ts-2022-004
Vulnerability from tailscale
Reference: CVE-2022-41924
Severity: Critical
CVSS vector string: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H
Description: A vulnerability identified in the Tailscale Windows client allows a malicious website to reconfigure the Tailscale daemon tailscaled
, which can then be used to remotely execute code.
Affected platforms: Windows
Patched Tailscale client versions: v1.32.3 or later, v1.33.257 or later (unstable)
What happened?
In the Tailscale Windows client, the local API was bound to a local TCP socket, and communicated with the Windows client GUI in cleartext with no Host header verification. This allowed an attacker-controlled website visited by the node to rebind DNS to an attacker-controlled DNS server, and then make local API requests in the client, including changing the coordination server to an attacker-controlled coordination server.
Who is affected?
All Windows clients prior to version v1.32.3 are affected.
What is the impact?
An attacker-controlled coordination server can send malicious URL responses to the client, including pushing executables or installing an SMB share. These allow the attacker to remotely execute code on the node.
Reviewing all logs confirms this vulnerability was not triggered or exploited.
What do I need to do?
If you are running Tailscale on Windows, upgrade to v1.32.3 or later to remediate the issue.
Credits
We would like to thank Emily Trau and Jamie McClymont (CyberCX) for reporting this issue. Further detail is available in their blog post.
Show details on source website{ "guidislink": false, "id": "https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins/#ts-2022-004", "link": "https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins/#ts-2022-004", "links": [ { "href": "https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins/#ts-2022-004", "rel": "alternate", "type": "text/html" } ], "published": "Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 GMT", "summary": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eReference\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: \u003ca href=\"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41924\"\u003eCVE-2022-41924\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSeverity\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: Critical\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCVSS vector string\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDescription\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: A vulnerability identified in the Tailscale Windows client allows a malicious website to reconfigure the Tailscale daemon \u003ccode\u003etailscaled\u003c/code\u003e, which can then be used to remotely execute code.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAffected platforms\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: Windows\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ePatched Tailscale client versions\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: v1.32.3 or later, v1.33.257 or later (unstable)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eWhat happened?\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the Tailscale Windows client, the local API was bound to a local TCP socket, and communicated with the Windows client GUI in cleartext with no Host header verification. This allowed an attacker-controlled website visited by the node to rebind DNS to an attacker-controlled DNS server, and then make local API requests in the client, including changing the coordination server to an attacker-controlled coordination server.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eWho is affected?\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll Windows clients prior to version v1.32.3 are affected.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eWhat is the impact?\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAn attacker-controlled coordination server can send malicious URL responses to the client, including pushing executables or installing an SMB share. These allow the attacker to remotely execute code on the node.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eReviewing all logs confirms this vulnerability was not triggered or exploited.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eWhat do I need to do?\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIf you are running Tailscale on Windows, upgrade to v1.32.3 or later to remediate the issue.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eCredits\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe would like to thank \u003ca href=\"https://github.com/emilytrau\"\u003eEmily Trau\u003c/a\u003e and \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/JJJollyjim\"\u003eJamie McClymont (CyberCX)\u003c/a\u003e for reporting this issue. Further detail is available in \u003ca href=\"https://emily.id.au/tailscale\"\u003etheir blog post\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e", "summary_detail": { "base": "https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins/index.xml", "language": null, "type": "text/html", "value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eReference\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: \u003ca href=\"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41924\"\u003eCVE-2022-41924\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSeverity\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: Critical\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCVSS vector string\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDescription\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: A vulnerability identified in the Tailscale Windows client allows a malicious website to reconfigure the Tailscale daemon \u003ccode\u003etailscaled\u003c/code\u003e, which can then be used to remotely execute code.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAffected platforms\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: Windows\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ePatched Tailscale client versions\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e: v1.32.3 or later, v1.33.257 or later (unstable)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eWhat happened?\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the Tailscale Windows client, the local API was bound to a local TCP socket, and communicated with the Windows client GUI in cleartext with no Host header verification. This allowed an attacker-controlled website visited by the node to rebind DNS to an attacker-controlled DNS server, and then make local API requests in the client, including changing the coordination server to an attacker-controlled coordination server.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eWho is affected?\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll Windows clients prior to version v1.32.3 are affected.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eWhat is the impact?\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAn attacker-controlled coordination server can send malicious URL responses to the client, including pushing executables or installing an SMB share. These allow the attacker to remotely execute code on the node.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eReviewing all logs confirms this vulnerability was not triggered or exploited.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eWhat do I need to do?\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIf you are running Tailscale on Windows, upgrade to v1.32.3 or later to remediate the issue.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003eCredits\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe would like to thank \u003ca href=\"https://github.com/emilytrau\"\u003eEmily Trau\u003c/a\u003e and \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/JJJollyjim\"\u003eJamie McClymont (CyberCX)\u003c/a\u003e for reporting this issue. Further detail is available in \u003ca href=\"https://emily.id.au/tailscale\"\u003etheir blog post\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e" }, "title": "TS-2022-004", "title_detail": { "base": "https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins/index.xml", "language": null, "type": "text/plain", "value": "TS-2022-004" } }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.