CWE-295
AllowedImproper Certificate Validation
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.
1917 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-8WF9-G5Q8-GG97
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 21:30 – Updated: 2026-06-16 15:33In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the server implementation does insufficient checks of the certificate provided by the client (when doing client authentication), which allows impersonation with certificates that are not meant for client authentication (because of KeyUsage and ExtendedKeyUsage).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-45389"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-15T20:16:28Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In OCaml-TLS before 2.1.0, the server implementation does insufficient checks of the certificate provided by the client (when doing client authentication), which allows impersonation with certificates that are not meant for client authentication (because of KeyUsage and ExtendedKeyUsage).",
"id": "GHSA-8wf9-g5q8-gg97",
"modified": "2026-06-16T15:33:47Z",
"published": "2026-06-15T21:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45389"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/OSEC-2026-07"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8X8Q-89W8-F24C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-15 21:31 – Updated: 2025-10-14 21:30An issue in the native clients for Amazon WorkSpaces Clients when running PCoIP protocol may allow an attacker to access remote sessions via man-in-the-middle.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-0501"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-15T19:15:27Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue in the native clients for Amazon WorkSpaces Clients when running PCoIP protocol may allow an attacker to access remote sessions via man-in-the-middle.",
"id": "GHSA-8x8q-89w8-f24c",
"modified": "2025-10-14T21:30:25Z",
"published": "2025-01-15T21:31:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-0501"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2025-001"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.aws.amazon.com/workspaces/latest/userguide/amazon-workspaces-android-client.html#android-release-notes"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.aws.amazon.com/workspaces/latest/userguide/amazon-workspaces-linux-client.html#linux-release-notes"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.aws.amazon.com/workspaces/latest/userguide/amazon-workspaces-osx-client.html#osx-release-notes"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.aws.amazon.com/workspaces/latest/userguide/amazon-workspaces-windows-client.html#windows-release-notes"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-8XJ5-7J6Q-7C3R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-18 18:30 – Updated: 2024-12-18 18:30IBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0.0 through 2.0.9 does not properly validate a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the host and client.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-47119"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-18T16:15:13Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "IBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0.0 through 2.0.9 does not properly validate a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the host and client.",
"id": "GHSA-8xj5-7j6q-7c3r",
"modified": "2024-12-18T18:30:52Z",
"published": "2024-12-18T18:30:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47119"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7178587"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8XMP-X69H-8JFQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:52 – Updated: 2022-05-24 16:52An issue was discovered on D-Link 6600-AP, DWL-3600AP, and DWL-8610AP Ax 4.2.0.14 21/03/2019 devices. There is post-authenticated Certificate and RSA Private Key extraction through an insecure sslcert-get.cgi HTTP command.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-14334"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-08-01T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered on D-Link 6600-AP, DWL-3600AP, and DWL-8610AP Ax 4.2.0.14 21/03/2019 devices. There is post-authenticated Certificate and RSA Private Key extraction through an insecure sslcert-get.cgi HTTP command.",
"id": "GHSA-8xmp-x69h-8jfq",
"modified": "2022-05-24T16:52:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:52:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-14334"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://us.dlink.com/en/security-advisory"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153840/D-Link-6600-AP-XSS-DoS-Information-Disclosure.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-8XRJ-2854-7X44
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:11 – Updated: 2022-12-26 03:30An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-36478"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-08-23T02:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid.",
"id": "GHSA-8xrj-2854-7x44",
"modified": "2022-12-26T03:30:21Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:11:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36478"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/issues/3629"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-756638.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.16.9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.25.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbedtls/releases/tag/v2.7.18"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00021.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00036.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-8XW6-9H78-C89J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-30 03:30 – Updated: 2024-02-05 21:04Ylianst MeshCentral 1.1.16 is vulnerable to Missing SSL Certificate Validation.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "meshcentral"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.1.16"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-51837"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-01-30T18:44:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-30T01:15:58Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Ylianst MeshCentral 1.1.16 is vulnerable to Missing SSL Certificate Validation.",
"id": "GHSA-8xw6-9h78-c89j",
"modified": "2024-02-05T21:04:52Z",
"published": "2024-01-30T03:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-51837"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Ylianst/MeshCentral"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Ylianst/MeshCentral/blob/master/mpsserver.js"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tianjk99/Cryptographic-Misuses/blob/main/Bug_MeshCentral.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tianjk99/Cryptographic-Misuses/blob/main/CVE-2023-51837.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Ylianst MeshCentral Missing SSL Certificate Validation"
}
GHSA-9239-QGCV-WRCC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:23 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:23The iRemoconWiFi App for Android version 4.1.7 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-0553"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-04-09T13:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The iRemoconWiFi App for Android version 4.1.7 and earlier does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.",
"id": "GHSA-9239-qgcv-wrcc",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:23:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:23:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0553"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=jp.co.glamo.iremoconwifi"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN43382653/index.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9266-J9V3-Q4J5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-11 00:00 – Updated: 2024-09-13 18:30An issue was discovered in Couchbase Sync Gateway 3.x before 3.0.2. Admin credentials are not verified when using X.509 client-certificate authentication from Sync Gateway to Couchbase Server. When Sync Gateway is configured to authenticate with Couchbase Server using X.509 client certificates, the admin credentials provided to the Admin REST API are ignored, resulting in privilege escalation for unauthenticated users. The Public REST API is not impacted by this issue. A workaround is to replace X.509 certificate based authentication with Username and Password authentication inside the bootstrap configuration.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "couchbase"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-32563"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-24T21:38:00Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-06-10T12:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Couchbase Sync Gateway 3.x before 3.0.2. Admin credentials are not verified when using X.509 client-certificate authentication from Sync Gateway to Couchbase Server. When Sync Gateway is configured to authenticate with Couchbase Server using X.509 client certificates, the admin credentials provided to the Admin REST API are ignored, resulting in privilege escalation for unauthenticated users. The Public REST API is not impacted by this issue. A workaround is to replace X.509 certificate based authentication with Username and Password authentication inside the bootstrap configuration.",
"id": "GHSA-9266-j9v3-q4j5",
"modified": "2024-09-13T18:30:10Z",
"published": "2022-06-11T00:00:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-32563"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://forums.couchbase.com/tags/security"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/couchbase/PYSEC-2022-207.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.couchbase.com/alerts"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.couchbase.com/alerts/#CVE-2022-32563"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Couchbase Sync Gateway admin credentials not verified when using X.509 client cert authentication"
}
GHSA-92HM-VX54-JG8M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-27 21:32 – Updated: 2025-02-28 18:31Draytek devices Vigor 165/166 prior to v4.2.6 , Vigor 2620/LTE200 prior to v3.9.8.8, Vigor 2860/2925 prior to v3.9.7, Vigor 2862/2926 prior to v3.9.9.4, Vigor 2133/2762/2832 prior to v3.9.8, Vigor 2135/2765/2766 prior to v4.4.5.1, Vigor 2865/2866/2927 prior to v4.4.5.3, Vigor 2962/3910 prior to v4.3.2.7, Vigor 3912 prior to v4.3.5.2, and Vigor 2925 up to v3.9.6 were discovered to not utilize certificate verification, allowing attackers to upload crafted APPE modules from non-official servers, leading to arbitrary code execution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-41334"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-27T21:15:36Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Draytek devices Vigor 165/166 prior to v4.2.6 , Vigor 2620/LTE200 prior to v3.9.8.8, Vigor 2860/2925 prior to v3.9.7, Vigor 2862/2926 prior to v3.9.9.4, Vigor 2133/2762/2832 prior to v3.9.8, Vigor 2135/2765/2766 prior to v4.4.5.1, Vigor 2865/2866/2927 prior to v4.4.5.3, Vigor 2962/3910 prior to v4.3.2.7, Vigor 3912 prior to v4.3.5.2, and Vigor 2925 up to v3.9.6 were discovered to not utilize certificate verification, allowing attackers to upload crafted APPE modules from non-official servers, leading to arbitrary code execution.",
"id": "GHSA-92hm-vx54-jg8m",
"modified": "2025-02-28T18:31:00Z",
"published": "2025-02-27T21:32:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41334"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://medium.com/faraday/advisory-multiple-vulnerabilities-affecting-draytek-routers-78a6cb8b3946"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://draytek.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-9343-CHMF-H73M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-13 21:32 – Updated: 2026-07-14 15:31An improper certificate validation vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN ION enables man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacker to impersonate the controller.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-0244"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-13T19:16:58Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An improper certificate validation vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN ION enables man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacker to impersonate the controller.",
"id": "GHSA-9343-chmf-h73m",
"modified": "2026-07-14T15:31:58Z",
"published": "2026-05-13T21:32:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0244"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2026-0244"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Amber",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Mitigation
Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
Mitigation
If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.