CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14225 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-RC78-FWW2-R3JX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-23 03:30 – Updated: 2022-11-23 21:30A vulnerability in Optilink OP-XT71000N Hardware version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to change the Password for "WLAN SSID" through "wlwpa.asp".
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-23590"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-23T02:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in Optilink OP-XT71000N Hardware version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to change the Password for \"WLAN SSID\" through \"wlwpa.asp\".",
"id": "GHSA-rc78-fww2-r3jx",
"modified": "2022-11-23T21:30:32Z",
"published": "2022-11-23T03:30:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-23590"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/huzaifahussain98/CVE-2020-23590"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RC8Q-H3V5-FWWH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-20 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Beee TinyNav allows Stored XSS. This issue affects TinyNav: from n/a through 1.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-52781"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-20T15:15:33Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Beee TinyNav allows Stored XSS. This issue affects TinyNav: from n/a through 1.4.",
"id": "GHSA-rc8q-h3v5-fwwh",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:33Z",
"published": "2025-06-20T15:30:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-52781"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/tinynav/vulnerability/wordpress-tinynav-plugin-1-4-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RC94-7V55-WMG6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:01 – Updated: 2023-07-26 20:38There are CSRF vulnerabilities in Subrion CMS 4.1.x through 4.1.5, and before 4.2.0, because of a logic error. Although there is functionality to detect CSRF, it is called too late in the ia.core.php code, allowing (for example) an attack against the query parameter to panel/database.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "intelliants/subrion"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.1"
},
{
"fixed": "4.2.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-15063"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-26T20:38:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2017-10-06T07:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "There are CSRF vulnerabilities in Subrion CMS 4.1.x through 4.1.5, and before 4.2.0, because of a logic error. Although there is functionality to detect CSRF, it is called too late in the ia.core.php code, allowing (for example) an attack against the query parameter to panel/database.",
"id": "GHSA-rc94-7v55-wmg6",
"modified": "2023-07-26T20:38:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:01:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-15063"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/intelliants/subrion/issues/547"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/intelliants/subrion/issues/570"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/intelliants/subrion/commit/5fdf03af1a7d89c3692faa155e17457153020dca"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/intelliants/subrion/commit/65fb937a588d730e57da0c2c5ca3bc4b9c2b5628"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Subrion CMS CSRF Vulnerability"
}
GHSA-RCCM-3MP2-XC76
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-02 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alberto Reineri Simple Header and Footer allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Simple Header and Footer: from n/a through 1.0.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-53777"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-02T14:15:18Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alberto Reineri Simple Header and Footer allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Simple Header and Footer: from n/a through 1.0.0.",
"id": "GHSA-rccm-3mp2-xc76",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:40Z",
"published": "2024-12-02T15:31:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53777"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/simple-header-and-footer/vulnerability/wordpress-simple-header-and-footer-plugin-1-0-0-csrf-to-stored-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCCV-3QJV-C8H5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-12 06:30 – Updated: 2024-09-12 15:33The Gixaw Chat WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-7816"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-12T06:15:24Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Gixaw Chat WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.",
"id": "GHSA-rccv-3qjv-c8h5",
"modified": "2024-09-12T15:33:00Z",
"published": "2024-09-12T06:30:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-7816"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/f610c4a5-ccde-4305-93e0-3c6f50c741ee"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCFP-33RG-J3VG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-02-23 18:31 – Updated: 2023-03-02 18:30Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in QuantumCloud ChatBot ? plugin <= 4.2.8 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-24415"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-02-23T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in QuantumCloud ChatBot ? plugin \u003c= 4.2.8 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-rcfp-33rg-j3vg",
"modified": "2023-03-02T18:30:28Z",
"published": "2023-02-23T18:31:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-24415"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/chatbot/wordpress-chatbot-plugin-4-2-8-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCGV-P6G8-M244
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-07-19 00:00 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:31The AnyMind Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.1. This is due to missing nonce protection on the createDOMStructure() function found in the ~/anymind-widget-id.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts into the page, granted they can trick a site’s administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-2435"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-07-18T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The AnyMind Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 1.1. This is due to missing nonce protection on the createDOMStructure() function found in the ~/anymind-widget-id.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts into the page, granted they can trick a site\u2019s administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-rcgv-p6g8-m244",
"modified": "2026-04-08T18:31:57Z",
"published": "2022-07-19T00:00:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2435"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/anymind-widget/trunk/anymind-widget-id.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/174eae70-15d7-4772-8fcd-dc4c0fca5b7d?source=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/vulnerability-advisories/#CVE-2022-2435"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCHX-RVH2-VX5J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-26 21:30 – Updated: 2023-08-01 21:40A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in versions of the Jenkins Plug-in for ServiceNow DevOps prior to 1.38.1 that, if exploited successfully, could cause the unwanted exposure of sensitive information. To address this issue, apply the 1.38.1 version of the Jenkins plug-in for ServiceNow DevOps on your Jenkins server. No changes are required on your instances of the Now Platform.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.jenkins.plugins:servicenow-devops"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.38.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-3414"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200",
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-26T22:39:17Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-26T19:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in versions of the Jenkins Plug-in for ServiceNow DevOps prior to 1.38.1 that, if exploited successfully, could cause the unwanted exposure of sensitive information.\u00a0To address this issue, apply the 1.38.1 version of the Jenkins plug-in for ServiceNow DevOps on your Jenkins server. No changes are required on your instances of the Now Platform. \n",
"id": "GHSA-rchx-rvh2-vx5j",
"modified": "2023-08-01T21:40:55Z",
"published": "2023-07-26T21:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3414"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/servicenow-devops-plugin/commit/67192e24099787ad732b41d581f20714d4253921"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/servicenow-devops-plugin/commit/d7d2422b016995402dd245d9c9c5c2f4cf00c691"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/servicenow-devops-plugin"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/servicenow-devops-plugin/releases/tag/v1.38.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.servicenow.com/kb?id=kb_article_view\u0026sysparm_article=KB1434118"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Credential leakage in Jenkins Plug-in for ServiceNow "
}
GHSA-RCJR-P35P-MHJW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:01 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:01ECESSA ShieldLink SL175EHQ 10.7.4 devices have CSRF to add superuser accounts via the cgi-bin/pl_web.cgi/util_configlogin_act URI.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-13032"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-01T16:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "ECESSA ShieldLink SL175EHQ 10.7.4 devices have CSRF to add superuser accounts via the cgi-bin/pl_web.cgi/util_configlogin_act URI.",
"id": "GHSA-rcjr-p35p-mhjw",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:01:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:01:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13032"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44938"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCM2-22F3-PQV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-02 15:30 – Updated: 2025-07-22 21:41This vulnerability was a potential CSRF attack. When running the Firebase emulator suite, there is an export endpoint that is used normally to export data from running emulators. If a user was running the emulator and navigated to a malicious website with the exploit on a browser that allowed calls to localhost (ie Chrome before v94), the website could exfiltrate emulator data. We recommend upgrading past version 13.6.0 or commit 068a2b08dc308c7ab4b569617f5fc8821237e3a0.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "firebase-tools"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "13.6.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-4128"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-05-03T20:01:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-02T14:15:10Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "This vulnerability was a potential CSRF attack.\u00a0When running the Firebase emulator suite, there is an export endpoint that is used normally to export data from running emulators. If a user was running the emulator and navigated to a malicious website with the exploit on a browser that allowed calls to localhost (ie Chrome before v94), the website could exfiltrate emulator data. We recommend upgrading past version 13.6.0 or [commit\u00a0068a2b08dc308c7ab4b569617f5fc8821237e3a0](https://github.com/firebase/firebase-tools/commit/068a2b08dc308c7ab4b569617f5fc8821237e3a0).",
"id": "GHSA-rcm2-22f3-pqv3",
"modified": "2025-07-22T21:41:39Z",
"published": "2024-05-02T15:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4128"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/firebase/firebase-tools/pull/6944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/firebase/firebase-tools/commit/068a2b08dc308c7ab4b569617f5fc8821237e3a0"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/firebase/firebase-tools"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Firebase vulnerable to CRSF attack"
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.