CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14159 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-F85G-5X38-2G3R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:10 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:10Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in v2.0.0 in video_list.php, which can let a malicious user delete a video message.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-18463"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-08-12T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in v2.0.0 in video_list.php, which can let a malicious user delete a video message.",
"id": "GHSA-f85g-5x38-2g3r",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:10:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:10:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-18463"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Richard1266/aikcms/issues/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-F85H-FQX5-HVJV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-16 21:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chris Roberts Annie allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Annie: from n/a through 2.1.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-23884"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-16T21:15:29Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chris Roberts Annie allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Annie: from n/a through 2.1.1.",
"id": "GHSA-f85h-fqx5-hvjv",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:15Z",
"published": "2025-01-16T21:31:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23884"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/annie/vulnerability/wordpress-annie-plugin-2-1-1-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F86G-PH5Q-24PX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-16 21:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Oren hahiashvili add custom google tag manager allows Stored XSS.This issue affects add custom google tag manager: from n/a through 1.0.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-23537"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-16T20:15:39Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Oren hahiashvili add custom google tag manager allows Stored XSS.This issue affects add custom google tag manager: from n/a through 1.0.3.",
"id": "GHSA-f86g-ph5q-24px",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:12Z",
"published": "2025-01-16T21:31:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23537"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/add-custom-google-tag-manager/vulnerability/wordpress-add-custom-google-tag-manager-plugin-1-0-3-csrf-to-stored-cross-site-scripting-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F88V-CPJM-QPMX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-22 18:30 – Updated: 2026-01-27 00:31Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bdthemes Element Pack Elementor Addons bdthemes-element-pack-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Element Pack Elementor Addons: from n/a through <= 8.3.13.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-31413"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-22T17:15:54Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bdthemes Element Pack Elementor Addons bdthemes-element-pack-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Element Pack Elementor Addons: from n/a through \u003c= 8.3.13.",
"id": "GHSA-f88v-cpjm-qpmx",
"modified": "2026-01-27T00:31:09Z",
"published": "2026-01-22T18:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31413"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/bdthemes-element-pack-lite/vulnerability/wordpress-element-pack-elementor-addons-plugin-8-3-13-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F8C8-4PM7-W885
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-21 20:25 – Updated: 2025-04-08 17:52Summary
Cross-site request forgery allows an unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a logged in user, and use the web API with the same permissions.
Details
Security attributes like HttpOnly and SameSite are missing from the session cookie, allowing its use from XHR requests and form submissions. The CodeChecker API endpoints only require the session cookie, they do not require a CSRF token, and missing HTTP headers allow the form submission to succeed (but not XHR). This means that the attacker needs to know the ID of products to edit or delete them, but it does not need knowledge to create new products with the SQLite backend.
PoC
With a superuser logged into CodeChecker.
<html><body>
<form action="https://codechecker.example.com/v6.58/Products" method="POST" enctype="text/plain">
<input type="text" name='[1,"getProducts",1,1,{}]' value=''>
</form>
<script>document.forms[0].submit()</script>
</body></html>
Or the same form attack on any of the applicable endpoints.
Impact
The vulnerability allows an attacker to make requests to CodeChecker as the currently logged in user, including but not limited to adding, removing or editing products. The attacker needs to know the ID of the available products to modify or delete them. The attacker cannot directly exfiltrate data from CodeChecker, due to being limited to form-based CSRF.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "codechecker"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.24.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-53829"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-01-21T20:25:05Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-21T15:15:13Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\nCross-site request forgery allows an unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a logged in user, and use the web API with the same permissions.\n\n### Details\nSecurity attributes like HttpOnly and SameSite are missing from the session cookie, allowing its use from XHR requests and form submissions.\nThe CodeChecker API endpoints only require the session cookie, they do not require a CSRF token, and missing HTTP headers allow the form submission to succeed (but not XHR). This means that the attacker needs to know the ID of products to edit or delete them, but it does not need knowledge to create new products with the SQLite backend.\n\n### PoC\nWith a superuser logged into CodeChecker.\n\n```html\n\u003chtml\u003e\u003cbody\u003e\n \u003cform action=\"https://codechecker.example.com/v6.58/Products\" method=\"POST\" enctype=\"text/plain\"\u003e\n \u003cinput type=\"text\" name=\u0027[1,\"getProducts\",1,1,{}]\u0027 value=\u0027\u0027\u003e\n \u003c/form\u003e\n \u003cscript\u003edocument.forms[0].submit()\u003c/script\u003e\n\u003c/body\u003e\u003c/html\u003e\n```\nOr the same form attack on any of the applicable endpoints.\n\n### Impact\nThe vulnerability allows an attacker to make requests to CodeChecker as the currently logged in user, including but not limited to adding, removing or editing products. The attacker needs to know the ID of the available products to modify or delete them. The attacker cannot directly exfiltrate data from CodeChecker, due to being limited to form-based CSRF.",
"id": "GHSA-f8c8-4pm7-w885",
"modified": "2025-04-08T17:52:35Z",
"published": "2025-01-21T20:25:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/security/advisories/GHSA-f8c8-4pm7-w885"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53829"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/codechecker/PYSEC-2025-12.yaml"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Cross-Site Request Forgery in CodeChecker API"
}
GHSA-F8FV-2XCX-3X86
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-20 15:32 – Updated: 2024-08-20 18:31A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component admin_room_removed.php of Hotel Management System commit 91caab8 allows attackers to escalate privileges.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-42555"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-20T13:15:06Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component admin_room_removed.php of Hotel Management System commit 91caab8 allows attackers to escalate privileges.",
"id": "GHSA-f8fv-2xcx-3x86",
"modified": "2024-08-20T18:31:24Z",
"published": "2024-08-20T15:32:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42555"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/topsky979/afd445b90e13a27a6422cea2f5ff0f64"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F8GQ-C723-XWPV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-17 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Integrate Google Drive.This issue affects Integrate Google Drive: from n/a through 1.3.4.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-49769"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-12-17T10:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SoftLab Integrate Google Drive.This issue affects Integrate Google Drive: from n/a through 1.3.4.",
"id": "GHSA-f8gq-c723-xwpv",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:23Z",
"published": "2023-12-17T12:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-49769"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/integrate-google-drive/wordpress-integrate-google-drive-plugin-1-3-4-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F8GQ-PP7V-Q277
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-05 09:30 – Updated: 2024-11-05 09:30The WooCommerce Report plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-10711"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-05T09:15:03Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The WooCommerce Report plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-f8gq-pp7v-q277",
"modified": "2024-11-05T09:30:37Z",
"published": "2024-11-05T09:30:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-10711"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://ithemelandco.com/docs/woocommerce-report"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/ithemelandco-woo-report/trunk/class/setting_report.php#L1174"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3181117"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/ithemelandco-woo-report/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/d1d21339-3a86-4bee-be86-2d2ab9190b26?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F8HQ-773H-3F28
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:48 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:48sikcms 1.1 has CSRF via admin.php?m=Admin&c=Users&a=userAdd to add an administrator account.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-19561"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-11-26T07:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "sikcms 1.1 has CSRF via admin.php?m=Admin\u0026c=Users\u0026a=userAdd to add an administrator account.",
"id": "GHSA-f8hq-773h-3f28",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:48:05Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:48:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-19561"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/chenfeizhou/sikcms-v1.1/issues/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-F8JR-6JVQ-67XQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:33 – Updated: 2022-05-14 01:33BEESCMS 4.0 has a CSRF vulnerability to add arbitrary VIP accounts via the admin/admin_member.php?action=add&nav=add_web_user&admin_p_nav=user URI.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-8347"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-02-15T15:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "BEESCMS 4.0 has a CSRF vulnerability to add arbitrary VIP accounts via the admin/admin_member.php?action=add\u0026nav=add_web_user\u0026admin_p_nav=user URI.",
"id": "GHSA-f8jr-6jvq-67xq",
"modified": "2022-05-14T01:33:53Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:33:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-8347"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/source-trace/beescms/issues/4"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.