u0633\u0627\u0641\u062a \u067e\u0686 \u0647\u0627\u06cc \u0627\u0645\u0646\u06cc\u062a\u06cc \u0631\u0627 \u0628\u0631\u0627\u06cc 55 \u0622\u0633\u06cc\u0628\u200c\u067e\u0630\u06cc\u0631\u06cc \u062c\u062f\u06cc\u062f \u0645\u0646\u062a\u0634\u0631 \u0645\u06cc\u200c\u06a9\u0646\u062f\u060c \u0627\u0632 \u062c\u0645\u0644\u0647 \u062f\u0648 \u0646\u0642\u0635 \u0632\u06cc\u0631\u0648-\u062f\u06cc \u062f\u0631 \u0627\u06a9\u0633\u0644 (CVE-2021-42292) \u0648 Exchange Server (CVE-2021-42321).\n\nCVE-2021-43208 (CVSS score: 7.8) - 3D Viewer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\nCVE-2021-43209 (CVSS score: 7.8) - 3D Viewer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\nCVE-2021-38631 (CVSS score: 4.4) - Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\nCVE-2021-41371 (CVSS score: 4.4) - Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability\n\n\n@Unidentified_TM", "creation_timestamp": "2026-07-29T00:00:08.851304Z"}, {"uuid": "5ed272cf-0f59-4ec5-8222-2afebf1f8456", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38633", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/23976", "content": "atpost that a trio of local privilege-escalation vulnerabilities in the Windows Common Log File System Driver (CVE-2021-36955, CVE-2021-36963, CVE-2021-38633) are also noteworthy, all of them being listed as \u201cexploitation more likely.\u201d\n\n\u201cLocal priv-esc vulnerabilities are a key component of almost every successful cyberattack, especially for the likes of ransomware operators who abuse this kind of exploit to gain the highest level of access,\u201d Breen said via email. \u201cThis allows them to disable antivirus, delete backups and ensure their encryptors can reach even the most sensitive of files.\u201d\n\nOne glaring example of that emerged in May, when hundreds of millions of Dell users were found to be at risk\u00a0from kernel-privilege bugs. The bugs lurked undisclosed for 12 years, and could have allowed attackers to bypass security products, execute code and pivot to other parts of the network for lateral movement.\n\nThe three exploits Microsoft patched on Tuesday aren\u2019t remote, meaning that attackers need to have achieved code execution by other means. One such way would be via CVE-2021-40444.\n\nTwo other vulnerabilities \u2013 CVE-2021-38639\u00a0and CVE-2021-36975, both Win32k escalation of privilege flaws \u2013 have also been listed as \u201cexploitation more likely\u201d and, together, cover the full range of supported Windows versions.\n\nBreen said that he\u2019s starting to feel like a broken record when it comes to privilege escalation vulnerabilities. They\u2019re not rated as high a severity risk as RCE bugs, but \u201cthese local exploits can be the linchpin in the post-exploitation phases of an experienced attacker,\u201d he asserted. \u201cIf you can block them here you have the potential to significantly limit their damage.\u201d\n\nhe added, \u201cIf we assume a determined attacker will be able to infect a victim\u2019s device through social engineering or other techniques, I would argue that patching priv-esc vulnerabilities is even more important than patching some other remote code-execution vulns,\u201d Breen said. See Also: Hacking Stories: Andrian Lamo \u2013 The \u2018homeless\u2019 HackerStill, This RCE Is Pretty ImportantDanny Kim, a principal architect at Virsec who spent time at Microsoft during his graduate work on the OS security development team, wants security teams to pay attention to CVE-2021-36965\u00a0\u2013 an important-rated Windows WLAN AutoConfig Service RCE vulnerability \u2013 given its combination of severity (with a CVSS:3.0 base score of 8.8); no requirement for privilege escalation/user interaction to exploit; and breadth of affected Windows versions.\n\nThe WLAN AutoConfig Service is part of the mechanism that Windows 10 uses to choose the wireless network a computer will connect to, and to the Windows Scripting Engine, respectively.\n\nThe patch fixes a flaw that could allow network-adjacent attackers to run their code on affected systems at system level.\n\nAs the Zero Day Initiative explained, that means an attacker could \u201ccompletely take over the target \u2013 provided they are on an adjacent network.\u201d That would come in quite handy in a coffee-shop attack, where multiple people use an unsecured Wi-Fi network.\n\nThis one \u201cis especially alarming,\u201d Kim said: Think SolarWinds\u00a0and PrintNightmare.\n\n\u201cAs recent trends have shown, remote code execution-based attacks are the most critical vulnerabilities that can lead to the largest negative impact on an enterprise, as we have seen in the Solarwinds and PrintNightmare attacks,\u201d he said in an email.\n\nKim said that in spite of the exploit code maturity being currently unproven, the vulnerability has been confirmed to exist, leaving an opening for attackers.\n\n\u201cIt specifically relies on the attacker being located in the same network, so it would not be surprising to see this vulnerability used in combination with another CVE/attack to achieve an attacker\u2019s end goal,\u201d he predicted. \u201cRemote code execution attacks can lead to unverified processes running on the server workload, only highlighting the need for constant, deter[...]", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:02:22.580979Z"}, {"uuid": "1f33fee6-fc6f-4e42-b5d2-aa38877acafc", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38633", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/23976", "content": "atpost that a trio of local privilege-escalation vulnerabilities in the Windows Common Log File System Driver (CVE-2021-36955, CVE-2021-36963, CVE-2021-38633) are also noteworthy, all of them being listed as \u201cexploitation more likely.\u201d\n\n\u201cLocal priv-esc vulnerabilities are a key component of almost every successful cyberattack, especially for the likes of ransomware operators who abuse this kind of exploit to gain the highest level of access,\u201d Breen said via email. \u201cThis allows them to disable antivirus, delete backups and ensure their encryptors can reach even the most sensitive of files.\u201d\n\nOne glaring example of that emerged in May, when hundreds of millions of Dell users were found to be at risk\u00a0from kernel-privilege bugs. The bugs lurked undisclosed for 12 years, and could have allowed attackers to bypass security products, execute code and pivot to other parts of the network for lateral movement.\n\nThe three exploits Microsoft patched on Tuesday aren\u2019t remote, meaning that attackers need to have achieved code execution by other means. One such way would be via CVE-2021-40444.\n\nTwo other vulnerabilities \u2013 CVE-2021-38639\u00a0and CVE-2021-36975, both Win32k escalation of privilege flaws \u2013 have also been listed as \u201cexploitation more likely\u201d and, together, cover the full range of supported Windows versions.\n\nBreen said that he\u2019s starting to feel like a broken record when it comes to privilege escalation vulnerabilities. They\u2019re not rated as high a severity risk as RCE bugs, but \u201cthese local exploits can be the linchpin in the post-exploitation phases of an experienced attacker,\u201d he asserted. \u201cIf you can block them here you have the potential to significantly limit their damage.\u201d\n\nhe added, \u201cIf we assume a determined attacker will be able to infect a victim\u2019s device through social engineering or other techniques, I would argue that patching priv-esc vulnerabilities is even more important than patching some other remote code-execution vulns,\u201d Breen said. See Also: Hacking Stories: Andrian Lamo \u2013 The \u2018homeless\u2019 HackerStill, This RCE Is Pretty ImportantDanny Kim, a principal architect at Virsec who spent time at Microsoft during his graduate work on the OS security development team, wants security teams to pay attention to CVE-2021-36965\u00a0\u2013 an important-rated Windows WLAN AutoConfig Service RCE vulnerability \u2013 given its combination of severity (with a CVSS:3.0 base score of 8.8); no requirement for privilege escalation/user interaction to exploit; and breadth of affected Windows versions.\n\nThe WLAN AutoConfig Service is part of the mechanism that Windows 10 uses to choose the wireless network a computer will connect to, and to the Windows Scripting Engine, respectively.\n\nThe patch fixes a flaw that could allow network-adjacent attackers to run their code on affected systems at system level.\n\nAs the Zero Day Initiative explained, that means an attacker could \u201ccompletely take over the target \u2013 provided they are on an adjacent network.\u201d That would come in quite handy in a coffee-shop attack, where multiple people use an unsecured Wi-Fi network.\n\nThis one \u201cis especially alarming,\u201d Kim said: Think SolarWinds\u00a0and PrintNightmare.\n\n\u201cAs recent trends have shown, remote code execution-based attacks are the most critical vulnerabilities that can lead to the largest negative impact on an enterprise, as we have seen in the Solarwinds and PrintNightmare attacks,\u201d he said in an email.\n\nKim said that in spite of the exploit code maturity being currently unproven, the vulnerability has been confirmed to exist, leaving an opening for attackers.\n\n\u201cIt specifically relies on the attacker being located in the same network, so it would not be surprising to see this vulnerability used in combination with another CVE/attack to achieve an attacker\u2019s end goal,\u201d he predicted. \u201cRemote code execution attacks can lead to unverified processes running on the server workload, only highlighting the need for constant, deter[...]", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:52.311486Z"}, {"uuid": "2e734578-c2bc-4e17-b2c0-651b2bdabf3b", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2021-38639", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/23976", "content": "atpost that a trio of local privilege-escalation vulnerabilities in the Windows Common Log File System Driver (CVE-2021-36955, CVE-2021-36963, CVE-2021-38633) are also noteworthy, all of them being listed as \u201cexploitation more likely.\u201d\n\n\u201cLocal priv-esc vulnerabilities are a key component of almost every successful cyberattack, especially for the likes of ransomware operators who abuse this kind of exploit to gain the highest level of access,\u201d Breen said via email. \u201cThis allows them to disable antivirus, delete backups and ensure their encryptors can reach even the most sensitive of files.\u201d\n\nOne glaring example of that emerged in May, when hundreds of millions of Dell users were found to be at risk\u00a0from kernel-privilege bugs. The bugs lurked undisclosed for 12 years, and could have allowed attackers to bypass security products, execute code and pivot to other parts of the network for lateral movement.\n\nThe three exploits Microsoft patched on Tuesday aren\u2019t remote, meaning that attackers need to have achieved code execution by other means. One such way would be via CVE-2021-40444.\n\nTwo other vulnerabilities \u2013 CVE-2021-38639\u00a0and CVE-2021-36975, both Win32k escalation of privilege flaws \u2013 have also been listed as \u201cexploitation more likely\u201d and, together, cover the full range of supported Windows versions.\n\nBreen said that he\u2019s starting to feel like a broken record when it comes to privilege escalation vulnerabilities. They\u2019re not rated as high a severity risk as RCE bugs, but \u201cthese local exploits can be the linchpin in the post-exploitation phases of an experienced attacker,\u201d he asserted. \u201cIf you can block them here you have the potential to significantly limit their damage.\u201d\n\nhe added, \u201cIf we assume a determined attacker will be able to infect a victim\u2019s device through social engineering or other techniques, I would argue that patching priv-esc vulnerabilities is even more important than patching some other remote code-execution vulns,\u201d Breen said. See Also: Hacking Stories: Andrian Lamo \u2013 The \u2018homeless\u2019 HackerStill, This RCE Is Pretty ImportantDanny Kim, a principal architect at Virsec who spent time at Microsoft during his graduate work on the OS security development team, wants security teams to pay attention to CVE-2021-36965\u00a0\u2013 an important-rated Windows WLAN AutoConfig Service RCE vulnerability \u2013 given its combination of severity (with a CVSS:3.0 base score of 8.8); no requirement for privilege escalation/user interaction to exploit; and breadth of affected Windows versions.\n\nThe WLAN AutoConfig Service is part of the mechanism that Windows 10 uses to choose the wireless network a computer will connect to, and to the Windows Scripting Engine, respectively.\n\nThe patch fixes a flaw that could allow network-adjacent attackers to run their code on affected systems at system level.\n\nAs the Zero Day Initiative explained, that means an attacker could \u201ccompletely take over the target \u2013 provided they are on an adjacent network.\u201d That would come in quite handy in a coffee-shop attack, where multiple people use an unsecured Wi-Fi network.\n\nThis one \u201cis especially alarming,\u201d Kim said: Think SolarWinds\u00a0and PrintNightmare.\n\n\u201cAs recent trends have shown, remote code execution-based attacks are the most critical vulnerabilities that can lead to the largest negative impact on an enterprise, as we have seen in the Solarwinds and PrintNightmare attacks,\u201d he said in an email.\n\nKim said that in spite of the exploit code maturity being currently unproven, the vulnerability has been confirmed to exist, leaving an opening for attackers.\n\n\u201cIt specifically relies on the attacker being located in the same network, so it would not be surprising to see this vulnerability used in combination with another CVE/attack to achieve an attacker\u2019s end goal,\u201d he predicted. \u201cRemote code execution attacks can lead to unverified processes running on the server workload, only highlighting the need for constant, deter[...]", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:52.815984Z"}]}