ghsa-2h5w-3h6g-pgqq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 17:55
Modified
2022-05-01 17:55
Details

The Asterisk Extension Language (AEL) in pbx/pbx_ael.c in Asterisk does not properly generate extensions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary extensions and have an unknown impact by specifying an invalid extension in a certain form.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-1595"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-03-22T23:19:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Asterisk Extension Language (AEL) in pbx/pbx_ael.c in Asterisk does not properly generate extensions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary extensions and have an unknown impact by specifying an invalid extension in a certain form.",
  "id": "GHSA-2h5w-3h6g-pgqq",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T17:55:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T17:55:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-1595"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9316"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24694"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25582"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?rev=59073\u0026view=rev"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2007_34_asterisk.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23155"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1123"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.