CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-2GRG-6J4W-C3V4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:48 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:48CSRF vulnerability in flatCore version 1.4.6 allows remote attackers to modify CMS configurations.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-7877"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-04-14T18:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "CSRF vulnerability in flatCore version 1.4.6 allows remote attackers to modify CMS configurations.",
"id": "GHSA-2grg-6j4w-c3v4",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:48:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:48:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-7877"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/flatCore/flatCore-CMS/issues/27"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97709"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2GV2-Q542-493M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-11 00:32 – Updated: 2026-06-11 00:32Easy Twitter Feeds before 1.2.13 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the duplicate_post action handler that lacks nonce verification. Attackers can trick an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link that duplicates any post regardless of post type.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53736"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-10T22:17:01Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Easy Twitter Feeds before 1.2.13 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the duplicate_post action handler that lacks nonce verification. Attackers can trick an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link that duplicates any post regardless of post type.",
"id": "GHSA-2gv2-q542-493m",
"modified": "2026-06-11T00:32:05Z",
"published": "2026-06-11T00:32:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53736"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/easy-twitter-feeds"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/easy-twitter-feeds-before-cross-site-request-forgery-via-duplicate-post-action"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-2GWV-7WQ2-WV5G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:41 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:41Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the TinyMCE Color Picker plugin before 1.2 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that change plugin settings via unknown vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-3845"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-05-22T15:13:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the TinyMCE Color Picker plugin before 1.2 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests that change plugin settings via unknown vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.",
"id": "GHSA-2gwv-7wq2-wv5g",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:41:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:41:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3845"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/58095"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://wordpress.org/plugins/tinymce-colorpicker/changelog"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-2GX7-RX3R-F497
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-09 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ZealousWeb User Registration Using Contact Form 7 allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects User Registration Using Contact Form 7: from n/a through 2.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-32679"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-09T17:15:52Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ZealousWeb User Registration Using Contact Form 7 allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects User Registration Using Contact Form 7: from n/a through 2.2.",
"id": "GHSA-2gx7-rx3r-f497",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:37Z",
"published": "2025-04-09T18:30:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32679"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/user-registration-using-contact-form-7/vulnerability/wordpress-user-registration-using-contact-form-7-plugin-2-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2H2J-55G7-G43C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-24 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:40The WPCode WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 has a flawed CSRF when deleting log, and does not ensure that the file to be deleted is inside the expected folder. This could allow attackers to make users with the wpcode_activate_snippets capability delete arbitrary log files on the server, including outside of the blog folders
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-1624"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-24T19:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WPCode WordPress plugin before 2.0.9 has a flawed CSRF when deleting log, and does not ensure that the file to be deleted is inside the expected folder. This could allow attackers to make users with the wpcode_activate_snippets capability delete arbitrary log files on the server, including outside of the blog folders",
"id": "GHSA-2h2j-55g7-g43c",
"modified": "2024-04-04T03:40:06Z",
"published": "2023-04-24T21:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/132b70e5-4368-43b4-81f6-2d01bc09dc8f"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2H2Q-74G8-R928
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AntoineH Football Pool allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Football Pool: from n/a through 2.12.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-30764"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T11:15:37Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AntoineH Football Pool allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Football Pool: from n/a through 2.12.2.",
"id": "GHSA-2h2q-74g8-r928",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:06Z",
"published": "2025-03-27T12:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30764"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/football-pool/vulnerability/wordpress-football-pool-plugin-2-12-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-settings-change-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2H44-QFM6-PCM9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-18 18:30 – Updated: 2025-09-18 18:30Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smartvista BackOffice SmartVista Suite 2.2.22 via crafted GET request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-50255"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-18T16:15:50Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smartvista BackOffice SmartVista Suite 2.2.22 via crafted GET request.",
"id": "GHSA-2h44-qfm6-pcm9",
"modified": "2025-09-18T18:30:28Z",
"published": "2025-09-18T18:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-50255"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.com/c2at3/cve-2025-50255/-/blob/main/Bypassing_CSRF_Protection_in_Smartvista-BackOffice.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2H9C-GJWM-VFQX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-02 12:32 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Rara Business allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Rara Business: from n/a through 1.2.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-37937"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-02T12:15:22Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Rara Business allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Rara Business: from n/a through 1.2.5.",
"id": "GHSA-2h9c-gjwm-vfqx",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:58Z",
"published": "2025-01-02T12:32:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/theme/rara-business/vulnerability/wordpress-rara-business-theme-1-2-5-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2H9W-XQ69-F5QJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:48 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:40There are no Anti-CSRF tokens in any forms on the web interface in Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux File Server before Maintenance Pack 2 Critical Fix 4 (version 8.0.4.312). This would allow an attacker to submit authenticated requests when an authenticated user browses an attacker-controlled domain.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-9810"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-07-17T21:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "There are no Anti-CSRF tokens in any forms on the web interface in Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux File Server before Maintenance Pack 2 Critical Fix 4 (version 8.0.4.312). This would allow an attacker to submit authenticated requests when an authenticated user browses an attacker-controlled domain.",
"id": "GHSA-2h9w-xq69-f5qj",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:40:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:48:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9810"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.coresecurity.com/advisories/kaspersky-anti-virus-file-server-multiple-vulnerabilities"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/143190/Kaspersky-Anti-Virus-File-Server-8.0.3.297-XSS-CSRF-Code-Execution.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jun/33"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99330"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038798"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2HC7-883F-33CM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:46 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:05Unibox SMB 2.4 and UniBox Enterprise Series 2.4 and UniBox Campus Series 2.4 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /tools/network-trace, /list_users, /list_byod?usertype=raduser, /dhcp_leases, /go?rid=202 in which a specially crafted HTTP request may reconfigure the device.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-21884"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-09T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Unibox SMB 2.4 and UniBox Enterprise Series 2.4 and UniBox Campus Series 2.4 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /tools/network-trace, /list_users, /list_byod?usertype=raduser, /dhcp_leases, /go?rid=202 in which a specially crafted HTTP request may reconfigure the device.",
"id": "GHSA-2hc7-883f-33cm",
"modified": "2024-04-04T03:05:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:46:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-21884"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://s3curityb3ast.github.io/KSA-Dev-008.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/fulldisclosure%40seclists.org/msg07139.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/fulldisclosure@seclists.org/msg07139.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://wifi-soft.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.