CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14174 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-G4HP-VH46-5GW6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-06-19 12:31 – Updated: 2024-06-24 06:30The Paradox IP150 Internet Module in version 1.40.00 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks due to a lack of countermeasures and the use of the HTTP method GET to introduce changes in the system.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-5676"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-19T10:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Paradox IP150 Internet Module in version 1.40.00 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks due to a lack of countermeasures and the use of the HTTP method `GET` to introduce changes in the system.",
"id": "GHSA-g4hp-vh46-5gw6",
"modified": "2024-06-24T06:30:55Z",
"published": "2024-06-19T12:31:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5676"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2024/SBA-ADV-20240321-01_Paradox_Cross_Site_Request_Forgery"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.paradox.com/Products/default.asp?CATID=3\u0026SUBCATID=38\u0026PRD=563"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Jun/8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G4JH-RQRC-RM99
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:58 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:58Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DIR865L router (Rev. A1) with firmware before 1.05b07 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrator password or (2) enable remote management via a request to hedwig.cgi or (3) activate configuration changes via a request to pigwidgeon.cgi.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-3095"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-11-20T13:19:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DIR865L router (Rev. A1) with firmware before 1.05b07 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrator password or (2) enable remote management via a request to hedwig.cgi or (3) activate configuration changes via a request to pigwidgeon.cgi.",
"id": "GHSA-g4jh-rqrc-rm99",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:58:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:58:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-3095"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/53064"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityadvisories.dlink.com/security/publication.aspx?name=SAP10003"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityevaluators.com/content/case-studies/routers/dlink_dir865l.jsp"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G4P6-WJ2C-46F6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-21 03:36 – Updated: 2026-04-08 21:32The Easy Social Feed – Social Photos Gallery – Post Feed – Like Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_groups_list function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect a site's facebook or instagram page/group connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-1214"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-21T02:51:38Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Easy Social Feed \u2013 Social Photos Gallery \u2013 Post Feed \u2013 Like Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_groups_list function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disconnect a site\u0027s facebook or instagram page/group connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-g4p6-wj2c-46f6",
"modified": "2026-04-08T21:32:23Z",
"published": "2024-03-21T03:36:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1214"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/easy-facebook-likebox/trunk/facebook/admin/class-easy-facebook-likebox-admin.php?rev=3047064"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/aaf62045-b9ce-40d7-92b3-7ab683e5a08c?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G4PQ-P927-7PGG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-16 15:30 – Updated: 2023-08-16 21:08Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugin 1.27.5 and earlier does not require POST requests for an HTTP endpoint, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
This vulnerability allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL, capturing GitHub credentials associated with an attacker-specified job.
This issue is due to an incomplete fix of SECURITY-2502.
Blue Ocean Plugin 1.27.5.1 uses the configured SCM URL, instead of a user-specified URL provided as a parameter to the HTTP endpoint.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "io.jenkins.blueocean:blueocean"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.27.5.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-40341"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-16T21:08:50Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-08-16T15:15:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugin 1.27.5 and earlier does not require POST requests for an HTTP endpoint, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nThis vulnerability allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL, capturing GitHub credentials associated with an attacker-specified job.\n\nThis issue is due to an incomplete fix of SECURITY-2502.\n\nBlue Ocean Plugin 1.27.5.1 uses the configured SCM URL, instead of a user-specified URL provided as a parameter to the HTTP endpoint.",
"id": "GHSA-g4pq-p927-7pgg",
"modified": "2023-08-16T21:08:50Z",
"published": "2023-08-16T15:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40341"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2023-08-16/#SECURITY-3116"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/08/16/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Jenkins Blue Ocean Plugin cross-site request forgery vulnerability"
}
GHSA-G4QR-96MV-425V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-05 00:31 – Updated: 2026-06-05 18:31Inappropriate implementation in CSS in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-11156"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-04T23:17:22Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Inappropriate implementation in CSS in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)",
"id": "GHSA-g4qr-96mv-425v",
"modified": "2026-06-05T18:31:36Z",
"published": "2026-06-05T00:31:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11156"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.chromium.org/issues/501810226"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G4R7-2W2R-848V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-24 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-24 09:30The Taqnix plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the taqnix_delete_my_account() function, where the check_ajax_referer() call is explicitly commented out on line 883. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in non-administrator user into deleting their own account via a forged request granted they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking a link or visiting a malicious page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-3565"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T08:16:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Taqnix plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the taqnix_delete_my_account() function, where the check_ajax_referer() call is explicitly commented out on line 883. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in non-administrator user into deleting their own account via a forged request granted they can trick the user into performing an action such as clicking a link or visiting a malicious page.",
"id": "GHSA-g4r7-2w2r-848v",
"modified": "2026-04-24T09:30:30Z",
"published": "2026-04-24T09:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3565"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/taqnix/tags/1.0.3/public/class-taqnix-user.php#L67"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/taqnix/tags/1.0.3/public/class-taqnix-user.php#L883"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/taqnix/tags/1.0.3/public/class-taqnix-user.php#L916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/taqnix/trunk/public/class-taqnix-user.php#L67"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/taqnix/trunk/public/class-taqnix-user.php#L883"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/taqnix/trunk/public/class-taqnix-user.php#L916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3491080%40taqnix\u0026new=3491080%40taqnix\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/82aeab24-3467-4cb0-b71f-b7f97c26dc80?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G4RW-J5PQ-MQC4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:25 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:25Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in index.aas in Application Access Server (A-A-S) 2.0.48 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) execute arbitrary programs via a command job, (2) stop services via a setservice job, or (3) terminate processes via a killprocess job.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-1464"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-05-14T17:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in index.aas in Application Access Server (A-A-S) 2.0.48 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) execute arbitrary programs via a command job, (2) stop services via a setservice job, or (3) terminate processes via a killprocess job.",
"id": "GHSA-g4rw-j5pq-mqc4",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:25:24Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:25:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1464"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35034"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1022204"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503434/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34911"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.syhunt.com/advisories/?id=aas-multiple"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.syhunt.com/advisories/aashack.txt"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G4W5-383H-H2MX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:18 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:18Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/index.php in Cambio 0.5a nightly r37 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify credentials via a user save action.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-5316"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-01-01T11:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/index.php in Cambio 0.5a nightly r37 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that modify credentials via a user save action.",
"id": "GHSA-g4w5-383h-h2mx",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:18:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:18:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-5316"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB22768"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G4X7-8W68-PF83
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-26 15:30 – Updated: 2024-12-26 15:30A vulnerability has been found in PHPGurukul Blood Bank & Donor Management System 2.4 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /logout.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-12955"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-26T15:15:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability has been found in PHPGurukul Blood Bank \u0026 Donor Management System 2.4 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /logout.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-g4x7-8w68-pf83",
"modified": "2024-12-26T15:30:33Z",
"published": "2024-12-26T15:30:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12955"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://phpgurukul.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.289318"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.289318"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.468878"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G4XC-C4G2-RHM3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-20 18:30 – Updated: 2023-03-24 06:30The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 4.2.5 has a flawed CSRF and authorisation check when deleting a client, which could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to delete arbitrary client.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-4148"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-732"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-20T16:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 4.2.5 has a flawed CSRF and authorisation check when deleting a client, which could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to delete arbitrary client.",
"id": "GHSA-g4xc-c4g2-rhm3",
"modified": "2023-03-24T06:30:17Z",
"published": "2023-03-20T18:30:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-4148"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be9b25c8-b0d7-4c22-81ff-e41650a4ed41"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.