CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-85FP-523Q-5XWC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-22 03:30 – Updated: 2024-10-25 21:43rdiffweb prior to version 2.5.4 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "rdiffweb"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.5.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-4646"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-22T20:01:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-12-22T02:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "rdiffweb prior to version 2.5.4 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).",
"id": "GHSA-85fp-523q-5xwc",
"modified": "2024-10-25T21:43:27Z",
"published": "2022-12-22T03:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-4646"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ikus060/rdiffweb/commit/e6f0d8002129be90fe82fa3e3ea0a6942caba398"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ikus060/rdiffweb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/rdiffweb/PYSEC-2022-43004.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/17bc1b0f-1f5c-432f-88e4-c9866ccf6e10"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "rdiffweb vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery"
}
GHSA-85HQ-JVX8-V4HV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-02 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in A.Cihangir BALTACI Google Plus Share and +1 Button allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Google Plus Share and +1 Button: from n/a through 1.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-53723"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-02T14:15:15Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in A.Cihangir BALTACI Google Plus Share and +1 Button allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Google Plus Share and +1 Button: from n/a through 1.0.",
"id": "GHSA-85hq-jvx8-v4hv",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:39Z",
"published": "2024-12-02T15:31:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53723"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/google-plus-share-and-plusone-button/vulnerability/wordpress-google-plus-share-and-1-button-plugin-1-0-csrf-to-stored-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-85JC-8H5P-8VW8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-20 12:32 – Updated: 2025-03-21 21:18A vulnerability in open-webui/open-webui versions <= 0.3.8 allows remote code execution by non-admin users via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The application uses cookies with the SameSite attribute set to lax for authentication and lacks CSRF tokens. This allows an attacker to craft a malicious HTML that, when accessed by a victim, can modify the Python code of an existing pipeline and execute arbitrary code with the victim's privileges.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "open-webui"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.3.33"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-7806"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-03-21T21:18:09Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-20T10:15:37Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability in open-webui/open-webui versions \u003c= 0.3.8 allows remote code execution by non-admin users via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The application uses cookies with the SameSite attribute set to lax for authentication and lacks CSRF tokens. This allows an attacker to craft a malicious HTML that, when accessed by a victim, can modify the Python code of an existing pipeline and execute arbitrary code with the victim\u0027s privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-85jc-8h5p-8vw8",
"modified": "2025-03-21T21:18:09Z",
"published": "2025-03-20T12:32:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-7806"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/pull/6054"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/7e253df17593bc12dc5cc89d28703675f05b0158"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/1d20c27553f019477f01d7233ebe40b11d31e479/backend/main.py#L892-L920"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/9350a68d-5f33-4b3d-988b-81e778160ab8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Open WebUI Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Vulnerability"
}
GHSA-85JH-9232-5897
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-09 21:31 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:32The EnvíaloSimple: Email Marketing y Newsletters plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gallery_add function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload malicious files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-2125"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-434"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-09T19:15:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Env\u00edaloSimple: Email Marketing y Newsletters plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gallery_add function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload malicious files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-85jh-9232-5897",
"modified": "2026-04-08T18:32:54Z",
"published": "2024-04-09T21:31:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-2125"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/envialosimple-email-marketing-y-newsletters-gratis/trunk/api/gallery.php#L29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3065710"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/2b39abc8-9281-4d58-a9ec-877c5bae805a?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-85JX-CR4X-X6MX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:00 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:00Multiple Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the HTTP API in ABBYY FlexiCapture before 12 Release 1 Update 7 exist in Web Verification, Web Scanning, Web Capture, Monitoring and Administration, and Login.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-13793"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-09T21:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the HTTP API in ABBYY FlexiCapture before 12 Release 1 Update 7 exist in Web Verification, Web Scanning, Web Capture, Monitoring and Administration, and Login.",
"id": "GHSA-85jx-cr4x-x6mx",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:00:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:00:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13793"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://abbyydownloads.com/fc12/PreviousReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotes_FC12_R1_U3_1299.18_build_12.0.1.516.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-85M8-H92Q-HP3J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-06 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seerox WP Media File Type Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Media File Type Manager: from n/a through 2.3.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-27359"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-06T13:15:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seerox WP Media File Type Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Media File Type Manager: from n/a through 2.3.0.",
"id": "GHSA-85m8-h92q-hp3j",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:40Z",
"published": "2025-06-06T15:30:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-27359"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-media-file-type-manager/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-media-file-type-manager-plugin-2-3-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-to-settings-change-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-85QG-RQ64-MXX7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-26 12:31 – Updated: 2023-12-26 12:31A vulnerability was found in BestWebSoft Portfolio Plugin up to 2.04 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 2.06 is able to address this issue. The patch is named 68af950330c3202a706f0ae9bbb52ceaa17dda9d. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248955.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-10017"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-12-26T10:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in BestWebSoft Portfolio Plugin up to 2.04 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 2.06 is able to address this issue. The patch is named 68af950330c3202a706f0ae9bbb52ceaa17dda9d. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-248955.",
"id": "GHSA-85qg-rq64-mxx7",
"modified": "2023-12-26T12:31:27Z",
"published": "2023-12-26T12:31:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-10017"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/wp-plugins/portfolio/commit/68af950330c3202a706f0ae9bbb52ceaa17dda9d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.248955"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.248955"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-85QP-4Q9C-33VH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-01 00:00 – Updated: 2022-10-05 00:00Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Booking Ultra Pro plugin <= 1.1.4 at WordPress.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-36855"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-09-30T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Booking Ultra Pro plugin \u003c= 1.1.4 at WordPress.",
"id": "GHSA-85qp-4q9c-33vh",
"modified": "2022-10-05T00:00:40Z",
"published": "2022-10-01T00:00:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-36855"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/booking-ultra-pro/wordpress-booking-ultra-pro-plugin-1-1-4-cross-site-scripting-xss-via-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/booking-ultra-pro"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-85QQ-VF84-RFG4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:17 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:17Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in I-O DATA DEVICE HDL-F160, HDL-F250, HDL-F300, and HDL-F320 firmware before 1.02 allows remote attackers to (1) change a configuration or (2) delete files as an authenticated user via unknown vectors. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-5382"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-12-09T00:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in I-O DATA DEVICE HDL-F160, HDL-F250, HDL-F300, and HDL-F320 firmware before 1.02 allows remote attackers to (1) change a configuration or (2) delete files as an authenticated user via unknown vectors. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.",
"id": "GHSA-85qq-vf84-rfg4",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:17:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:17:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5382"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46880"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN70599814/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/50183"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32836"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.iodata.jp/news/2008/important/hdl-f.htm"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-85R9-5WFQ-FRXC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-09 18:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SCAND MultiMailer allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MultiMailer: from n/a through 1.0.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-32505"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-09T17:15:44Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SCAND MultiMailer allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MultiMailer: from n/a through 1.0.3.",
"id": "GHSA-85r9-5wfq-frxc",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:36Z",
"published": "2025-04-09T18:30:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32505"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/scand-multi-mailer/vulnerability/wordpress-multimailer-plugin-1-0-3-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.