CWE-295
AllowedImproper Certificate Validation
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.
1913 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-GG8H-RVX3-6C4C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-02 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 04:29Certificate OCSP revocation status was not checked when verifying S/Mime signatures. Mail signed with a revoked certificate would be displayed as having a valid signature. Thunderbird versions from 68 to 102.7.0 were affected by this bug. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 102.7.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-0430"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-02T17:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Certificate OCSP revocation status was not checked when verifying S/Mime signatures. Mail signed with a revoked certificate would be displayed as having a valid signature. Thunderbird versions from 68 to 102.7.0 were affected by this bug. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird \u003c 102.7.1.",
"id": "GHSA-gg8h-rvx3-6c4c",
"modified": "2024-04-04T04:29:12Z",
"published": "2023-06-02T18:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0430"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1769000"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2023-04"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GG97-R299-8CPM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-15 15:31 – Updated: 2025-09-15 15:31An issue was discovered in the method push.lite.avtech.com.MySSLSocketFactoryNew.checkServerTrusted in AVTECH EagleEyes 2.0.0. The custom X509TrustManager used in checkServerTrusted only checks the certificate's expiration date, skipping proper TLS chain validation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-50944"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-15T14:15:43Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in the method push.lite.avtech.com.MySSLSocketFactoryNew.checkServerTrusted in AVTECH EagleEyes 2.0.0. The custom X509TrustManager used in checkServerTrusted only checks the certificate\u0027s expiration date, skipping proper TLS chain validation.",
"id": "GHSA-gg97-r299-8cpm",
"modified": "2025-09-15T15:31:24Z",
"published": "2025-09-15T15:31:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-50944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/shinyColumn/CVE-2025-50944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://shinycolumn.notion.site/eagleeyes-lite"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GGGH-R5VJ-86C3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:46 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:46Remote Service Manager 3.0.0 to 3.1.4 fails to verify client certificates, which may allow remote attackers to gain access to systems on the network.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-7815"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-04-28T16:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Remote Service Manager 3.0.0 to 3.1.4 fails to verify client certificates, which may allow remote attackers to gain access to systems on the network.",
"id": "GHSA-gggh-r5vj-86c3",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:46:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:46:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7815"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.cybozu.com/ja-jp/article/9689"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN19241292/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95379"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GGV5-38C7-P4JR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-13 03:30 – Updated: 2025-02-13 18:32Due to improper validation of certificate in SAP Cloud Connector - version 2.0, attacker can impersonate the genuine servers to interact with SCC breaking the mutual authentication. Hence, the attacker can intercept the request to view/modify sensitive information. There is no impact on the availability of the system.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-25642"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-13T03:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Due to improper validation of certificate in SAP Cloud Connector - version 2.0, attacker can impersonate the genuine servers to interact with SCC breaking the mutual authentication. Hence, the attacker can intercept the request to view/modify sensitive information. There is no impact on the availability of the system.",
"id": "GHSA-ggv5-38c7-p4jr",
"modified": "2025-02-13T18:32:14Z",
"published": "2024-02-13T03:30:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-25642"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3424610"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sap.com/documents/2022/02/fa865ea4-167e-0010-bca6-c68f7e60039b.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/May/26"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GH47-WQWG-V2CM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-16 15:32 – Updated: 2025-09-16 15:32An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions when using an empty or default kdb keystore or a default PKCS#12 keystore. A remote attacker with access to a signed third-party or demo certificate for client authentication can bypass the need for a certificate signed by the certificate authority of the organization during authentication on the Control-M/Agent.
The Control-M/Agent contains hardcoded certificates which are only trusted as fallback if an empty kdb keystore is used; they are never trusted if a PKCS#12 keystore is used. All of these certificates are now expired.
In addition, the Control-M/Agent default kdb and PKCS#12 keystores contain trusted third-party certificates (external recognized CAs and default self-signed demo certificates) which are trusted for client authentication.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-55109"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-16T13:16:04Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions when using an empty or default kdb keystore or a default PKCS#12 keystore. A remote attacker with access to a signed third-party or demo certificate for client authentication can bypass the need for a certificate signed by the certificate authority of the organization during authentication on the Control-M/Agent.\n\nThe Control-M/Agent contains hardcoded certificates which are only trusted as fallback if an empty kdb keystore is used; they are never trusted if a PKCS#12 keystore is used. All of these certificates are now expired.\n\n\nIn addition, the Control-M/Agent default kdb and PKCS#12 keystores contain trusted third-party certificates (external recognized CAs and default self-signed demo certificates) which are trusted for client authentication.",
"id": "GHSA-gh47-wqwg-v2cm",
"modified": "2025-09-16T15:32:36Z",
"published": "2025-09-16T15:32:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-55109"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bmcapps.my.site.com/casemgmt/sc_KnowledgeArticle?sfdcid=000441963"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bmcapps.my.site.com/casemgmt/sc_KnowledgeArticle?sfdcid=000442099"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-GJ29-J7QG-VPF7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-04 03:31 – Updated: 2024-12-04 03:31An Improper Certificate Validation on the UniFi iOS App managing a standalone UniFi Access Point (not using UniFi Network Application) could allow a malicious actor with access to an adjacent network to take control of this UniFi Access Point.
Affected Products: UniFi iOS App (Version 10.17.7 and earlier)
Mitigation: UniFi iOS App (Version 10.18.0 or later).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-45205"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-04T02:15:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An Improper Certificate Validation on the UniFi iOS App managing a standalone UniFi Access Point (not using UniFi Network Application) could allow a malicious actor with access to an adjacent network to take control of this UniFi Access Point.\n\n\nAffected Products:\nUniFi iOS App (Version 10.17.7 and earlier) \n \nMitigation:\nUniFi iOS App (Version 10.18.0 or later).",
"id": "GHSA-gj29-j7qg-vpf7",
"modified": "2024-12-04T03:31:16Z",
"published": "2024-12-04T03:31:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://community.ui.com/releases/UniFi-iOS-10-18-0/42f02428-544c-4626-b5b3-5ae40308edc7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GJ95-8384-WRH5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-17 03:32 – Updated: 2024-04-04 08:42IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity due to improperly validating certificates. IBM X-Force ID: 221957.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-22380"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-10-17T02:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "\nIBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity due to improperly validating certificates. IBM X-Force ID: 221957.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-gj95-8384-wrh5",
"modified": "2024-04-04T08:42:20Z",
"published": "2023-10-17T03:32:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22380"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/221957"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7047202"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GJVH-7JH8-7XHM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 03:32 – Updated: 2026-04-13 21:30Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-32281"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T02:16:03Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool.",
"id": "GHSA-gjvh-7jh8-7xhm",
"modified": "2026-04-13T21:30:33Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T03:32:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32281"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/758061"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/78281"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/0uYbvbPZRWU"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4946"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GM26-9M2C-FRWP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-10 18:30 – Updated: 2026-02-10 18:30Improper certificate validation in Azure Local allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-21228"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-10T18:16:23Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper certificate validation in Azure Local allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.",
"id": "GHSA-gm26-9m2c-frwp",
"modified": "2026-02-10T18:30:40Z",
"published": "2026-02-10T18:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-21228"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21228"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-GM3W-M9X6-X5VQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:05 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:05Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the Online Threat Prevention module as used in Bitdefender Total Security allows an attacker to potentially bypass HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) checks. This issue affects: Bitdefender Total Security versions prior to 25.0.7.29. Bitdefender Internet Security versions prior to 25.0.7.29. Bitdefender Antivirus Plus versions prior to 25.0.7.29.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-15732"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-06-22T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in the Online Threat Prevention module as used in Bitdefender Total Security allows an attacker to potentially bypass HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) checks. This issue affects: Bitdefender Total Security versions prior to 25.0.7.29. Bitdefender Internet Security versions prior to 25.0.7.29. Bitdefender Antivirus Plus versions prior to 25.0.7.29.",
"id": "GHSA-gm3w-m9x6-x5vq",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:05:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:05:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15732"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.bitdefender.com/support/security-advisories/improper-certificate-validation-bitdefender-total-security-va-8957"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation
Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
Mitigation
If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.