fkie_cve-2025-2840
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-03-29 07:15
Modified
2025-04-01 20:26
Severity ?
5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Summary
The DAP to Autoresponders Email Syncing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.0 through the publicly accessible phpinfo.php script. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view potentially sensitive information contained in the exposed file.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/dap-to-autoresponders-daar/trunk/infusionsoft_src/phpinfo.php#L3
security@wordfence.comhttps://wordpress.org/plugins/dap-to-autoresponders-daar/#developers
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/3ff90774-f5f6-4d9c-9565-1cff31f9bec4?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version


To clipboard 

{
   cveTags: [],
   descriptions: [
      {
         lang: "en",
         value: "The DAP to Autoresponders Email Syncing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.0 through the publicly accessible phpinfo.php script. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view potentially sensitive information contained in the exposed file.",
      },
      {
         lang: "es",
         value: "El complemento DAP to Autoresponders Email Syncing para WordPress es vulnerable a la exposición de información confidencial en todas las versiones hasta la 1.0 incluida, a través del script phpinfo.php, de acceso público. Esto permite que atacantes no autenticados accedan a información potencialmente confidencial contenida en el archivo expuesto.",
      },
   ],
   id: "CVE-2025-2840",
   lastModified: "2025-04-01T20:26:30.593",
   metrics: {
      cvssMetricV31: [
         {
            cvssData: {
               attackComplexity: "LOW",
               attackVector: "NETWORK",
               availabilityImpact: "NONE",
               baseScore: 5.3,
               baseSeverity: "MEDIUM",
               confidentialityImpact: "LOW",
               integrityImpact: "NONE",
               privilegesRequired: "NONE",
               scope: "UNCHANGED",
               userInteraction: "NONE",
               vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
               version: "3.1",
            },
            exploitabilityScore: 3.9,
            impactScore: 1.4,
            source: "security@wordfence.com",
            type: "Primary",
         },
      ],
   },
   published: "2025-03-29T07:15:19.317",
   references: [
      {
         source: "security@wordfence.com",
         url: "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/dap-to-autoresponders-daar/trunk/infusionsoft_src/phpinfo.php#L3",
      },
      {
         source: "security@wordfence.com",
         url: "https://wordpress.org/plugins/dap-to-autoresponders-daar/#developers",
      },
      {
         source: "security@wordfence.com",
         url: "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/3ff90774-f5f6-4d9c-9565-1cff31f9bec4?source=cve",
      },
   ],
   sourceIdentifier: "security@wordfence.com",
   vulnStatus: "Awaiting Analysis",
   weaknesses: [
      {
         description: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "CWE-200",
            },
         ],
         source: "security@wordfence.com",
         type: "Primary",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.