CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-266J-GPF6-27HM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:49 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:10A CSRF vulnerability was detected in one of the admin endpoints of JetBrains YouTrack. The issue was fixed in YouTrack 2018.4.49852.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-12851"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-07-03T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A CSRF vulnerability was detected in one of the admin endpoints of JetBrains YouTrack. The issue was fixed in YouTrack 2018.4.49852.",
"id": "GHSA-266j-gpf6-27hm",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:10:16Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:49:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12851"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2019/06/19/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q1-2019"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-267V-VCRF-M92X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-09 06:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 04:42The Active Directory Integration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to time-based SQL Injection via the orderby and order parameters in versions up to, and including, 4.1.4 due to missing nonce verification on the get_users function and insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to cause resource exhaustion via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-2599"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-09T06:16:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Active Directory Integration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to time-based SQL Injection via the orderby and order parameters in versions up to, and including, 4.1.4 due to missing nonce verification on the get_users function and insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to cause resource exhaustion via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-267v-vcrf-m92x",
"modified": "2024-04-04T04:42:10Z",
"published": "2023-06-09T06:30:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2599"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ldap-login-for-intranet-sites/trunk/class-mo-ldap-user-auth-reports.php?rev=2859403#L64"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026new=2910898%40ldap-login-for-intranet-sites%2Ftrunk\u0026old=2903294%40ldap-login-for-intranet-sites%2Ftrunk\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=#file5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/74089b16-76fa-4654-9007-3f0c2e894894?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-268J-8Q64-9CQX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-07-19 00:00 – Updated: 2022-07-26 00:01The Button Widget Smartsoft plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the smartsoftbutton_settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-1912"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-07-18T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Button Widget Smartsoft plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the smartsoftbutton_settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-268j-8q64-9cqx",
"modified": "2022-07-26T00:01:16Z",
"published": "2022-07-19T00:00:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1912"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/smartsoftbutton-widget-de-botones-de-chat/trunk/admin/pages/settings.php#L60"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/53757567-5024-46cc-b2ae-04b5fc55a35c?source=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/vulnerability-advisories/#CVE-2022-1912"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-269F-H4CX-J3FR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-07 00:37 – Updated: 2024-07-09 18:30An issue was discovered in the MediaWikiChat extension for MediaWiki through 1.42.1. CSRF can occur in API modules.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-40601"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-07T00:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in the MediaWikiChat extension for MediaWiki through 1.42.1. CSRF can occur in API modules.",
"id": "GHSA-269f-h4cx-j3fr",
"modified": "2024-07-09T18:30:43Z",
"published": "2024-07-07T00:37:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40601"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T362588"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-269V-RMV9-MWH8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-03 09:30 – Updated: 2024-10-03 09:30A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall Agent products could be exploited remotely to cause a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the login flow.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-42504"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-03T07:15:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall Agent products could be exploited remotely to cause a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the login flow.",
"id": "GHSA-269v-rmv9-mwh8",
"modified": "2024-10-03T09:30:36Z",
"published": "2024-10-03T09:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42504"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbmu04711en_us\u0026docLocale=en_US"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-26C7-W6FG-FW3H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:19 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:19The web management interface in the TP-Link EAP Controller and Omada Controller versions 2.5.4_Windows/2.6.0_Windows does not have Anti-CSRF tokens in any forms. This would allow an attacker to submit authenticated requests when an authenticated user browses an attack-controlled domain. This is fixed in version 2.6.1_Windows.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-10166"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-05-03T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The web management interface in the TP-Link EAP Controller and Omada Controller versions 2.5.4_Windows/2.6.0_Windows does not have Anti-CSRF tokens in any forms. This would allow an attacker to submit authenticated requests when an authenticated user browses an attack-controlled domain. This is fixed in version 2.6.1_Windows.",
"id": "GHSA-26c7-w6fg-fw3h",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:19:30Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:19:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-10166"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.coresecurity.com/advisories/tp-link-eap-controller-multiple-vulnerabilities"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104094"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-26FV-PX38-WM73
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-22 04:25 – Updated: 2024-11-22 04:25The CM Table Of Contents WordPress plugin before 1.2.4 does not have CSRF check when updating its settings, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-5029"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-21T11:15:35Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The CM Table Of Contents WordPress plugin before 1.2.4 does not have CSRF check when updating its settings, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack.",
"id": "GHSA-26fv-px38-wm73",
"modified": "2024-11-22T04:25:02Z",
"published": "2024-11-22T04:25:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5029"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/f0f4a33c-9dd2-45ee-82e7-4b8bc2c20094"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-26H2-XPJ3-3R9V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-16 18:31 – Updated: 2025-01-22 18:3107FLYCMS V1.3.9 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /erp.07fly.net:80/oa/OaWorkReport/edit.html
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-57161"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-16T16:15:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "07FLYCMS V1.3.9 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via /erp.07fly.net:80/oa/OaWorkReport/edit.html",
"id": "GHSA-26h2-xpj3-3r9v",
"modified": "2025-01-22T18:31:53Z",
"published": "2025-01-16T18:31:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57161"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/1091101/yang.xian/tree/main/8/readme.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-26J3-4M55-J6R7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-16 18:30 – Updated: 2023-05-17 03:24Jenkins Azure VM Agents Plugin 852.v8d35f0960a_43 and earlier does not perform permission checks in several HTTP endpoints.
This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified Azure Cloud server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method.
Additionally, these HTTP endpoints do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
Azure VM Agents Plugin 853.v4a_1a_dd947520 requires POST requests and the appropriate permissions for the affected HTTP endpoints.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:azure-vm-agents"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "853.v4a"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-32989"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-05-17T03:24:22Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-16T16:15:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Jenkins Azure VM Agents Plugin 852.v8d35f0960a_43 and earlier does not perform permission checks in several HTTP endpoints.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified Azure Cloud server using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method.\n\nAdditionally, these HTTP endpoints do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nAzure VM Agents Plugin 853.v4a_1a_dd947520 requires POST requests and the appropriate permissions for the affected HTTP endpoints.",
"id": "GHSA-26j3-4m55-j6r7",
"modified": "2023-05-17T03:24:22Z",
"published": "2023-05-16T18:30:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32989"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-05-16/#SECURITY-2855%20(2)"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jenkins Azure VM Agents Plugin Cross-site Request Forgery vulnerability"
}
GHSA-26JC-6P9C-5PC3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-07 12:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Spell Check WP Spell Check allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Spell Check: from n/a through 9.21.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-25111"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-07T10:15:16Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Spell Check WP Spell Check allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Spell Check: from n/a through 9.21.",
"id": "GHSA-26jc-6p9c-5pc3",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:34Z",
"published": "2025-02-07T12:31:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25111"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-spell-check/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-spell-check-plugin-9-21-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.