CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14169 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-C89W-RRQ4-PQXJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:54 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:54Cross site request forgery vulnerability in Junos Space before 15.2R2 allows remote attackers to perform certain administrative actions on Junos Space.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-4928"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-03-20T20:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross site request forgery vulnerability in Junos Space before 15.2R2 allows remote attackers to perform certain administrative actions on Junos Space.",
"id": "GHSA-c89w-rrq4-pqxj",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:54:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:54:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4928"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content\u0026id=JSA10760"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93540"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C8CV-CF72-RHRR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:51 – Updated: 2022-12-02 21:30IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 159132.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-4212"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-07-25T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 159132.",
"id": "GHSA-c8cv-cf72-rhrr",
"modified": "2022-12-02T21:30:44Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:51:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-4212"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/159132"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ibm10959463"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C8FF-J5GM-6492
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-12 18:30 – Updated: 2023-04-21 17:53Jenkins Report Portal Plugin 0.5 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation.
This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified bearer token authentication. Additionally, this form validation method does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:reportportal"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-30525"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-04-12T22:18:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-12T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Jenkins Report Portal Plugin 0.5 and earlier does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified bearer token authentication. Additionally, this form validation method does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-c8ff-j5gm-6492",
"modified": "2023-04-21T17:53:28Z",
"published": "2023-04-12T18:30:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-30525"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-04-12/#SECURITY-2950"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/04/13/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jenkins Report Portal Plugin Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability"
}
GHSA-C8HX-4WWQ-PQ7F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 09:31 – Updated: 2026-04-14 15:30Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Blog grandblog allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Blog: from n/a through <= 3.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39632"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T09:16:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Blog grandblog allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Grand Blog: from n/a through \u003c= 3.1.",
"id": "GHSA-c8hx-4wwq-pq7f",
"modified": "2026-04-14T15:30:29Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T09:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39632"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Theme/grandblog/vulnerability/wordpress-grand-blog-theme-3-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C8JP-PC3C-H742
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:17 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:17The Compact WP Audio Player WordPress plugin before 1.9.7 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the "Disable Simultaneous Play" setting via a CSRF attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-24735"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-10-18T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Compact WP Audio Player WordPress plugin before 1.9.7 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change the \"Disable Simultaneous Play\" setting via a CSRF attack.",
"id": "GHSA-c8jp-pc3c-h742",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:17:47Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:17:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24735"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/dcbcf6e7-e5b3-498b-9f5e-7896d309441f"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-C8JQ-XC6Q-XXPF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:14 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:14QNAP NAS application Proxy Server through version 1.2.0 does not utilize CSRF protections.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-7635"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-06-05T21:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "QNAP NAS application Proxy Server through version 1.2.0 does not utilize CSRF protections.",
"id": "GHSA-c8jq-xc6q-xxpf",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:14:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:14:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-7635"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/nas-201806-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041025"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C8JW-79FC-G6PW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-11-25 00:00 – Updated: 2024-02-27 23:42Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Unlimited Sitemap Generator versions prior to v8.2 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator and conduct arbitrary operation via a specially crafted web page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-20845"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-11-24T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Unlimited Sitemap Generator versions prior to v8.2 allows a remote attacker to hijack the authentication of an administrator and conduct arbitrary operation via a specially crafted web page.",
"id": "GHSA-c8jw-79fc-g6pw",
"modified": "2024-02-27T23:42:54Z",
"published": "2021-11-25T00:00:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20845"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN58407606/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.xml-sitemaps.com/news-20210831.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.xml-sitemaps.com/standalone-google-sitemap-generator.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C8M7-C9RP-W2G3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-19 00:00 – Updated: 2022-01-27 00:03An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 7.7 before 14.4.5, all versions starting from 14.5.0 before 14.5.3, all versions starting from 14.6.0 before 14.6.2. GitLab was vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack that allows a malicious user to have their GitHub project imported on another GitLab user account.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0154"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-01-18T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue has been discovered in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 7.7 before 14.4.5, all versions starting from 14.5.0 before 14.5.3, all versions starting from 14.6.0 before 14.6.2. GitLab was vulnerable to a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack that allows a malicious user to have their GitHub project imported on another GitLab user account.",
"id": "GHSA-c8m7-c9rp-w2g3",
"modified": "2022-01-27T00:03:58Z",
"published": "2022-01-19T00:00:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0154"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/605576"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cves/-/blob/master/2022/CVE-2022-0154.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/29580"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-C8MV-4P79-64XH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-09 18:30 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jupitercow WP sIFR wp-sifr allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP sIFR: from n/a through <= 0.6.8.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-49347"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-09T16:17:58Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jupitercow WP sIFR wp-sifr allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP sIFR: from n/a through \u003c= 0.6.8.1.",
"id": "GHSA-c8mv-4p79-64xh",
"modified": "2026-01-20T15:31:58Z",
"published": "2025-12-09T18:30:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-49347"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/wp-sifr/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-sifr-plugin-0-6-8-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/wp-sifr/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-sifr-plugin-0-6-8-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C8PV-42W6-G942
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-20 15:32 – Updated: 2024-08-21 15:30A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component add_product.php of Warehouse Inventory System v2.0 allows attackers to escalate privileges.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-42577"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-20T13:15:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component add_product.php of Warehouse Inventory System v2.0 allows attackers to escalate privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-c8pv-42w6-g942",
"modified": "2024-08-21T15:30:50Z",
"published": "2024-08-20T15:32:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42577"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/topsky979/20ad7b251f2905db38e7a6566b1d46cc"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.