CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14239 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-JM9M-H6MG-FC5J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-20 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Infomaniak Staff VOD Infomaniak allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VOD Infomaniak: from n/a through 1.5.7.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-49274"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-20T11:15:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Infomaniak Staff VOD Infomaniak allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VOD Infomaniak: from n/a through 1.5.7.",
"id": "GHSA-jm9m-h6mg-fc5j",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:08Z",
"published": "2024-10-20T12:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49274"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/vod-infomaniak/vulnerability/wordpress-vod-infomaniak-plugin-1-5-7-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/vod-infomaniak/wordpress-vod-infomaniak-plugin-1-5-7-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-JMC4-FGF5-JP55
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-11 21:30 – Updated: 2024-02-13 00:30flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /core/tools/delete_menu.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-25418"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-11T21:15:46Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /core/tools/delete_menu.php.",
"id": "GHSA-jmc4-fgf5-jp55",
"modified": "2024-02-13T00:30:27Z",
"published": "2024-02-11T21:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-25418"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Carl0724/cms/blob/main/2.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-JMC4-RR4X-8W62
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-22 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bage Flexible FAQ allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Flexible FAQ: from n/a through 0.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-58200"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-22T19:16:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Bage Flexible FAQ allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Flexible FAQ: from n/a through 0.2.",
"id": "GHSA-jmc4-rr4x-8w62",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:14Z",
"published": "2025-09-22T21:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58200"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/flexible-faq/vulnerability/wordpress-flexible-faq-plugin-0-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-JMC8-JW39-CQ2W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-01 21:30 – Updated: 2023-03-09 03:30A CSRF vulnerability allows malicious websites to retrieve logs and technical support archives in Sophos Connect versions older than 2.2.90.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-48309"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-01T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A CSRF vulnerability allows malicious websites to retrieve logs and technical support archives in Sophos Connect versions older than 2.2.90.",
"id": "GHSA-jmc8-jw39-cq2w",
"modified": "2023-03-09T03:30:15Z",
"published": "2023-03-01T21:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48309"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sophos.com/en-us/security-advisories/sophos-sa-20230301-scc-csrf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-JMCC-268G-JP5G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-01 15:32 – Updated: 2024-10-01 15:32Cross site request forgery in Kiteworks OwnCloud allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge requests. If a request has no Authorization header, it is created with an empty string as value by a rewrite rule. The CSRF check is done by comparing the header value to null, meaning that the existing CSRF check is bypassed in this case. An attacker can, for example, create a new administrator account if the request is executed in the browser of an authenticated victim.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-7273"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-01T13:15:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross site request forgery in Kiteworks OwnCloud allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge requests.\nIf a request has no Authorization header, it is created with an empty string as value by a rewrite rule. The CSRF check is done by comparing the header value to null, meaning that the existing CSRF check is bypassed in this case. An attacker can, for example, create a new administrator account if the request is executed in the browser of an authenticated victim.",
"id": "GHSA-jmcc-268g-jp5g",
"modified": "2024-10-01T15:32:05Z",
"published": "2024-10-01T15:32:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-7273"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/2041007"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cirosec.de/sa/sa-2023-012"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-JMCF-QQ6F-FGVG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:04 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:04Vembu BDR Suite before 4.2.0 allows Unauthenticated SSRF via a GET request that specifies a hostname and port number.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-26474"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-06-08T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Vembu BDR Suite before 4.2.0 allows Unauthenticated SSRF via a GET request that specifies a hostname and port number.",
"id": "GHSA-jmcf-qq6f-fgvg",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:04:18Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:04:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26474"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://csirt.divd.nl/2021/05/11/Vembu-zero-days"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://csirt.divd.nl/cases/DIVD-2020-00011"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://csirt.divd.nl/cves/CVE-2021-26474"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.divd.nl"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wbsec.nl/vembu"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-JMGF-P46X-982H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2017-10-24 18:33 – Updated: 2025-04-09 16:49CRLF injection vulnerability in Ruby on Rails before 2.0.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted URL to the redirect_to function.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "rails"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-5189"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:43:46Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2008-11-21T12:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "CRLF injection vulnerability in Ruby on Rails before 2.0.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted URL to the redirect_to function.",
"id": "GHSA-jmgf-p46x-982h",
"modified": "2025-04-09T16:49:45Z",
"published": "2017-10-24T18:33:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5189"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/rails/CVE-2008-5189.yml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "http://github.com/rails/rails"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/7282ed863ca7e6f928bae9162c9a63a98775a19d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-12/msg00002.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/10/19/rails-2-0-5-redirect_to-and-offset-limit-sanitizing"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/10/19/response-splitting-risk"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "rails is vulnerable to CRLF injection"
}
GHSA-JMGW-798H-3J7F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:45 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:45Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Internationalization (i18n) Drupal module 5.x before 5.x-2.3 and 5.x-1.1, and 6.x before 6.x-1.0 beta 1, allows remote attackers to change node translation relationships via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-1977"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-04-27T20:05:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Internationalization (i18n) Drupal module 5.x before 5.x-2.3 and 5.x-1.1, and 6.x before 6.x-1.0 beta 1, allows remote attackers to change node translation relationships via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-jmgw-798h-3j7f",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:45:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:45:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1977"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41982"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://drupal.org/node/250344"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29961"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1352/references"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-JMMP-VH96-78RM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-07 22:01 – Updated: 2024-06-07 22:01zend-diactoros (and, by extension, Expressive), zend-http (and, by extension, Zend Framework MVC projects), and zend-feed (specifically, its PubSubHubbub sub-component) each contain a potential URL rewrite exploit. In each case, marshaling a request URI includes logic that introspects HTTP request headers that are specific to a given server-side URL rewrite mechanism.
When these headers are present on systems not running the specific URL rewriting mechanism, the logic would still trigger, allowing a malicious client or proxy to emulate the headers to request arbitrary content.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "zendframework/zend-feed"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.10.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-06-07T22:01:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "zend-diactoros (and, by extension, Expressive), zend-http (and, by extension, Zend Framework MVC projects), and zend-feed (specifically, its PubSubHubbub sub-component) each contain a potential URL rewrite exploit. In each case, marshaling a request URI includes logic that introspects HTTP request headers that are specific to a given server-side URL rewrite mechanism.\n\nWhen these headers are present on systems not running the specific URL rewriting mechanism, the logic would still trigger, allowing a malicious client or proxy to emulate the headers to request arbitrary content.",
"id": "GHSA-jmmp-vh96-78rm",
"modified": "2024-06-07T22:01:20Z",
"published": "2024-06-07T22:01:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zendframework/zend-feed/commit/6641f4cf3f4586c63f83fd70b6d19966025c8888"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zendframework/zend-feed/commit/b28589c49bae3ee215cff904cc0be368e6409cd8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://framework.zend.com/security/advisory/ZF2018-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/zendframework/zend-feed/ZF2018-01.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/zendframework/zend-feed"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Zend-Feed URL Rewrite vulnerability"
}
GHSA-JMMR-W66H-7P5R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-31 06:30 – Updated: 2024-08-01 21:31The HTML Forms WordPress plugin before 1.3.34 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-6412"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-31T06:15:04Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The HTML Forms WordPress plugin before 1.3.34 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks",
"id": "GHSA-jmmr-w66h-7p5r",
"modified": "2024-08-01T21:31:40Z",
"published": "2024-07-31T06:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6412"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9eb0dad6-3c19-4fe4-a20d-d45b51410444"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.