pysec-2024-236
Vulnerability from pysec
Jupyter Server Proxy allows users to run arbitrary external processes alongside their notebook server and provide authenticated web access to them. Versions of 3.x prior to 3.2.4 and 4.x prior to 4.2.0 have a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) issue. The /proxy
endpoint accepts a host
path segment in the format /proxy/<host>
. When this endpoint is called with an invalid host
value, jupyter-server-proxy
replies with a response that includes the value of host
, without sanitization [2]. A third-party actor can leverage this by sending a phishing link with an invalid host
value containing custom JavaScript to a user. When the user clicks this phishing link, the browser renders the response of GET /proxy/<host>
, which runs the custom JavaScript contained in host
set by the actor. As any arbitrary JavaScript can be run after the user clicks on a phishing link, this issue permits extensive access to the user's JupyterLab instance for an actor. Patches are included in versions 4.2.0 and 3.2.4. As a workaround, server operators who are unable to upgrade can disable the jupyter-server-proxy
extension.
Name | purl |
---|---|
jupyter-server-proxy | pkg:pypi/jupyter-server-proxy |
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "jupyter-server-proxy", purl: "pkg:pypi/jupyter-server-proxy", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "7abc9dc5bbb0b4b440548a5375261b8b8192fc22", }, { fixed: "ff78128087e73fb9d0909e1366f8bf051e8ea878", }, { fixed: "7abc9dc5bbb0b4b440548a5375261b8b8192fc22", }, { fixed: "ff78128087e73fb9d0909e1366f8bf051e8ea878", }, ], repo: "https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy", type: "GIT", }, { events: [ { introduced: "3.0.0", }, { fixed: "3.2.4", }, { introduced: "4.1.2", }, { fixed: "4.2.0", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], versions: [ "3.0.0", "3.0.1", "3.0.2", "3.1.0", "3.2.0", "3.2.1", "3.2.2", "3.2.3", "4.1.2", ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-35225", ], details: "Jupyter Server Proxy allows users to run arbitrary external processes alongside their notebook server and provide authenticated web access to them. Versions of 3.x prior to 3.2.4 and 4.x prior to 4.2.0 have a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) issue. The `/proxy` endpoint accepts a `host` path segment in the format `/proxy/<host>`. When this endpoint is called with an invalid `host` value, `jupyter-server-proxy` replies with a response that includes the value of `host`, without sanitization [2]. A third-party actor can leverage this by sending a phishing link with an invalid `host` value containing custom JavaScript to a user. When the user clicks this phishing link, the browser renders the response of `GET /proxy/<host>`, which runs the custom JavaScript contained in `host` set by the actor. As any arbitrary JavaScript can be run after the user clicks on a phishing link, this issue permits extensive access to the user's JupyterLab instance for an actor. Patches are included in versions 4.2.0 and 3.2.4. As a workaround, server operators who are unable to upgrade can disable the `jupyter-server-proxy` extension.", id: "PYSEC-2024-236", modified: "2025-02-26T23:22:41.524251+00:00", published: "2024-06-11T22:15:09+00:00", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-fvcq-4x64-hqxr", }, { type: "FIX", url: "https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/commit/7abc9dc5bbb0b4b440548a5375261b8b8192fc22", }, { type: "FIX", url: "https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/commit/ff78128087e73fb9d0909e1366f8bf051e8ea878", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/blob/62a290f08750f7ae55a0c29ca339c9a39a7b2a7b/jupyter_server_proxy/handlers.py#L328", }, ], related: [ "GHSA-fvcq-4x64-hqxr", "GHSA-fvcq-4x64-hqxr", ], severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.