Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-352

Allowed

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

14165 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-FQJ8-WMFW-C4M4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:19 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:19
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Subuser module before 6.x-1.8 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that switch the user to a subuser via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-4486"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-11-02T15:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Subuser module before 6.x-1.8 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that switch the user to a subuser via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-fqj8-wmfw-c4m4",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:19:28Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:19:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-4486"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1700550"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1700584"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/04/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/07/1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-FQPP-WX48-C63R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-03 15:32 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:33
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DigiTimber DigiTimber cPanel Integration allows Stored XSS. This issue affects DigiTimber cPanel Integration: from n/a through 1.4.6.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-22690"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-03T15:15:19Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DigiTimber DigiTimber cPanel Integration allows Stored XSS. This issue affects DigiTimber cPanel Integration: from n/a through 1.4.6.",
  "id": "GHSA-fqpp-wx48-c63r",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:33:31Z",
  "published": "2025-02-03T15:32:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22690"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/digitimber-cpanel-integration/vulnerability/wordpress-digitimber-cpanel-integration-plugin-1-4-6-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FQPX-XFJR-2QR9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-16 00:00 – Updated: 2022-11-30 20:20
VLAI
Summary
CSRF vulnerability and missing permission checks in Jenkins Extended Choice Parameter Plugin allow SSRF
Details

Extended Choice Parameter Plugin 346.vd87693c5a_86c and earlier does not perform a permission check on form validation methods. This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL.

Additionally, these form validation methods do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 346.vd87693c5a"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:extended-choice-parameter"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "356.va_90a_94ca_62ec"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-27204"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-11-30T20:20:51Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-03-15T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Extended Choice Parameter Plugin 346.vd87693c5a_86c and earlier does not perform a permission check on form validation methods. This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL.\n\nAdditionally, these form validation methods do not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-fqpx-xfjr-2qr9",
  "modified": "2022-11-30T20:20:51Z",
  "published": "2022-03-16T00:00:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27204"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/extended-choice-parameter-plugin/commit/eff9472b64f68749e5272aa59b68e561fb4ab4cd"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/extended-choice-parameter-plugin"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2022-03-15/#SECURITY-1350"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/03/15/2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "CSRF vulnerability and missing permission checks in Jenkins Extended Choice Parameter Plugin allow SSRF"
}

GHSA-FQR4-Q363-G7GM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-20 00:31 – Updated: 2026-02-28 00:31
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText™ Web Site Management Server allows Cross Site Request Forgery. The vulnerability could make a user, with active session inside the product, click on a page that contains this malicious HTML triggering to perform changes unconsciously.

This issue affects Web Site Management Server: 16.7.0, 16.7.1.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-13671"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-19T23:16:14Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText\u2122 Web Site Management Server allows Cross Site Request Forgery. The vulnerability could\u00a0make a user, with active session inside the product, click on a page that contains this malicious HTML triggering to perform changes unconsciously.\n\nThis issue affects Web Site Management Server: 16.7.0, 16.7.1.",
  "id": "GHSA-fqr4-q363-g7gm",
  "modified": "2026-02-28T00:31:01Z",
  "published": "2026-02-20T00:31:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13671"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MarioTesoro/vulnerability-research/blob/main/CVE-2025-13671/README.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.opentext.com/csm/en?id=ot_kb_unauthenticated\u0026sysparm_article=KB0854846"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:N/R:U/V:D/RE:H/U:Red",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FQV8-7PV4-8QP3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:54 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:54
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Decisions module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that remove individual voters via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-4383"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-06-15T14:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Decisions module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that remove individual voters via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-fqv8-7pv4-8qp3",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T03:54:01Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T03:54:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4383"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.drupal.org/node/2459349"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/04/25/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74344"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-FQWV-R262-9XM8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:33 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:33
VLAI
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the XML Pack in IBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.5.x through 8.5 FP3, 8.7.x through 8.7 FP2, and 9.1.x through 9.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-4057"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-03-16T14:06:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the XML Pack in IBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.5.x through 8.5 FP3, 8.7.x through 8.7 FP2, and 9.1.x through 9.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.",
  "id": "GHSA-fqwv-r262-9xm8",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:33:28Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:33:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4057"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/86546"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1JR48815"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1JR49200"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1JR49206"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21666684"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/66154"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-FR29-VWW3-Q54M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 00:52 – Updated: 2022-05-14 00:52
VLAI
Details

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the optionsPageRequest function in admin.php in WP Fastest Cache plugin before 0.8.3.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that call the (1) saveOption, (2) deleteCache, (3) deleteCssAndJsCache, or (4) addCacheTimeout method via the wpFastestCachePage parameter in the WpFastestCacheOptions/ page.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-4089"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-09-19T15:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the optionsPageRequest function in admin.php in WP Fastest Cache plugin before 0.8.3.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that call the (1) saveOption, (2) deleteCache, (3) deleteCssAndJsCache, or (4) addCacheTimeout method via the wpFastestCachePage parameter in the WpFastestCacheOptions/ page.",
  "id": "GHSA-fr29-vww3-q54m",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T00:52:10Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T00:52:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4089"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-fastest-cache/#developers"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/9756"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/05/26/20"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FR2R-X4WP-Q45H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-21 15:31 – Updated: 2024-06-21 15:31
VLAI
Details

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ali2Woo Ali2Woo Lite.This issue affects Ali2Woo Lite: from n/a through 3.3.5.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-37212"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-06-21T14:15:12Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ali2Woo Ali2Woo Lite.This issue affects Ali2Woo Lite: from n/a through 3.3.5.",
  "id": "GHSA-fr2r-x4wp-q45h",
  "modified": "2024-06-21T15:31:06Z",
  "published": "2024-06-21T15:31:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37212"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/ali2woo-lite/wordpress-aliexpress-dropshipping-with-alinext-lite-plugin-3-3-5-csrf-to-php-object-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FR35-QPGV-G932

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-16 00:01 – Updated: 2022-03-26 00:01
VLAI
Details

Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to modify several resources (including CsvFieldMappingsPage.jspa and ImporterValueMappingsPage.jspa) via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the jira-importers-plugin. The affected versions are before version 8.13.15, and from version 8.14.0 before 8.20.3.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-43941"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-15T04:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to modify several resources (including CsvFieldMappingsPage.jspa and ImporterValueMappingsPage.jspa) via a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the jira-importers-plugin. The affected versions are before version 8.13.15, and from version 8.14.0 before 8.20.3.",
  "id": "GHSA-fr35-qpgv-g932",
  "modified": "2022-03-26T00:01:04Z",
  "published": "2022-02-16T00:01:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43941"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRASERVER-73073"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FR47-P696-MM9V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-02 06:30 – Updated: 2025-03-21 18:31
VLAI
Details

The Wow Skype Buttons WordPress plugin before 4.0.4 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting buttons via CSRF attacks

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-3474"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-02T06:15:50Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Wow Skype Buttons WordPress plugin before 4.0.4 does not have CSRF checks in some bulk actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform unwanted actions, such as deleting buttons via CSRF attacks",
  "id": "GHSA-fr47-p696-mm9v",
  "modified": "2025-03-21T18:31:27Z",
  "published": "2024-05-02T06:30:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3474"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/e5c3e145-6738-4d85-8507-43ca1b1d5877"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
  • Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
  • When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
  • Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
  • This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.

Mitigation
Implementation

Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)

An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.

CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing

An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.

CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification

An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).

CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery

An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.