Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-325
AllowedMissing Cryptographic Step
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not implement a required step in a cryptographic algorithm, resulting in weaker encryption than advertised by the algorithm.
91 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-9266 (GCVE-0-2026-9266)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-12 10:00 – Updated: 2026-06-12 13:29
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
A Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability has been identified in Moxa's embedded Linux firmware for industrial computers and controllers. This vulnerability represents an incomplete remediation of CVE-2026-0714. The firmware introduced TPM2 parameter encryption as a countermeasure against CVE-2026-0714. However, an omission in the authorization session configuration causes the parameter encryption to provide no effective protection. An attacker with invasive physical access to the device can still capture TPM communications on the SPI bus and derive the LUKS disk encryption key in plaintext. While successful exploitation results in full compromise of the encrypted disk volume, the attack requires invasive physical access, including opening the device and attaching external equipment to the SPI bus. Remote exploitation is not possible, and the attack does not affect any downstream systems.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.moxa.com/en/support/product-support/s… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxa | UC-1200A Series |
Affected:
1.0 , ≤ 1.4
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-06-12 10:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-9266",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-12T13:29:27.309419Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T13:29:34.626Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"OS image\u00a0(MIL3 Secure version)"
],
"product": "UC-1200A Series",
"vendor": "Moxa",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:moxa:uc-1200a_series:*:*:os_image_mil3_secure_version_:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Cyloq"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-12T10:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability has been identified in Moxa\u0027s embedded Linux firmware for industrial computers and controllers. This vulnerability represents an incomplete remediation of CVE-2026-0714. The firmware introduced TPM2 parameter encryption as a countermeasure against CVE-2026-0714. However, an omission in the authorization session configuration causes the parameter encryption to provide no effective protection.\u0026nbsp;An attacker with invasive physical access to the device can still capture TPM communications on the SPI bus and derive the LUKS disk encryption key in plaintext. While successful exploitation results in full compromise of the encrypted disk volume, the attack requires invasive physical access, including opening the device and attaching external equipment to the SPI bus. Remote exploitation is not possible, and the attack does not affect any downstream systems."
}
],
"value": "A Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability has been identified in Moxa\u0027s embedded Linux firmware for industrial computers and controllers. This vulnerability represents an incomplete remediation of CVE-2026-0714. The firmware introduced TPM2 parameter encryption as a countermeasure against CVE-2026-0714. However, an omission in the authorization session configuration causes the parameter encryption to provide no effective protection.\u00a0An attacker with invasive physical access to the device can still capture TPM communications on the SPI bus and derive the LUKS disk encryption key in plaintext. While successful exploitation results in full compromise of the encrypted disk volume, the attack requires invasive physical access, including opening the device and attaching external equipment to the SPI bus. Remote exploitation is not possible, and the attack does not affect any downstream systems."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-699",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-699: Eavesdropping on a Monitor"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T10:00:33.056Z",
"orgId": "2e0a0ee2-d866-482a-9f5e-ac03d156dbaa",
"shortName": "Moxa"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.moxa.com/en/support/product-support/security-advisory/mpsa-266240-cve-2026-9266-missing-required-cryptographic-step-vulnerability-in-industrial-computers"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Please refer to Moxa\u0027s security advisory."
}
],
"value": "Please refer to Moxa\u0027s security advisory."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "2e0a0ee2-d866-482a-9f5e-ac03d156dbaa",
"assignerShortName": "Moxa",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-9266",
"datePublished": "2026-06-12T10:00:33.056Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-22T02:41:04.026Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-12T13:29:34.626Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-6458 (GCVE-0-2026-6458)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-23 23:49 – Updated: 2026-06-24 13:15 X_Open Source
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
AES-256-GCM Authentication Tag Does Not Cover First Ciphertext Blocks When AAD Is Empty
Summary
Missing cryptographic step in Caliptra Core Firmware (aes_256_gcm_update module) results in an incorrect GCM authentication tag. When the streaming AES-256-GCM API is used with empty AAD, the hardware GHASH accumulator state is not saved after the first update call, causing the final tag to exclude the first batch of processed ciphertext. Ciphertext produced by that call may be modified without the tag reflecting the change.
This issue affects Core Runtime Firmware: from 2.0.0 through 2.0.1, 2.1.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caliptra | Core Runtime Firmware |
Affected:
2.0.0 , ≤ 2.0.1
(semver)
Affected: 2.1.0 (semver) Unaffected: 2.0.2 (semver) Unaffected: 2.1.1 (semver) |
Date Public
2026-06-23 19:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-6458",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-24T13:14:19.562293Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-24T13:15:03.109Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/chipsalliance/caliptra-sw",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"aes_256_gcm_update"
],
"packageName": "Core Runtime Firmware",
"product": "Core Runtime Firmware",
"vendor": "Caliptra",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "2.0.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "2.1.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "NVIDIA Offensive Security Research (OSR) team"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-23T19:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Missing cryptographic step in Caliptra Core Firmware (aes_256_gcm_update module) results in an incorrect GCM authentication tag. When the streaming AES-256-GCM API is used with empty AAD, the hardware GHASH accumulator state is not saved after the first update call, causing the final tag to exclude the first batch of processed ciphertext. Ciphertext produced by that call may be modified without the tag reflecting the change.\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Core Runtime Firmware: from 2.0.0 through 2.0.1, 2.1.0.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Missing cryptographic step in Caliptra Core Firmware (aes_256_gcm_update module) results in an incorrect GCM authentication tag. When the streaming AES-256-GCM API is used with empty AAD, the hardware GHASH accumulator state is not saved after the first update call, causing the final tag to exclude the first batch of processed ciphertext. Ciphertext produced by that call may be modified without the tag reflecting the change.\n\nThis issue affects Core Runtime Firmware: from 2.0.0 through 2.0.1, 2.1.0."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-148",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-148 Content Spoofing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325 Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T23:49:44.591Z",
"orgId": "b01ddd03-5ef6-483b-b2c5-acba77f1a554",
"shortName": "Caliptra"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/chipsalliance/caliptra-sw/security/advisories/GHSA-834g-h5x6-2hqr"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"x_open-source"
],
"title": "AES-256-GCM Authentication Tag Does Not Cover First Ciphertext Blocks When AAD Is Empty",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b01ddd03-5ef6-483b-b2c5-acba77f1a554",
"assignerShortName": "Caliptra",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-6458",
"datePublished": "2026-06-23T23:49:44.591Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-16T21:11:47.086Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-24T13:15:03.109Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-0420 (GCVE-0-2026-0420)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-09 15:50 – Updated: 2026-06-11 05:19
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Missing TLS certificate validation in NETGEAR's ReadyCloud client app
Summary
An improper implementation of TLS certificate validation vulnerability found in NETGEAR's ReadyCloud client app which could allow an attacker to perform attacker-in-the-middle (MiTM) style attacks impacting the product's confidentiality. This vulnerability affects the listed NETGEAR models.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing cryptographic step
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax35/ | productpatch |
| https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax38/ | productpatch |
| https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax40/ | productpatch |
| https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax120v2/ | productpatch |
| https://kb.netgear.com/000070811/June-2026-NETGEA… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-06-09 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-0420",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-09T17:22:54.642384Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-09T17:23:31.036Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "RAX120v1",
"vendor": "NETGEAR",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V1.2.9.52",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "RAX120v2",
"vendor": "NETGEAR",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V1.2.9.52",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "RAX35",
"vendor": "NETGEAR",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V1.0.6.106",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "RAX38",
"vendor": "NETGEAR",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V1.0.6.106",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "RAX40",
"vendor": "NETGEAR",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V1.0.6.106",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "talsonor"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn improper implementation of TLS certificate validation vulnerability found in NETGEAR\u0027s ReadyCloud client app which could allow an attacker to perform\u0026nbsp;attacker-in-the-middle (MiTM) style attacks impacting the product\u0027s confidentiality. This vulnerability affects the listed NETGEAR models.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An improper implementation of TLS certificate validation vulnerability found in NETGEAR\u0027s ReadyCloud client app which could allow an attacker to perform\u00a0attacker-in-the-middle (MiTM) style attacks impacting the product\u0027s confidentiality. This vulnerability affects the listed NETGEAR models."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-217",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-217 Exploiting Incorrectly Configured SSL/TLS"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 4.6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "UNREPORTED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325 Missing cryptographic step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T05:19:09.117Z",
"orgId": "a2826606-91e7-4eb6-899e-8484bd4575d5",
"shortName": "NETGEAR"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax35/"
},
{
"tags": [
"product",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax38/"
},
{
"tags": [
"product",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax40/"
},
{
"tags": [
"product",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax120v2/"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://kb.netgear.com/000070811/June-2026-NETGEAR-Security-Advisory"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eDevices with automatic updates enabled may already have this patch applied. If not, please check the firmware version and update it to the latest. Fixed in:\u003c/p\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth\u003eProduct\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth\u003eFixed Version\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cb\u003eRAX120v1 (EoS)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax120v1\"\u003eV1.2.9.52\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cb\u003eRAX120v2\u003c/b\u003e Nighthawk AX12 12-Stream AX6000 WiFi Router\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax120v2/\"\u003eV1.2.9.52\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cb\u003eRAX35 (EoS)\u003c/b\u003e Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream WiFi 6 Router\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax35/\"\u003eV1.0.6.106\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cb\u003eRAX38 (EoS)\u003c/b\u003e Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream AX3000 WiFi Router\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax38/\"\u003eV1.0.6.106\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003cb\u003eRAX40 (EoS)\u003c/b\u003e Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream WiFi Router\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax40/\"\u003eV1.0.6.106\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003cp\u003eModels marked (EoS) have reached End-of-Support phase, and no security updates are planned. NETGEAR strongly recommends that you retire these devices and upgrade to a newer NETGEAR device for continued security support.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Devices with automatic updates enabled may already have this patch applied. If not, please check the firmware version and update it to the latest. Fixed in:\n\nProductFixed VersionRAX120v1 (EoS) V1.2.9.52 https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax120v1 RAX120v2 Nighthawk AX12 12-Stream AX6000 WiFi Router V1.2.9.52 https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax120v2/ RAX35 (EoS) Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream WiFi 6 Router V1.0.6.106 https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax35/ RAX38 (EoS) Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream AX3000 WiFi Router V1.0.6.106 https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax38/ RAX40 (EoS) Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream WiFi Router V1.0.6.106 https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax40/ \n\nModels marked (EoS) have reached End-of-Support phase, and no security updates are planned. NETGEAR strongly recommends that you retire these devices and upgrade to a newer NETGEAR device for continued security support."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Missing TLS certificate validation in NETGEAR\u0027s ReadyCloud client app",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.3"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a2826606-91e7-4eb6-899e-8484bd4575d5",
"assignerShortName": "NETGEAR",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-0420",
"datePublished": "2026-06-09T15:50:53.619Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-03T04:16:27.690Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T05:19:09.117Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-69418 (GCVE-0-2025-69418)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-27 16:01 – Updated: 2026-05-12 12:08
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Unauthenticated/unencrypted trailing bytes with low-level OCB function calls
Summary
Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or<br>other hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple<br>of 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.<br><br>Impact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in<br>cleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,<br>allowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.<br><br>The low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated<br>stream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output<br>pointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original<br>base pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while<br>leaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum<br>also excludes the true tail bytes.<br><br>However, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the<br>higher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full<br>blocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding<br>the problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.<br>The vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level<br>CRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with<br>non-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.<br>For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.<br><br>The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected<br>by this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.<br><br>OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.<br><br>OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.
Severity
4 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
7 references
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
Affected:
3.6.0 , < 3.6.1
(semver)
Affected: 3.5.0 , < 3.5.5 (semver) Affected: 3.4.0 , < 3.4.4 (semver) Affected: 3.3.0 , < 3.3.6 (semver) Affected: 3.0.0 , < 3.0.19 (semver) Affected: 1.1.1 , < 1.1.1ze (custom) |
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem |
Affected:
0 , < *
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-01-27 14:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-69418",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-29T15:06:43.617751Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-29T15:07:14.052Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T12:08:40.794Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.6.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.6.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.5.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.4.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.3.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.0.19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.1.1ze",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.1.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-01-27T14:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or\u003cbr\u003eother hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple\u003cbr\u003eof 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in\u003cbr\u003ecleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,\u003cbr\u003eallowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated\u003cbr\u003estream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output\u003cbr\u003epointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original\u003cbr\u003ebase pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while\u003cbr\u003eleaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum\u003cbr\u003ealso excludes the true tail bytes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the\u003cbr\u003ehigher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full\u003cbr\u003eblocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding\u003cbr\u003ethe problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level\u003cbr\u003eCRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with\u003cbr\u003enon-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.\u003cbr\u003eFor these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected\u003cbr\u003eby this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or\u003cbr\u003eother hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple\u003cbr\u003eof 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in\u003cbr\u003ecleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,\u003cbr\u003eallowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated\u003cbr\u003estream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output\u003cbr\u003epointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original\u003cbr\u003ebase pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while\u003cbr\u003eleaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum\u003cbr\u003ealso excludes the true tail bytes.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the\u003cbr\u003ehigher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full\u003cbr\u003eblocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding\u003cbr\u003ethe problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.\u003cbr\u003eThe vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level\u003cbr\u003eCRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with\u003cbr\u003enon-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.\u003cbr\u003eFor these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected\u003cbr\u003eby this issue, as OCB mode is not a FIPS-approved algorithm.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"format": "other",
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "Low"
},
"type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325 Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-27T16:01:23.986Z",
"orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"shortName": "openssl"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt"
},
{
"name": "3.6.1 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ed40856d7d4ba6cb42779b6770666a65f19cb977"
},
{
"name": "3.5.5 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4016975d4469cd6b94927c607f7c511385f928d8"
},
{
"name": "3.4.4 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/372fc5c77529695b05b4f5b5187691a57ef5dffc"
},
{
"name": "3.3.6 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7589230356d908c0eca4b969ec4f62106f4f5ae"
},
{
"name": "3.0.19 git commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/52d23c86a54adab5ee9f80e48b242b52c4cc2347"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Unauthenticated/unencrypted trailing bytes with low-level OCB function calls",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
"assignerShortName": "openssl",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-69418",
"datePublished": "2026-01-27T16:01:23.986Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-06T12:44:09.945Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T12:08:40.794Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-60704 (GCVE-0-2025-60704)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-11 17:59 – Updated: 2026-02-26 16:57
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Summary
Missing cryptographic step in Windows Kerberos allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerabi… | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
24 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1607 |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.8594
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1809 |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.8027
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 21H2 |
Affected:
10.0.19044.0 , < 10.0.19044.6575
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 22H2 |
Affected:
10.0.19045.0 , < 10.0.19045.6575
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 22H3 |
Affected:
10.0.22631.0 , < 10.0.22631.6199
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 23H2 |
Affected:
10.0.22631.0 , < 10.0.22631.6199
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 24H2 |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.7171
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 25H2 |
Affected:
10.0.26200.0 , < 10.0.26200.7171
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 |
Affected:
6.1.7601.0 , < 6.1.7601.28021
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
6.1.7601.0 , < 6.1.7601.28021
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 |
Affected:
6.0.6003.0 , < 6.0.6003.23624
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
6.0.6003.0 , < 6.0.6003.23624
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 |
Affected:
6.2.9200.0 , < 6.2.9200.25768
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
6.2.9200.0 , < 6.2.9200.25768
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 |
Affected:
6.3.9600.0 , < 6.3.9600.22869
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
6.3.9600.0 , < 6.3.9600.22869
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.8594
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.14393.0 , < 10.0.14393.8594
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.8027
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.17763.0 , < 10.0.17763.8027
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022 |
Affected:
10.0.20348.0 , < 10.0.20348.4405
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.25398.0 , < 10.0.25398.1965
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.7171
(custom)
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) |
Affected:
10.0.26100.0 , < 10.0.26100.7171
(custom)
|
Date Public
2025-11-11 08:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-60704",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-12T04:57:17.631076Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T16:57:35.568Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 1607",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.8594",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 1809",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.8027",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 21H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.19044.6575",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.19044.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 10 Version 22H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.19045.6575",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.19045.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"ARM64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 version 22H3",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.22631.6199",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.22631.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 Version 23H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.22631.6199",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.22631.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"ARM64-based Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows 11 Version 24H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.7171",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Windows 11 Version 25H2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26200.7171",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26200.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.1.7601.28021",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.1.7601.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.1.7601.28021",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.1.7601.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.0.6003.23624",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.6003.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"32-bit Systems",
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.0.6003.23624",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.6003.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.2.9200.25768",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.2.9200.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.2.9200.25768",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.2.9200.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012 R2",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.3.9600.22869",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3.9600.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.3.9600.22869",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.3.9600.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2016",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.8594",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.14393.8594",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.14393.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2019",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.8027",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.17763.8027",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.17763.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2022",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.20348.4405",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.20348.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.25398.1965",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.25398.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.7171",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"platforms": [
"x64-based Systems"
],
"product": "Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)",
"vendor": "Microsoft",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.0.26100.7171",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.26100.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1809:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.8027",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.8027",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.17763.8027",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.17763.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.20348.4405",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.20348.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_21H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.19044.6575",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.19044.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_22H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.19045.6575",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.19045.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.7171",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_25H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26200.7171",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26200.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_23H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.22631.6199",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.22631.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_23H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.22631.6199",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.22631.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_23h2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.25398.1965",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.25398.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_24H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.7171",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2025:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.26100.7171",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.26100.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1607:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.8594",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.8594",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.0.14393.8594",
"versionStartIncluding": "10.0.14393.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008_sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.0.6003.23624",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.0.6003.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008_sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.0.6003.23624",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.0.6003.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008_R2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.7601.28021",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.1.7601.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008_R2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.7601.28021",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.1.7601.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.2.9200.25768",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2.9200.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.2.9200.25768",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2.9200.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012_R2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.3.9600.22869",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3.9600.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012_R2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.3.9600.22869",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.3.9600.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-11-11T08:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "Missing cryptographic step in Windows Kerberos allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-13T20:45:46.978Z",
"orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"shortName": "microsoft"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-60704"
}
],
"title": "Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
"assignerShortName": "microsoft",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-60704",
"datePublished": "2025-11-11T17:59:21.068Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-26T05:03:24.534Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T16:57:35.568Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-59339 (GCVE-0-2025-59339)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-17 17:50 – Updated: 2025-09-17 18:09
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
The Bastion ttyrec files are not signed after encryption by the osh-encrypt-rsync script
Summary
The Bastion provides authentication, authorization, traceability and auditability for SSH accesses. Session-recording ttyrec files, may be handled by the provided osh-encrypt-rsync script that is a helper to rotate, encrypt, sign, copy, and optionally move them to a remote storage periodically, if configured to. When running, the script properly rotates and encrypts the files using the provided GPG key(s), but silently fails to sign them, even if asked to.
Severity
4.4 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ovh/the-bastion/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/ovh/the-bastion/commit/9bc85ec… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ovh | the-bastion |
Affected:
< 3.22.00
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-59339",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-17T18:08:36.241076Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-17T18:09:55.732Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "the-bastion",
"vendor": "ovh",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.22.00"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Bastion provides authentication, authorization, traceability and auditability for SSH accesses. Session-recording ttyrec files, may be handled by the provided osh-encrypt-rsync script that is a helper to rotate, encrypt, sign, copy, and optionally move them to a remote storage periodically, if configured to. When running, the script properly rotates and encrypts the files using the provided GPG key(s), but silently fails to sign them, even if asked to."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-17T17:50:34.877Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ovh/the-bastion/security/advisories/GHSA-h66q-g57p-rgg6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ovh/the-bastion/security/advisories/GHSA-h66q-g57p-rgg6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ovh/the-bastion/commit/9bc85ec3f4b724f903773ba64909777c4826a13f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ovh/the-bastion/commit/9bc85ec3f4b724f903773ba64909777c4826a13f"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-h66q-g57p-rgg6",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "The Bastion ttyrec files are not signed after encryption by the osh-encrypt-rsync script"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-59339",
"datePublished": "2025-09-17T17:50:34.877Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-12T12:36:24.635Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-17T18:09:55.732Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-58359 (GCVE-0-2025-58359)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-04 23:50 – Updated: 2025-09-05 16:06
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
frost-core: refresh shares with smaller min_signers will reduce group security
Summary
ZF FROST is a Rust implementation of FROST (Flexible Round-Optimised Schnorr Threshold signatures). In versions 2.0.0 through 2.1.0, refresh shares with smaller min_signers will reduce security of group. The inability to change min_signers (i.e. the threshold) with the refresh share functionality (frost_core::keys::refresh module) was not made clear to users. Using a smaller value would not decrease the threshold, and attempts to sign using a smaller threshold would fail. Additionally, after refreshing the shares with a smaller threshold, it would still be possible to sign with the original threshold, potentially causing a security loss to the participant's shares. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/frost/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/frost/commit/3… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/frost/releases… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZcashFoundation | frost |
Affected:
>= 2.0.0, < 2.2.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-58359",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-05T16:05:51.869099Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-05T16:06:05.432Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "frost",
"vendor": "ZcashFoundation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.0.0, \u003c 2.2.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ZF FROST is a Rust implementation of FROST (Flexible Round-Optimised Schnorr Threshold signatures). In versions 2.0.0 through 2.1.0, refresh shares with smaller min_signers will reduce security of group. The inability to change min_signers (i.e. the threshold) with the refresh share functionality (frost_core::keys::refresh module) was not made clear to users. Using a smaller value would not decrease the threshold, and attempts to sign using a smaller threshold would fail. Additionally, after refreshing the shares with a smaller threshold, it would still be possible to sign with the original threshold, potentially causing a security loss to the participant\u0027s shares. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-04T23:50:45.746Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/frost/security/advisories/GHSA-wgq8-vr6r-mqxm",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/frost/security/advisories/GHSA-wgq8-vr6r-mqxm"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/frost/commit/379ef689c733b3d9c80fd409071d4f3af4dafed2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/frost/commit/379ef689c733b3d9c80fd409071d4f3af4dafed2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/frost/releases/tag/frost-core%2Fv2.2.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/frost/releases/tag/frost-core%2Fv2.2.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-wgq8-vr6r-mqxm",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "frost-core: refresh shares with smaller min_signers will reduce group security"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-58359",
"datePublished": "2025-09-04T23:50:45.746Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-29T16:19:59.010Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-05T16:06:05.432Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-49600 (GCVE-0-2025-49600)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-04 00:00 – Updated: 2025-07-08 14:36
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
In MbedTLS 3.3.0 before 3.6.4, mbedtls_lms_verify may accept invalid signatures if hash computation fails and internal errors go unchecked, enabling LMS (Leighton-Micali Signature) forgery in a fault scenario. Specifically, unchecked return values in mbedtls_lms_verify allow an attacker (who can induce a hardware hash accelerator fault) to bypass LMS signature verification by reusing stale stack data, resulting in acceptance of an invalid signature. In mbedtls_lms_verify, the return values of the internal Merkle tree functions create_merkle_leaf_value and create_merkle_internal_value are not checked. These functions return an integer that indicates whether the call succeeded or not. If a failure occurs, the output buffer (Tc_candidate_root_node) may remain uninitialized, and the result of the signature verification is unpredictable. When the software implementation of SHA-256 is used, these functions will not fail. However, with hardware-accelerated hashing, an attacker could use fault injection against the accelerator to bypass verification.
Severity
4.9 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
1 reference
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-49600",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-08T13:18:22.211877Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-08T14:36:23.748Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "mbedtls",
"vendor": "Mbed",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:mbed:mbedtls:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.6.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.3.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In MbedTLS 3.3.0 before 3.6.4, mbedtls_lms_verify may accept invalid signatures if hash computation fails and internal errors go unchecked, enabling LMS (Leighton-Micali Signature) forgery in a fault scenario. Specifically, unchecked return values in mbedtls_lms_verify allow an attacker (who can induce a hardware hash accelerator fault) to bypass LMS signature verification by reusing stale stack data, resulting in acceptance of an invalid signature. In mbedtls_lms_verify, the return values of the internal Merkle tree functions create_merkle_leaf_value and create_merkle_internal_value are not checked. These functions return an integer that indicates whether the call succeeded or not. If a failure occurs, the output buffer (Tc_candidate_root_node) may remain uninitialized, and the result of the signature verification is unpredictable. When the software implementation of SHA-256 is used, these functions will not fail. However, with hardware-accelerated hashing, an attacker could use fault injection against the accelerator to bypass verification."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325 Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-04T14:53:53.498Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls-docs/blob/main/security-advisories/mbedtls-security-advisory-2025-06-3.md"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-49600",
"datePublished": "2025-07-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-06-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-08T14:36:23.748Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-47383 (GCVE-0-2025-47383)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-02 16:53 – Updated: 2026-03-03 04:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Missing Cryptographic Step in Data Modem
Summary
Weak configuration may lead to cryptographic issue when a VoWiFi call is triggered from UE.
Severity
7.2 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualcomm, Inc. | Snapdragon |
Affected:
5G Fixed Wireless Access Platform
Affected: 9206 LTE Modem Affected: 9207 LTE Modem Affected: APQ8098 Affected: AQT1000 Affected: AR8035 Affected: C-V2X 9150 Affected: CSRA6620 Affected: CSRA6640 Affected: CSRB31024 Affected: FastConnect 6200 Affected: FastConnect 6700 Affected: FastConnect 6800 Affected: FastConnect 6900 Affected: FastConnect 7800 Affected: FSM100 Platform Affected: FWA Gen 3 Ultra Platform Affected: G1 Gen 1 Affected: MDM8207 Affected: MDM9250 Affected: MDM9628 Affected: MDM9640 Affected: Milos Affected: Netrani Affected: Orne Affected: Palawan25 Affected: QCA6174A Affected: QCA6391 Affected: QCA6420 Affected: QCA6430 Affected: QCA6564A Affected: QCA6564AU Affected: QCA6574 Affected: QCA6574A Affected: QCA6574AU Affected: QCA6584 Affected: QCA6584AU Affected: QCA6595AU Affected: QCA6678AQ Affected: QCA6688AQ Affected: QCA6696 Affected: QCA6698AQ Affected: QCA6698AU Affected: QCA6797AQ Affected: QCA8081 Affected: QCA8337 Affected: QCA9367 Affected: QCA9377 Affected: QCC710 Affected: QCM2290 Affected: QCM4325 Affected: QCM4490 Affected: QCM5430 Affected: QCM6125 Affected: QCM6490 Affected: QCN6024 Affected: QCN6224 Affected: QCN6274 Affected: QCN9011 Affected: QCN9012 Affected: QCN9024 Affected: QCS2290 Affected: QCS4290 Affected: QCS4490 Affected: QCS8550 Affected: QEP8111 Affected: QFW7114 Affected: QFW7124 Affected: QMP1000 Affected: Qualcomm 215 Mobile Platform Affected: Qualcomm Video Collaboration VC1 Platform Affected: Qualcomm Video Collaboration VC3 Platform Affected: Robotics RB2 Platform Affected: SD 8 Gen1 5G Affected: SD626 Affected: SD662 Affected: SDA660 Affected: SDM429W Affected: SDX57M Affected: SDX61 Affected: SDX71M Affected: SM6225P Affected: SM6250 Affected: SM6650P Affected: SM7325P Affected: SM7435 Affected: SM7550 Affected: SM7550P Affected: SM7635P Affected: SM7675 Affected: SM7675P Affected: SM8475P Affected: SM8550P Affected: SM8635 Affected: SM8635P Affected: SM8650Q Affected: SM8750P Affected: Smart Display 200 Platform Affected: Snapdragon 1100 Wearable Platform Affected: Snapdragon 1200 Wearable Platform Affected: Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 429 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 460 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 480 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 480+ 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 625 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 626 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 660 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 662 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 680 4G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 685 4G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 690 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 695 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 778G 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 778G+ 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 782G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 7c Compute Platform Affected: Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 Compute Platform "Rennell Pro" Affected: Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 Compute Affected: Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 8 Elite Affected: Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 820 Automotive Platform Affected: Snapdragon 820Am Affected: Snapdragon 865 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 865+ 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 870 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 888 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 888+ 5G Mobile Platform Affected: Snapdragon 8c Compute Platform "Poipu Lite" Affected: Snapdragon 8c Compute Platform (SC8180XP-AD) "Poipu Lite" Affected: Snapdragon 8cx Compute Platform Affected: Snapdragon 8cx Compute Platform "Poipu Pro" Affected: Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G Compute Platform Affected: Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G Compute Platform "Poipu Pro" Affected: Snapdragon Auto 5G Modem-RF Affected: Snapdragon Auto 5G Modem-RF Gen 2 Affected: Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 Wearable Platform Affected: Snapdragon X12 LTE Modem Affected: Snapdragon X32 5G Modem-RF System Affected: Snapdragon X35 5G Modem-RF System Affected: Snapdragon X5 LTE Modem Affected: Snapdragon X53 5G Modem-RF System Affected: Snapdragon X55 5G Modem-RF System Affected: Snapdragon X65 5G Modem-RF System Affected: Snapdragon X70 Modem-RF System Affected: Snapdragon X72 5G Modem-RF System Affected: Snapdragon X75 5G Modem-RF System Affected: Snapdragon X80 5G Modem-RF System Affected: SnapdragonAuto 4GModem Affected: SW5100 Affected: SW5100P Affected: SW6100 Affected: SW6100P Affected: Themisto Affected: Vision Intelligence 100 Platform Affected: Vision Intelligence 200 Platform Affected: Vision Intelligence 400 Platform Affected: WCD9306 Affected: WCD9326 Affected: WCD9330 Affected: WCD9335 Affected: WCD9340 Affected: WCD9341 Affected: WCD9360 Affected: WCD9370 Affected: WCD9371 Affected: WCD9375 Affected: WCD9378 Affected: WCD9380 Affected: WCD9385 Affected: WCD9390 Affected: WCD9395 Affected: WCN3615 Affected: WCN3620 Affected: WCN3660B Affected: WCN3680B Affected: WCN3910 Affected: WCN3950 Affected: WCN3980 Affected: WCN3988 Affected: WCN3990 Affected: WCN6650 Affected: WCN6755 Affected: WCN7860 Affected: WCN7861 Affected: WCN7880 Affected: WCN7881 Affected: WSA8810 Affected: WSA8815 Affected: WSA8830 Affected: WSA8832 Affected: WSA8835 Affected: WSA8840 Affected: WSA8845 Affected: WSA8845H |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-47383",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-02T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T04:56:19.656Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Snapdragon Auto",
"Snapdragon Compute",
"Snapdragon Consumer IOT",
"Snapdragon Industrial IOT",
"Snapdragon MDM",
"Snapdragon Mobile",
"Snapdragon WBC",
"Snapdragon Wearables"
],
"product": "Snapdragon",
"vendor": "Qualcomm, Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5G Fixed Wireless Access Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9206 LTE Modem"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "9207 LTE Modem"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "APQ8098"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "AQT1000"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "AR8035"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "C-V2X 9150"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "CSRA6620"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "CSRA6640"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "CSRB31024"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "FastConnect 6200"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "FastConnect 6700"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "FastConnect 6800"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "FastConnect 6900"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "FastConnect 7800"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "FSM100 Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "FWA Gen 3 Ultra Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "G1 Gen 1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "MDM8207"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "MDM9250"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "MDM9628"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "MDM9640"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Milos"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Netrani"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Orne"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Palawan25"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6174A"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6391"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6420"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6430"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6564A"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6564AU"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6574"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6574A"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6574AU"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6584"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6584AU"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6595AU"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6678AQ"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6688AQ"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6696"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6698AQ"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6698AU"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA6797AQ"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA8081"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA8337"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA9367"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCA9377"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCC710"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCM2290"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCM4325"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCM4490"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCM5430"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCM6125"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCM6490"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCN6024"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCN6224"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCN6274"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCN9011"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCN9012"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCN9024"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCS2290"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCS4290"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCS4490"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QCS8550"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QEP8111"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QFW7114"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QFW7124"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "QMP1000"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Qualcomm 215 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Qualcomm Video Collaboration VC1 Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Qualcomm Video Collaboration VC3 Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Robotics RB2 Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SD 8 Gen1 5G"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SD626"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SD662"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SDA660"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SDM429W"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SDX57M"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SDX61"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SDX71M"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM6225P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM6250"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM6650P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM7325P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM7435"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM7550"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM7550P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM7635P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM7675"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM7675P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM8475P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM8550P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM8635"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM8635P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM8650Q"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SM8750P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Smart Display 200 Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 1100 Wearable Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 1200 Wearable Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 429 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 460 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 480 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 480+ 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 625 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 626 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 660 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 662 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 680 4G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 685 4G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 690 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 695 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 778G 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 778G+ 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 782G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 7c Compute Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 Compute Platform \"Rennell Pro\""
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 Compute"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8 Elite"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 820 Automotive Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 820Am"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 865 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 865+ 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 870 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 888 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 888+ 5G Mobile Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8c Compute Platform \"Poipu Lite\""
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8c Compute Platform (SC8180XP-AD) \"Poipu Lite\""
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8cx Compute Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8cx Compute Platform \"Poipu Pro\""
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G Compute Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G Compute Platform \"Poipu Pro\""
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon Auto 5G Modem-RF"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon Auto 5G Modem-RF Gen 2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1 Wearable Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X12 LTE Modem"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X32 5G Modem-RF System"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X35 5G Modem-RF System"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X5 LTE Modem"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X53 5G Modem-RF System"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X55 5G Modem-RF System"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X65 5G Modem-RF System"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X70 Modem-RF System"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X72 5G Modem-RF System"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X75 5G Modem-RF System"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Snapdragon X80 5G Modem-RF System"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SnapdragonAuto 4GModem"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SW5100"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SW5100P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SW6100"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SW6100P"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Themisto"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Vision Intelligence 100 Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Vision Intelligence 200 Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Vision Intelligence 400 Platform"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9306"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9326"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9330"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9335"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9340"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9341"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9360"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9370"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9371"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9375"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9378"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9380"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9385"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9390"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCD9395"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN3615"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN3620"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN3660B"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN3680B"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN3910"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN3950"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN3980"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN3988"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN3990"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN6650"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN6755"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN7860"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN7861"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN7880"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WCN7881"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WSA8810"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WSA8815"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WSA8830"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WSA8832"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WSA8835"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WSA8840"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WSA8845"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "WSA8845H"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Weak configuration may lead to cryptographic issue when a VoWiFi call is triggered from UE."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T16:53:52.332Z",
"orgId": "2cfc7d3e-20d3-47ac-8db7-1b7285aff15f",
"shortName": "qualcomm"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://docs.qualcomm.com/product/publicresources/securitybulletin/march-2026-bulletin.html"
}
],
"title": "Missing Cryptographic Step in Data Modem"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "2cfc7d3e-20d3-47ac-8db7-1b7285aff15f",
"assignerShortName": "qualcomm",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-47383",
"datePublished": "2026-03-02T16:53:52.332Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-06T08:33:16.266Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T04:56:19.656Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-30147 (GCVE-0-2025-30147)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-05-07 18:27 – Updated: 2025-05-07 20:04
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
ALTBN128_ADD, ALTBN128_MUL, ALTBN128_PAIRING precompile functions do not check if points are on curve
Summary
Besu Native contains scripts and tooling that is used to build and package the native libraries used by the Ethereum client Hyperledger Besu. Besu 24.7.1 through 25.2.2, corresponding to besu-native versions 0.9.0 through 1.2.1, have a potential consensus bug for the precompiles ALTBN128_ADD (0x06), ALTBN128_MUL (0x07), and ALTBN128_PAIRING (0x08). These precompiles were reimplemented in besu-native using gnark-crypto's bn254 implementation, as the former implementation used a library which was no longer maintained and not sufficiently performant. The new gnark implementation was initially added in version 0.9.0 of besu-native but was not utilized by Besu until version 0.9.2 in Besu 24.7.1. The issue is that there are EC points which may be crafted which are in the correct subgroup but are not on the curve and the besu-native gnark implementation was relying on subgroup checks to perform point-on-curve checks as well. The version of gnark-crypto used at the time did not do this check when performing subgroup checks. The result is that it was possible for Besu to give an incorrect result and fall out of consensus when executing one of these precompiles against a specially crafted input point. Additionally, homogenous Besu-only networks can potentially enshrine invalid state which would be incorrect and difficult to process with patched versions of besu which handle these calls correctly. The underlying defect has been patched in besu-native release 1.3.0. The fixed version of Besu is version 25.3.0. As a workaround for versions of Besu with the problem, the native precompile for altbn128 may be disabled in favor of the pure-java implementation. The pure java implementation is significantly slower, but does not have this consensus issue.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-325 - Missing Cryptographic Step
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/hyperledger/besu-native/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/blob/main/bes… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| hyperledger | besu-native |
Affected:
>= 0.9.0, < 1.3.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-30147",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-07T20:03:45.572863Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-07T20:04:15.702Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "besu-native",
"vendor": "hyperledger",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.9.0, \u003c 1.3.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Besu Native contains scripts and tooling that is used to build and package the native libraries used by the Ethereum client Hyperledger Besu. Besu 24.7.1 through 25.2.2, corresponding to besu-native versions 0.9.0 through 1.2.1, have a potential consensus bug for the precompiles ALTBN128_ADD (0x06), ALTBN128_MUL (0x07), and ALTBN128_PAIRING (0x08). These precompiles were reimplemented in besu-native using gnark-crypto\u0027s bn254 implementation, as the former implementation used a library which was no longer maintained and not sufficiently performant. The new gnark implementation was initially added in version 0.9.0 of besu-native but was not utilized by Besu until version 0.9.2 in Besu 24.7.1. The issue is that there are EC points which may be crafted which are in the correct subgroup but are not on the curve and the besu-native gnark implementation was relying on subgroup checks to perform point-on-curve checks as well. The version of gnark-crypto used at the time did not do this check when performing subgroup checks. The result is that it was possible for Besu to give an incorrect result and fall out of consensus when executing one of these precompiles against a specially crafted input point. Additionally, homogenous Besu-only networks can potentially enshrine invalid state which would be incorrect and difficult to process with patched versions of besu which handle these calls correctly. The underlying defect has been patched in besu-native release 1.3.0. The fixed version of Besu is version 25.3.0. As a workaround for versions of Besu with the problem, the native precompile for altbn128 may be disabled in favor of the pure-java implementation. The pure java implementation is significantly slower, but does not have this consensus issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-07T18:27:41.736Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/hyperledger/besu-native/security/advisories/GHSA-jcp8-gh74-97hq",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hyperledger/besu-native/security/advisories/GHSA-jcp8-gh74-97hq"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/blob/main/besu/src/main/java/org/hyperledger/besu/cli/options/NativeLibraryOptions.java#L31-L38",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hyperledger/besu/blob/main/besu/src/main/java/org/hyperledger/besu/cli/options/NativeLibraryOptions.java#L31-L38"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jcp8-gh74-97hq",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ALTBN128_ADD, ALTBN128_MUL, ALTBN128_PAIRING precompile functions do not check if points are on curve"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-30147",
"datePublished": "2025-05-07T18:27:41.736Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-17T12:41:42.565Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-07T20:04:15.702Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-68: Subvert Code-signing Facilities
Many languages use code signing facilities to vouch for code's identity and to thus tie code to its assigned privileges within an environment. Subverting this mechanism can be instrumental in an attacker escalating privilege. Any means of subverting the way that a virtual machine enforces code signing classifies for this style of attack.