CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14177 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-G8MW-H5HW-6G35
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:57 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:57Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 5.x before 5.8 and 6.x before 6.3 allows remote attackers to perform administrative actions via vectors involving deletion of "translated strings."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-3220"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-07-18T16:41:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 5.x before 5.8 and 6.x before 6.3 allows remote attackers to perform administrative actions via vectors involving deletion of \"translated strings.\"",
"id": "GHSA-g8mw-h5hw-6g35",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:57:55Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:57:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3220"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454849"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43702"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-August/msg00016.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-July/msg00527.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-July/msg00551.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://drupal.org/node/280571"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31079"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/10/3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30168"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G8P5-6V5G-J48P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-06 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Map Plugins Interactive Regional Map of Africa allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Interactive Regional Map of Africa: from n/a through 1.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-49449"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-06T13:15:59Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Map Plugins Interactive Regional Map of Africa allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Interactive Regional Map of Africa: from n/a through 1.0.",
"id": "GHSA-g8p5-6v5g-j48p",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:23Z",
"published": "2025-06-06T15:30:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-49449"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/interactive-map-of-africa/vulnerability/wordpress-interactive-regional-map-of-africa-1-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G8PV-W9GQ-24X8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-09 21:31 – Updated: 2026-02-23 21:31Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR Camera contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to add a new admin user with full system privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-47730"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-798"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-09T21:15:51Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Selea Targa IP OCR-ANPR Camera contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to add a new admin user with full system privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.",
"id": "GHSA-g8pv-w9gq-24x8",
"modified": "2026-02-23T21:31:22Z",
"published": "2025-12-09T21:31:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47730"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zeroscience"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49458"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.selea.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/selea-targa-ip-camera-cross-site-request-forgery-via-admin-creation"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zeroscience.mk/en/vulnerabilities/ZSL-2021-5618.php"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G8Q2-R69C-J6R7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:20 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:20Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Flash System V9000 7.4 before 7.4.1.4, 7.5 before 7.5.1.3, and 7.6 before 7.6.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-7446"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-03-12T15:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Flash System V9000 7.4 before 7.4.1.4, 7.5 before 7.5.1.3, and 7.6 before 7.6.0.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.",
"id": "GHSA-g8q2-r69c-j6r7",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:20:56Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:20:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7446"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1005570"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G8QG-F769-3PM2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-02 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-02 12:31Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Heateor Social Login <= 1.1.39 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-57751"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-02T12:17:40Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Heateor Social Login \u003c= 1.1.39 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-g8qg-f769-3pm2",
"modified": "2026-07-02T12:31:02Z",
"published": "2026-07-02T12:31:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-57751"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/heateor-social-login/vulnerability/wordpress-heateor-social-login-plugin-1-1-39-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability-2?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G8R5-VX2F-JMH2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:50 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:50Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in IBM Rational AppScan Enterprise 5.x and 8.x before 8.5.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative accounts.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-0730"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-05-03T04:08:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in IBM Rational AppScan Enterprise 5.x and 8.x before 8.5.0.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative accounts.",
"id": "GHSA-g8r5-vx2f-jmh2",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:50:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:50:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0730"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74370"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48967"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48968"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21592188"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53247"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G8RG-9W6V-V9GV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-12 21:31 – Updated: 2026-06-12 21:31MISP contains an insecure default configuration in which the Security.check_sec_fetch_site_header control is disabled. When this setting is disabled, state-changing requests such as POST, PUT, or AJAX requests are not restricted based on the browser-provided Sec-Fetch-Site header. A remote unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious web page that causes an authenticated MISP user’s browser to issue cross-site requests to MISP automation endpoints. If successful, the forged requests may be processed with the privileges of the victim user, potentially allowing unauthorized modification of MISP data or configuration. Enabling Security.check_sec_fetch_site_header mitigates this issue, although operators of multi-homed MISP deployments should validate the setting before enforcing it.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-54359"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-12T20:16:47Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "MISP contains an insecure default configuration in which the Security.check_sec_fetch_site_header control is disabled. When this setting is disabled, state-changing requests such as POST, PUT, or AJAX requests are not restricted based on the browser-provided Sec-Fetch-Site header. A remote unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious web page that causes an authenticated MISP user\u2019s browser to issue cross-site requests to MISP automation endpoints. If successful, the forged requests may be processed with the privileges of the victim user, potentially allowing unauthorized modification of MISP data or configuration. Enabling Security.check_sec_fetch_site_header mitigates this issue, although operators of multi-homed MISP deployments should validate the setting before enforcing it.",
"id": "GHSA-g8rg-9w6v-v9gv",
"modified": "2026-06-12T21:31:45Z",
"published": "2026-06-12T21:31:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54359"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/b82db1bcaa550689c05e1ed175e81f25a8d97b91"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G8RP-GMFV-H6M2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-22 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TravelMap Travel Map allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Travel Map: from n/a through 1.0.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-57960"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-22T19:15:54Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TravelMap Travel Map allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Travel Map: from n/a through 1.0.3.",
"id": "GHSA-g8rp-gmfv-h6m2",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:11Z",
"published": "2025-09-22T21:30:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-57960"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/travelmap-blog/vulnerability/wordpress-travel-map-plugin-1-0-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G8RV-4CCG-WC6M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:41 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:41An Anti CSRF mechanism was discovered missing in the Teradici Cloud Access Connector v31 and earlier in a specific web form, which allowed an attacker with knowledge of both a machineID and user GUID to modify data if a user clicked a malicious link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-13186"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-02-11T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An Anti CSRF mechanism was discovered missing in the Teradici Cloud Access Connector v31 and earlier in a specific web form, which allowed an attacker with knowledge of both a machineID and user GUID to modify data if a user clicked a malicious link.",
"id": "GHSA-g8rv-4ccg-wc6m",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:41:53Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:41:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13186"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://advisory.teradici.com/security-advisories/70"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G8VG-M5VQ-4HCQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-16 06:30 – Updated: 2025-03-27 18:30The Newsletter Popup WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting subscriber, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform such action via a CSRF attack
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-3642"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-16T06:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Newsletter Popup WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting subscriber, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform such action via a CSRF attack",
"id": "GHSA-g8vg-m5vq-4hcq",
"modified": "2025-03-27T18:30:40Z",
"published": "2024-05-16T06:30:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3642"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/dc44d85f-afe8-4824-95b0-11b9abfb04d8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.