CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-R243-VHV6-3VXR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:10 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:10Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Acobot Live Chat & Contact Form plugin 2.0 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change plugin settings or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the acobot_token parameter in the acobot page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-2039"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-02-20T16:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Acobot Live Chat \u0026 Contact Form plugin 2.0 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change plugin settings or (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the acobot_token parameter in the acobot page to wp-admin/options-general.php.",
"id": "GHSA-r243-vhv6-3vxr",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:10:19Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:10:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-2039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/100813"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/100814"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/130306/WordPress-Acobot-Live-Chat-And-Contact-Form-2.0-CSRF-XSS.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-R24P-5GQM-PC2R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-13 18:30 – Updated: 2023-11-16 18:30Dreamer CMS v4.1.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/task/add
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-48060"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-11-13T16:15:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Dreamer CMS v4.1.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /admin/task/add",
"id": "GHSA-r24p-5gqm-pc2r",
"modified": "2023-11-16T18:30:30Z",
"published": "2023-11-13T18:30:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-48060"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/CP1379767017/cms/blob/main/CSRF%20exists%20at%20the%20location%20where%20task%20management%20adds%20tasks.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R25P-2JW3-4QP2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-11-09 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WooCommerce Product Recommendations plugin <= 2.3.0 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-32744"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-11-09T21:15:24Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WooCommerce Product Recommendations plugin \u003c=\u00a02.3.0 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-r25p-2jw3-4qp2",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:05Z",
"published": "2023-11-09T21:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32744"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/woocommerce-product-recommendations/vulnerability/wordpress-woocommerce-product-recommendations-plugin-2-3-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/woocommerce-product-recommendations/wordpress-woocommerce-product-recommendations-plugin-2-3-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R263-RP96-99FP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-06 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FasterThemes FastBook allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects FastBook: from n/a through 1.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-26593"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-06T13:15:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FasterThemes FastBook allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects FastBook: from n/a through 1.1.",
"id": "GHSA-r263-rp96-99fp",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:18Z",
"published": "2025-06-06T15:30:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-26593"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/fastbook-responsive-appointment-booking-and-scheduling-system/vulnerability/wordpress-fastbook-1-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R26R-2J23-R3HV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-19 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-26 00:00The Easy Digital Downloads WordPress plugin before 2.11.6 does not have CSRF check in place when inserting payment notes, which could allow attackers to make a logged admin insert arbitrary notes via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0707"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-04-18T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Easy Digital Downloads WordPress plugin before 2.11.6 does not have CSRF check in place when inserting payment notes, which could allow attackers to make a logged admin insert arbitrary notes via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-r26r-2j23-r3hv",
"modified": "2022-04-26T00:00:51Z",
"published": "2022-04-19T00:00:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0707"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2697388"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/50680797-61e4-4737-898f-e5b394d89117"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R27C-7G4J-XM44
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-22 18:30 – Updated: 2026-01-27 21:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mikado-Themes PawFriends - Pet Shop and Veterinary WordPress Theme pawfriends allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PawFriends - Pet Shop and Veterinary WordPress Theme: from n/a through <= 1.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-22382"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T17:16:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mikado-Themes PawFriends - Pet Shop and Veterinary WordPress Theme pawfriends allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PawFriends - Pet Shop and Veterinary WordPress Theme: from n/a through \u003c= 1.3.",
"id": "GHSA-r27c-7g4j-xm44",
"modified": "2026-01-27T21:31:43Z",
"published": "2026-01-22T18:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22382"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/pawfriends/vulnerability/wordpress-pawfriends-pet-shop-and-veterinary-wordpress-theme-theme-1-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R28F-22R5-GJ9W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-05 21:30 – Updated: 2023-06-05 21:30A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Exit Box Lite Plugin up to 1.06 on WordPress. Affected by this vulnerability is the function exitboxadmin of the file wordpress-exit-box-lite.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 1.10 is able to address this issue. The patch is named fad26701addb862c51baf85c6e3cc136aa79c309. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-230671.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-10029"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-05T21:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Exit Box Lite Plugin up to 1.06 on WordPress. Affected by this vulnerability is the function exitboxadmin of the file wordpress-exit-box-lite.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 1.10 is able to address this issue. The patch is named fad26701addb862c51baf85c6e3cc136aa79c309. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-230671.",
"id": "GHSA-r28f-22r5-gj9w",
"modified": "2023-06-05T21:30:16Z",
"published": "2023-06-05T21:30:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-10029"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/wp-plugins/wordpress-exit-box-lite/commit/fad26701addb862c51baf85c6e3cc136aa79c309"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.230671"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.230671"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R28R-HQJW-7RF7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:18 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:18Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the PictoBrowser (pictobrowser-gallery) plugin 0.3.1 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the pictoBrowserFlickrUser parameter in the options-page.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-9392"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-12-31T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the PictoBrowser (pictobrowser-gallery) plugin 0.3.1 and earlier for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the pictoBrowserFlickrUser parameter in the options-page.php page to wp-admin/options-general.php.",
"id": "GHSA-r28r-hqjw-7rf7",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:18:20Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:18:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-9392"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/129638/WordPress-PictoBrowser-0.3.1-CSRF-XSS.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-R297-8R34-C73V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-02 12:32 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes Vilva allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Vilva: from n/a through 1.2.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-37102"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-02T12:15:17Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blossom Themes Vilva allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Vilva: from n/a through 1.2.2.",
"id": "GHSA-r297-8r34-c73v",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:55Z",
"published": "2025-01-02T12:32:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37102"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/theme/vilva/vulnerability/wordpress-vilva-theme-1-2-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R2CP-JR96-FMW7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-01 06:30 – Updated: 2024-08-07 15:30The Light Poll WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF checks when deleting polls, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform such action via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-6496"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-01T06:15:02Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Light Poll WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF checks when deleting polls, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform such action via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-r2cp-jr96-fmw7",
"modified": "2024-08-07T15:30:38Z",
"published": "2024-08-01T06:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6496"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d598eabd-a87a-4e3e-be46-a5c5cc3f130e"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.