{"vulnerability": "cve-2022-2200", "sightings": [{"uuid": "61beb8c3-68ce-44b6-ab72-2c6d164b874f", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "86ecb4e1-bb32-44d5-9f39-8a4673af8385", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22005", "type": "seen", "source": "https://www.govcert.gov.hk/en/alerts_detail.php?id=736", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-09T04:00:00.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "0e91d295-32b0-455c-9fc1-0a3198c3ee3b", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22005", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/poxek/1463", "content": "Microsoft Sharepoint RCE (CVE-2022-22005)\nhttps://hnd3884.github.io/posts/cve-2022-22005-microsoft-sharepoint-RCE/\n\n\u0414\u043d\u0435\u0432\u043d\u0438\u043a \u0411\u0435\u0437\u043e\u043f\u0430\u0441\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430 \ud83d\udee1", "creation_timestamp": "2022-05-03T11:01:42.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "46e8e82b-5179-4df8-b1ff-155429703944", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22005", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "Telegram/clKl3auU8QoglkpPj9_p4mcvmByiEoEwK1DFowLa23yPaC7g", "content": "", "creation_timestamp": "2022-04-25T06:22:57.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "cc946074-504e-4be9-8299-97e20b15ba86", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22005", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/NeKaspersky/1786", "content": "\u041e\u0447\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0439 patch tuesday \u0441 \u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043d\u044b\u043c\u0438 \u0430\u043f\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0442\u0430\u043c\u0438. \u0427\u0442\u043e \u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043d\u043e, Microsoft \u043d\u0435 \u0432 \u0446\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0440\u0435 \u0432\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f.\n\nMozilla \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0432 \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0435\u043c \u0431\u0440\u0430\u0443\u0437\u0435\u0440\u0435 Firefox \u0434\u044e\u0436\u0438\u043d\u0443 \u0443\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0439. \u041d\u0430\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0441\u043d\u044b\u043c \u044f\u0432\u043b\u044f\u0435\u0442\u0441\u044f CVE-2022-22753. \u0412 \u0441\u043b\u0443\u0436\u0431\u0435-\u0430\u043f\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0435 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u0443\u0437\u0435\u0440\u0430 \u043d\u0430\u0448\u043b\u0438 \u00abTime-of-Check Time-of-Use\u00bb \u0431\u0430\u0433, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u044b\u0439 \u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043b\u044c\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0440\u0443\u043a\u0430\u0445 \u043c\u043e\u0433 \u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0447\u044c \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0441\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0438 \u0434\u043e \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u044b.\n\nAdobe \u0432\u044b\u043f\u0443\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043b\u0430 \u0430\u043f\u0434\u0435\u0439\u0442\u044b \u0434\u043b\u044f 17 CVE \u0432 \u0442\u0430\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043a\u0442\u0430\u0445 \u043a\u0430\u043a Premiere Rush, Illustrator, Photoshop, After Effects \u0438 Creative Cloud Desktop. \u041f\u044f\u0442\u044c \u0438\u0437 \u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043e\u0446\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0432\u0430\u044e\u0442\u0441\u044f \u043a\u0430\u043a \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0438 \u0432\u0435\u0434\u0443\u0442 \u043a RCE.\n\n\u0422\u0435\u043f\u0435\u0440\u044c \u0442\u0440\u0430\u0434\u0438\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e \u043a Microsoft:\n\u2022 CVE-2022-21989 \u2014 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0439, \u043a\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0435, \u043f\u043e \u0441\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043c Microsoft, \u043d\u0435 \u0444\u0430\u043a\u0442 \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442;\n\u2022 CVE-2022-21996 \u2014 \u0431\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0435 \u0440\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0447\u0435\u0435 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u044b\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0438\u0439, \u0442\u0440\u0435\u0431\u0443\u0435\u0442 \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0438\u044e;\n\u2022 CVE-2022-22005 \u2014 RCE \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0445 SharePoint. \u041d\u0443\u0436\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0443\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0438 \u043e\u0431\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0442\u044c \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0441\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0446 (\u043f\u043e \u0434\u0435\u0444\u043e\u043b\u0442\u0443 \u043e\u043d\u0438 \u043e\u0431\u044b\u0447\u043d\u043e \u0435\u0441\u0442\u044c);\n\u2022 CVE-2022-21984 \u2014 RCE \u0432 DNS-\u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0435 Windows. \u0420\u0430\u0431\u043e\u0442\u0430\u0435\u0442, \u0435\u0441\u043b\u0438 \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044b \u0434\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043c\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u043e\u0431\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f, \u0447\u0442\u043e \u0442\u043e\u0436\u0435 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043e\u0447\u043d\u043e \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0440\u0442\u043d\u0430\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430.\n@NeKaspersky", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-09T16:38:51.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "11d8490d-b546-4359-acbe-2c38b7380dab", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22007", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/38601", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-22007 \u203c\n\nHEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22006, CVE-2022-23301, CVE-2022-24452, CVE-2022-24453, CVE-2022-24456.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-03-09T20:18:04.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "c883143d-7bae-40e0-8159-97349836d49c", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22006", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/38601", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-22007 \u203c\n\nHEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22006, CVE-2022-23301, CVE-2022-24452, CVE-2022-24453, CVE-2022-24456.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-03-09T20:18:04.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "e6a87741-f160-4a83-bf40-6c8a04b75eaf", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22005", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/cibsecurity/37103", "content": "\u203c CVE-2022-22005 \u203c\n\nMicrosoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability.\n\n\ud83d\udcd6 Read\n\nvia \"National Vulnerability Database\".", "creation_timestamp": "2022-02-09T20:13:31.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "afa5c294-88d3-49b0-b1a0-0476fd64efd2", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22005", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/BlueRedTeam/1790", "content": "#exploit\n1. CVE-2022-22005:\nMicrosoft Sharepoint RCE\nhttps://hnd3884.github.io/posts/cve-2022-22005-microsoft-sharepoint-RCE\n\n2. CVE-2022-25636:\nnet/netfilter/nf_dup_netdev.c in the Linux kernel <5.6.10 allows local users to gain privileges because of a heap out-of-bounds write\nhttps://github.com/Bonfee/CVE-2022-25636\n\n@BlueRedTeam", "creation_timestamp": "2022-03-09T10:01:49.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "0f0bf72c-a387-4b1b-8001-d76c292075a7", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22005", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/CyberSecurityTechnologies/5570", "content": "#exploit\n1. CVE-2022-22005:\nMicrosoft Sharepoint RCE\nhttps://hnd3884.github.io/posts/cve-2022-22005-microsoft-sharepoint-RCE\n\n2. CVE-2022-25636:\nnet/netfilter/nf_dup_netdev.c in the Linux kernel <5.6.10 allows local users to gain privileges because of a heap out-of-bounds write\nhttps://github.com/Bonfee/CVE-2022-25636", "creation_timestamp": "2022-03-09T11:03:01.000000Z"}, {"uuid": "9abc1407-5970-4295-9a48-478194582b89", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-2200", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/onelab1337/2324", "content": "#exploit\n1. CVE-2022-23779:\nInternal Hostname Disclosure Vulnerability\nhttps://github.com/Vulnmachines/Zoho_CVE-2022-23779\n\n2. CVE-2022-37153:\nXSS vulnerability in Artica Proxy 4.30.0\nhttps://github.com/Fjowel/CVE-2022-37153\n\n3. CVE-2022-1802 + CVE-2022-1529 + CVE-2022-2200:\nMozilla Firefox RCE + SBX full chain complete\nhttps://github.com/mistymntncop/CVE-2022-1802", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-09T04:23:36.896971Z"}, {"uuid": "62f29acd-c478-4b4b-95da-bebe4c8810f4", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22005", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/onelab1337/2148", "content": "#exploit\n1. CVE-2022-22005:\nMicrosoft Sharepoint RCE\n\ud83d\udd17 See on Github\n\n2. CVE-2022-25636:\nnet/netfilter/nf_dup_netdev.c in the Linux kernel <5.6.10 allows local users to gain privileges because of a heap out-of-bounds write\n\ud83d\udd17 See on Github\n\nShare and support us \u2764\ufe0f\n@zero0lab", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-09T05:06:43.217966Z"}, {"uuid": "a3736c40-307d-4478-ba05-e2ca09bd1772", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-2200", "type": "published-proof-of-concept", "source": "https://t.me/onelab1337/2324", "content": "#exploit\n1. CVE-2022-23779:\nInternal Hostname Disclosure Vulnerability\nhttps://github.com/Vulnmachines/Zoho_CVE-2022-23779\n\n2. CVE-2022-37153:\nXSS vulnerability in Artica Proxy 4.30.0\nhttps://github.com/Fjowel/CVE-2022-37153\n\n3. CVE-2022-1802 + CVE-2022-1529 + CVE-2022-2200:\nMozilla Firefox RCE + SBX full chain complete\nhttps://github.com/mistymntncop/CVE-2022-1802", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-10T00:00:29.303239Z"}, {"uuid": "4c06b65a-f028-4fe5-b4f0-512c082af1c5", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22005", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/onelab1337/2148", "content": "#exploit\n1. CVE-2022-22005:\nMicrosoft Sharepoint RCE\n\ud83d\udd17 See on Github\n\n2. CVE-2022-25636:\nnet/netfilter/nf_dup_netdev.c in the Linux kernel <5.6.10 allows local users to gain privileges because of a heap out-of-bounds write\n\ud83d\udd17 See on Github\n\nShare and support us \u2764\ufe0f\n@zero0lab", "creation_timestamp": "2026-08-10T00:00:27.076875Z"}, {"uuid": "23e31167-c0f8-4f3f-bb92-684034ca38af", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22008", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/49993", "content": "nctionality, which is used primarily for file-sharing and inter-process communication, including Remote Procedure Calls. RPC is a communication mechanism that allows for one program to request a service or functionality from another program located on the network (internet and/or intranet). RPCs can be used in technologies like storage replica or managing shared volumes.\n\n\u201cThis vulnerability is another example of an attacker taking advantage of legitimate functionality for malicious gain,\u201d he said via email. \u201cUsing the vulnerability, an attacker can create a specially crafted RPC to execute code on the remote server with the same permissions as the RPC service.\u201d\n\nThe bug could be used to create especially virulent threats, according to Childs.\n\n\u201cSince no user interaction is required, these factors combine to make this wormable, at least between machines where RPC can be reached,\u201d Childs noted.\n\nMicrosoft recommends configuring firewall rules to help prevent this vulnerability from being exploited; the static port used (TCP port 135) can be blocked at the network perimeter.\n\n\u201cStill, this bug could be used for lateral movement by an attacker,\u201d Childs warned. \u201cDefinitely test and deploy this one quickly.\u201d\n\nNext up are CVE-2022-24491/24497, two RCE bugs that affect the Windows Network File System (NFS). Both also have CVSS scores of 9.8, and both are listed as exploitation more likely. They also allow the potential for worming exploits, Childs warned.\n\n\u201cOn systems where the NFS role is enabled, a remote attacker could execute their code on an affected system with high privileges and without user interaction,\u201d Childs explained. \u201cAgain, that adds up to a wormable bug \u2013 at least between NFS servers. Similar to RPC, this is often blocked at the network perimeter.\u201d\n\nImmersive\u2019s Breen added, \u201cThese could be the kind of vulnerabilities which appeal to ransomware operators as they provide the potential to expose critical data.\u00a0 It is also important for security teams to note that NFS Role is not a default configuration for Windows devices.\u201d\n\nThe remaining critical vulnerabilities are as follows:\n\n* CVE-2022-23259: Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises) (CVSS 8.8)\n* CVE-2022-22008: Windows Hyper-V (CVSS 7.7)\n* CVE-2022-23257: Windows Hyper-V (CVSS 8.6)\n* CVE-2022-24537: Windows Hyper-V (CVSS 7.7)\n* CVE-2022-26919: Windows LDAP (CVSS 8.1)\n* CVE-2022-24541: Windows Server (CVSS 8.8)\n* CVE-2022-24500: Windows SMB (CVSS 8.8) Are u a security researcher? Or a company that writes articles or write ups about Cyber Security, Offensive Security (related to information security in general) that match with our specific audience and is worth sharing?\n\nIf you want to express your idea in an article contact us here for a quote: info@blackhatethicalhacking.com\nSee Also: Hacking stories: MafiaBoy, the hacker who took down the Internet Other Bugs of NoteAlso worth mentioning: Out of a whopping 18 bugs found in the Windows Domain Name Server (DNS), one (CVE-2022-26815) allows RCE and is listed as important, with a CVSS score of 7.2.\n\nMicrosoft noted that while attack complexity is low, \u201cthe attacker or targeted user would need specific elevated privileges [for successful exploitation]. As is best practice, regular validation and audits of administrative groups should be conducted.\u201d\n\nMeanwhile, \u201cthere are a couple of important mitigations to point out here,\u201d Childs noted. \u201cThe first is that dynamic updates must be enabled for a server to be affected by this bug. The CVSS also lists some level of privileges to exploit. Still, any chance of an attacker getting RCE on a DNS server is one too many, so get your DNS servers patched.\u201d\nSource: threatpost.com Source Linkhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Merch-1024x1024.png Recent News* https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ezgif.com-gif-maker-2-2-90x90.jpg Git security vulnerabilities prompt updates1 day ago\n* https://www.blackhatethicalhac[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:44.266465Z"}, {"uuid": "1fe6a170-7012-4389-a228-1f1527bc404b", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22006", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/45622", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nMicrosoft Addresses 3 Zero-Days & 3 Critical Bugs for March\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Microsoft Addresses 3 Zero-Days & 3 Critical Bugs for MarchPost Views: 29 \nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Patreon.png \nReading Time: 2 Minutes\nMicrosoft patched 71 security vulnerabilities in an uncharacteristically light scheduled update, including its first Xbox bug.\nMicrosoft has addressed 71 security vulnerabilities in its scheduled March Patch Tuesday update \u2013 only three of which are rated critical in severity. The other 68 are all rated \u201cimportant.\u201d\n\nThree of the bugs are listed as publicly known zero-days, but none of them are listed as having been exploited in the wild (thus far).\n\nThe issues affect the gamut of the computing giant\u2019s portfolio, including Microsoft Windows and Windows Components, Azure Site Recovery, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and IoT, Intune, Edge (Chromium-based), Windows HTML Platforms, Office and Office Components, Skype, .NET and Visual Studio, Windows RDP, SMB Server.\n\nNotably, the tranche also contains the first-ever patch for the Xbox gaming console.\n\nIt\u2019s worth noting that the update marks the second month in a row with a surprisingly low number of critical patches; in fact, February\u2019s Patch Tuesday update didn\u2019t list any.\n\n\u201cThe number of critical-rated patches is again strangely low for this number of bugs,\u201d Trend Micro Zero-Day Initiative researcher Dustin Childs noted in an email. \u201cIt\u2019s unclear if this low percentage of bugs is just a coincidence, or if Microsoft might be evaluating the severity using different calculus than in the past.\u201d\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Critical-Rated Microsoft Security BugsThe three critical bugs, all of which could lead to remote code execution, are:\n\n* CVE-2022-22006: HEVC Video Extensions (CVSS rating of 7.8)\n* CVE-2022-24501: VP9 Video Extensions (CVSS rating of 7.8)\n* CVE-2022-23277: Microsoft Exchange Server (CVSS rating of 8.8)\n\nBoth video extensions bugs, in HEVC and VP9, require social engineering; an attacker would need to convince a victim to download and open a specially crafted file, which could lead to a crash, according to Microsoft\u2019s advisory.\n\nThe video extensions are coding standards for video compression that Windows is able to run so that users can watch high-fidelity videos. Paul Laudanski, head of threat intelligence at Tessian, noted that the likelihood of compromise is low, thanks to the user-interaction requirement.\n\nThat said, the VP9 bug is more crucial for patching, he said: \u201cVP9 is supported by modern day browsers except for Internet Explorer, so it is critical for users to ensure they are updating them. While VP9 is open and royalty free, the other file code affected, HEVC, is one that users have to purchase a license for.\u201d\n\nThe vulnerability in Exchange Server meanwhile would allow an authenticated attacker to target server accounts with the aim of executing code with elevated privileges, through a network call. Laudanski added that the vulnerability arises from the server not correctly handling objects in memory, which can lead to code execution.\n\nHere, the attacker must be authenticated. Even so, \u201cthis is also listed as low complexity with exploitation more likely, so it wouldn\u2019t surprise me to see this bug exploited in the wild soon,\u201d Childs noted. \u201cTest and deploy this to your Exchange servers quickly.\u201d\nSee Also: Kali Linux 2022.1 Release with Visual Updates, New Tools, Legacy SSH Kevin Breen, director of cyber-threat research at Immersive Labs, agreed. \u201cWhile requiring authentication, this vul[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-01T20:01:52.595315Z"}, {"uuid": "c66d2804-763a-40c7-ab3a-ab5b7da0cf7a", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22008", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/49993", "content": "nctionality, which is used primarily for file-sharing and inter-process communication, including Remote Procedure Calls. RPC is a communication mechanism that allows for one program to request a service or functionality from another program located on the network (internet and/or intranet). RPCs can be used in technologies like storage replica or managing shared volumes.\n\n\u201cThis vulnerability is another example of an attacker taking advantage of legitimate functionality for malicious gain,\u201d he said via email. \u201cUsing the vulnerability, an attacker can create a specially crafted RPC to execute code on the remote server with the same permissions as the RPC service.\u201d\n\nThe bug could be used to create especially virulent threats, according to Childs.\n\n\u201cSince no user interaction is required, these factors combine to make this wormable, at least between machines where RPC can be reached,\u201d Childs noted.\n\nMicrosoft recommends configuring firewall rules to help prevent this vulnerability from being exploited; the static port used (TCP port 135) can be blocked at the network perimeter.\n\n\u201cStill, this bug could be used for lateral movement by an attacker,\u201d Childs warned. \u201cDefinitely test and deploy this one quickly.\u201d\n\nNext up are CVE-2022-24491/24497, two RCE bugs that affect the Windows Network File System (NFS). Both also have CVSS scores of 9.8, and both are listed as exploitation more likely. They also allow the potential for worming exploits, Childs warned.\n\n\u201cOn systems where the NFS role is enabled, a remote attacker could execute their code on an affected system with high privileges and without user interaction,\u201d Childs explained. \u201cAgain, that adds up to a wormable bug \u2013 at least between NFS servers. Similar to RPC, this is often blocked at the network perimeter.\u201d\n\nImmersive\u2019s Breen added, \u201cThese could be the kind of vulnerabilities which appeal to ransomware operators as they provide the potential to expose critical data.\u00a0 It is also important for security teams to note that NFS Role is not a default configuration for Windows devices.\u201d\n\nThe remaining critical vulnerabilities are as follows:\n\n* CVE-2022-23259: Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises) (CVSS 8.8)\n* CVE-2022-22008: Windows Hyper-V (CVSS 7.7)\n* CVE-2022-23257: Windows Hyper-V (CVSS 8.6)\n* CVE-2022-24537: Windows Hyper-V (CVSS 7.7)\n* CVE-2022-26919: Windows LDAP (CVSS 8.1)\n* CVE-2022-24541: Windows Server (CVSS 8.8)\n* CVE-2022-24500: Windows SMB (CVSS 8.8) Are u a security researcher? Or a company that writes articles or write ups about Cyber Security, Offensive Security (related to information security in general) that match with our specific audience and is worth sharing?\n\nIf you want to express your idea in an article contact us here for a quote: info@blackhatethicalhacking.com\nSee Also: Hacking stories: MafiaBoy, the hacker who took down the Internet Other Bugs of NoteAlso worth mentioning: Out of a whopping 18 bugs found in the Windows Domain Name Server (DNS), one (CVE-2022-26815) allows RCE and is listed as important, with a CVSS score of 7.2.\n\nMicrosoft noted that while attack complexity is low, \u201cthe attacker or targeted user would need specific elevated privileges [for successful exploitation]. As is best practice, regular validation and audits of administrative groups should be conducted.\u201d\n\nMeanwhile, \u201cthere are a couple of important mitigations to point out here,\u201d Childs noted. \u201cThe first is that dynamic updates must be enabled for a server to be affected by this bug. The CVSS also lists some level of privileges to exploit. Still, any chance of an attacker getting RCE on a DNS server is one too many, so get your DNS servers patched.\u201d\nSource: threatpost.com Source Linkhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Merch-1024x1024.png Recent News* https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ezgif.com-gif-maker-2-2-90x90.jpg Git security vulnerabilities prompt updates1 day ago\n* https://www.blackhatethicalhac[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:01:57.119702Z"}, {"uuid": "78230f4b-7a3f-4477-b1a9-2fa189834d30", "vulnerability_lookup_origin": "1a89b78e-f703-45f3-bb86-59eb712668bd", "author": "9f56dd64-161d-43a6-b9c3-555944290a09", "vulnerability": "CVE-2022-22006", "type": "seen", "source": "https://t.me/hacking_Attack/45622", "content": "Black Hat Ethical Hacking\nMicrosoft Addresses 3 Zero-Days & 3 Critical Bugs for March\n\nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Untitled-design-2-1.png Microsoft Addresses 3 Zero-Days & 3 Critical Bugs for MarchPost Views: 29 \nhttps://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Patreon.png \nReading Time: 2 Minutes\nMicrosoft patched 71 security vulnerabilities in an uncharacteristically light scheduled update, including its first Xbox bug.\nMicrosoft has addressed 71 security vulnerabilities in its scheduled March Patch Tuesday update \u2013 only three of which are rated critical in severity. The other 68 are all rated \u201cimportant.\u201d\n\nThree of the bugs are listed as publicly known zero-days, but none of them are listed as having been exploited in the wild (thus far).\n\nThe issues affect the gamut of the computing giant\u2019s portfolio, including Microsoft Windows and Windows Components, Azure Site Recovery, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and IoT, Intune, Edge (Chromium-based), Windows HTML Platforms, Office and Office Components, Skype, .NET and Visual Studio, Windows RDP, SMB Server.\n\nNotably, the tranche also contains the first-ever patch for the Xbox gaming console.\n\nIt\u2019s worth noting that the update marks the second month in a row with a surprisingly low number of critical patches; in fact, February\u2019s Patch Tuesday update didn\u2019t list any.\n\n\u201cThe number of critical-rated patches is again strangely low for this number of bugs,\u201d Trend Micro Zero-Day Initiative researcher Dustin Childs noted in an email. \u201cIt\u2019s unclear if this low percentage of bugs is just a coincidence, or if Microsoft might be evaluating the severity using different calculus than in the past.\u201d\nSee Also: Complete Offensive Security and Ethical Hacking Course Critical-Rated Microsoft Security BugsThe three critical bugs, all of which could lead to remote code execution, are:\n\n* CVE-2022-22006: HEVC Video Extensions (CVSS rating of 7.8)\n* CVE-2022-24501: VP9 Video Extensions (CVSS rating of 7.8)\n* CVE-2022-23277: Microsoft Exchange Server (CVSS rating of 8.8)\n\nBoth video extensions bugs, in HEVC and VP9, require social engineering; an attacker would need to convince a victim to download and open a specially crafted file, which could lead to a crash, according to Microsoft\u2019s advisory.\n\nThe video extensions are coding standards for video compression that Windows is able to run so that users can watch high-fidelity videos. Paul Laudanski, head of threat intelligence at Tessian, noted that the likelihood of compromise is low, thanks to the user-interaction requirement.\n\nThat said, the VP9 bug is more crucial for patching, he said: \u201cVP9 is supported by modern day browsers except for Internet Explorer, so it is critical for users to ensure they are updating them. While VP9 is open and royalty free, the other file code affected, HEVC, is one that users have to purchase a license for.\u201d\n\nThe vulnerability in Exchange Server meanwhile would allow an authenticated attacker to target server accounts with the aim of executing code with elevated privileges, through a network call. Laudanski added that the vulnerability arises from the server not correctly handling objects in memory, which can lead to code execution.\n\nHere, the attacker must be authenticated. Even so, \u201cthis is also listed as low complexity with exploitation more likely, so it wouldn\u2019t surprise me to see this bug exploited in the wild soon,\u201d Childs noted. \u201cTest and deploy this to your Exchange servers quickly.\u201d\nSee Also: Kali Linux 2022.1 Release with Visual Updates, New Tools, Legacy SSH Kevin Breen, director of cyber-threat research at Immersive Labs, agreed. \u201cWhile requiring authentication, this vul[...]\n\n___________________________ \n@hacking_Attack\n@Hacking_Video", "creation_timestamp": "2026-09-02T01:02:05.462615Z"}]}